Abstract
Bacteria represent the most genetically diverse kingdom of life. While great progress has been made in describing this diversity, it remains difficult to identify the phylogenetic and ecological characteristics that delineate groups of bacteria that possess species-like properties. One major challenge associated with species delineations is that not all shared genes have the same evolutionary history, and thus the choice of loci can have a major impact on phylogenetic reconstruction. Sequencing the genomes of large numbers of closely related strains provides new opportunities to distinguish ancestral from acquired alleles and assess the effects of recombination on phylogenetic inference. Here we analyzed the genomes of 119 strains of the marine actinomycete genus Salinispora, which is currently comprised of three named species that share 99% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity. While 63% of the core genome showed evidence of recombination, this had no effect on species-level phylogenomic resolution. Recombination did however blur intra-species relationships and biogeographic resolution. The genome-wide average nucleotide identity provided a new perspective on Salinispora diversity, revealing as many as seven new species. Patterns of orthologous group distributions reveal a genetic basis to delineation the candidate taxa and insight into the levels of genetic cohesion associated with bacterial species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The concept that bacteria can be grouped into phylogenetically cohesive clusters with properties that allow them to be regarded as “species” remains controversial1, 2. It is challenging to determine which clusters represent species level units of diversity and if ecological or evolutionary theory can be invoked to explain the circumstances that led to their formation3. As Gevers et al. lament4, “any effort to produce a robust species definition is hindered by the lack of a solid theoretical basis explaining the effects of biological processes on cohesion within and divergence between species”. Nonetheless, identifying meaningful groups of bacteria and ascribing formal Latinized names remains useful in clinical, environmental, and experimental contexts5. In the absence of a robust species concept for bacteria, we are left with a series of metrics used to gauge the relatedness among strains and phylogenetic frameworks within which species level units of diversity are often arbitrarily assigned.
It is widely recognized that bacterial species concepts should consider both genetic diversity and ecology2, 6, 7. Buckley and Roberts stated that, “in moving forward with microbial taxonomy, it is critical to determine whether microorganisms cluster in groups with meaningful commonalities or determine what commonalities may be best used to cluster microorganisms into meaningful groups”8. The ecotype model states that bacterial species should fall into well-supported sequence clusters that evolve under cohesive processes and are ecologically distinct and irreversibly separated from each other6. A fundamental tenant of this model is that ecologically distinct populations can be recognized as clades in phylogenetic trees and that these clades correspond to fundamental units of diversity or species2, 6.
Confounding the common ancestry inferred by phylogenetic reconstruction is homologous recombination. While the efficiency of homologous recombination decreases with increasing genetic distance9, it nonetheless occurs between different species10. The homologous exchange of genes encoding common housekeeping functions creates challenges for species delineations based on single gene phylogenies and led to the use of techniques such as multi-locus sequence analysis1. However, even when multiple loci are considered, an accurate model of vertical inheritance can be difficult to depict due to widespread recombination between species11, 12 including ancestral events that have subsequently become fixed among subclades13. While the rates of recombination vary widely among bacteria14, it remains largely unknown how this process affects species-level phylogenetic resolution when whole genomes are considered.
Whole-genome sequencing has become an indispensable tool for studying genome evolution, genetic diversity, and bacterial species concepts. It has recently been suggested that genome sequences should be used as a source of taxonomic information15. One genome-based metric that is gaining acceptance is the Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) of the sequences shared between strains. It has been shown that an ANI of 95% corresponds to the 70% DNA:DNA hybridization value traditionally used to delineate bacterial species16 thus establishing a link to bacterial systematics. Genome sequences also provide unique opportunities to generate highly resolved phylogenies, with automated pipelines to build genomic phylogenies from concatenated protein markers now available17. While there is no agreement regarding how many genes it takes to generate a robust phylogenomic evolutionary tree, genome sequences provide comprehensive datasets from which to address evolutionary relationships and predict lateral gene transfer events18.
The marine actinomycete genus Salinispora provides a valuable model to address bacterial species concepts19, 20. It is comprised of three closely related species (S. arenicola, S. tropica, and S. pacifica) within the family Micromonosporeaceae21, 22 whose relationships could not be confidently resolved based on 16S rRNA gene phylogeny23, 24. The genus is a rich source of structurally diverse natural products25, and there is evidence that certain compounds26 and their associated biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs)27 are fixed at the species level. This has been used to suggest that secondary metabolites represent ecotype-defining traits for S. tropica and S. arenicola. Similar patterns were not observed for S. pacifica 26, the most diverse of the three species24. This greater diversity, coupled with the relatively low recombination to mutation rates observed within the S. pacifica clade, were used to suggest it represents an amalgam of ecotypes or newly diverged species19. While all three species are prolific in terms of natural product biosynthesis, it was shown that S. arenicola differentially invests in interference competition, while S. tropica invests in growth thus establishing these co-occurring lineages as distinct ecotypes28. Here we present a phylogenomic analysis of the genus Salinispora based on the shared gene content among 119 strains. The goals were to assess species level diversity and address the effects of recombination on species level phylogenetic reconstruction.
Results
General genome characteristics
The 119 Salinispora genome sequences were derived from 12 S. tropica, 45 S. pacifica, and 62 S. arenicola strains isolated from 11 global locations (Fig. 1). All strains were obtained from marine sediment samples collected at depths from 1–700 meters with the exception of four that were derived from marine sponges (Supplementary Table S1). No heterogeneity was observed in the 2–5 copies of the 16S rRNA gene observed in any of the strains. The draft genome sequences averaged 86.3 contigs (Supplementary Table S2) with the majority of sequence data accounted for by a few large contigs in each genome. The average genome size was 5.49 Mb, with the S. arenicola genomes being larger and containing more genes than the other two species (Table 1).
Strain origins. Numbers of strains sequenced at each site for each species with totals in parentheses. Modified with permission from Freel et al.24, Environ. Microbiol. 14:480–493.
Orthologous groups
The program FastOrtho was used to predict a total of 13,512 orthologous groups (OGs) and 4,980 single copy genes (singletons) among the 119 Salinispora genomes revealing a pan-genome that totaled 18,492 protein families. The core genome consists of 2603 OGs shared by all 119 strains, with 2362 of these occurring as a single-copy in each strain. The core genome represents 51% of the average gene content across the genus. Based on the annotation or putative function of the OGs, more than 50% of the pan-genome is comprised of poorly characterized genes (Supplementary Fig. S1). As observed in other genera29, the core genome is enriched in functionally annotated genes with the largest group (35%) attributed to metabolism. Similar analyses performed at the species level reveal that S. tropica has the largest core genome representing 78.68% of the average gene content. Conversely, S. pacifica displays the smallest core genome at 56.10% of the average gene content while S. arenicola was intermediate at 67.42%. As expected, the core genomes vary inversely as a function of the diversity of the strains sequenced within each species.
Rarefaction curves were computed to estimate how effectively gene content had been sampled (Fig. 2). There is clear evidence for saturation when the genus or species-level core genomes are considered and thus the common genetic features that characterize the cultured representatives of these taxa have largely been identified. It is notable that the curves generated from the S. tropica and S. arenicola core genomes are largely identical, while the curve for S. pacifica resembles that describing the genus. For the pan-genomes however, it can be predicted that additional sequencing will reveal additional genetic diversity at all levels. Diversity estimators (Chao1 and ACE) predict more than 24,000 protein families at the genus-level relative to the 18,492 observed. Of the three species, S. pacifica shows the highest observed and predicted genetic diversity.
Rarefaction curves. Orthologous groups (protein families) plotted vs. the number of sequenced genomes. Core genomes (lower curves) and pan-genomes (upper curves) are shown for the genus and each species. Black: genus, red: S. tropica, blue: S. arenicola, yellow: S. pacifica. Blue shading indicates standard error. Diversity estimates using Chao1 and ACE are given.
Effects of recombination on Salinispora phylogeny
The 2362 single copy genes identified in the core Salinispora genome (hereafter referred to as the single copy core or SCC) were used to generate a concatenated phylogeny that clearly resolved the genus into three well supported clades in accordance with prior species-level relationships (Fig. 3)19. This phylogeny supports the relatively high level of diversity reported for S. pacifica. We next used the program PhiPack to address the effects of recombination on phylogenetic reconstruction30. This led to the detection of 1,486 SCC genes (62.9%) with evidence of recombination. The remaining 876 genes had no evidence of recombination and are considered the “minimum” core genome. We generated a second concatenated phylogenomic tree using the minimum core genome (Fig. 3) and manually compared this to the individual gene trees for each of the 1,486 SCC genes with evidence of recombination. We identified 635 genes (42.7% of those under recombination and 26.9% of the SCC) that displayed incongruent species level phylogenies for at least one strain relative to the concatenated phylogenomic tree (Supplementary Fig. S2). To test for the aggregate effects of recombination, a third concatenated phylogeny was generated using the 1486 SCC genes with evidence of recombination (Fig. 3). Surprisingly, all three trees were both congruent and similarly well supported in terms of the three major clades associated with the named Salinispora species. Thus, recombination did not affect Salinispora species-level phylogenomic resolution. The large numbers of genes that displayed incongruent species-level phylogenies were insufficient to affect interspecies relationships when taken in the context of the larger gene pools. Notably, the tree generated from the minimum core genome reveals clear biogeographic patterns within S. arenicola that were obscured when genes subject to recombination were included (Fig. 3).
Salinispora maximum likelihood phylogeny. (a) Collapsed phylogenomic tree based on a concatenation of 2362 shared, single-copy genes. Number of strains analyzed for each species is shown in parentheses. Non-collapsed trees are presented in Fig. 5. (b) Phylogeny based on genes with evidence of recombination. (c) Phylogeny based on genes with no evidence of recombination. Strain numbers are given in cases where the tree topologies differ. When possible, branches with the same topology in both trees were collapsed. Dashed lines depict positional changes of strains in the trees. Branches are color-coded by species. Symbols on the branches represent the support from 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Strain numbers are color-coded by location.
These phylogenies were based on the concatenation of various gene sets into a single multiple alignment and the estimation of a single tree from this super-alignment. Given that alternative phylogenetic methods can infer different relationships, the data were re-analyzed using ASTRAL (Accurate Species TRee ALgorithm), a coalescent-based method to summarize individual gene trees into a single species tree31. ASTRAL identifies the species tree that agrees with the largest number of individual trees and can be more accurate than maximum likelihood analyses when using a concatenated gene set32. Given this, we performed a similar set of analyses using ASTRAL, which resulted in trees that were congruent at the species level with the concatenated trees (Supplementary Figs S3 and S4), thus providing further support for these phylogenetic patterns.
ANI and ANI-AF metrics
We next asked if the species assignments inferred from the three primary clades observed in the SCC phylogenomic tree, which have been used to distinguish among the three Salinispora species24, were in accordance with the proposal that ANI values between members of the same species should be ≥95%16. A distance matrix based on ANI values reveals a dendrogram with three primary bifurcations that are congruent with the phylogenomic tree (Fig. 4). However, many strains within the three primary clades fall below the 95% ANI metric, suggesting the existence of additional species-level diversity. More specifically, seven branches within the primary S. pacifica lineage could be considered distinct species based on this metric. The most populated branch includes the S. pacifica type strain (CNR-114)22 and 22 additional strains isolated from seven of the global collection sites. The second most populated branch includes 12 strains recovered largely from Fiji while the remaining five branches include one to three strains. The strains comprising these seven lineages are clearly resolved in the expanded phylogenomic tree (Fig. 5) and suggest that the primary clade sister to S. tropica is comprised of as many as seven distinct species of which S. pacifica is one. Similarly, the S. arenicola clade includes two branches that fall below the 95% ANI level. These consist of the single strain CNY-281 and a second branch that contains all of the remaining S. arenicola strains including the type strain. Conversely, the S. tropica clade is represented by a single branch within which all strains share >95% ANI. Thus, according to the ANI analyses, the 119 Salinispora strains represent as many as 10 different species.
Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) distance matrix. The vertical dashed line represents 95% ANI. Strains associated with the three primary clades are delineated by green (S. arenicola), red (S. tropica), and light blue (S. pacifica) branches. ANI clades that share >95% and are associated with type strains are shaded. Red circles and corresponding numbers represent all lineages that share <95% ANI values including seven (2–7, 9) that do not contain type strains. ANI-AF networks are shown adjacent to the corresponding regions in the dendogram. Each node represents a strain and is color-coded based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence types (single nucleotide polymorphisms) observed for each species.
Effects of recombination on phylogenetic resolution using ANI species designations. (a) Phylogenomic tree based on a concatenation of 2362 shared, single-copy genes. Each sequence or clade that shares <95% ANI with neighboring strains is numbered 1–10 (corresponding to Fig. 4) and shaded with a different color. Species names are listed corresponding to the clades associated with the type strains (T). (b) Phylogeny based on genes with no evidence of recombination. (c) Phylogeny based on genes with evidence of recombination.
We analyzed the data further using the ANI-AF method33, which considers only coding orthologous groups (CDS: From Coding DNA Sequences) and the alignment fraction (AF) between genomes as a measure of relatedness. The values suggested to delineate species are ANI >96.5 and AF >0.6. The ANI-AF results for S. tropica and S. arenicola remain the same, however within the S. pacifica clade, CNS-055 and CNY-646 are delineated as two additional species. Based on the ANI species designations, we re-investigated the effects of recombination on species-level phylogenomic resolution and once again found no effect (Fig. 5). The 10 candidate Salinispora species are all clearly resolved both from their minimum core genomes and the SCC genes with evidence of recombination. Thus, recombination does not affect the phylogenetic resolution of the major lineages associated with the three currently named Salinispora species or the ten candidate species into which these lineages could be delineated based on ANI.
Salinispora 16S rRNA sequence types (single nucleotide polymorphisms) correspond surprisingly well to the ANI-AF clustering (Fig. 4). To further explore these relationships, we plotted 16S rRNA sequence divergence vs. ANI (Fig. 6). Interspecies comparisons based on the three primary clades in the Salinispora phylogeny revealed from five (St-Sp) to 14 (Sa-Sp) changes in the 16S rRNA gene. All S. arenicola and S. tropica intra-species comparisons are above 95% ANI and reveal at most three 16S polymorphisms while many of the S. pacifica intraspecies comparisons fall below this line and include up to six SNPs. A linear regression of the data and best-fit line reveals that a 95% ANI value corresponds to 3.1 changes in the 16S rRNA gene (Supplementary Fig. S5). Given that many of the intra-clade comparisons for the major clade that includes S. pacifica fall below 95% ANI, we performed a separate analysis of these seven lineages (Fig. 6). As expected, all comparisons within these seven clades fall above and all between clade comparisons fall below 95% ANI. In this case however, the inter-clade comparisons differ from 0–6 16S rRNA SNPs.
Relationships between 16S rRNA diversity and Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI). The black line indicates 95% ANI. (a) Inter- and intraclade comparisons among the three major lineages represented by S. tropica (St), S. arenicola (Sa), S. pacifica (Sp). (b) Inter- and intraclade comparisons among the S. pacifica clades (2–8) as identified in Figs 4 and 5.
Genetic basis for species delineations
We previously reported species-specific patterns of secondary metabolite production in S. arenicola and S. tropica 26, however similar patterns were not observed for S. pacifica 25. To further explore this concept in S. pacifica, we identified biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) associated with secondary metabolism using antiSMASH34 and manual annotations. We then prepared a similarity matrix using the presence/absence of BGCs in each strain as input (Supplementary Fig. S6). Except for the position of CNY-666, the BGC dendrogram and the phylogenomic tree are largely identical. To further test for evidence of genetic or functional traits that differentiate the candidate Salinispora species, we performed similar analyses based on the presence or absence of orthologous groups associated with 23 COG categories (Supplementary Table S3) and found that categories C (energy production and conversion, Supplementary Fig. S7), E (amino acid transport and metabolism), G (carbohydrate transport and metabolism), H (coenzyme transport and metabolism), I (lipid transport and metabolism), and R (general function prediction) consistently delineated the candidate species within the primary S. pacifica lineage in accordance with the phylogenomic tree (Fig. 5). Thus, in addition to secondary metabolism, there appear to be major genetic differences among the candidate S. pacifica species.
While differences in gene content provide one mechanism to distinguish among species, it can also be expected that the same species will share a certain level of genetic homogeneity. To explore these concepts, we plotted OG distributions across various taxonomic levels (Fig. 7). All histograms clearly show that most genes are either rare or occur in all strains. When the genus is assessed, the core genome represents only 14% of the pan-genome and the relatively large spike in the left portion of the graph provides little evidence for genetic cohesion, as might be expected from a genus comprised of multiple species29. Conversely, when S. arenicola and S. tropica are plotted, the core genomes represent 29% and 58% of the respective pan-genomes, and the numbers of OGs observed in all strains exceed those observed in only one strain. In the primary S. pacifica lineage however, the pattern is similar to that detected for the genus, with the core genome representing only 22% of the pan-genome. As was observed in the rarefaction curves, these results are more similar to those for the genus than for either S. tropica or S. arenicola. We performed similar analyses using the two most populated candidate species within the primary S. pacifica lineage and observed OG distributions that resemble S. tropica and S. arenicola, with core genomes between 40% and 44% of the pan-genomes. These patterns may provide added insight into the levels of genetic cohesion expected for a bacterial species.
Numbers of orthologous groups found across all genomes (upper left), S. arenicola genomes (upper center), S. tropica genomes (upper right), S. pacifica genomes (bottom left), S. pacifica candidate species“Sp1” (bottom center), S. pacifica candidate species “Sp2” (bottom right). The histograms were generated from the pan-genomes excluding singletons and recent paralogs.
Discussion
The comparison of large numbers of genome sequences derived from closely related bacteria provides a unique opportunity to address bacterial species concepts and the metrics commonly employed to assess sequence-based relationships. Fundamental to this process is the identification of the core genome, which defines the common genomic features that characterize the strains under consideration. As can be expected, core genomes vary widely depending on the diversity of strains and number of genomes examined35,36,37,38. Nonetheless, this shared gene pool provides unparalleled opportunities to assess levels of sequence divergence and generate comprehensive molecular phylogenies that can be used to infer evolutionary relationships and identify alleles that have been exchanged by homologous recombination.
Homologous recombination provides a mechanism to repair damaged DNA and generate genetic diversity within bacterial genomes39. While molecular phylogeny is the primary tool used to assess bacterial diversity, it is well documented that homologous recombination blurs species boundaries and can prevent accurate species delineations40. By analyzing the single copy core (SCC) genome associated with 119 closely related Salinispora strains, it was possible to generate a detailed and highly supported phylogeny that revealed three primary lineages in agreement with previously established relationships among the three currently names species19. Although 63% of the SCC showed evidence of recombination for at least one strain, this had no effect on the evolutionary relationships among the three primary clades. However, removing loci that showed evidence of recombination from the analyses revealed enhanced biogeographic patterning within the S. arenicola clade and new evidence for endemism among the structured populations. A majority of genes that displayed evidence of recombination generated phylogenies that were congruent with the established species phylogeny, indicating that most of these events occurred within the three primary lineages as opposed to between them. This is in agreement with the concept that recombination provides a cohesive force that maintains species level units of diversity41. However, the large number of core genes that generated incongruent species phylogenies (27%) reveals the importance of selecting the appropriate phylogenetic markers and the power of phylogenomics to overcome this potential source of misleading phylogenetic inference.
ANI analyses revealed that the three primary Salinispora clades could be further delineated into as many as 10 different species, all of which could be confidently resolved even when recombinant alleles were included. While three of these lineages are associated with named species21, 22, six belong to the relatively diverse clade that is sister to S. tropica and contains the S. pacifica type strain. This supports the previous suggestion that this clade represents an amalgam of ecotypes or newly diverges species based on its relative low rates of recombination to mutation19. The possibility that 10 species are represented among a group of strains that share 99% 16S sequence identity supports the concept that this conserved phylogenetic marker is not the best choice for species-level resolution4. Nonetheless, 95% ANI corresponded to approximately three changes in the 16S gene thus indicating that any change in this conserved marker may be meaningful from a taxonomic perspective.
The phylogenetic resolution achieved here is in stark contrast to the genus Streptomyces, where high recombination to mutation rates detected using MLSA approaches led to the suggestion that phylogenetic relationships within this genus were better represented by a reticulate network12. It remains unclear why the effects of recombination on phylogenetic resolution differ between two taxa within the same bacterial order, however it may relate to the diversity of the strains examined and the number of alleles assessed in the different studies. Furthermore, it is interesting to speculate that among Streptomyces spp., the acquisition of alleles resistant to the many antibiotics they produce may contribute to the high levels of homologous recombination observed, as was shown for the rpoB phylogeny in Salinispora spp.19 and exploited to identify the biological targets of secondary metabolites prior to their discovery42.
In support of this concept, natural product BGCs are frequently exchanged by horizontal gene transfer27 and often include a resistant version of the target on which the encoded compounds act43. These resistance genes often have homologs in the core genome and can appear as a second copy of a housekeeping gene44. In other cases, the resistant housekeeping gene associated with the BGC is the only copy in the genome19, suggesting the ancestral allele was subsequently lost. These later events are difficult to distinguish from homologous recombination and may account for some of the single copy genes identified as under recombination in this study. Thus, the ability to produce and be resistant to secondary metabolites may represent a major factor confounding phylogenetic resolution among bacteria enriched in this metabolic capacity. Nonetheless, phylogenomic approaches were sufficient to overcome these incongruences, leading to the generation of stable trees with highly supported clades that can be further evaluated for species-like properties.
Linking strains that can be delineated based on phylogeny or sequence similarity with distinct ecological traits remains a critical and challenging component of microbial ecology. In this regard, it was possible to show that the distributions of secondary metabolite BGCs and six COG categories were largely congruent with the 10 candidate Salinispora species delineated based on ANI and resolved in the phylogenomic tree. Thus, there appears to be considerable genetic cohesion among these lineages including within the category of secondary metabolism, which has been reported to represent an important species defining trait for this genus45. Ultimately, resolving the genetic and ecological differences among these closely related groups of bacteria, as initially demonstrated between strains of S. tropica and S. arenicola 28, will be an essential component of testing the hypothesis that they maintain the properties expected of different species. While it remains to be determined if these results apply more broadly to other groups of bacteria, the expansive growth of genome sequence data will provide ample opportunities to explore species concepts in the future.
Methods
Genome sequencing
Genome sequencing was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute as part of the Community Science Program (http://jgi.doe.gov/user-program-info/community-science-program/). DNA was extracted and the sequence annotation and assembly carried out as previously described27. Genomic data is available from the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) database (https://img.jgi.doe.gov). IMG genomes ID and NCBI taxon numbers are provided in Supplementary Table S1.
Orthologous group computation
A total of 119 Salinispora strains (12S. tropica, 62S. arenicola and 45S. pacifica) from 11 different locations (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table S1) were analyzed using the program FastOrtho46 to identify groups of orthologous protein coding genes (orthologous groups, OGs). This program is a reimplementation of OrthoMCL47 and performs a bidirectional best blast amino-acid analysis. Clustering based on a percent match was performed using default parameters (cutoff = 70, e-value cutoff = 1e−05, and inflation index (I) = 1.5) (https://github.com/juanu/MicroCompGenomics). Rarefaction curves and diversity estimates were generated using the vegan package in R (http://www.R-project.org). The output matrix of FastOrtho was processed to identify species-specific orthologous groups using an Excel macro (https://github.com/joseluisrc/FindSharedGenes). Histograms were plotted from the presence-absence matrix of OGs using the qplot function and the ggplot2 package in R (http://www.R-project.org).
Identification of the core genome and the detection of recombination
A series of custom python scripts (htps://github.com/juanu/MicroCompGenomics) were applied to the FastOrtho results to identify the OG members that included gene duplications (paralogs). Orthologous groups that included paralogs were removed to generate the single copy core (SCC) gene pool. The nucleotide sequences of the individual SCC genes in each strain were aligned using MUSCLE with default parameters and trimmed for quality using GBlocks. The SCC genes were screened for evidence of recombination using PhiPack48, which included the statistical tests PHI, MaxChi, and Neighbor Similarity Score, all with default parameters. Recombination was inferred when p-values less than 0.01 were detected. Attempts to use the Recombination Detection Program49 failed due to the large number of loci examined.
Phylogenetic analyses
A maximum likelihood (ML) tree was generated for each SCC gene using the program RAxML (command line version) with mid-point rooting and 100 bootstraps (Stamatakis, 2006). The individual gene trees were visualized using the program FigTree v1.3.1 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree). Trimmed alignments of each gene were then concatenated and used to build ML phylogenies using RAxML50 implemented on the CIPRES portal v2.2 at the San Diego Supercomputer Center51. Analyses included 1,000 bootstrap replicates using the most complex model (GTR + GAMMA) for both bootstrapping and final ML optimization using default parameter settings. The resulting tree was rooted at the mid-point and visualized using FigTree. Individual SCC gene trees that showed incongruence at the species level with the concatenated tree were scored as under recombination. Two additional concatenated SCC gene trees were then generated for the subsets of this gene pool that included only genes with evidence of recombination and only genes with no evidence of recombination using the methods described above. A similar set of SCC species trees was also generated using the program ASTRAL31, which uses the best RAxML trees for each gene tree.
Average nucleotide identity and alignment fraction
The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and alignment fraction (AF) were determined for all 119 Salinispora genomes using published methods16, 33. ANI values were calculated for all pairwise comparisons and used to compile a distance matrix representing ANI divergence (100 - ANI). The custom scripts used to perform these analyses and generate the ANI dendrogram are available (https://github.com/juanu/ANI_analysis/blob/master/ANI_blastn.py and https://ani.jgi-psf.org/html/download.php). Cytoscape 3.3.0 was used to visualize the results52.
Clustering based on COG category and functional traits
The OGs were classified into five major functional categories based on the FastOrtho results and further divided into clusters of orthologous groups (COGs, Supplementary Table S3). These classifications were used to build hierarchical cluster analyses based on the presence/absence of OGs assigned to each COG category using the function hclust and the method “average” in the R package (http://www.R-project.org). A hierarchical cluster analysis was similarly generated using the presence/absence of secondary metabolite BGCs predicted for the 119 Salinispora genomes using antiSMASH34 as previously described27.
References
Hanage, W. P., Fraser, C. & Spratt, B. G. Sequences, sequence clusters and bacterial species. Phil Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 361, 1917–1927, doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1917 (2006).
Fraser, C., Alm, E. J., Polz, M. F., Spratt, B. G. & Hanage, W. P. The bacterial species challenge: Making sense of genetic and ecological diversity. Science 323, 741–746, doi:10.1126/science.1159388 (2009).
Doolittle, W. F. & Zhaxybayeva, O. On the origin of prokaryotic species. Genome Res 19, 744–756, doi:10.1101/gr.086645.108 (2009).
Gevers, D. et al. Re-evaluating prokaryotic species. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 733–739, doi:10.1038/nrmicro1236 (2005).
Stackebrandt, E. et al. Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Inter J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1043–1047, doi:10.1099/00207713-52-3-1043 (2002).
Cohan, F. What are bacterial species? Annu Rev Microbiol 56, 457–487, doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160634 (2002).
Doolittle, W. F. & Papke, R. T. Genomics and the bacterial species problem. Genome Biol 7, 116, doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-9-116 (2006).
Buckley, M. & Roberts, R. Reconciling microbial systematics and genomics. Amer Acad Microbiol Rep 2006 (2007).
Majewski, J., Zawadzki, P., Pickerill, P., Cohan, F. M. & Dowson, C. G. Barriers to genetic exchange between bacterial species: Streptococcus pneumoniae transformation. J Bacteriol 182, 1016–1023, doi:10.1128/JB.182.4.1016-1023.2000 (2000).
Fraser, C., Hanage, W. P. & Spratt, B. G. Recombination and the nature of bacterial speciation. Science 315, 476–480, doi:10.1126/science.1127573 (2007).
Doroghazi, J. R. & Buckley, D. H. Widespread homologous recombination within and between Streptomyces species. ISME J. 4, 1136–1143, doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.45 (2010).
Cheng, K., Rong, X. & Huang, Y. Widespread interspecies homologous recombination reveals reticulate evolution within the genus. Streptomyces. Mol Phylogenetics Evol 102, 246–254, doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2016.06.004 (2016).
Andam, C. P., Choudoir, M. J., Nguyen, A. V., Park, H. S. & Buckley, D. H. Contributions of ancestral inter-species recombination to the genetic diversity of extant Streptomyces lineages. ISME J 10, 1731–1741, doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.230 (2016).
Vos, M. & Didelot, X. A comparison of homologous recombination rates in bacteria and archaea. ISME J 3, 199–208, doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.93 (2009).
Thompson, C. C. et al. Microbial taxonomy in the post-genomic era: Rebuilding from scratch? Arch Microbiol 197, 359–370, doi:10.1007/s00203-014-1071-2 (2015).
Goris, J. et al. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57, 81–91, doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0 (2007).
Wu, M. & Eisen, J. A. A simple, fast, and accurate method of phylogenomic inference. Genome Biol 9, 1 (2008).
Eisen, J. A. Phylogenomics: improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis. Genome Res 8, 163–167, doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.163 (1998).
Freel, K. C., Millan-Aguinaga, N. & Jensen, P. R. Multilocus sequence typing reveals evidence of homologous recombination linked to antibiotic resistance in the genus Salinispora. Appl Environ Microbiol 79, 5997–6005, doi:10.1128/AEM.00880-13 (2013).
Jensen, P. R. Linking species concepts to natural product discovery in the post-genomic era. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37, 219–224, doi:10.1007/s10295-009-0683-z (2010).
Maldonado, L. A. et al. Salinispora arenicola gen. nov., sp. nov. and Salinispora tropica sp. nov., obligate marine actinomycetes belonging to the family Micromonosporaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55, 1759–1766, doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63625-0 (2005).
Ahmed, L. et al. Salinispora pacifica sp. nov., an actinomycete from marine sediments. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 103, 1069–1078, doi:10.1007/s10482-013-9886-4 (2013).
Vidgen, M. E., Hooper, J. N. A. & Fuerst, J. A. Diversity and distribution of the bioactive actinobacterial genus Salinispora from sponges along the Great Barrier Reef. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 101, 603–618, doi:10.1007/s10482-011-9676-9 (2012).
Freel, K. C., Edlund, A. & Jensen, P. R. Microdiversity and evidence for high dispersal rates in the marine actinomycete ‘Salinispora pacifica’. Environ Microbiol 14, 480–493, doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02641.x (2012).
Jensen, P. R., Moore, B. S. & Fenical, W. The marine actinomycete genus Salinispora: a model organism for secondary metabolite discovery. Nat Prod Rep 32, 738–751, doi:10.1039/c4np00167b (2015).
Jensen, P. R., Williams, P. G., Oh, D. C., Zeigler, L. & Fenical, W. Species-specific secondary metabolite production in marine actinomycetes of the genus Salinispora. Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 1146–1152, doi:10.1128/AEM.01891-06 (2007).
Ziemert, N. et al. Diversity and evolution of secondary metabolism in the marine actinomycete genus Salinispora. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111, E1130–E1139, doi:10.1073/pnas.1324161111 (2014).
Patin, N. V., Duncan, K. R., Dorrestein, P. C. & Jensen, P. R. Competitive strategies differentiate closely related species of marine actinobacteria. ISME J 10, 478–490, doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.128 (2015).
Qin, Q. L. et al. Comparative genomics of the marine bacterial genus Glaciecola reveals the high degree of genomic diversity and genomic characteristic for cold adaptation. Environ Microbiol 16, 1642–1653, doi:10.1111/emi.2014.16.issue-6 (2014).
Bruen, T. & Bruen, T. PhiPack: PHI test and other tests of recombination. McGill University, Montreal, Quebec (2005).
Mirarab, S. et al. ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation. Bioinformatics 30, i541–i548, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu462 (2014).
Kubatko, L. S. & Degnan, J. H. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst Biol 56, 17–24, doi:10.1080/10635150601146041 (2007).
Varghese, N. J. et al. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucl Acids Res, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1657 (2015).
Weber, T. et al. antiSMASH 3.0—a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucl Acids Res 43, 237–243, doi:10.1093/nar/gkv437 (2015).
Deng, X., Phillippy, A. M., Li, Z., Salzberg, S. L. & Zhang, W. Probing the pan-genome of Listeria monocytogenes: new insights into intraspecific niche expansion and genomic diversification. BMC Genomics 11, 1, doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-500 (2010).
Donati, C. et al. Structure and dynamics of the pan-genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae and closely related species. Genome Biol 11, 1, doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r107 (2010).
Lukjancenko, O., Wassenaar, T. M. & Ussery, D. W. Comparison of 61 sequenced Escherichia coli genomes. Microbial Ecol 60, 708–720, doi:10.1007/s00248-010-9717-3 (2010).
Biller, S. J. et al. Genomes of diverse isolates of the marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus. Scientific Data 1, 140034, doi:10.1038/sdata.2014.1034 (2014).
Rocha, E. P., Cornet, E. & Michel, B. Cparative and evolutionary analysis of the bacterial homologous recombination systems. PLoS Genet 1, e15, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0010015 (2005).
Hanage, W. P., Fraser, C. & Spratt, B. G. Fuzzy species among recombinogenic bacteria. BMC Biol. 3, 1, doi:10.1186/1741-7007-3-6 (2005).
Majewski, J. & Cohan, F. M. DNA sequence similarity requirements for interspecific recombination in Bacillus. Genetics 153, 1525–1533 (1999).
Tang, X. et al. Identification of thiotetronic acid antibiotic biosynthetic pathways by target-directed genome mining. ACS Chem Biol 10, 2841–2849, doi:10.1021/acschembio.5b00658 (2015).
Nett, M., Ikeda, H. & Moore, B. S. Genomic basis for natural product biosynthetic diversity in the actinomycetes. Nat Prod Rep 26, 1362–1384, doi:10.1039/b817069j (2009).
Kale, A. J., McGlinchey, R. P., Lechner, A. & Moore, B. S. Bacterial self-resistance to the natural proteasome inhibitor salinosporamide A. ACS Chem Biol 6, 1257–1264, doi:10.1021/cb2002544 (2011).
Jensen, P. Natural products and the gene cluster revolution. Trends Microbiol, doi: 10.1026/j.tim.2106.07.006 (2016).
Wattam, A. R. et al. PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res gkt1099 (2013).
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J. & Roos, D. S. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 13, 2178–2189, doi:10.1101/gr.1224503 (2003).
Bruen, T. C., Philippe, H. & Bryant, D. A simple and robust statistical test for detecting the presence of recombination. Genetics 172, 2665–2681, doi:10.1534/genetics.105.048975 (2006).
Martin, D. P. et al. RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics 26, 2462–2463, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq467 (2010).
Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688–2690, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 (2006).
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. In Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) 1–8 (IEEE).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13, 2498–2504, doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 (2003).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (OCE-1235142) and the National Institutes of Health (2U19TW007401 and 5R01GM085770). JU was supported by a Conicyt Grant (Fondecyt Iniciación 11140666) and a research grant from Amazon Web Services. NM-A acknowledges a graduate fellowship from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT-213497). Susana Gaudêncio (REQUIMTE, LAQV) and the Portuguese funding agency FCT/MEC (grant PTDC/QUI-QUI/119116/2010 and IF/00700/2014) are acknowledged for support of sample acquisition from the Madeira Islands, PT. Genome sequencing was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute and supported by the Office Of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02- 05CH11231. We thank U. Hentchsel and U. Abdelomohsen for kindly providing strain CNY-646 and W. Aalbersberg and J. Ginigini for strains CNY-230, CNY-234, CNY-256, CNY-282, and CNY-342.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.M.-A. designed and performed the majority of the research, analyzed the data, and drafted the initial manuscript, K.L.C. assisted with generating the genome sequences and the bioinformatic analyses, J.A.U. wrote the scripts and assisted with the bioinformatics analyses, A.-C.L. generated the secondary metabolite gene cluster annotations, G.W.R. assisted with the phylogenetic analyses, P.R.J. helped design the experiments, analyze the data, and write the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Millán-Aguiñaga, N., Chavarria, K.L., Ugalde, J.A. et al. Phylogenomic Insight into Salinispora (Bacteria, Actinobacteria) Species Designations. Sci Rep 7, 3564 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02845-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02845-3
- Springer Nature Limited