Abstract
Species assemblage composition of marine microfossils offers the possibility to investigate ecological and climatological change on time scales inaccessible using conventional observations. Planktonic foraminifera - calcareous zooplankton - have an excellent fossil record and are used extensively in palaeoecology and palaeoceanography. During the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM; 19,000 – 23,000 years ago), the climate was in a radically different state. This period is therefore a key target to investigate climate and biodiversity under different conditions than today. Studying LGM climate and ecosystems indeed has a long history, yet the most recent global synthesis of planktonic foraminifera assemblage composition is now nearly two decades old. Here we present the ForCenS-LGM dataset with 2,365 species assemblage samples collected using standardised methods and with harmonised taxonomy. The data originate from marine sediments from 664 sites and present a more than 50% increase in coverage compared to previous work. The taxonomy is compatible with the most recent global core top dataset, enabling direct investigation of temporal changes in foraminifera biogeography and facilitating seawater temperature reconstructions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background and Summary
Palaeoecological data holds the unique promise to provide insights into ecosystem and climate change on time scales that are inaccessible through direct observations1,2,3,4. Planktonic foraminifera are marine zooplankton that are globally ubiquitous in the near-surface ocean5. They build calcite shells, which upon death of the organisms, sink and, are, under the right conditions preserved in seafloor sediments. Calcareous sediments with abundant and well-preserved planktonic foraminifera are globally distributed at water depths above ~4000 metres. The species composition of their sedimentary assemblages presents a vertically and temporally integrated reflection of the living species community6. The group has an exceptional fossil record that stretches back to the Jurassic7,8. Because the species composition of planktonic foraminifera assemblages is sensitive to temperature9,10, fossil assemblages not only offer a chance to study ecosystem and biogeography changes11,12,13,14, but also provide a basis for quantitative reconstructions of seawater temperature by means of a range of (multivariate) approaches that relate species composition to seawater temperature15,16. In fact, one of the first global compilations of fossil planktonic foraminifera assemblages was conducted for this purpose17.
This first compilation within the CLIMAP (Climate: Long range Investigation, Mapping, and Prediction) project focussed on the period known as the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), marked by the largest ice sheets in the recent past, to obtain a reconstruction of global temperature from a climate state fundamentally different from today. An important aim of CLIMAP was to provide temperature reconstructions that could be used both as boundary conditions and tests for climate models. Since then, new syntheses of LGM planktonic foraminifera assemblages were built18 and the most recent, global compilation was carried out within the MARGO (Multiproxy Approach for the Reconstruction of the Glacial Ocean) project16,19. The data have been used extensively for global temperature reconstructions20,21 and for comparison with climate model simulations19,22,23. In addition, the data have provided a window into a marine ecosystem under markedly different climate conditions and prior to human influence that is unaffected by the appearance or extinction of species11,24.
Lingering uncertainty about the state of the last glacial ocean25,26, new developments in transfer function modelling27,28, novel ways to analyse palaeoecological data and the prospect to use such data to evaluate climate models directly, demonstrate the relevance of syntheses of planktonic foraminifera assemblages. The long history of using planktonic foraminifera assemblage data for quantitative palaeoecology has also ensured fairly well-standardised data collection protocols, rendering synthesis of such data relatively straightforward. Almost two decades have passed since the MARGO foraminifera dataset for the LGM was published and valuable new data has become available. Here we present an update to the MARGO compilation, the ForCenS-LGM dataset, that presents an extension in data coverage by more than 50%, especially in the North Atlantic. We anticipate that this extended LGM planktonic foraminifera assemblage dataset will be of use to palaeoceanographers and palaeoecologists alike.
Methods
Since the ForCenS-LGM dataset presents an update to the MARGO dataset, we follow the same inclusion criteria. That means that we use the same temporal definition of the LGM: 19,000–23,000 years BP29 and follow their system of ranking of chronological confidence30. In practice, this means that samples with at least two calibrated 14C dates within the LGM interval are assigned chronozone level 1. Chronozone level 2 indicates samples that are bracketed by at least two radiometric dates within the 12–30 ka BP interval, or have age control based on correlation to time series with level 1 age control using for instance benthic foraminifera oxygen isotope ratios. Level 3 is similar to the hypothesis-based age control as specified for level 2, but with correlations targets that themselves have chronozone level 2. Level 4 is used to indicate sites without chronozone assignment and does not indicate sites with low chronological confidence. We use the age-depth models as provided in the publication describing the data. Even though these criteria were outlined in the MARGO project, their application and archiving was not consistently followed, resulting in a large number of sites with chronozone level 4. However, subsequent sensitivity tests showed negligible influence of chronological confidence on the reconstructions, testifying to the stability of the LGM and the temporally smoothed nature of the sedimentary record.
For practical reasons of data availability, we have not added calendar ages to data included in previous syntheses of LGM planktonic foraminifera assemblage composition. For other, new, data, we include the chronology as published in the paper describing the assemblage data. The reliance on the published chronologies is primarily because, for most sediment cores, age control information (radiocarbon ages, foraminifera stable isotope data, etc) is not (publicly) available, thus preventing reevaluation of the published age-depth models. However, since this dataset is intended to provide plankton assemblage composition representative of the four thousand year long LGM period and not to provide information on the temporal evolution of assemblage composition through time, we think using the original chronology is not critical. For the purposes of this dataset, stratigraphic consistency and applicability are likely to be of more immediate importance than absolute (calendar) chronology. The latter may evolve with new information such as improved radiocarbon calibrations. Users interested in analysing the precise temporal evolution of marine plankton species composition might want to use other resources31,32.
We only include assemblages with complete taxonomic coverage and counts made on specimens >150 μm. The latter also ensures compatibility with the ForCenS coretop dataset33, which can be used as a modern counterpart to this LGM compilation, as well as for transfer function calibration.
We have searched relevant literature and public data repositories (PANGAEA, National Center for Environmental Information) for new planktonic foraminifera assemblage data. In most cases this was done by searching for foraminifera-based temperature reconstructions using the following terms “plank* AND foram* AND assemblage” or “plank* AND foram* AND transfer function”. Virtually all additions stem from sedimentary time series of planktonic foraminifera assemblages, from which we selected the relevant samples34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83. Our update includes all data from a previous synthesis84,85 that was only partially included in MARGO and which was re-checked for chronological confidence. When available, data was assembled from public sources. Alternatively, data was sourced from publications or obtained from the authors of the publications in case it was not publicly available. The data compiled here was originally generated by manually identifying and counting the species present using a (binocular) microscope. Counts were in general based on aliquots of the sample containing at least 300 specimens as previous work has shown that this number is sufficient to capture the biodiversity86. In some cases (n = 108, of which 52 from two cores), particularly in low diversity assemblages, data from counts of fewer than 300 specimens were included. Whenever possible, specimen counts were archived. In most other cases the data is available as relative abundances. To further increase spatial coverage, we include previously unpublished count data from a single core with known chronology87. The assemblage data for the eight samples were generated using the methods described above.
Relevant metadata was compiled for all samples and is included in the data file. No attempt was made to fill out missing metadata for data included in the MARGO synthesis, but some minor corrections have been made. These were predominantly corrections to the position or water depth of the sites and are indicated whenever applicable. We have however updated the publication information associated with the MARGO data to allow users to cite individual data points.
Despite the largely standardised sampling protocols, individual researchers tend to use different taxonomies, thus necessitating taxonomic standardisation in order to compare assemblages from different sources. To a large degree, taxonomies differ in the names of the species and differences can hence be resolved through synonym mapping. Some taxonomies contain more species, but such splitting of species is rarer, but can be resolved through lumping. The opposite, taxonomies with fewer species, is fortunately rare, except for recently described (sub)species. Despite recent developments in planktonic foraminifera taxonomy88,89, we chose to follow the same taxonomy as ForCenS33. This choice ensures compatibility with the latter dataset, but also arises from practical issues as most legacy datasets do not resolve all currently known or accepted species. Changes to the taxonomy (renaming and lumping) are documented in the data file. Species not indicated in the original counts were assumed to be absent. This is a reasonable assumption and common practice in the field33.
Data Records
The ForCenS-LGM dataset90 is available at PANGAEA using the following link: https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.962852. An earlier version of the dataset with fewer samples and less thorough checking of the chronological confidence is available on Zenodo91 to ensure reproducibility of other work83. We recommend using the dataset described here.
Format
The format of the ForCenS-LGM dataset is a wide comma-separated text file. Each row contains the metadata and the species abundance data for a single sample. Species abundances are represented either as fractions (percentages) or as raw counts and in rare cases as accumulation rates. Many sites contain information from multiple samples within the LGM time frame.
Column description
Each site is described using a core name (Core in the data file), coring device (CoreDevice), position (Longitude, Latitude), water depth (WaterDepth_m) and Ocean basin (Ocean). Of these, core name and position are considered essential metadata and available for all sites. The ocean basin designation follows earlier work16 and is intended for the application of regional transfer functions. Researchers can use the position data for alternative spatial grouping of the data.
Samples are accompanied by an indication of their depth within the sediment core (SampleDepthTop_m; SampleDepthBottom_m; SampleDepthMid_m of which at least one is considered essential) and an optional sample label (SampleLabel). Chronological information is contained in optional columns for age and sedimentation rate (CalendarAge_cal_ky_BP; SedimentationRate_cm_ky, respectively) and an indication of the chronological confidence following the criteria described above (ChronozoneLevel). The laboratory where the analyses were carried out is indicated in the column Laboratory. Publication contains information about where the data have been described first. Where possible, this information is provided using a digital object identifier. The column ChronologySource is only relevant to the new counts presented here and documents the origin of the chronological information used to define the LGM time interval. When available, a link to the data source is indicated in the column Source. For completeness the file also lists the date of addition (DateOfAddition) and the name of the person who added the data (AddedBy). Notes on the taxonomic harmonisation are included in TaxonomicNotes and other quality control issues are mentioned in QCNote. The file further contains a column Count indicating the total number of shells counted. This column can be used to screen for samples with low count sums. We made no attempt to convert relative abundances to absolute abundance in cases where the count sum is available as this is unlikely to yield only integers because of rounding errors that have accumulated over time. Finally, the file contains four columns that are included for practical purposes. siteID presents a simplified identifier for each site and sampleID for each sample; isCounts and inMARGO are boolean variables indicating whether or not the data is presented as counts (rather than relative abundances) and if the sample was part of the MARGO compilation, respectively. These are primarily included to allow filtering of the data. All other columns contain species abundances. Genus and species names are separated using an underscore.
Technical Validation
The ForCenS-LGM dataset contains planktonic foraminifera abundance data from 41 species and 3 (sub)species groups (Globorotalia menardii and G. tumida, Globigerinoides ruber ruber (G. ruber according to the ForCenS taxonomy) and Globigerinoides ruber alba (designated informally as G. white), Turborotalita humilis and Berggrenia pumilio). When available, information on the coiling direction of Globorotalia truncatulinoides and Turborotalita quinqueloba is indicated, as is the abundance of specimens with and without a final sac-like chamber in Trilobatus sacculifer.
The dataset contains data from 2,365 samples from 664 unique sites, compared to 1,437 and 428 in MARGO, respectively (Fig. 1). Most new sites are in the Atlantic basin, with a marked increase in coverage in the low to mid-latitude North Atlantic. Coverage in the Pacific and in the Southern Ocean remains poor, in part because of logistical issues with retrieving samples from these remote areas, but also because of issues associated with preservation of calcium carbonate in these deep basins. The majority of the sites is characterised by a single sample, but over 40% of the sites have at least two samples, offering the chance to assess within LGM variability to some degree at a large number of sites (Fig. 2). The chronology of approximately three quarters of the sites has been evaluated and the majority has been assigned to chronozone level 2.
The spatial variability among the LGM planktonic foraminifera assemblages can in theory be inflated due to post-depositional alteration, analytical and chronological uncertainty and archiving errors. One way to assess the influence of these factors is to investigate the spatial consistency of the compilation. We do this here by calculating for each site the average dissimilarity to all samples within a 1,500 km radius (Fig. 3). To a first order, this analysis reveals a link with species diversity, showing smaller heterogeneity in colder areas with lower species diversity (Fig. 4). This illustrates the challenges associated with the consistent characterisation of high-diversity species assemblages. The approach also highlights a few samples with unexpectedly high dissimilarity. In most cases these samples stem from areas with low spatial coverage, such as the Pacific Ocean indicating situations where the encountered assemblage composition represents a key enrichment of the dataset. In other cases, such as in the North Atlantic, the observed dissimilarity is unexpected and may warrant closer inspection depending on research needs. However, in general, the data set shows high spatial consistency. This indicates that even though the species counts were made by dozens of different researchers and over a time frame spanning decades and in the presence of uncertainty about the chronology and the degree to which the samples provide an accurate representation of the entire 4,000 year period, the compilation can be used to obtain a reasonable picture of the distribution of planktonic foraminifera during the LGM. Indeed, the ForCenS-LGM compilation shows clear biogeographical patterns, such as the latitudinal diversity gradient (Fig. 4), demonstrating the utility of the dataset for studying long-term changes in plankton biogeography, quantitative palaeoecology and palaeoceanography on basin and global spatial scales.
Usage Notes
Species counts at ten sites in the Mediterranean, at 19 sites in the Pacific and one in the South Atlantic are not fully resolved. At these sites, white and pink subspecies of G. ruber are not distinguished in the Mediterranean and South Atlantic and Globorotalia menardii and G. tumida are lumped in the Pacific. Researchers will need to lump the species from the remaining sites if they deem it important to include those sites in their analysis. Lumping may be done on an ocean basin basis for the development of transfer function models as the effect of endemism or of cryptic species with different ecology has been shown to be reduced when regional transfer functions are used16.
The dataset contains the necessary data for further quality control if these are needed for analyses. Assemblages from great water depths may be influenced by dissolution, rendering resistant species overrepresented in the assemblages92. The user can explore the effect, and if needed filter the data, using the water depth of each site. In addition, assemblages are likely to be affected by bioturbation, potentially mixing assemblages of species that never co-occurred. This effect is likely to be more pronounced at low accumulation rates and the user may want to filter out assemblages from sites with low sediment accumulation rates. Not all samples are accompanied by an estimate of sedimentation rates. In these cases we suggest that a sediment depth threshold (e.g. 40 cm) may be used instead, as the depth of the LGM in any given core is a function of sedimentation rate.
The ForCenS-LGM compilation contains species assemblage data expressed as counts (integers), as relative abundances (either fractions or percentages) and in rare cases in other ways (accumulation rates, shells per unit weight of sediment). No correction has been attempted for assemblages where the relative abundances did not sum to unity, as it proved often impossible to trace the origin of the error. However, in most cases the uncertainty is small and likely the result of rounding. If desired, the user can filter out assemblages that deviate too much. For most research needs, the data will need to be standardised to account for differences in sampling effort and sediment accumulation rates. However, we explicitly refrain from doing so here in order to preserve the count data as they allow for quality control and rarefaction analysis. With the count data available, the user can also combine counts from different samples from the same site if the count numbers appear insufficient to capture the biodiversity. A final reason to preserve the count data is that conversion to relative abundances is prone to lead to downstream errors as a result of rounding and (future) changes in the taxonomy. With this in mind, we also recommend that researchers archive their microfossil abundance data using clear and complete taxonomy and report species counts, rather than relative abundances.
With automated processing of sediment samples and species identification still in its infancy, acquiring fossil assemblage data remains a manual and laborious effort. From the median number of specimens counted per sample, we estimate that this synthesis is based on over 870,000 specimens. Their identification requires specialist taxonomic knowledge and often involves manual manipulation of single specimens measuring a few 100s of a μm. Hence, to acknowledge the work needed to generate this data, we encourage users of the dataset to also cite the original data source whenever possible.
Code availability
No custom code was used to process the data.
References
Jonkers, L. et al. Linking zooplankton time series to the fossil record. ICES J. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab123 (2021).
Lewandowska, A. M. et al. Scale dependence of temporal biodiversity change in modern and fossil marine plankton. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1008–1019 (2020).
Alroy, J. et al. Phanerozoic trends in the global diversity of marine invertebrates. Science 321, 97–100 (2008).
Yasuhara, M., Tittensor, D. P., Hillebrand, H. & Worm, B. Combining marine macroecology and palaeoecology in understanding biodiversity: microfossils as a model. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 92, 199–215 (2017).
Rebotim, A. et al. Factors controlling the depth habitat of planktonic foraminifera in the subtropical eastern North Atlantic. Biogeosciences 14, 827–859 (2017).
Bé, A. W. H. & Tolderlund, D. S. Distribution and ecology of living planktonic foraminifera in surface waters of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. in The Micropaleontology of Oceans (eds. Funnell, B. M. & Riedel, W. R.) 105–149 (Cambridge University Press, 1971).
Caron, M. & Homewood, P. Evolution of Early Planktic Foraminifers. Marine Micropaleontology 7(6), 453–462 (1983).
Hart, M. B. et al. The search for the origin of the planktic Foraminifera. J. Geol. Soc. London 160, 341–343 (2003).
Morey, A. E., Mix, A. C. & Pisias, N. G. Planktonic foraminiferal assemblages preserved in surface sediments correspond to multiple environment variables. Quat. Sci. Rev. 24, 925–950 (2005).
Rillo, M. C., Woolley, S. & Hillebrand, H. Drivers of global pre‐industrial patterns of species turnover in planktonic foraminifera. Ecography, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05892 (2021).
Yasuhara, M. et al. Past and future decline of tropical pelagic biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 201916923 (2020).
Jonkers, L., Hillebrand, H. & Kučera, M. Global change drives modern plankton communities away from the pre-industrial state. Nature 570, 372–375 (2019).
Fenton, I. S. et al. The impact of Cenozoic cooling on assemblage diversity in planktonic foraminifera. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 371, (2016).
Strack, A., Jonkers, L., Rillo, M. C., Hillebrand, H. & Kucera, M. Plankton response to global warming is characterized by non-uniform shifts in assemblage composition since the last ice age. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1–10 (2022).
Imbrie, J. & Kipp, N. G. A new micropaleontological method for quantitative paleoclimatology: application to a late Pleistocene Caribbean core. in The late Cenozoic glacial ages (ed. Turekian, K. K.) 71–181 (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1971).
Kucera, M. et al. Reconstruction of sea-surface temperatures from assemblages of planktonic foraminifera: multi-technique approach based on geographically constrained calibration data sets and its application to glacial Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Quaternary Science Reviews 24, 951–998 (2005).
CLIMAP project members. The Surface of the Ice-Age Earth. Science 191, 1131–1137 (1976).
Pflaumann, U. et al. Glacial North Atlantic: Sea-surface conditions reconstructed by GLAMAP 2000. Paleoceanography 18, 1065, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002PA000774 (2003).
MARGO project members. Constraints on the magnitude and patterns of ocean cooling at the Last Glacial Maximum. Nat. Geosci. 2, 127–132 (2009).
Paul, A., Mulitza, S., Stein, R. & Werner, M. A global climatology of the ocean surface during the Last Glacial Maximum mapped on a regular grid (GLOMAP). Clim. Past 17, 805–824 (2021).
Annan, J. D. & Hargreaves, J. C. A new global reconstruction of temperature changes at the Last Glacial Maximum. Clim. Past 9, 367–376 (2013).
Otto-Bliesner, B. L. et al. A comparison of PMIP2 model simulations and the MARGO proxy reconstruction for tropical sea surface temperatures at last glacial maximum. Clim. Dyn. 32, 799–815 (2009).
Schmittner, A. et al. Climate Sensitivity Estimated from Temperature Reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum. Science 334, 1385–1388 (2011).
Yasuhara, M., Hunt, G., Dowsett, H. J., Robinson, M. M. & Stoll, D. K. Latitudinal species diversity gradient of marine zooplankton for the last three million years. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1174–1179 (2012).
Tierney, J. E. et al. Glacial cooling and climate sensitivity revisited. Nature 584, 569–573 (2020).
Annan, J. D., Hargreaves, J. C. & Mauritsen, T. A new global surface temperature reconstruction for the Last Glacial Maximum. Clim. Past 18, 1883–1896 (2022).
Trachsel, M. & Telford, R. J. Technical note: Estimating unbiased transfer-function performances in spatially structured environments. Clim. Past 12, 1215–1223 (2016).
Salonen, J. S., Korpela, M., Williams, J. W. & Luoto, M. Machine-learning based reconstructions of primary and secondary climate variables from North American and European fossil pollen data. Sci. Rep. 9, 15805 (2019).
Mix, A. C., Bard, E. & Schneider, R. Environmental processes of the ice age: land, oceans, glaciers (EPILOG). Quat. Sci. Rev. 20, 627–657 (2001).
Kucera, M., Rosell-Melé, A., Schneider, R., Waelbroeck, C. & Weinelt, M. Multiproxy approach for the reconstruction of the glacial ocean surface (MARGO). Quat. Sci. Rev. 24, 813–819 (2005).
Fenton, I. S. et al. Triton, a new species-level database of Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal occurrences. Sci Data 8, 160 (2021).
Smith, J. et al. BioDeepTime: A database of biodiversity time series for modern and fossil assemblages. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. n/a, (2023).
Siccha, M. & Kucera, M. ForCenS, a curated database of planktonic foraminifera census counts in marine surface sediment samples. Scientific Data 4, 170109 (2017).
Haslett, S. K. & Smart, C. W. Late Quaternary upwelling off tropical NW Africa: new micropalaeontological evidence from ODP Hole 658C. J. Quat. Sci. 21, 259–269 (2006).
de Garidel-Thoron, T. et al. A multiproxy assessment of the western equatorial Pacific hydrography during the last 30 kyr. Paleoceanography 22, (2007).
Lopes dos Santos, R. A. et al. Comparison of organic (UK’37, TEXH86, LDI) and faunal proxies (foraminiferal assemblages) for reconstruction of late Quaternary sea surface temperature variability from offshore southeastern Australia. Paleoceanography, https://doi.org/10.1002/palo.20035 (2013).
Lessa, D. V. O., Santos, T. P., Venancio, I. M. & Albuquerque, A. L. S. Offshore expansion of the Brazilian coastal upwelling zones during Marine Isotope Stage 5. Glob. Planet. Change 158, 13–20 (2017).
Caley, T. et al. Quantitative estimate of the paleo-Agulhas leakage. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1238–1246 (2014).
Voelker, A. H. L. & de Abreu, L. A Review of Abrupt Climate Change Events in the Northeastern Atlantic Ocean (Iberian Margin): Latitudinal, Longitudinal, and Vertical Gradients. in Abrupt Climate Change: Mechanisms, Patterns, and Impacts (eds. Rashid, H., Polyak, L. & Mosley-Thompson, E.) vol. 193 15–37 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, D. C., 2011).
Hayward, B. W. et al. Planktic foraminifera-based sea-surface temperature record in the Tasman Sea and history of the Subtropical Front around New Zealand, over the last one million years. Mar. Micropaleontol. 82-83, 13–27 (2012).
Petró, S. M., Pivel, M. A. G., Coimbra, J. C. & Mizusaki, A. M. P. Paleoceanographic changes through the last 130 ka in the western South Atlantic based on planktonic Foraminifera. Rev. bras. paleontol. 19, 3–14 (2016).
Matsuzaki, K. M. R. et al. Paleoceanography of the Mauritanian margin during the last two climatic cycles: From planktonic foraminifera to African climate dynamics. Mar. Micropaleontol. 79, 67–79 (2011).
Arellano-Torres, E., Machain-Castillo, M. L., Contreras-Rosales, L. A., Cuesta-Castillo, L. B. & Ruiz-Fernández, A. C. Foraminiferal faunal evidence for Glacial–Interglacial variations in the ocean circulation and the upwelling of the Gulf of Tehuantepec (Mexico). Mar. Micropaleontol. 100, 52–66 (2013).
Naughton, F. et al. Wet to dry climatic trend in north-western Iberia within Heinrich events. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 284, 329–342 (2009).
Sánchez Goñi, M. F. et al. Contrasting impacts of Dansgaard–Oeschger events over a western European latitudinal transect modulated by orbital parameters. Quat. Sci. Rev. 27, 1136–1151 (2008).
Penaud, A. et al. Contrasting paleoceanographic conditions off Morocco during Heinrich events (1 and 2) and the Last Glacial Maximum. Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 1923–1939 (2010).
Chabaud, L., Sánchez Goñi, M. F., Desprat, S. & Rossignol, L. Land–sea climatic variability in the eastern North Atlantic subtropical region over the last 14,200 years: Atmospheric and oceanic processes at different timescales. Holocene 24, 787–797 (2014).
Sanchez Goni, M. F., Bard, E., Landais, A., Rossignol, L. & d/’Errico, F. Air-sea temperature decoupling in western Europe during the last interglacial-glacial transition. Nat. Geosci. 6, 837–841 (2013).
Xiang, R. et al. Planktonic foraminiferal records of East Asia monsoon changes in the southern South China Sea during the last 40,000years. Mar. Micropaleontol. 73, 1–13 (2009).
Wary, M. et al. The southern Norwegian Sea during the last 45 ka: hydrographical reorganizations under changing ice-sheet dynamics. J. Quat. Sci. 32, 908–922 (2017).
Yu, P.-S. et al. Influences of extratropical water masses on equatorial Pacific cold tongue variability during the past 160 ka as revealed by faunal evidence of planktic foraminifers. J. Quat. Sci. 27, 921–931 (2012).
Godad, S. P., Naidu, P. D. & Malmgren, B. A. Sea surface temperature changes during May and August in the western Arabian Sea over the last 22kyr: Implications as to shifting of the upwelling season. Mar. Micropaleontol. 78, 25–29 (2011).
Crundwell, M., Scott, G., Naish, T. & Carter, L. Glacial–interglacial ocean climate variability from planktonic foraminifera during the Mid-Pleistocene transition in the temperate Southwest Pacific, ODP Site 1123. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 260, 202–229 (2008).
Steinke, S., Yu, P.-S., Kucera, M. & Chen, M.-T. No-analog planktonic foraminiferal faunas in the glacial southern South China Sea: Implications for the magnitude of glacial cooling in the western Pacific warm pool. Mar. Micropaleontol. 66, 71–90 (2008).
Wary, M. et al. Stratification of surface waters during the last glacial millennial climatic events: a key factor in subsurface and deep-water mass dynamics. Clim. Past 11, 1507–1525 (2015).
Kuroyanagi, A., Kawahata, H. & Narita, H. Ohkushi, K.’ichi & Aramaki, T. Reconstruction of paleoenvironmental changes based on the planktonic foraminiferal assemblages off Shimokita (Japan) in the northwestern North Pacific. Glob. Planet. Change 53, 92–107 (2006).
Ijiri, A. et al. Paleoenvironmental changes in the northern area of the East China Sea during the past 42,000 years. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 219, 239–261 (2005).
Ivanova, E. V., Beaufort, L., Vidal, L. & Kucera, M. Precession forcing of productivity in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific during the last glacial cycle. Quat. Sci. Rev. 40, 64–77 (2012).
Carter, L., Manighetti, B., Ganssen, G. & Northcote, L. Southwest Pacific modulation of abrupt climate change during the Antarctic Cold Reversal–Younger Dryas. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 260, 284–298 (2008).
Haddam, N. A. et al. Improving past sea surface temperature reconstructions from the Southern Hemisphere oceans using planktonic foraminiferal census data. Paleoceanography 31, 822–837 (2016).
Haddam, N. A. et al. Changes in latitudinal sea surface temperature gradients along the Southern Chilean margin since the last glacial. Quat. Sci. Rev. 194, 62–76 (2018).
Essallami, L., Sicre, M. A., Kallel, N., Labeyrie, L. & Siani, G. Hydrological changes in the Mediterranean Sea over the last 30,000 years. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 8, (2007).
Sikes, E. L. et al. Southern Ocean seasonal temperature and Subtropical Front movement on the South Tasman Rise in the late Quaternary. Paleoceanography 24, PA2201 (2009).
Ujiié, Y., Asahi, H., Sagawa, T. & Bassinot, F. Evolution of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre during the past 190 kyr through the interaction of the Kuroshio Current with the surface and intermediate waters. Paleoceanography 31, 1498–1513 (2016).
Simon, M. H. et al. Millennial-scale Agulhas Current variability and its implications for salt-leakage through the Indian–Atlantic Ocean Gateway. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 383, 101–112 (2013).
Bostock, H. C., Hayward, B. W., Neil, H. L., Sabaa, A. T. & Scott, G. H. Changes in the position of the Subtropical Front south of New Zealand since the last glacial period. Paleoceanography 30, 824–844 (2015).
Gebhardt, H. et al. Paleonutrient and productivity records from the subarctic North Pacific for Pleistocene glacial terminations I to V. Paleoceanography 23, PA4212 (2008).
Mohtadi, M. & Hebbeln, D. Mechanisms and variations of the paleoproductivity off northern Chile (24°S-33°S) during the last 40,000 years. Paleoceanography 19, PA2023 (2004).
Schulz, H. Meeresoberflächentemperaturen Vor 10.000 Jahren - Auswirkungen Des Frühholozänen Insolationsmaximums, https://doi.org/10.2312/REPORTS-GPI.1995.73 (1995).
Martinez, J. I., Mora, G. & Barrows, T. T. Paleoceanographic conditions in the western Caribbean Sea for the last 560 kyr as inferred from planktonic foraminifera. Mar. Micropaleontol. 64, 177–188 (2007).
Arellano-Torres, E. & Machain-Castillo, M. L. Late Pleistocene-Holocene variability in the southern Gulf of Mexico surface waters based on planktonic foraminiferal assemblages. Mar. Micropaleontol. 131, 44–58 (2017).
Caley, T. et al. New Arabian Sea records help decipher orbital timing of Indo-Asian monsoon. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 308, 433–444 (2011).
Regalado-Quiroz, F. Reconstrucción de masas de agua y corrientes oceánicas en el golfo de California a través de asociaciones de foraminíferos planctónicos de los últimos 28 ka. (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2022).
Ufkes, E. & Kroon, D. Sensitivity of south‐east Atlantic planktonic foraminifera to mid‐Pleistocene climate change. Palaeontology 55, 183–204 (2012).
Rogerson, M., Rohling, E. J., Weaver, P. P. E. & Murray, J. W. The Azores Front since the Last Glacial Maximum. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 222, 779–789 (2004).
Hall, I. R., Colmenero-Hidalgo, E., Zahn, R., Peck, V. L. & Hemming, S. R. Centennial- to millennial-scale ice-ocean interactions in the subpolar northeast Atlantic 18–41 kyr ago. Paleoceanography 26, PA2224 (2011).
Chen, M.-T. et al. Late Quaternary sea-surface temperature variations in the southeast Atlantic: a planktic foraminifer faunal record of the past 600 000 yr (IMAGES II MD962085). Mar. Geol. 180, 163–181 (2002).
Dokken, T. M. & Jansen, E. Rapid changes in the mechanism of ocean convection during the last glacial period. Nature 401, 458–461 (1999).
Salgueiro, E. et al. Past circulation along the western Iberian margin: a time slice vision from the Last Glacial to the Holocene. Quat. Sci. Rev. 106, 316–329 (2014).
Abrantes, F. et al. Sediment fluxes along the northeastern European Margin: inferring hydrological changes between 20 and 8 kyr. Mar. Geol. 152, 7–23 (1998).
Salgueiro, E. et al. Temperature and productivity changes off the western Iberian margin during the last 150 ky. Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 680–695 (2010).
Hagen, S. & Hald, M. Variation in surface and deep water circulation in the Denmark Strait, North Atlantic, during marine isotope stages 3 and 2. Paleoceanography 17, 1061 (2002).
Jonkers, L. et al. Strong temperature gradients in the ice age North Atlantic Ocean revealed by plankton biogeography. Nat. Geosci. 1–6 (2023).
Mix, A. C., Morey, A. E., Pisias, N. G. & Hostetler, S. W. Foraminiferal faunal estimates of paleotemperature: Circumventing the No-analog problem yields cool Ice Age tropics. Paleoceanography 14, 350–359 (1999).
Mix, A. C. & Morey, A. E. Climate Feedback and Pleistocene Variations in the Atlantic South Equatorial Current. The South Atlantic. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80353-6_26 (1996).
CLIMAP Project Members. et al. The last interglacial ocean. Quat. Res. 21, 123–224 (1984).
Risebrobakken, B. Age determination of sediment core MD99-2303. PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.840549 (2014).
Morard, R. et al. Genetic and morphological divergence in the warm-water planktonic foraminifera genus Globigerinoides. PLoS One 14, e0225246 (2019).
Brummer, G.-J. A. & Kučera, M. Taxonomic review of living planktonic foraminifera. Journal of Micropalaeontology 41, 29–74 (2022).
Jonkers, L. et al. ForCenS-LGM – a compilation of planktonic foraminifera assemblage composition for the Last Glacial Maximum. PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.962852 (2024).
Jonkers, L. Last Glacial Maximum planktonic foraminifera species assemblages. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10000129 (2023).
Berger, W. H. Planktonic Foraminifera: selective solution and paleoclimatic interpretation. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts 15, 31–43 (1968).
Acknowledgements
We thank the reviewers and the editorial board member Julien Emile-Geay for their constructive criticism on an earlier version of this manuscript. L.J. is supported through the German climate modelling initiative PALMOD, funded by the German Ministry of Science and Education (BMBF, 01LP1922A). A.V. acknowledges Portuguese national funds from the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through projects UIDB/04326/2020, UIDP/04326/2020 and LA/P/0101/2020. B.R. acknowledges support from RCN project number 325333. E.I. acknowledges support from Russian-French Project PICS N3467.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.J.: conceptualisation, data collection, visualisation and writing of initial version of the manuscript. M.K.: conceptualisation, funding acquisition. All authors contributed data, helped with quality control and commented/edited the draft manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jonkers, L., Mix, A., Voelker, A. et al. ForCenS-LGM: a dataset of planktonic foraminifera species assemblage composition for the Last Glacial Maximum. Sci Data 11, 361 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03166-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03166-7
- Springer Nature Limited