Skip to main content
Log in

Make deep learning algorithms in computational pathology more reproducible and reusable

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Medicine

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This article has been updated

Greater emphasis on reproducibility and reusability will advance computational pathology quickly and sustainably, ultimately optimizing clinical workflows and benefiting patient health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Workflow in computational pathology.

Change history

  • 11 August 2022

    In the version of this article initially published, text in the second and third sections of Fig. 1 were obscured and have now been restored in the HTML and PDF versions of the article as of 11 August 2022

References

  1. Fuchs, T. J. & Buhmann, J. M. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 35, 515–530 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Försch, S. et al. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 118, 194–204 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Esteva, A. et al. Nature 542, 115–118 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coudray, N. et al. Nat. Med. 24, 1559–1567 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Matek, C. et al. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 538–544 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu, M. Y. et al. Nature 594, 106–110 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fu, Y. et al. Nat. Cancer 1, 800–810 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Echle, A. et al. Br. J. Cancer 124, 686–696 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Laak, J. et al. Nat. Med. 27, 775–784 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutson, M. Science 359, 725–726 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stodden, V. et al. Science 354, 1240–1241 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haibe-Kains, B. et al. Nature 586, E14–E16 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Howard, F. M. et al. Nat. Commun. 12, 4423 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner, S. J. et al. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.15.22275108 (2022).

  15. Pineau, J. et al. J. Mach. Learn. 22, 1–20 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. McDermott, M. B. A. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabb1655 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiens, J. et al. Nat. Med. 25, 1337–1340 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Schüffler for feedback. S.J.W., L.L. and S.S.B. are supported by the Helmholtz Association under the joint research school “Munich School for Data Science - MUDS”. S.J.W., L.L. and T.P. were funded by Helmholtz Association’s Initiative and Networking Fund through Helmholtz AI. S.S.B. has received funding by F. Hoffmann-la Roche LTD (No grant number is applicable). L.L. acknowledges a fellowship from the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds. C.M. has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant no. 866411).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.J.W., Ch.M., T.P. and C.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the review14 in preparation for this Comment.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Carsten Marr or Tingying Peng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, S.J., Matek, C., Shetab Boushehri, S. et al. Make deep learning algorithms in computational pathology more reproducible and reusable. Nat Med 28, 1744–1746 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01905-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01905-0

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation