Abstract
It is estimated that only 0.02% of disseminated tumour cells are able to seed overt metastases1. While this suggests the presence of environmental constraints to metastatic seeding, the landscape of host factors controlling this process remains largely unclear. Here, combining transposon technology2 and fluorescence niche labelling3, we developed an in vivo CRISPR activation screen to systematically investigate the interactions between hepatocytes and metastatic cells. We identify plexin B2 as a critical host-derived regulator of liver colonization in colorectal and pancreatic cancer and melanoma syngeneic mouse models. We dissect a mechanism through which plexin B2 interacts with class IV semaphorins on tumour cells, leading to KLF4 upregulation and thereby promoting the acquisition of epithelial traits. Our results highlight the essential role of signals from the liver parenchyma for the seeding of disseminated tumour cells before the establishment of a growth-promoting niche. Our findings further suggest that epithelialization is required for the adaptation of CRC metastases to their new tissue environment. Blocking the plexin-B2–semaphorin axis abolishes metastatic colonization of the liver and therefore represents a therapeutic strategy for the prevention of hepatic metastases. Finally, our screening approach, which evaluates host-derived extrinsic signals rather than tumour-intrinsic factors for their ability to promote metastatic seeding, is broadly applicable and lays a framework for the screening of environmental constraints to metastasis in other organs and cancer types.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The importance of microenvironmental conditions of the host organ for metastatic seeding has long been recognized. The seminal ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis postulates that metastatic cells will seed and colonize only favourable environments4. However, we still lack a comprehensive overview of the signals from the metastasis-accepting organs that promote or suppress the establishment of secondary tumours. Indeed, retrospective analysis may identify factors that allow metastases to thrive long term, but does not capture early events of metastatic seeding, and cannot distinguish between cellular interactions that are cause or consequence of metastatic outgrowth. Here we devised a screening approach for functional testing of cell–cell interactions in vivo, aimed at the identification of host-derived factors that determine the fate of disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) at the time of seeding. We used it to interrogate which hepatocyte-derived signals promote or suppress seeding of colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases and identify plexin B2 as a crucial regulator of liver colonization.
Screening interactions in a mosaic liver
Hepatocytes constitute 60% of the liver by cell number and 80% by mass5. We therefore hypothesized that early interactions with these cells might influence the ability of extravasated DTCs to seed metastases. To test this, we developed an experimental strategy for pooled perturbation of hepatocyte–tumour interactions during seeding (Fig. 1a). First, hundreds of genes are stably overexpressed in hepatocytes using CRISPR-mediated transcriptional activation (CRISPR-a), resulting in a ‘mosaic liver’ containing multiple perturbed environments; then, tumour cells are delivered to the liver by intrasplenic injection. We assumed that, after cancer inoculation, DTCs interacting with hepatocytes overexpressing a seeding-promoting factor would seed and grow, while DTCs interacting with hepatocytes overexpressing a suppressing factor would fail to form metastases. The effect of a perturbation on seeding can therefore be inferred by its enrichment in metastatic or non-metastatic areas, indicating a seeding-promoting or seeding-suppressing effect, respectively (Fig. 1a). Thus, even if perturbed seeding events are not directly observed, their outcome can be retrospectively assessed by the presence of a metastasis.
To achieve hepatocyte-specific CRISPR-a in vivo, dCas9-SunTag-p65-HSF16 mice crossed with albumin-Cre mice7 (Alb-cre;dCas9-SPH) were subjected to hydrodynamic tail vein injection of transposon plasmids containing sgRNAs and Sleeping Beauty transposase (SB100X), which mediates stable integration of exogenous DNA in mouse hepatocytes2. Indeed, injection of sgRNAs targeting glutamine synthetase resulted in increased Glul transcript expression and ectopic glutamine synthetase immunoreactivity (Extended Data Fig. 1a,b).
Molecular interactions between surface proteins on tumour cells and hepatocytes are probably among the first events to occur after DTC extravasation into the space of Disse. We therefore designed a library of sgRNAs targeting ligands and receptors (LRs) expressed by quiescent and regenerating mouse hepatocytes8. Moreover, we included components of the Hippo signalling pathway, the activation of which suppresses melanoma metastases9; claudins recently implicated in CRC dissemination10; orphan class C G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with an unknown role in metastatic seeding; and 100 safe-targeting sgRNAs as negative controls11 (Extended Data Fig. 1c). The library (3 sgRNAs per gene, 997 sgRNAs in total; Supplementary Table 1) was cloned into transposon vectors containing a CMV-GFP reporter, and co-injected with SB100X into AlbCre;dCas9-SPH mice at a concentration resulting in 0.5% GFP+ hepatocytes (Extended Data Fig. 1d,e). One week after injection, we isolated CD31−CD45−GFP+ hepatocytes using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and performed targeted sgRNA amplification from genomic DNA followed by sequencing. Correlation analysis of sgRNA abundances in the pre- and post-injection library revealed stable sgRNA distribution and high library retention, indicating no loss of perturbation diversity (Extended Data Fig. 1f). Notably, the introduction of sgRNAs into non-proliferative hepatocytes, rather than into tumour cells, ensures unaltered library distribution throughout the experiment, avoids bottleneck effects arising from poor grafting of tumour cells in vivo and prevents library skewing towards perturbations that confer a proliferative advantage. Moreover, the elevated number of hepatocytes in the adult mouse liver (150 million)12 enables screening of 997 sgRNAs library at high coverage (750×), while also ensuring a multiplicity of infection (MOI) lower than 1 (Extended Data Fig. 1g).
Our approach depends on the assumption that a DTC interacting with a hepatocyte with a seeding-promoting perturbation would have increased chances of survival, and the corresponding sgRNA would therefore be enriched in metastatic areas. To record the proximity of perturbed hepatocytes to metastases, we introduced the sLP-mCherry niche-labelling system3 in Villin-creERT2;APCfl/fl;Trp53fl/fl;KrasG12D;Smad4KO (AKPS) organoids (AKPSsLP-mCherry) and observed efficient perimetastatic hepatocyte mCherry labelling in vivo after intrasplenic injection (Extended Data Fig. 1h–j). Thus, hepatocytes with successful transposon insertion (GFP+) can be separated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) as either proximal to metastasis (metastasis-proximal, mCherry+GFP+) or distant from metastases (metastasis-distal, mCherry−GFP+) (Extended Data Fig. 1k).
We conducted three screening experiments with independently amplified sgRNA library batches (Extended Data Fig. 2a). In total, 7 Alb-cre;dCas9-SPH mice and 5 non-Cre littermate controls were injected with sgRNA library and intrasplenically injected with AKPSsLP-mCherry organoids. Metastases were allowed to grow for 2 weeks, after which metastasis-proximal and metastasis-distal hepatocytes were isolated using FACS. The amount of sorted cells across all experiments and mice resulted in cumulative coverage of 1,000× for Alb-cre;dCas9-SPH mice and 500× for the littermate controls (Extended Data Fig. 2b,c). We scored genes based on the enrichment of their inferring sgRNAs in metastasis-proximal versus metastasis-distal hepatocytes (Fig. 1b). The top-scoring differentially enriched perturbations were consistent across individual mice and library batches (Fig. 1c), indicating high robustness of our screening strategy, and were not differentially enriched in non-Cre littermates (Extended Data Fig. 2d). sgRNAs strongly enriched in metastasis-distal hepatocytes induced overexpression (OE) of the tumour necrosis factor family cytokine lymphotoxin-β (Ltb), as well as several genes involved in acute phase response such as serum amyloid 1 (Saa1), amyloid precursor protein (App), ceruloplasmin (Cp) and α2 macroglobulin (A2m) (Fig. 1d). The depletion of sgRNAs targeting these genes in metastatic areas suggests that their upregulation prevents seeding of DTCs, possibly by inducing local immune activation. Indeed, Saa1 was suggested to attract macrophages to the tumour invasive front13, whereas amyloid protein (APP) deposition recruits neutrophils in several cancers14. Conversely, sgRNAs enriched in the proximity of metastases induced OE of epithelial growth factor (Egf), a known driver of metastatic CRC15, as well as other regulators of morphogenesis (Gpc3 and Psen1), and several genes that are involved in axon guidance such as Plxnb2, Nrp2, Sema3b, Ncam1 and Nenf (Fig. 1b–d). Our screen therefore implicates neurotrophic factors as promoters of metastatic seeding in the liver. This is consistent with reports of DTCs hijacking axonal morphogenesis pathways to interact with endothelial cells16,17; however, their role in tumour–hepatocyte interactions has not been explored.
We next sought to cross-validate the results of our screen in transcriptional and mutational data of human liver metastases. We first tested whether any of the identified seeding-regulating factors (SRFs; 62 genes, top and bottom decile in GFP+mCherry+ hepatocytes) were predicted to engage in tumour–hepatocyte interaction at the metastatic edge. We therefore generated spatial transcriptomics data of a human CRC liver metastasis with an extensive tumour–liver border, and performed cell type deconvolution using published single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets18,19 (Extended Data Fig. 2e). We then predicted LR pairs between metastasis-proximal hepatocytes and the tumour edge that potentially regulate expression changes between the tumour edge and core (Methods and Extended Data Fig. 2f,g). Among the 109 active LR pairs, 22 involved SRFs, including the chemoattractants App, Saa1, Cp and Ltb and the axon guidance molecules Plxnb2, Nenf and Nectin2 (Fig. 1e). Next, we extracted LRs from a published dataset of genomic alterations enriched in liver metastases compared with in matched primary tumours20 and identified their interaction partners expressed by hepatocytes (Methods and Extended Data Fig. 3a). We found that 21 LRs mutated in liver metastases potentially interact with SRFs, with deleted LRs mainly predicted to interact with suppressing factors, and amplified LRs with promoting factors, possibly suggesting a selection of these interactions (Fig. 1f). Finally, SRFs are also predicted to interact with LR-encoding differentially expressed genes in liver metastases compared with in matched primary CRC in two independent scRNA-seq datasets21,22 (Extended Data Fig. 2h). Together with our screening results, these analyses demonstrate the ability of our screening platform to capture disease-relevant interactions, and implicate hepatocyte-derived chemoattractants and axon guidance cues as regulators of metastatic seeding in the liver.
To test the direct effect of SRFs on cancer growth, we devised a small interaction screen based on co-culture of hepatocytes and cancer cells. sgRNAs targeting SRFs were transfected in an arrayed manner in primary hepatocytes isolated from Alb-cre;dCas9-SPH mice, or in immortalized mouse hepatocytes (AML12) stably expressing dCas9-SPH (Extended Data Fig. 3b). AKPSsLP-mCherry organoids dissociated into single cells were then sparsely seeded onto the hepatocyte monolayer and allowed to grow for 5 days before colony counting (colony forming units, CFU) (Fig. 1g). OE of App and Saa1 did not result in significantly altered CFU values with respect to the non-targeting sgRNA (sgNT) or untransfected controls, suggesting that their effect on seeding in vivo might be mediated by local recruitment of a third cell type (Fig. 1h and Extended Data Fig. 3c). Conversely, we observed increased CFU values after Plnxb2, Psen1 and Gprc5b OE, indicating their direct involvement in the interactions between hepatocytes and tumour cells (Fig. 1h). In particular, both CRISPR-a-mediated and lentiviral Plxnb2 OE in AML12 cultures had a very potent effect on AKPS seeding (Fig. 1i and Extended Data Fig. 3d–g). Moreover, addition of recombinant mouse plexin B2 ectodomain (rmPlexin B2) on AKPS single cells significantly increased CFUs both in the presence and absence of hepatocytes, suggesting that plexin B2 directly binds to tumour cells (Fig. 1j and Extended Data Fig. 3h). Notably, these results could be recapitulated by adding recombinant human plexin B2 (rhPlexin B2) on patient-derived CRC organoids (PDOs) with or without immortalized human hepatocytes (PTA-5565) (Fig. 1k and Extended Data Fig. 3i,j). Together with our transcriptomic and mutational analysis, these results implicate plexin B2 in direct interactions between hepatocytes and metastatic cells, which we next sought to investigate in vivo.
Plexin B2 is required for liver seeding
Plexin B2 is widely expressed in epithelial cells of most mouse tissues, where it localizes to the basolateral membrane23. Although its functions are mostly characterized in neural development24, the phylogenetic emergence of the plexin family predates the appearance of the nervous system25, and recent studies have unravelled roles of plexin B2 in several tissue contexts26,27. We used adeno-associated virus 8 (AAV8) to broadly deliver sgRNAs targeting Plxnb2 to hepatocytes of Alb-cre;dCas9-SPH mice in vivo (Extended Data Fig. 4a–e). Consistent with the results of our screen, Plxnb2 OE induced a threefold increase in metastatic foci after intrasplenic injection of AKPS organoids (Fig. 2a,b). Notably, Plxnb2 OE also promoted grafting of syngeneic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Ptf1a-cre;KrasG12D/+;Trp53flox/+, KPC) and melanoma cells (Tyr-creER;BRafCA;Ptenlox/lox, D4M-3A), suggesting that its seeding-promoting effect also applies to other cancers that frequently metastasize to the liver (Fig. 2c,d). To test the requirement of hepatocyte-derived plexin B2 for metastatic seeding, we performed hepatocyte-specific ablation of plexin B2 through AAV8-mediated delivery of Plxnb2-targeting sgRNAs in Alb-cre;Cas9 mice or Alb-cre to Plxnb2flox/flox mice (Plxnb2 KO; Extended Data Fig. 4d,f,g). In both of the experimental models, loss of plexin B2 almost completely prevented metastatic outgrowth of AKPS liver metastases, as revealed by histological analysis and in vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI; Fig. 2e,f and Extended Data Fig. 4h). We further assessed the influence of hepatocyte-derived plexin B2 on seeding of spontaneous liver metastases from colorectal tumours generated by colonoscopy-guided submucosal injection of organoids (Extended Data Fig. 5a). Notably, 86% of the Plxnb2-OE mice developed spontaneous liver metastases 8 weeks after orthotopic tumour inoculation (AKPS organoids), while only 29% of control littermates did (Fig. 2g and Extended Data Fig. 5b,c). Conversely, Plxnb2 deletion significantly decreased the incidence and numbers of spontaneous liver metastases of Apcflox/flox;Trp53flox/flox;Tgfbr2flox/flox;KrasG12D;Akt1myristoilated (APTAK) organoids, which exhibit a high metastatic potential28 (Fig. 2h and Extended Data Fig. 5d–f).
At steady state, plexin B2 is widely expressed by hepatocytes—with higher expression in portal areas (Extended Data Fig. 5g,h). Notably, although plexin B2 immunoreactivity is higher in peritumoral hepatocytes (Extended Data Fig. 5i,j), Plxnb2 expression is unaltered in the livers of mice bearing AKPS colon tumours, suggesting that Plxnb2 is not upregulated by primary-tumour-secreted factors nor systemic effects but, rather, due to a local response to the presence of liver metastases (Extended Data Fig. 5k). Notably, ablation of Plxnb2 5 days after intrasplenic AKPS organoid injection delayed but did not prevent metastasis formation, indicating that the presence of plexin B2 on peritumoral hepatocytes is required for metastatic seeding, but not to sustain growth (Extended Data Fig. 5l,m).
Histological analysis revealed that hepatic plexin B2 levels substantially change the morphology and microenvironment of AKPS metastases. The few remaining lesions in Plxnb2-KO livers exhibited cellular disarray and often lacked gland structures, suggesting that the absence of plexin B2 impairs epithelial morphogenesis in liver metastases (Fig. 2i). Instead, lesions in Plxnb2-OE livers consisted mostly of epithelial cells, contained fewer fibroblasts positive for α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and periostin (POSTN) that instead surround AKPS liver metastases in wild-type (WT) livers, and exhibited an extensive CD146+ vascular network (Fig. 2i,j and Extended Data Fig. 6a,b). Importantly, α-SMA and CD146 immunoreactivity, as well as transcriptionally predicted cellular composition, were unaltered before tumour inoculation, indicating that increased metastatic seeding was not due to alterations in the liver environment induced by Plxnb2 OE but, rather, to direct tumour–hepatocyte interactions (Extended Data Fig. 6c–f).
Plexin B2 induces epithelialization
We next sought to investigate the mechanism by which plexin B2 controls liver colonization. scRNA-seq revealed that, in AKPS organoids, 2 h treatment with rmPlexin B2 was sufficient to induce a shift towards a more proliferative cell population, with increased expression gene sets related to MAPK and JNK signalling, cell junction assembly and morphogenesis (Fig. 3a). Consistent with an induction of proliferation, rmPlexin B2 increased frequencies of EdU+ cells in AKPS organoids and PDOs (Extended Data Fig. 7a,b). Lesions in Plxnb2-OE livers further contained a higher density of Ki-67+ epithelial cells, indicating a proliferative advantage in vivo, as well as lower levels of cleaved caspase 3 (Fig. 3b and Extended Data Fig. 7c). We profiled AKPS liver metastases in Plxnb2-OE and control livers using single-nucleus assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (snATAC–seq) and snRNA-seq (Extended Data Fig. 7d,e). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) in tumour cells confirmed upregulation of terms related to cell division, morphogenesis and assembly of cell projections (Fig. 3c,d and Extended Data Fig. 7f). Consistent with cytoskeletal remodelling, phalloidin staining indicated notable apical F-actin accumulation in epithelial gland structures of AKPS liver metastases in Plxnb2-OE livers (Fig. 3e). Treatment of KPC cells and CRC PDOs with rmPlexin B2 similarly induced F-actin focal aggregation in vitro (Extended Data Fig. 7g,h). Notably, lesions in Plxnb2-OE livers also exhibited strong downregulation of genes involved in immune recognition, such as Cd74, B2m and H2-D1, coinciding with diminished CD4+ T cell infiltration (Fig. 3d and Extended Data Fig. 7f,i).
To reveal the transcription factors mediating the effects of plexin B2 in metastases, we used the chromatin profile of tumour cells to identify differentially accessible peaks and their associated motifs (Fig. 3f). With respect to the controls, metastases growing in Plxnb2-OE livers exhibited increased activity of several members of the SP/KLF family of zinc-finger transcription factors (Fig. 3g). Consistent with these results, we detected increased nuclear levels of KLF4 in AKPS liver metastases growing in Plxnb2-OE livers, while it was absent from lesions in Plxnb2-KO livers (Fig. 3h). Moreover, expression of Klf4 as well as its predicted target genes was increased in tumour cells in Plxnb2-OE livers, as well as in AKPS organoids treated with rmPlexin B2 (Extended Data Fig. 7j).
Klf4 is expressed by differentiated cells of the colonic epithelium, but its expression is lost in CRC, in which it acts as tumour suppressor by inhibiting epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT)29,30,31. In AKPS metastases colonizing Plxnb2-OE livers, increased KLF4 coincided with elevated EPCAM immunoreactivity (Extended Data Fig. 7k). We therefore hypothesized that reactivation of KLF4 at secondary sites might promote epithelialization of tumour cells through reversion of EMT, which is thought to be essential for successful metastatic outgrowth of several carcinomas32,33,34. Treatment of two-dimensional (2D) AKPS cultures with the KLF4 inhibitor WX2-43 (ref. 35) induced a mesenchymal-like phenotype, altering colony morphology, size and actin cytoskeleton, and reduced the frequency of Ki-67+ cells (Extended Data Fig. 7l–n), indicating that KLF4 suppresses mesenchymal traits and promotes proliferation in AKPS organoids. KLF4 inhibition further reduced seeding of AKPS organoids in vitro, which could be rescued by co-treatment with rmPlexin B2 (Extended Data Fig. 7o).
AKPS organoids in culture show a hybrid EMT state with non-overlapping transcriptional signatures of EMT and mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET), and a mix of E-cadherin (ECAD)highZEB1low and ECADlowZEB1high cells (Extended Data Fig. 8a,b). Notably, nuclear ZEB1 levels are decreased after treatment with rmPlexin B2 and conversely increased by KLF4 inhibition (Extended Data Fig. 8c). In vivo, ZEB1 is absent from metastases growing in Plxnb2-OE and control livers, while AKPS lesions in Plxnb2-KO livers retain epithelial ZEB1 expression (Fig. 3i and Extended Data Fig. 8c). In the absence of plexin B2, AKPS metastases also lack expression of ELF3 and GRHL2, two transcription factors that preserve epithelial identity by suppressing EMT36,37 (Extended Data Fig. 8d). These data implicate hepatocyte-derived plexin B2 as an inducer of epithelialization of AKPS liver metastases, and suggest that reversion of EMT is required for DTC seeding and adaptation to the liver environment. Consistent with a liver-induced epithelialization of metastases, AKPS organoid lines derived from metastases exhibit morphological and transcriptomic evidence of epithelial morphogenesis, and have an impaired ability to establish colonies when seeded in vitro as single cells, indicating increased susceptibility to anoikis (Extended Data Fig. 8d–f).
Plexin B2 interacts with class IV semaphorins
Interactions between plexin B2 and its canonical ligands, class IV semaphorins, have been implicated in promoting tumour invasion and metastasis by means of cytoskeletal remodelling and activation of RAC1 signalling38,39,40,41. The seeding-promoting effect of rhPlexin B2 on PDOs in vitro was indeed prevented by antibody-mediated blockade of the semaphorin-binding domain of plexin B2 (Fig. 4a). Moreover, treatment of AKPS organoids with rmPlexin B2 increased in vitro and in vivo seeding in a RAC1-dependent manner (Extended Data Fig. 9a,b), suggesting that class IV semaphorins mediate the seeding-promoting effects of hepatocyte-derived plexin B2 on DTCs.
In AKPS liver metastases, SEMA4A+ tumour cells contact hepatocytes at the metastatic leading edge, and class IV semaphorins (Sema4a, Sema4c, Sema4d and Sema4g) are widely expressed (Extended Data Fig. 9c,d). SEMA4A, SEMA4C, SEMA4D and SEMA4G are also detected in human colon and primary CRC42 (Extended Data Fig. 9e). Notably, in two scRNA-seq datasets of human CRC18, expression of the semaphorin genes and KLF4-target genes is significantly upregulated in high-relapse cells (HRCs)43 and in intrinsic consensus molecular subtype 3 (iCMS3) cells44, but not in Lgr5high cells (Fig. 4b–d and Extended Data Fig. 9f,g). Semaphorin expression also coincides with a MET signature and expression of KLF4-target genes (Extended Data Fig. 9h). Conversely, the core epithelial HRC signature is significantly upregulated in metastatic cells grown in Plxnb2-OE livers, as well as in AKPS organoids after treatment with rmPlexin B2 (Fig. 4e and Extended Data Fig. 9i). Of note, semaphorin levels are unaltered in liver metastases compared with in matched primary tumours21,22 (Extended Data Fig. 9j). These analyses indicate that high semaphorin expression marks a subpopulation in the primary tumour with elevated liver metastatic potential. Indeed, in a large cohort of patients with CRC, increased expression of SEMA4A, SEMA4C and SEMA4D, but not SEMA4G, is associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (Extended Data Fig. 9k). Moreover, copy-number variation (CNV) analysis in the COAD dataset45 indicates that SEMA4A, SEMA4C and SEMA4D are commonly found amplified, while SEMA4G is often deleted in patients with CRC (Extended Data Fig. 9k). Cumulatively, these data support the role of plexin B2–semaphorin–KLF4 signalling in promoting liver seeding, and might explain the differential ability of distinct tumour cell subpopulations to successfully form hepatic metastases.
To test the requirement of semaphorin genes for liver metastases, we performed simultaneous partial knockdown of Sema4a, Sema4c, Sema4d and Sema4g in AKPS organoids (AKPSSema4KD), and observed downregulation of gene sets involved in epithelial morphogenesis, cell adhesion and RAC1 GTPase activity (Extended Data Fig. 10a–c). Notably, when co-injected with control organoids in competitive seeding assays, AKPSSema4KD organoids exhibited reduced grafting ability in vivo (Fig. 4f and Extended Data Fig. 10d). To achieve complete deletion of semaphorins, we generated quadruple KO organoids (AKPSSema4KO; Extended Data Fig. 10e and Supplementary Table 2). While AKPSSema4KO organoids show unaltered proliferation in vitro, they exhibit significant grafting impairment when inoculated orthotopically (Extended Data Fig. 10f–h). To assay liver colonization, we injected AKPSSema4KO organoids intrasplenically, and found significantly decreased metastatic burden compared with control organoids (Fig. 4g). Notably, KLF4 immunoreactivity is lost in AKPSSema4KO metastases, which further exhibit diminished EPCAM and ECAD expression and high ZEB1 levels (Fig. 4h,i). Loss of semaphorins in AKPS liver metastases therefore phenocopies loss of plexin B2 on hepatocytes, supporting the notion that plexin–semaphorin interactions are required for metastatic seeding.
Discussion
Historically viewed as a late-stage event in cancer progression, spreading of DTCs has recently gained recognition as an early phenomenon in tumorigenesis46,47. Recent studies have elucidated mechanisms that promote DTC survival in circulation48, regulate DTC dormancy49,50,51 or promote recurrence43. Yet, owing to the technical challenges of tracking single extravasated tumour cells, the environmental determinants of DTC adaptation and survival in a foreign organ environment remain largely unclear. Identification of these factors might reveal a therapeutic window to target metastasis at its most vulnerable point: before the establishment of a growth-promoting metastatic niche. The results presented here identify the interaction between hepatocyte-derived plexin B2 and class IV semaphorins on tumour cells as a necessary inducer of KLF4-mediated epithelialization of liver metastases and lay a methodological framework to deepen our understanding of metastatic seeding.
Methods
Mice
All of the experiments were performed in male and female mice aged 6–16 weeks. LSL-dCas9-SPH (dCas9-SPH, 031645) and Plxnb2flox/flox mice (036883) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. Alb-cre (003574), LSL-Cas9 (Cas9, 024858) and mT/mG mice (007576) were obtained from a local live mouse repository. LSL-dCas9-SPH mice were obtained in 2019 and initially exhibited spontaneous urination, as also reported on the Jackson Laboratory website. The phenotype disappeared when the mice were outcrossed to B6J mice and crossed with the Alb-cre strain. Chow and water were available ad libitum, unless specified otherwise. All of the mice were in the B6J background and maintained under a 12 h–12 h light–dark schedule. Mice were housed and bred under specific-pathogen-free conditions in accredited animal facilities. At the experimental end point, mice were euthanized by raising the CO2 concentrations. Approved humane end points (a palpable tumour with a diameter of more than 1.5 cm, or weight loss of more than 15%) were not exceeded. All of the experimental procedures were performed in accordance with Swiss Federal regulations and approved by the Cantonal Veterinary Office. Genotyping was performed by Transnetyx genotyping services.
Animal experiments
Hydrodynamic tail vein injection
Hydrodynamic injection, an efficient method to deliver nucleic acids to the liver, involves the rapid injection (6–8 s) of a large volume (8–12% body weight) of saline (0.9% sodium chloride) into the tail52. Mice were placed in a restraining device, and the tail was warmed with a red light lamp to induce lateral tail-vein dilatation. The injection site was cleaned and disinfected using an alcohol swab. Transposon plasmid (PT4-CMV-GFP (Addgene, 11704) or PT4-U6-sgRNA-CMV-GFP) and SB100X transposase OE plasmid pCMV(CAT)T7-SB100X (Addgene, 34879) were equilibrated at room temperature, transferred to a 3 ml syringe mounted with a 27 G needle, and then injected into the tail vein in a continuous motion. The mouse was removed from the restrainer and signs of recovery were monitored.
Intrasplenic injection of tumour cells followed by splenectomy
Intrasplenic injection of tumour cells followed by splenectomy was performed as previously described53. In brief, the mice were placed into a container connected to an oxygen–isoflurane inhalation device (4% for induction and 2–3% for maintenance). After 5 min, anaesthetized mice were placed onto a thermal pad (37 °C), isoflurane gas was continuously supplied by a nose cone and sterile eye ointment was applied to avoid corneal dehydration. Anaesthesia depth was monitored regularly by testing toe and tail pinch reflexes and by observing the rate, depth and pattern of respiration. All of the surgical instruments were sterilized before use and the surgical procedure was performed under aseptic conditions. The skin over the surgical site was shaved and disinfected with betadine. Using aseptic technique, an incision was made in the skin and peritoneal wall to expose the spleen. A sterile gauze was placed under the spleen. For each mouse, four 50 μl domes of AKPS organoids were collected, washed of Matrigel in ice-cold PBS and mechanically dissociated using a 20 G needle on a 20 ml syringe. Dissociated organoids were pelleted at 290g for 3 min, and resuspended in 0.04 ml sterile PBS and injected under the splenic capsule with an insulin syringe (BD, MicroFine, 0.3 ml, 30 G). Alternatively, 100,000 KPC cells in 0.04 ml sterile PBS were injected. After 10 min, the splenic artery and vein were closed by ligation. Immediately after, the spleen was resected. Subsequently, the wound was washed three times with sterile PBS. The peritoneal wall was closed with an absorbable polyglactin suture (Vicryl 4-0 or 5-0 coated) and the skin was closed with wound clips. The mice were monitored for weight loss and the experiment was terminated maximally 3 weeks after tumour cell injection.
Colonoscopy-guided submucosal injection of CRC organoids
The procedure for the colonoscopy-guided orthotopic injection of mouse colonic organoids was adapted from a previously published protocol54. At 36 h after passaging, AKPS or APTAK organoids were mechanically dissociated, resuspended in OptiMEM (Gibco) (one 50 μl Matrigel dome in 50 μl of OptiMEM per mouse for AKPS, three 50 μl Matrigel domes in 50 μl of OptiMEM per mouse for APTAK). Mice were anaesthetized by isoflurane inhalation and placed onto their back on a heating pad (37 °C). The colons were evacuated of stool with prewarmed PBS (37 °C) (Gibco) using the plastic tubing from an intravascular catheter (BD) mounted onto a 50 ml syringe (B. Braun). The organoid solution was injected with custom injection needles (33 gauge, 400 mm length, point style 4, 45° angle, Hamilton), a syringe (Hamilton) and a colonoscope with integrated working channel (Storz). The needle was brought into contact with colonic mucosa and 50 μl of organoid solution was quickly delivered to form a submucosal injection bubble. The mice were then monitored until the experimental or humane end point was reached.
Tail vein injection of AAV8
A 100 μl solution of 1 × 1011–2 × 1011 AAV viral genomes in sterile saline was loaded into a 1 ml syringe mounted with a 27 G needle. Mice were placed in a restraining device, and the tail was warmed with a red-light lamp to induce lateral tail-vein dilatation. The injection site was cleaned and disinfected using an alcohol swab, and then the AAV-containing solution was injected into the tail vein. The injections were performed 1 week before tumour inoculation for Plxnb2 overexpression, 2 weeks before or 5 days after tumour inoculation for Plxnb2 knockout, or 2 weeks after tumour inoculation for primary tumour experiments.
In vivo BLI
At 5 min before imaging, mice were injected intraperitoneally with luciferin substrate (d-luciferin, 150 mg per kg body weight in 0.15 ml PBS). During imaging on the Lumina S5 In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS, PerkinElmer), mice were anaesthetized with isoflurane and kept warm on a heated stage.
In vivo CRISPR-a screen
Library cloning
sgRNA sequences for dCas9-SPH-mediated OE were retrieved from the Caprano library55 and obtained as oPool from Integrated DNA Technologies with Gecko flanking sequences56. Three sgRNAs were selected per target from the Caprano Set A, for a total of 897 sgRNAs targeting 299 genes. One hundred safe-targeting sgRNAs11 were also included. The library (Supplementary Table 1) was cloned into the transposon vector PT4-CMV-GFP (Addgene, 117046) and amplified as described previously56. In brief, oPools were resuspended to 1 μg μl−1 in water and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C, then amplified by PCR (a list of the primer sequences is provided in Supplementary Table 3): 1 μl library (1 ng μl−1) was mixed with 12.5 μl NebNext MasterMix, 1.25 μl oligo reverse primer (10 μM), 1.25 μl oligo forward primer (10 μM) and 9 μl water and incubated in a thermocycler (98 °C for 30 s; 20 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 63 °C for 10 s, 72 °C for 12 s; then 72 °C for 2 min). The PCR products were purified using the Qiagen QIAquick PCR Purification Kit, eluted in 30 μl buffer EB (Qiagen) and separated on a 2% agarose gel in Tris-borate EDTA (TBE) buffer with SybrSafe Dye. The transposon vector was digested overnight with the Bsmb-v2 enzyme and run on a 2% agarose gel in TBE buffer with SybrSafe Dye. The 150 bp sgRNA amplicon and the digested vector band (missing 1,000 bp filler) were excised and gel-extracted using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit. Both the vector and insert were processed for isopropanol purification by incubating 50 μl eluted DNA with 50 μl isopropanol, 0.5 μl GlycoBlue Coprecipitant and 0.4 μl 5 M NaCl. The reactions were vortexed and incubated at room temperature for 15 min, before centrifugation at 16,000g for 15 min at room temperature. The precipitate was washed twice with 1 ml ice-cold 80% ethanol and air-dried for 1 min before resuspension in 10 μl water. The DNA concentration was measured using the NanoDrop system. The Gibson assembly reaction mix containing 10 μl MasterMix, 330 ng vector, 50 ng insert and water to 20 μl was incubated at 50 °C for 1 h. After a second isopropanol precipitation, the cloned transposon libraries were resuspended in 5 μl Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer and incubated at 55 °C for 10 min. The DNA concentration was measured using the NanoDrop system.
Library amplification
Escherichia coli electrocompetent bacteria (E. cloni; Biosearch Technologies) were thawed on ice for 20 min before addition of 1 μl of Gibson reaction and electroporation (1,800 V) in a MicroPulser Electroporator (Bio-Rad). A total of 975 μl of prewarmed recovery medium was added and the bacteria were incubated 37 °C at 250 rpm for 1 h. Bacteria were plated onto prewarmed 30 cm2 square agar plates with ampicillin and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The plates were scraped with 30–50 ml Luria–Bertani broth and plasmids were purified using the endotoxin-free MaxiPrep kit (Macherey-Nagel). Precipitated DNA was resuspended in 1 ml water and the concentration was measured using the NanoDrop system. pCMV(CAT)T7-SB100 (Addgene, 34879) was amplified in competent E. coli under chloramphenicol selection and purified using the Endotoxin-Free MaxiPrep kit (Macherey-Nagel).
Library delivery to mouse liver and tumour inoculation
The sgRNA transposon plasmid libraries (150 μg) and SB100X-encoding plasmids (50 μg) were co-injected hydrodynamically into Alb-cre;dCas9-SPH mice or littermate controls lacking Alb-cre. Then, 1 week later, dissociated AKPSsLP-mCherry organoids were inoculated by intrasplenic injection, followed by splenectomy. Metastases were allowed to grow for 2 weeks, during which several (10–100) small metastases (0.5–1.5 mm) formed.
Isolation of metastasis-distal and metastasis-proximal hepatocytes
Mice were euthanized by raising the CO2 concentrations, then the abdomen was opened and a G22 cannula was inserted into the inferior vena cava. The liver was perfused with 20 ml Hanks buffer (0.5 mM EDTA and 25 mM HEPES in HBSS) followed by 15 ml digestion buffer (15 mM HEPES and 32 μg ml−1 liberase (Roche) in low-glucose DMEM). After initial swelling of the liver, the portal vein was cut to allow outflow. After perfusion, the gallbladder was removed and the liver was transferred to a Petri dish with 10 ml digestion buffer and squished with a cell scraper to release the hepatocytes. Liberase was inactivated by adding 10 ml isolation buffer (10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in low-glucose DMEM). The cell suspension was filtered through a 100 μm cell strainer and centrifuged at 50g for 2 min. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was washed again twice with 20 ml isolation buffer. Cells were resuspended in 2 ml FACS buffer (2 mM EDTA, 0.5% BSA in PBS) and stained with Zombie Violet (1:500) (BioLegend, 423113), TruStain FcX (anti-mouse CD16/32) antibody (BioLegend, 101320, 1:50), PE/Cy7 anti-mouse CD31 (BioLegend, 102418, 1:300) and BV570 anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, 103135, 1:300) for 25 min at 4 °C. Cells were washed and filtered through a 70 μm strainer. CD45−CD31− hepatocytes that contained a sgRNA (GFP+), were divided into metastasis-proximal (mCherry+) and metastasis-distal (mCherry−) by drawing different sorting gates on an AriaIII sorter (BD Biosciences) with 100 μm nozzle (the gating strategy is shown in the Supplementary Information). Cells were collected in PBS, centrifuged at 800g for 5 min and the pellet was stored at −20 °C.
Genomic DNA extraction and targeted guide amplification and sequencing
Genomic DNA extraction was performed as described in the ‘Isolation of genomic DNA with NucleoSpin Blood Kits and PCR pre-check’ protocol of the Broad Institute’s Genetic Perturbation Platform. In brief, the pellet was equilibrated at room temperature, resuspended in 200 μl PBS and incubated with proteinase K and lysis buffer mixture at 70 °C overnight. Then, 1 μl RNase A was added for 5 min at room temperature, followed by column purification using the NucleoSpin Blood Mini Kit (Macherey Nagel). DNA was eluted in 25 μl elution buffer (prewarmed at 70 °C), incubating on column for 5 min before centrifugation, then the concentration was measured using the NanoDrop system. sgRNAs were target amplified from both post-injection libraries and the plasmid library using an equimolar mixture of staggered P5 primers and P7 primers with sample-specific barcode (the sequences are provided in Supplementary Table 3) under the following conditions: 10 μl titanium buffer, 8 μl dNTPs, 5 μl DMSO, 0.5 μl P5 primer mix (100 μM), 40 μl water, 1.5 μl Titanium Taq polymerase, 25 μl DNA (maximum, 10 μg), 10 μl P7 primer (5 μM). The reactions were incubated in a thermocycler with the following programme: 95 °C for 5 min; 28 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 20 s; and 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products from different samples were pooled according to the number of reads required to ensure 200–1,000 reads per sorted cell. After 1× SPRIselect bead (Beckman Coulter, B23319) purification, PCR products were eluted in 50 μl TE buffer. The quality and quantity of libraries were assessed using the dsDNA high-sensitivity kit (Life Technologies, Q32854) on the Qubit 4 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and using the high-sensitivity D1000 reagents and tapes (Agilent, 5067-5585, 5067-5584) on the TapeStation 4200 or Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) system. Libraries were sequenced using the NextSeq kit (Illumina) with 75 bp single-end read chemistry and 9 bp index read, adding 10% PhiX spike-in (Illumina).
Replicates and coverage
The procedure outlined above (from cloning to sequencing) was repeated independently three times (three batches). In summary, the sgRNA coverage (that is, the number of sorted cells/997 sgRNAs) added up to a total of 1,000× for Alb-cre;dCas9-SPH mice (n = 7) and 500× for non-Cre littermate controls (n = 5).
Analysis
FASTQ files were demultiplexed using Bcl2fastq v.2.20.0.422 (Illumina) and adaptors were trimmed with cutadapt57 using the following parameters (-g CACCG and -a GTTTT). The sequences were aligned to the sgRNA library using Bowtie258,59. sgRNAs were counted using the MAGeCK count function (--norm-method total)60,61. sgRNA enrichment was calculated using the MAGeCK paired test function. Metastasis-proximal and metastasis-distal libraries from the same mouse were considered as paired samples. As sgRNAs in paired samples are considered to be independent sgRNAs (3 sgRNAs in 7 mice are thus considered to be 21 independent sgRNAs), paired testing yields consistent effects between paired replicates. This analysis was repeated for the individual library batches. The paired function was not used to compare perturbation enrichment in Alb-cre;dCas9-SPH versus non-Cre littermates, as an equal number of samples is required. Instead, sgRNA counts were added up from all Alb-cre;dCas9-SPH and non-Cre mice and then the standard MAGeCK RRA test function was applied. Results were visualized using MAGeCKFlute60 and ggplot262.
Spatial transcriptomics of human CRC liver metastases
Visium library preparation
A sample of human CRC hepatic metastasis (CB522586, 44 year old, male) with clear tumour-liver borders was selected from a commercial biobank (Origene). Non-consecutive sections were cut with a thickness of 10 μm and placed onto two capture areas of the 10x Visium Spatial Gene expression slide using the cryostat (Leica, CM3050S). The tissue optimization kit was used to determine the permeabilization times (24 min), and cDNA libraries were generated according to the manufacturer’s instructions (10x Genomics). The quality and quantity of libraries were assessed using the dsDNA high-sensitivity kit (Life Technologies, Q32854) on the Qubit 4 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the high-sensitivity D1000 reagents and tapes (Agilent, 5067-5585, 5067-5584) on the TapeStation 4200 (Agilent Technologies) system. Paired-end sequencing was performed for all of the libraries (read 1:28 bp; index read: 10 bp; read 2: 82 bp) on the NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina) system using NovaSeq SP Reagent Kits (100 cycles).
Data analysis
Binary base call (BCL) files were demultiplexed using Bcl2fastq v.2.20.0.422 (Illumina) and preprocessed using Space Ranger (v.1.1.0 or v.1.2.0; 10x Genomics). Spot transcriptomes were deconvoluted with Spotlight63 using published scRNA-seq data as reference. Specifically, two datasets of primary CRC18 and liver tumour microenvironment19 were integrated using the Seurat integration method64. Edge spot selection was performed using the CellSelector function in Seurat, and the FindMarkers function was used for differential gene expression analysis of metastasis proximal versus distal and metastasis core versus centre. NicheNet65 was used to predict LR interactions at the metastatic leading edge (503 possible interactions). The ligand activity analysis from NicheNet was used to estimate the potential of these interactions to regulate differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between metastasis edge and core, yielding 109 LR pairs with regulatory potential. These were then intersected with SRFs (top and bottom decile of the screen, 62 factors).
Cross-validation with human and transcriptional mutational data
Interactors of liver-metastasis-specific mutations
The Genomic Features of Organotropism dataset20 was used to extract genes with mutations more frequently occurring in liver metastases as compared to primary tumours. This set of genes was then parsed with CellPhoneDB (v.3)66, CellTalkDB67 and NicheNet65 to filter for ligand and receptors and compile a list of their known interactors. The obtained interactors were then filtered for expression by hepatocytes according to the Human Protein Atlas (v.22.0; https://www.proteinatlas.org/)68. Specifically, we filtered out genes with transcript per million (TPM) ≤ 0.5 in the RNA GTEx tissue gene data, normalized TPM ≤ 0.5 in the RNA single-cell data (v.22.0 https://www.proteinatlas.org/humanproteome/single+cell+type) and ‘not detected’ in the normal tissue data (v.22.0; https://www.proteinatlas.org/; Ensembl v.103.38). The data used for the analyses described in this Article were obtained from the GTEx Portal on 30 May 2022 and/or dbGaP phs000424 on 30 May 2022. The interactors of LRs frequently mutated in liver metastases were then intersected with SRFs.
Interactors of liver-metastasis-specific DEGs
Two published datasets of primary CRC tumours and matched liver metastases21,22 were downloaded and imported into Seurat. Tumour cells were subsetted on the basis of EPCAM expression, then DEGs were calculated between liver metastases and primary CRC using the FindMarker function in Seurat. DEGs were parsed using CellPhoneDB (v.3)66, CellTalkDB67 and NicheNet65 to filter for ligand and receptors and compile a list of their known interactors, which were intersected with SRFs (top and bottom decile, 62 factors).
Organoid culture and modification
Mouse CRC organoid culture
Vil-creERT2;APCfl/fl;Trp53fl/fl;KrasG12D/WTSmad4KO (AKPS) and Vil-creERT2;APCfl/fl;Trp53fl/fl;KrasG12D/WTTgfbr2flox/floxAkt1myristoilated (APTAK) organoids were cultured in 50 μl Matrigel domes (Corning) as described previously69. To make complete medium, Advanced DMEM/F12 (Life Technologies) was supplemented with 10 mM HEPES (Life Technologies), 2 mM l-glutamine (Life Technologies), 100 mg ml−1 penicillin–streptomycin (1%), 1× B27 supplement (Life Technologies), 1× N2 supplement (Life Technologies) and 1 mM N-acetylcysteine (Sigma-Aldrich). Organoids were split every 3–5 days by mechanical dissociation. Splitting was always performed on the day before intrasplenic injection and 36 hours prior to orthotopic inoculation.
RNP-mediated Smad4 KO
Vil-creERT2;APCfl/fl;Trp53fl/fl;KrasG12D/WT mice were obtained from Owen Sansom (Beatson Institute for Cancer Research) and cultured under the above described conditions with supplementation of 100 ng ml−1 mouse recombinant noggin (LuBioScience, 250-38-250). Four domes of organoids were treated with 5 mM nicotinamide for 2–3 days before transfection. sgRNAs comprising both crRNA and tracrRNA sequences were obtained from IDT (Alt-R system). Targeting sequences were obtained from a previous study70. Organoids were collected, washed of Matrigel, and dissociated into single cells by incubation at 37 °C for 10 min in 1 ml prewarmed TrypLE Express Enzyme (Gibco). Cells were centrifuged at 190g for 3 min, resuspended in 1 ml complete medium with 5 mM nicotinamide and 10 µM Y-27632 dihydrochloride (Rock inhibitor) (StemCell, 72304), and seeded into two wells of a 48-well plate. Transfection was performed using the CRISPRmax kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In brief, 25 μl OPTImem supplemented with 1,250 ng Cas9 nuclease V3 (1081058), 240 ng sgRNA and 2.5 μl Cas9 Reagent Plus was mixed with 25 ml OPTImem with 1.5 μl CRISPRmax reagent, incubated for 10 min and added to each well. The cells were spinoculated for 1 h at 600g at 32 °C, then incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. Cells were then collected, resuspended in Matrigel and plated in complete medium supplemented with Rock inhibitor. Then, 3 days later, selection was started by adding medium supplemented with 10 ng ml−1 TGFβ (Peprotech, 100-21C-10UG) and lacking noggin. Selection was continued for 3 passages, then TGFβ was removed from the medium. Successful editing was confirmed by T7 endonuclease assay. Primers asymmetrically flanking the cut site were designed so as to yield fragments distinguishable by electrophoresis. Organoid DNA was extracted using the QuickExtract DNA Extraction Solution (Lucigen) and then PCR amplified. The PCR reaction mix consisted of 10 μl Q5 master mix, 6 μl H2O, 2 μl primer mix and 2 μl DNA. Then, 10 μl PCR products was mixed with 1.5 μl 10× NEB buffer 2 and 1.5 μl H2O and incubated in a thermocycler as follows: 10 min at 95 °C; from 95 °C to 85 °C with a ramp rate of −2 °C s−1; from 85 °C to 25 °C with a ramp rate of −0.3 °C s−1. Formed heteroduplexes were incubated with 2 μl T7 mix (10 μl NEBuffer 2, 10 μl T7 and 80 μl H2O) at 37 °C for 1 h. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 1 μl of 0.5 M EDTA. The samples were analysed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel. Abrogation of SMAD4 signalling was further confirmed by the loss of Id3 expression, as assessed using quantitative PCR with reverse transcription (RT–qPCR).
Integration of the sLP-mCherry labelling system
The pcPPT-mPGK-attR-sLP-mCherry-WPRE vector was obtained from Ximbio and lentiviruses were generated according to a published protocol71. In brief, HEK293T cells were cultured on poly-d-lysine-coated plates and transfected with 4.4 μg PAX2, 1.5 μg VSV-G and 5.9 μg lentiviral vector with JetOptimus reagents. The supernatant was collected after 2 days, centrifuged 5 min at 500g and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. Then, 4 domes of AKPS organoids were washed from Matrigel and dissociated into single cells by incubating them for 10 min in 1 ml prewarmed TripLE at 37 °C. Cells were centrifuged at 190g for 3 min, then resuspended in 2 ml infection medium containing 1.8 ml virus, 200 μl complete medium, 5 mM nicotinamide, 1.6 μl polybrene and 2 μl Rock inhibitor. The cells were plated into two wells of a 48-well plate and spinoculated for 1 h at 600g at 32 °C, then incubated 4 h at 37 °C. Cells were then collected, resuspended in Matrigel and plated into complete medium supplemented with Rock inhibitor. Then, 3 days later, the organoids were dissociated into single cells and mCherry+ cells were isolated by FACS using an the Aria III sorter (BD Biosciences). Organoids were further selected with 2 μg ml−1 puromycin for a week.
Integration of the luciferase reporter for BLI
To generate the pLVX-fireflyLuc-IRES-zsGreen1 vector, the protein coding sequence of firefly luciferase was amplified from an in-house plasmid, and cloned into EcoRI/BamHI-linearized pLVX-IRES-zsGreen1 (Takara) by InFusion (InF-fireflyLuc-F: TATTTCCGGTGAATTCCACCATGGAAGACGCCAAAAAC and -R: GAGAGGGGCGGGATCCTTACACGGCGATCTTTCCGCC). Sanger (Microsynth) and whole-plasmid (PlasmidSaurus) sequencing confirmed the identity of the construct and the absence of unwanted mutations. Lentiviral preparation and transduction of organoids was conducted as described above. Successfully transduced organoids were selected by FACS on the basis of GFP fluorescence and gating for live cells.
shRNA-mediated semaphorin KD
The sequences of shRNAs targeting Sema4a, Sema4c, Sema4d and Sema4g were obtained from The RNAi Consortium shRNA Library (Broad Institute) and cloned in an arrayed manner in a lentiviral vector expressing GFP as a selection marker based on a published plasmid backbone72. The EV control expressed a puromycin-resistance cassette for selection. Sanger (Microsynth) and whole-plasmid (PlasmidSaurus) sequencing confirmed the identity of each construct and the absence of unwanted mutations. Lentiviral preparation and transduction of organoids was conducted as described above. Organoids transduced with shRNAs targeting semaphorins were dissociated into single cells, incubated with Zombie Violet (1:500, BioLegend, 423113) and selected by FACS based on GFP fluorescence and gating for live cells. AKPS organoids transduced with the EV were also dissociated into single cells and subjected to sorting (only live-cell gate), and then selected by puromycin as described above. Semaphorin knockdown was assessed using RT–qPCR. For competitive seeding assays, AKPSSema4KD and AKPSEV organoids were grown separately and then mixed at a 1:1 ratio and mechanically dissociated for intrasplenic injection. A small fraction of the injection mix was seeded in three domes to estimate the injection ratios.
enAsCas12a-mediated KO of class IV semaphorins
AKPSSema4KO organoids were generated using enAsCas12a technology73,74. sgRNAs targeting Sema4a, Sema4c, Sema4d and Sema4g were obtained using the guide design tool CRISPick74,75 with the mouse GRCm38 reference genome and enAsCas12a CRISPRko mode. Two high-scoring sgRNAs (on-target efficacy score > 0.75) targeting different exons for each semaphorin were combined into an 8-mer pre-crRNA array (Sema4KO array). The Sema4KO array was cloned into a in a lentiviral vector expressed under the CMV promoter together with GFP and puromycin (pLVX-EF1a-EGFP-2A-Puro-Triplex-Sema4KO-array-WPRE)73. Lentiviral preparation and transduction of organoids was conducted as described above. AKPSSema4KO organoids were generated by co-transduction of pLVX-enAsCas12a-BSD (pRDA174, Addgene, 136476)74 and pLVX-EF1a-EGFP-2A-Puro-Triplex-Sema4KO-array-WPRE, and selected with 5 μg ml−1 blasticidin and 2 μg ml−1 puromycin for 7 days. Control organoids were transduced with pLVX-enAsCas12a and selected with 5 μg ml−1 blasticidin. GFP expression was confirmed by microscopy, then clonal lines were generated by single-cell picking, and screened for indels by next-generation-sequencing-based amplicon sequencing. For immunofluorescence staining of class IV semaphorins, organoids were seeded in Matrigel on eight-well chambers (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Then, 3 days after, the medium was removed from the wells and organoids were fixed with 400 μl 4% PFA for 20 min at room temperature. After washing twice with 400 μl 3% BSA in PBS, the organoids were permeabilized for 20 min at room temperature in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS. The organoids were incubated with mouse anti-SEMA4A (BioLegend, 148402), rat anti-SEMA4C-AF647 (Biotechne, FAB8497R), rat anti-SEMA4D-PE (BioLegend, 147603) and rabbit anti-SEMA4G (Thermo Fisher Scientific, BS-11479R) overnight in 1% BSA, 0.2% Trizol and 0.05% Tween-20. After washing three times with working solution, the organoids were incubated 1 h at room temperature with anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 405 and anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 647 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:400, in working solution). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, 1:1,000).
Patient-derived CRC organoids
Human CRC organoids were obtained from the Visceral Surgery Research Laboratory at the University of Basel. Tissues from primary and liver metastases of patients with CRC were obtained from the University Hospital Basel after patient consent and ethical approval (Ethics Committee of Basel, EKBB, 2019-00816). To generate PDOs, tissue was cut into small pieces and, subsequently, enzymatically digested in 5 ml advanced DMEM/F-12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 12634028) containing 2.5 mg ml−1 collagenase IV (Worthington, LS004189), 0.1 mg ml−1 DNase IV (Sigma-Aldrich, D5025), 20 μg ml−1 hyaluronidase V (Sigma-Aldrich, H6254), 1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, A3059) and 10 μM LY27632 (Abmole Bioscience, M1817) for 1 h and 30 min at 37 °C under slow rotation and vigorous pipetting every 15 min. The tissue lysate was filtered through a 100 μM cell strainer and centrifuged at 300g for 10 min. The cell pellet was resuspended with growth-factor-reduced Matrigel (Corning, 356231), plated into 50 μl domes and overlaid with medium composed of advanced DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 10 mM HEPES (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 15630056), 100 μg ml−1 penicillin–streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 10378-016), 1× GlutaMax (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 9149793), 100 μg ml−1 primocin (invivoGen, ant-pm-1), 1× B27 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 17504044), 1.25 mM N-acetylcysteine (Sigma-Aldrich, A9165-25G), 10 mM nicotinamide (Sigma-Aldrich, N0636), 500 ng ml−1 R-spondin (EPFL SV PTPSP), 100 ng ml−1 noggin ((EPFL SV PTPSP), 50 ng ml−1 EGF (PeproTech, AF-100-15), 500 nM A83-01 (R&D Systems, 2939), 10 µM SB202190 (Sigma-Aldrich, S7076), 10 nM prostaglandin E2 (Tocris Bioscience, 2296), 10 nM gastrin (Sigma-Aldrich, G9145) and 10 µM Y-27632 dihydrochloride. The medium was changed every 3 days, and the organoids were passaged using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Life Technologies, 25200-056).
Cell lines
Mouse immortalized hepatocytes
AML12 cells were obtained from ATCC (CRL-2254) and cultured in DMEM:F12 Medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS, 10 µg ml−1 insulin, 5.5 µg ml−1 transferrin, 5 ng ml−1 selenium, 40 ng ml−1 dexamethasone and 1% penicillin–streptomycin.
Human immortalized hepatocytes
PTA-5565 cells (ATCC) stably labelled by H2B–mCherry were obtained from the Bentires-Alj laboratory (University of Basel) and cultured in William’s E Medium supplemented with 1% GlutaMax (Gibco), 5% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin.
KPC cells
Ptf1a-Cre;KrasG12D/+;Trp53flox/+ (KPC) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells (B6J syngeneic) were donated by I. Guccini and cultured in 2D cultures in DMEM:F12 supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. Cells were split every 3–5 days and on the day before surgery. Before intrasplenic injection, KPC cells were detached from culture flasks with 1 mM EDTA.
Melanoma cells
The Tyr-CreER;BrafCA;Ptenlox/lox (D4M-3A) B6 mouse melanoma line was generated previously76, obtained from Merck Millipore and cultured in Advanced DMEM:F12 supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin and 1× GlutaMax (Gibco).
All of the cell lines were tested for mycoplasma, no cell lines were authenticated.
In vitro assays
Arrayed screen with primary hepatocytes or AML12 cells
Plates (96 or 384 well) were coated with the Collagen-I Cell Culture Surface Coating Kit (ScienCell Research Laboratories) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primary mouse hepatocytes from Alb-cre;dCas9-SPH mice were isolated by perfusion as described above. After two washes in isolation buffer, the hepatocyte pellet was further purified by density separation according to a published protocol77. In brief, the pellet was resuspended in 10 ml isolation buffer and 10 ml Percoll solution (9 ml Percoll, 1 ml 10× PBS), then mixed thoroughly by inverting the tube several times. After centrifugation at 200g for 10 min at 4 °C, the hepatocytes were resuspended in isolation medium (supplemented with 1% penicillin–streptomycin) and plated at high density (15,000 hepatocytes per well in 96-well plates, 5,000 hepatocytes per well in 384-well plates). The same plating density was used for AML12dCas9-SPH cells, which were generated introducing doxycycline-inducible dCas9-SPH into the Rosa26 safe-harbour by recombinase-mediated cassette exchange78,79 and kept in culture with 2 μg ml−1 doxycycline. The next day, primary Alb-cre;dCas9-SPH hepatocytes or AML12-SPH were transfected with SB100X and transposon vectors harbouring sgRNAs against selected gene targets using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For every target, three sgRNAs were independently cloned and amplified into transposon vectors, and then pooled before transfection. Three wells were transfected for each target, and three wells were left untransfected. The next day, the transfection efficiency was estimated on the basis of GFP fluorescence. AKPSsLP-mCherry organoids were dissociated into single cells as described above, then 50 cells were seeded per well. After 5 days, colony formation was assessed by microscopy.
Stable OE of Plxnb2
AML12dCas9-SPH were treated for a week with 2 μg ml−1 doxycycline and then transfected with SB100X and a pool of three PT4-U6-sgRNA-CMV-GFP transposon vectors targeting Plxnb2, or sgNT, using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). On the next day, cells were sorted for GFP+ fluorescence on the Aria III sorter (BD Biosciences) with a 70 μm nozzle and used for CFU assays as described above. Plxnb2 upregulation was assessed by RT–qPCR. To generate the pLVX-VSV-mmPLXNB2-IRES-Blast vector, the mouse Plxnb2 coding sequence was amplified from pmPB2-VSV (Roland Friedel, Addgene, 68038) and cloned into a BamHI/EcoRI-linearized and engineered pLVX-backbone (Takara), bearing BlasticidinR, by InFusion (Takara; InF-VSV-Plxnb2-F: TATTTCCGGTGAATTCACCATGTGGGTGACCAAACT and -R: GAGAGGGGCGGGATCTCAGAGGTCTGTAACCTTATTCTCA). Lentiviruses were generated as described above and used to transduce AML12 cells. The correct membrane localization was assessed by immunofluorescence with rabbit anti-VSV-G antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA1-29903). VSV-G+ cells were selected by FACS. Plexin B2 upregulation was assessed by flow cytometry using mouse anti-plexin-B2-PE (BioLegend, 145903).
Treatment with recombinant mouse and human plexin B2
Recombinant human plexin B2 (5329-PB-050, Biotechne) and mouse plexin B2 (6836-PB-050, Biotechne) were reconstituted at 100 μg ml−1 in PBS. Human or mouse organoids were dissociated into single cells as described above, mixed with recombinant plexin B2 in growth medium, then seeded into 384-well plates at a density of 50 cells per well, in the absence or presence of 5,000 human or mouse hepatocytes. Colony formation was scored by microscopy. Where indicated, cultures were supplemented with 50 μM RAC1 inhibitor NSC23766 or 1 ng μl−1 anti-plexin B2 monoclonal antibody (67265-1, Proteogenic). The EdU-incorporation assay was performed using the Click-iT EdU Cell Proliferation Kit for Imaging, Alexa Fluor 647 dye (Invitrogen). In brief, 3 days after treatment of PDOs with rhPlexin B2, half of the culture medium was removed and replaced with 2× EdU-containing medium for 1 h, then the manufacturer’s instructions were followed.
Treatment with KLF4 inhibitor
AKPS organoids were seeded as single cells into 384-well plates in the presence of the KLF4 inhibitor WX2-43 (10 μM, Aobious). Then, 4 days later, colonies were fixed in 4% PFA, blocked and stained overnight with rabbit anti-Ki-67 (Abcam, ab15580). After washing, wells were incubated with anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 594 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), F-actin was stained with Alexa Fluor 647 Phalloidin (1:400, Invitrogen, A22287) and nuclei with DAPI.
Generation of AAVs
Three sgRNA sequences for dCas9-SPH-mediated OE of Plxnb2 were obtained from the Caprano library55, four sgRNA sequences for Cas9-mediated knockout (KO) and two control non-targeting sgRNA were obtained from the Brie library80. A list of the sequences is provided in Supplementary Tables 1 and 3. Each guide was cloned into U6-sgRNA-EF1a-eGFP (Addgene, 117046) vector and amplified using the Maxi prep kit (Macherey-Nagel). To generate the AAV-mmALBpr-Cre-2A-moxGFP vector, the mouse Alb promoter was amplified from pALB-GFP (S. Thorgeirsson, Addgene, 55759) and cloned by InFusion (Takara; InF-mmAlb-F: CTGCGGCCGCACGCGTCTAGCTTCCTTAGCATGACGTTCCA and -R: GCATGGTGGCACCGGTGGGGTTGATAGGAAAGGTGATCTGT) into an AAV8 backbone, provided by A. Santinha (Platt laboratory, ETHZ-BSSE). GFP was replaced by PCR-out and InFusion with moxGFP (E. Snapp, Addgene, 68072; InF-noATG-moxGFP-F: AGGAGGTAGCGGATCCGTGTCCAAGGGCGAGGAG and R: TAGCGCTCGGTATCGATTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCC). AAVs were generated and purified according to a slightly modified version of the AddGene protocols ‘AAV Production in HEK293T Cells’ and ‘AAV Purification by Iodixanol Gradient Ultracentrifugation’. In brief, 250 million HEK293T cells were seeded in a Five Chambers Cell-Stack (Corning). Then, 24 h later, the vectors were pooled and co-transfected with pAdH helper plasmid and pAAV2/8 capsid (Addgene, 112864) using polyethylenimine (PEI). After viral genome production and purification, total viral genomes were quantified using digital droplet PCR according to the Addgene protocol ‘ddPCR Titration of AAV Vectors’. AAVs were injected into the tail vein as described above.
Immunofluorescence
Formalin-fixed and embedded tissues
Livers were perfused with PBS, then the medial lobe was fixed with 4% PFA in PBS for 48 h, followed by 48 h PBS incubation and storage in 75% ethanol. Dehydration, formalin embedding and H&E staining were performed by the histology core facility of the University of Basel. Sections (5 μm) were deparaffinized with descending alcohol series and subjected to heat-induced epitope retrieval in 2.4 mM sodium citrate and 1.6 mM citric acid, pH 6, for 25 min in a steamer. Sections were washed with PBST (0.1% Tween-20 in PBS) and blocked for 1 h at room temperature in blocking buffer (5% BSA, 5% heat-inactivated normal goat serum in PBST). Sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies (1:100, in blocking buffer): anti-CD146 (Abcam, ab75769), anti-α-SMA (Abcam, ab5694), anti-periostin (Abcam, ab227049) and anti-GFP (Aves Labs, GFP-1020). Sections were repeatedly washed in PBST and incubated with the following secondary antibodies (1:400, in blocking buffer) for 1 h at room temperature: AlexaFluor goat anti-rabbit 594 (A-11012), AlexaFluor goat anti-rabbit 647 (A-21244), Alexa Fluor goat anti-chicken 647 (A32933), all from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, 1:1,000) in blocking buffer for 15 min at room temperature. The sections were mounted with ProLong Gold (P36930, Invitrogen) and imaged on the Leica THUNDER Imager 3D Cell Imaging system, equipped with the Leica LED8 Light engine, Leica DFC9000 GTC sCMOS camera and the following filter sets: filter cube CYR71010 (excitation: 436/28, 506/21, 578/24, 730/40; dichroic: 459, 523, 598, 763; emission: 473/22, 539/24, 641/78, 810/80); filter cube DFT51010 (excitation: 391/32, 479/33, 554/24, 638/31; dichroic: 415, 500, 572, 660; emission: 435/30, 519/25, 594/32, 695/58) and extra emission filters (460/80, 535/70, 590/50, 642/80, 100%).
Fixed frozen tissue
After liver perfusion with PBS, the left lobe was incubated in 4% PFA at 4 °C for 1 h, then in 30% sucrose in PBS overnight at 4 °C and then embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT Compound (Sakura, 4583) for cryosectioning. Sections (8 μm) were washed three times, blocked and stained as described above with the following primary and secondary antibodies: anti-glutamine synthetase (1:100, BioLegend 856201), anti-plexin-B2-PE (1:500, BioLegend, 145903), anti-GFP-AlexaFluor-488 (1:200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21311), anti-ZEB1 (1:400, Novus, NBP1-05987), anti-α-SMA (1:1,000, Sigma-Aldrich, A2547), anti-CD146 (Abcam, ab75769), anti-E-cadherin (Biotechne, AF748), anti-EPCAM (Abcam 2884975), anti-GRHL2 (Abcam, ab271023), anti-KLF4 (Biotechne, AF3158), anti-ELF3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA5-120996) and anti-Sema4A (BioLegend, 148402). DAPI counterstain, mounting and imaging was performed as described above. F-actin was stained by incubating blocked slides for 2 h at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 647 Phalloidin (1:400, Invitrogen, A22287).
Multiplexed immunofluorescence and quantification
Multiplexed immunofluorescence was performed on the Comet instrument (Lunaphore) with the following antibodies: anti-cleaved caspase 3 (Cell Signaling, 9661), anti-CD68 (Abcam, ab125212), anti-CD4 (Abcam, ab183685), anti-Ki-67 (Abcam, ab15580), anti-E-cadherin (Cell Signaling, 3195), anti-α-SMA (1:1,000, Sigma-Aldrich, A2547), anti-CD146 (Abcam, ab75769). The fields of view (FOVs) containing individual liver metastases were cropped and saved using the HORIZON software (Lunaphore). Each condition (sgNT or sgPlxnb2 OE) had a minimum of five FOVs representing five different lesions taken from two mice. The individual FOVs were analysed in FIJI. In brief, each channel was thresholded manually, followed by application of a median filter for signal smoothing and filling of holes. Each image was overlaid with its corresponding thresholded image to verify the accuracy of the thresholding. The region corresponding to tumour within a FOV was demarcated as a ROI and the area covered by a specific antibody signal was quantified as the number of pixels within the thresholded image with respect to the total number of pixels within the ROI. For quantification of dividing tumour cells, signals from both Ki-67 and ECAD were used: the overlap between the two signals was calculated, then the area of dividing tumour cells was determined as Ki-67+ pixels within the overlap area over the area occupied by the nuclei of all cells (calculated using DAPI as a marker).
Organoids
After fixation in 4% PFA at 4 °C for 2 h, and blocking in 5% BSA-PBS solution with 0.2% Triton X-100, the samples were stained with primary (overnight) and secondary antibodies (4 h) (anti-ZEB1 (1:400, Novus, NBP1-05987), anti-E-cadherin (1:200, BD Biosciences, 610181)) and DAPI counterstain, and mounted in 3% low-melting-point agarose in glass-bottom plates and then imaged.
Quantification of metastatic foci and lesion area
H&E sections were imaged on the Leica DMi8 inverted microscope, equipped with a FLEXACAM C1 12 MP CMOS camera and analysed using QuPath software81. Whole-tissue area and single-liver metastases were manually isolated, producing a measure for whole-section area, metastatic area (μm2) and metastasis number per section. Two non-consecutive sections quantified per animal, and a mean was calculated for the number of metastatic foci per liver section.
In situ hybridization
Single-molecule in situ hybridization
Custom DNA smFISH probes for Plxnb2 were designed in house and synthesized by Biosearch Technologies containing a 3′ amine reactive group (a list of probes is provided in Supplementary Table 3). All of the probes were pooled and labelled with AlexaFluor 594 dye according to a previously published protocol82. Mouse tissues were collected and fixed with 4% PFA in PBS for 3 h followed by overnight incubations in 30% sucrose, 4% PFA in PBS at 4 °C. Fixed tissues were embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT Compound (Sakura, 4583). Tissue sections (8 µm) were sectioned onto poly-l-lysine-coated coverslips, allowed to adhere by drying at room temperature for 10 min, followed by 15 min fixation in 4% PFA and overnight permeabilization in 70% ethanol. Probe hybridization was performed according to a previously published protocol82. Images were acquired using a ×63 oil-immersion objective with NA = 1.4 on the Leica THUNDER Imager 3D Cell Imaging system, equipped with a Leica LED8 Light engine and Leica DFC9000 GTC sCMOS camera. For quantification, 3–4× FOVs covering the entire width of the tissue were acquired for each sample and the images were processed using the Thunder deconvolution algorithm. Maximum-intensity projections of the processed images were rendered using ImageJ. Dot counting to determine the transcript numbers for each FOV was performed with FISHQuant83 using the automatic thresholding function and the cell number was determined by segmenting and counting the nuclei using CellPose84. Spot counting and nucleus numbers were manually verified to ensure correctness. The average number of spots per cell was then measured by dividing the number of spots within the FOV by the number of nuclei.
Multiplexed in situ hybridization (Molecular Cartography)
Probe design, sample preparation imaging and processing were conducted as previously described85. The analysis of the data, including cell segmentation, cell type annotation and portal versus central area annotation was described previously86. Visualizations were generated in ImageJ using genexyz Polylux tool plugin from Resolve BioSciences.
RT–qPCR
RNA extraction from fresh organoids, cells or liver tissue was performed using the Qiagen RNeasy purification kit. Then, 1 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed using the cDNA synthesis kit (Takara Bio) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Expression of genes of interest was quantified with primers listed in Supplementary Table 3, by RT–qPCR using the Applied Biosystems SYBR Green Kit monitored by the QuantStudio3 system (Applied Biosystems). The samples were analysed in technical triplicates and the average cycle threshold values were normalized to Gapdh using the ∆∆CT method87.
Bulk RNA-seq experiments and analysis
Library preparation
RNA was extracted as described above from the livers of Alb-cre;SPH mice 7 days after injection with AAV8-sgPlxnb2-OE-EF1a-eGFP or AAV8-sgNT-EF1a-eGFP, livers of B6 mice bearing AKPS colon tumours, and organoids. Libraries for bulk RNA-seq were prepared using the mcSCRB-seq protocol88 (organoids) or the Takara SMART-Seq Stranded Kit (634762, mouse livers). Libraries were quality-controlled using the dsDNA high-sensitivity kit (Life Technologies, Q32854) on the Qubit 4 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and using the high-sensitivity D1000 reagents and tapes (Agilent, 5067-5585, 5067-5584) on the TapeStation 4200 (Agilent Technologies) and sequenced on the NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina) system using the NovaSeq SP Reagent Kits (100 cycles).
Analysis
Reads were demultiplexed with Bcl2fastq v.2.20.0.422 (Illumina) and quality-checked with FastQC89. Adaptors were trimmed with cutadapt57. Data were processed using the zUMIs (v.2.9.4) platform to convert reads to count matrices per sample. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using edgeR90. GSEA was performed using the Bioconductor package fgsea with the default parameters on genes ranked by log[fold change]91. The Gene Ontology Biological Process and Hallmarks gene set collections from the Molecular Signatures Database were imported into R using the package msigdbr92. Cell type composition was estimated for significantly up- and downregulated genes in Enrichr93 using Tabula Muris94 as a reference (odds ratio test).
scRNA-seq
Library preparation
AKPS organoids were dissociated into single cells and incubated with 2 μg ml−1 rmPlexin B2 or vehicle in culture medium for 2 h at 37 °C. Cells were filtered, counted and loaded onto the GemCode Single-cell Instrument (10x Genomics). Libraries were generated according to the manufacturer’s instructions from the Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3′ end Reagent Kits v1.1 protocol. The quality and quantity of all of the libraries were assessed using the dsDNA high-sensitivity (HS) kit (Life Technologies, Q32854) on the Qubit 4 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and using the high-sensitivity D1000 reagents and tapes (Agilent, 5067-5585, 5067-5584) or high sensitivity D5000 reagents and tapes (Agilent, 5067-5593, 5067-5592) on the TapeStation 4200 system (Agilent Technologies). Paired-cell sequencing was performed for all libraries using the NovaSeq SP Reagent Kits (100 cycles).
Analysis
BCL files were demultiplexed using Bcl2fastq v.2.20.0.422 from Illumina, then single-cell count matrices were generated using Cell Ranger (v.5.0.0, 10x Genomics) with GRCm38 v.2020-A gene code. Datasets were integrated and processed using Seurat. Downstream analysis was conducted in R (v.4.1.0) using the Seurat (v.4.0.3197) package. The Seurat objects (rmPlexin B2-treated and control) were merged and cells with <100 or >2,500 detected genes were excluded. After log-normalization, the data were scaled regressing for mitochondrial reads, and principal component analysis was performed based on the 2,000 most variable features. Clustering and UMAP visualization were performed using ten principal components and a resolution of 0.2 for the shared nearest-neighbour clustering algorithm. Cluster markers were computed using the FindAllMarkers function, and GSEA was performed as described above. KLF4-target genes were obtained from the CHEA Transcription Factor Binding Site Profiles database95 and computed using the AddModuleScore function. EMT and MET signatures were obtained from the GO Biological Process dataset. A list of all signatures and gene sets is provided in Supplementary Table 3.
snRNA-seq and snATAC–seq
Nucleus extraction and library construction
Combined profiling of gene expression and chromatin accessibility was performed from fresh frozen OCT-embedded livers. For each sample (2 sgNT and 2 sgPlxnb2 OE livers), three 50 μm liver sections were transferred into a prechilled gentleMACS C-tube (Miltenyi) and homogenized in the gentleMACS Octo Dissociator with 2 ml nucleus extraction buffer (Miltenyi). The nucleus suspension was filtered through a 70 µm SmartStrainer into a DNA-low-binding 5 ml tube (Eppendorf) and centrifuged at 150g for 3 min, at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in 5 ml 1% BSA in PBS and strained through a 30 µm SmartStrainer into a new tube. After centrifugation, the pellet was washed again in 5 ml 1% BSA in PBS. Nuclei were resuspended in 500 µl 1% BSA in PBS, counted and visually inspected. 16,000 nuclei per sample were profiled using the Chromium Single Cell Multiome ATAC + Gene Expression kit (10x) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were quality controlled and sequenced as described above.
Analysis
BCL files were demultiplexed using Bcl2fastq v.2.20.0.422 from Illumina, then single-nucleus count matrices were generated using Cell Ranger Arc (10x Genomics) with GRCm38 v2020-A gene code. RNA and chromatin profiles of the four datasets were integrated with Signac96 (v.1.12.0) using the FindIntegrationAnchors function. Ambient RNA was removed with the decontX package97 (v.1.0.0), then cell types were annotated based on the RNA profile. Tumour cells were subsetted and DEGs were calculated using the FindMarker function, and GSEA was performed as described above. Chromatin peaks were called with the CallPeaks function, then differentially open peaks and motifs were identified using the AddPeaks, FindPeaks and FindMotifs functions.
Analysis of class IV semaphorins in human CRC
Protein atlas stainings
SEMA4A, SEMA4D, SEMA4C and SEMA4G antibody stainings were obtained from the Human Protein Atlas42 with the R package HPAanalyze98.
CNV analysis of class IV semaphorin genes
The CNV status of SEMA4A, SEMA4D, SEMA4C and SEMA4G in 290 patients with CRC was obtained from the TGCA-COAD dataset45.
Published scRNA-seq datasets
Preprocessed and annotated scRNA-seq profiles of epithelial cells in the KUL and Samsung dataset were obtained from the Synapse repository syn3494242843. scRNA-seq datasets of matched liver metastases and primary tumours were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession numbers GSE225857 (ref. 21) and GSE178318 (ref. 22), and imported into Seurat. Epithelial cells were subsetted on the basis of EPCAM expression. Averaged expression of SEMA4A, SEMA4D, SEMA4C and SEMA4G was computed using the AddModuleScore function.
Kaplan–Meier analysis
Kaplan–Meier analysis of 1,211 patients with CRC was performed using an online tool (http://kmplot.com). Recurrence-free survival was stratified by SEMA4A, SEMA4C, SEMA4D and SEMA4G expression in the Affymetrix colon dataset, using best cut-off.
Statistics and reproducibility
Statistical analysis and visualization were performed using R (v.4.1.0, R Foundation for Statistical Computing), R Studio and the package ggplot262 or Prism v.8.2.0. Statistical significance tests were performed as described in each figure legend, and P values were adjusted for multiple testing. Micrographs are representative of multiple biological replicates (n ≥ 2).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The sequencing data generated in this study are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession numbers GSE267981 and GSE267982 and at Zenodo99 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7737590). Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The code used in this study is available at GitHub (https://github.com/Moors-Code/coco_mosaic_liver).
References
Celià-Terrassa, T. & Kang, Y. Distinctive properties of metastasis-initiating cells. Genes Dev. 30, 892–908 (2016).
Montini, E. et al. In vivo correction of murine tyrosinemia type I by DNA-mediated transposition. Mol. Ther. 6, 759–769 (2002).
Ombrato, L. et al. Metastatic-niche labelling reveals parenchymal cells with stem features. Nature 572, 603–608 (2019).
Paget, S. The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. Lancet 133, 571–573 (1889).
Abbruzzese, J. L., Abbruzzese, M. C., Lenzi, R., Hess, K. R. & Raber, M. N. Analysis of a diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected tumors of unknown origin. J. Clin. Oncol. 13, 2094–2103 (1995).
Zhou, H. et al. In vivo simultaneous transcriptional activation of multiple genes in the brain using CRISPR–dCas9-activator transgenic mice. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 440–446 (2018).
Postic, C. et al. Dual roles for glucokinase in glucose homeostasis as determined by liver and pancreatic β cell-specific gene knock-outs using Cre recombinase. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 305–315 (1999).
Chembazhi, U. V., Bangru, S., Hernaez, M. & Kalsotra, A. Cellular plasticity balances the metabolic and proliferation dynamics of a regenerating liver. Genome Res. 31, 576–591 (2021).
Moya, I. M. et al. Peritumoral activation of the Hippo pathway effectors YAP and TAZ suppresses liver cancer in mice. Science 366, 1029–1034 (2019).
Tabariès, S. & Siegel, P. M. The role of claudins in cancer metastasis. Oncogene 36, 1176–1190 (2017).
Morgens, D. W. et al. Genome-scale measurement of off-target activity using Cas9 toxicity in high-throughput screens. Nat. Commun. 8, 15178 (2017).
Sohlenius-Sternbeck, A.-K. Determination of the hepatocellularity number for human, dog, rabbit, rat and mouse livers from protein concentration measurements. Toxicol. In Vitro 20, 1582–1586 (2006).
Wu, L. et al. Spatially-resolved transcriptomics analyses of invasive fronts in solid tumors. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.21.465135 (2021).
Munir, H. et al. Stromal-driven and amyloid β-dependent induction of neutrophil extracellular traps modulates tumor growth. Nat. Commun. 12, 683 (2021).
Zhou, J., Ji, Q. & Li, Q. Resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: underlying mechanisms and reversal strategies. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 40, 328 (2021).
Tavora, B. et al. Tumoural activation of TLR3–SLIT2 axis in endothelium drives metastasis. Nature 586, 299–304 (2020).
Ganesh, K. et al. L1CAM defines the regenerative origin of metastasis-initiating cells in colorectal cancer. Nat. Cancer 1, 28–45 (2020).
Lee, H. O., Hong, Y., Etlioglu, H. E., Cho, Y. B. & Pomella, V. Lineage-dependent gene expression programs influence the immune landscape of colorectal cancer. Nature 52, 594–603 (2020).
Massalha, H. et al. A single cell atlas of the human liver tumor microenvironment. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9682 (2020).
Nguyen, B. et al. Genomic characterization of metastatic patterns from prospective clinical sequencing of 25,000 patients. Cell 185, 563–575 (2022).
Wang, F. et al. Single-cell and spatial transcriptome analysis reveals the cellular heterogeneity of liver metastatic colorectal cancer. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf5464 (2023).
Che, L.-H. et al. A single-cell atlas of liver metastases of colorectal cancer reveals reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment in response to preoperative chemotherapy. Cell Discov. 7, 80 (2021).
Xia, J. et al. Semaphorin-plexin signaling controls mitotic spindle orientation during epithelial morphogenesis and repair. Dev. Cell 33, 299–313 (2015).
Deng, S. et al. Plexin-B2, but not plexin-B1, critically modulates neuronal migration and patterning of the developing nervous system in vivo. J. Neurosci. 27, 6333–6347 (2007).
Junqueira Alves, C., Yotoko, K., Zou, H. & Friedel, R. H. Origin and evolution of plexins, semaphorins, and Met receptor tyrosine kinases. Sci. Rep. 9, 1970 (2019).
Junqueira Alves, C. et al. Plexin-B2 orchestrates collective stem cell dynamics via actomyosin contractility, cytoskeletal tension and adhesion. Nat. Commun. 12, 6019 (2021).
Kumanogoh, A. & Kikutani, H. Immunological functions of the neuropilins and plexins as receptors for semaphorins. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 802–814 (2013).
Varga, J. et al. AKT-dependent NOTCH3 activation drives tumor progression in a model of mesenchymal colorectal cancer. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20191515 (2020).
Zhao, W. et al. Identification of Krüppel-like factor 4 as a potential tumor suppressor gene in colorectal cancer. Oncogene 23, 395–402 (2004).
Subbalakshmi, A. R. et al. KLF4 induces mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) by suppressing multiple EMT-inducing transcription factors. Cancers 13, 5135 (2021).
Agbo, K. C. et al. Loss of the Krüppel-like factor 4 tumor suppressor is associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 5, 77 (2019).
Ocaña, O. H. et al. Metastatic colonization requires the repression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition inducer Prrx1. Cancer Cell 22, 709–724 (2012).
Tsai, J. H., Donaher, J. L., Murphy, D. A., Chau, S. & Yang, J. Spatiotemporal regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition is essential for squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. Cancer Cell 22, 725–736 (2012).
Reichert, M. et al. Regulation of epithelial plasticity determines metastatic organotropism in pancreatic cancer. Dev. Cell 45, 696–711 (2018).
Zhou, Z. et al. A novel small-molecule antagonizes PRMT5-mediated KLF4 methylation for targeted therapy. EBioMedicine 44, 98–111 (2019).
Subbalakshmi, A. R. et al. The ELF3 transcription factor is associated with an epithelial phenotype and represses epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Biol. Eng. 17, 17 (2023).
Yang, Z., Wu, D., Chen, Y., Min, Z. & Quan, Y. GRHL2 inhibits colorectal cancer progression and metastasis via oppressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Biol. Ther. 20, 1195–1205 (2019).
Gurrapu, S. et al. Reverse signaling by semaphorin 4C elicits SMAD1/5- and ID1/3-dependent invasive reprogramming in cancer cells. Sci. Signal. 12, eaav2041 (2019).
Smeester, B. A. et al. SEMA4C is a novel target to limit osteosarcoma growth, progression, and metastasis. Oncogene 39, 1049–1062 (2020).
Zhou, H. et al. Recruitment of Tiam1 to semaphorin 4D activates Rac and enhances proliferation, invasion, and metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Neoplasia 19, 65–74 (2017).
Sun, T. et al. A reverse signaling pathway downstream of Sema4A controls cell migration via Scrib. J. Cell Biol. 216, 199–215 (2017).
Uhlén, M. et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419 (2015).
Cañellas-Socias, A. et al. Metastatic recurrence in colorectal cancer arises from residual EMP1+ cells. Nature 611, 603–613 (2022).
Joanito, I. et al. Single-cell and bulk transcriptome sequencing identifies two epithelial tumor cell states and refines the consensus molecular classification of colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet. 54, 963–975 (2022).
Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 487, 330–337 (2012).
Hosseini, H. et al. Early dissemination seeds metastasis in breast cancer. Nature 540, 552–558 (2016).
Hu, Z. et al. Quantitative evidence for early metastatic seeding in colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet. 51, 1113–1122 (2019).
Szczerba, B. M. et al. Neutrophils escort circulating tumour cells to enable cell cycle progression. Nature 566, 553–557 (2019).
Correia, A. L. et al. Hepatic stellate cells suppress NK cell-sustained breast cancer dormancy. Nature 594, 566–571 (2021).
Baldominos, P. et al. Quiescent cancer cells resist T cell attack by forming an immunosuppressive niche. Cell 185, 1694–1708 (2022).
Albrengues, J. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps produced during inflammation awaken dormant cancer cells in mice. Science 361, eaao4227 (2018).
Kovacsics, D. & Raper, J. Transient expression of proteins by hydrodynamic gene delivery in mice. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/51481 (2014).
Warren, R. S., Yuan, H., Matli, M. R., Gillett, N. A. & Ferrara, N. Regulation by vascular endothelial growth factor of human colon cancer tumorigenesis in a mouse model of experimental liver metastasis. J. Clin. Invest. 95, 1789–1797 (1995).
Roper, J. et al. Colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer modeling in mice with CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing and organoid transplantation. Nat. Protoc. 13, 217–234 (2018).
Sanson, K. R. et al. Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities. Nat. Commun. 9, 5416 (2018).
Joung, J. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening. Nat. Protoc. 12, 828–863 (2017).
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Langmead, B., Wilks, C., Antonescu, V. & Charles, R. Scaling read aligners to hundreds of threads on general-purpose processors. Bioinformatics 35, 421–432 (2019).
Wang, B. et al. Integrative analysis of pooled CRISPR genetic screens using MAGeCKFlute. Nat. Protoc. 14, 756–780 (2019).
Li, W. et al. MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol. 15, 554 (2014).
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016).
Elosua-Bayes, M., Nieto, P., Mereu, E., Gut, I. & Heyn, H. SPOTlight: seeded NMF regression to deconvolute spatial transcriptomics spots with single-cell transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, e50 (2021).
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902 (2019).
Browaeys, R., Saelens, W. & Saeys, Y. NicheNet: modeling intercellular communication by linking ligands to target genes. Nat. Methods 17, 159–162 (2020).
Garcia-Alonso, L. et al. Mapping the temporal and spatial dynamics of the human endometrium in vivo and in vitro. Nat. Genet. 53, 1698–1711 (2021).
Shao, X. et al. CellTalkDB: a manually curated database of ligand-receptor interactions in humans and mice. Brief. Bioinform. 22, bbaa269 (2021).
Karlsson, M. et al. A single-cell type transcriptomics map of human tissues. Sci. Adv. 7, eabh2169 (2021).
Sato, T. & Clevers, H. Growing self-organizing mini-guts from a single intestinal stem cell: mechanism and applications. Science 340, 1190–1194 (2013).
de Sousa e Melo, F. et al. A distinct role for Lgr5+ stem cells in primary and metastatic colon cancer. Nature 543, 676–680 (2017).
Ombrato, L. et al. Generation of neighbor-labeling cells to study intercellular interactions in vivo. Nat. Protoc. 16, 872–892 (2021).
Fink, S. et al. A simple approach for multi-targeted shRNA-mediated inducible knockdowns using Sleeping Beauty vectors. PLoS ONE 13, e0205585 (2018).
Campa, C. C., Weisbach, N. R., Santinha, A. J., Incarnato, D. & Platt, R. J. Multiplexed genome engineering by Cas12a and CRISPR arrays encoded on single transcripts. Nat. Methods 16, 887–893 (2019).
DeWeirdt, P. C. et al. Optimization of AsCas12a for combinatorial genetic screens in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 94–104 (2021).
Kim, H. K. et al. Deep learning improves prediction of CRISPR-Cpf1 guide RNA activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 239–241 (2018).
Jenkins, M. H. et al. Multiple murine BRaf(V600E) melanoma cell lines with sensitivity to PLX4032. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 27, 495–501 (2014).
Charni-Natan, M. & Goldstein, I. Protocol for primary mouse hepatocyte isolation. STAR Protoc. 1, 100086 (2020).
Khandelia, P., Yap, K. & Makeyev, E. V. Streamlined platform for short hairpin RNA interference and transgenesis in cultured mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12799–12804 (2011).
Arora, A. et al. High-throughput identification of RNA localization elements in neuronal cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 10626–10642 (2022).
Doench, J. G. et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 184–191 (2016).
Bankhead, P. et al. QuPath: open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 16878 (2017).
Itzkovitz, S. et al. Single-molecule transcript counting of stem-cell markers in the mouse intestine. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 106–114 (2011).
Imbert, A. et al. FISH-quant v2: a scalable and modular tool for smFISH image analysis. RNA 28, 786–795 (2022).
Pachitariu, M. & Stringer, C. Cellpose 2.0: how to train your own model. Nat. Methods 19, 1634–1641 (2022).
Guilliams, M. et al. Spatial proteogenomics reveals distinct and evolutionarily conserved hepatic macrophage niches. Cell 185, 379–396 (2022).
Handler, K. et al. Fragment-sequencing unveils local tissue microenvironments at single-cell resolution. Nat. Commun. 14, 7775 (2023).
Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the \({2}^{-\Delta \Delta {C}_{{\rm{T}}}}\) method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).
Bagnoli, J. W. et al. Sensitive and powerful single-cell RNA sequencing using mcSCRB-seq. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05347-6 (2018).
Andrews, S. et al. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Bioinformatics http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2010).
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
Korotkevich, G. et al. Fast gene set enrichment analysis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/060012 (2016).
Liberzon, A. et al. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics 27, 1739–1740 (2011).
Chen, E. Y. et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 128 (2013).
Tabula Muris Consortium et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature 562, 367–372 (2018).
Lachmann, A. et al. ChEA: transcription factor regulation inferred from integrating genome-wide ChIP-X experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 2438–2444 (2010).
Stuart, T., Srivastava, A., Madad, S., Lareau, C. A. & Satija, R. Single-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac. Nat. Methods 18, 1333–1341 (2021).
Yin, Y. decontX. Bioconductor https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.BIOC.DECONTX (2023).
Tran, A. N., Dussaq, A. M., Kennell Jr, T., Willey, C. D. & Hjelmeland, A. B. HPAanalyze: an R package that facilitates the retrieval and analysis of the Human Protein Atlas data. BMC Bioinform. 20, 463 (2019).
Borrelli, C. et al. Data for ‘In vivo interaction screening reveals liver-derived constraints to metastasis’ Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7737590 (2024).
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Ozga and G. Aguilar and all of the members of the Moor laboratory for discussions and insights; the staff at the Single Cell Facility and Animal Facility of D-BSSE and the members of the laboratories of K. Basler, M. van den Broek, G. Schwank and R. Platt for technical support; O. Sansom for donating the AKP organoids; F. Greten for donating the APTAK organoids; M. Bentires-Alj for providing the human immortalized hepatocytes; I. Guccini for donating the KPC cells; and T. Stühmer for donating the shRNA plasmid backbone. This work was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (PCEFP3_181249) to A.E.M. and the Swiss Cancer League (KFS-5444-08-2021-R) to C.B. and A.E.M. T.V. was partially supported by the National Institute for Cancer Research (Programme EXCELES, LX22NPO5102) funded by the European Union (Next Generation EU). A. Meijs and R.J.P. are supported by the National Centres of Competence Molecular Systems Engineering (51NF40-182895). S.P. is funded by the Swiss Cancer Research foundation (KFS-4988-02-2020-R) and by the Prof. Dr. Max Cloëtta Foundation.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.B. conceived the study, performed and analysed the screen and key validation experiments, and wrote the manuscript. M.R., M.-D.H., H.F., T.V., A.K. and F.B.M. performed mouse experiments. D.E. cloned and designed all vectors. A.L., S.A., E.G.V., K.H. and I.E.A. performed and assisted with bioinformatic analyses. J.A.K. generated the Visium dataset. A. Mannhart and S.K. performed in vitro assays. A. Meijs and R.J.P. helped with enAsCas12a experiments. X.F. edited the manuscript. S.P. donated the patient-derived organoids. A.E.M. conceived, supervised and acquired funding for the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Screening tumour-hepatocytes interactions in a mosaic liver.
a, Glutamine synthetase immunoreactivity in AlbCre;dCas9-SPH mice upon co-injection of SB100X transposase and PT4-U6-sgGlul or PT4-U6-sgNT. Scale bar, 100 μm. CV, central vein. b, Glul gene expression of whole liver extracts of AlbCre;dCas9-SPH mice upon co-injection of SB100X and PT4-U6-sgGlul (n = 4) or PT4-U6-sgNT (n = 3), as assessed by qRT-PCR. Log2FC normalized to Gapdh, two-tailed unpaired t-test. c, Top, genes targeted by the sgRNA library (see Table S1). Bottom, sgRNA transposon vector design. TR, terminal repeats. d, Representative flow cytometry plot and quantification of GFP+ hepatocytes (gated as CD45- CD31-) one week after HTVI of SB100X transposase and PT4-CMV-GFP transposon in AlbCre;dCas9-SPH mice (n = 5). e, GFP expression one week after HTVI. Scale bar, 100 μm. Membrane TdTomato (mTdT) in red. f, sgRNA abundance in plasmid vs. sorted GFP+ hepatocytes. Two-tailed Pearson’s correlation test. g, Quantification of single and double positive hepatocytes in livers co-injected with transposon vectors harbouring myc or GFP reporters (n = 12 FOVs, pooled from 2 mice). h, Representative micrograph of AKPS organoids expressing sLP-mCherry. Scale bar, 50 μm. Inset shows sLP-mCherry punctae in red. Scale bar, 10 μm. i, Representative flow cytometry plots of mCherry niche labelling in vivo upon AKPS intrasplenic injection. Gated on CD31-CD45- hepatocytes. j, Fluorescent micrograph of AKPSsLP-mCherry metastases 1 week post intrasplenic injection. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI. Scale bar, 100 μm. Inset and arrowhead indicate sLP-mCherry punctae (in black) in proximal hepatocytes. Scale bar, 20 μm. k, Representative FACS plots and gating strategy for the isolation of hepatocytes (CD31-CD45-) harbouring a sgRNA (GFP+) that are proximal to (mCherry+) or distal from (mCherry-) metastases. b,d,g, Barplots indicate mean ± s.d.
Extended Data Fig. 2 In vivo CRISPR-a screen identifies hepatocyte-derived factors that regulate metastatic seeding.
a, Two-tailed Pearson correlation of sgRNA abundance in three independent library batches (Lib_1, Lib_2 and Lib_3). b, sgRNA coverage per mouse, calculated by dividing the number of sorted cells by 997 (sgRNAs) (n = 7 AlbCre;dCas9-SPH mice and n = 5 nonCre littermate controls). c, Proportion of reads mapped (left), zero count sgRNAs (middle), and Gini index (right) of sgRNA libraries amplified from distal (mCherry-, green) and proximal (mCherry+, red) hepatocytes across three independent batches and recipient AlbCre;dCas9-SPH mice (n = 7). d, Volcano plots showing aggregated results for all AlbCre;dCas9-SPH mice (left) and nonCre littermate controls (right). Red dots indicate seeding-promoting factors enriched in the proximity of metastases, green dots indicate seeding-suppressing factors depleted in the proximity of metastases. LogFC and adjusted p value calculated with unpaired robust rank aggregation (α-RRA) from the MAGeCK algorithm60. e, H&E staining (left) of a human CRC liver metastasis sample used for Visium spatial transcriptomics (10x Genomics) (1 representative image shown of 2 analysed replicates). After spot deconvolution, spots are annotated according to the predominant cell types, indicated in a colour-coded map (middle). The annotation is used as input for edge spot selection, identifying metastasis-proximal and distal hepatocytes as well as metastasis core vs. edge (right). f, DEGs between metastasis-edge and metastasis-core spots. Two-tailed unpaired Wilcoxon test. Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. g, Top 20 active hepatocyte ligands and their regulatory potential on DEGs at metastatic edge (analysis conducted with Nichenet65). h, Predicted interactions between top-scoring hits of the screen (proximal hits in red in top plot, distal hits in green in bottom plot) and cognate LRs whose expression is altered (logFC > |0.25|, adjusted P < 0.01, two-sided Wilcoxon test) between epithelial cells in liver metastases (LM) vs. matched primary tumours in two independent datasets of metastatic CRC (Wang et al. n = 521, Che et al. n = 622).
Extended Data Fig. 3 In vitro screen and Plexin B2 overexpression.
a, Schematic representation of workflow for mutational analysis. 1) Frequently mutated genes in hepatic metastases vs. primary tumours in a publicly available dataset20 are filtered for LR-encoding genes. 2) Cognate interaction partners are identified by cell-cell interaction prediction tools and filtered for hepatocyte expression and 3) intersected with SRFs. b, Experimental workflow for in vitro arrayed screens. 1) primary AlbCre;dCas9-SPH hepatocytes or AML12dCas9-SPH are plated on collagen-coated plates and 2) transfected with sgRNA-encoding transposon vectors and SB100X, prior to 3) seeding of dissociated AKPSsLP-mCherry organoids. After 5 days, CFUs are scored by fluorescent microscopy. c, CFU per well of AKPSsLP-mCherry organoids after co-culture with primary AlbCre;dCas9-SPH hepatocytes transfected with indicated sgRNAs. Dots indicate individual wells (n = 3 per condition). d, Plxnb2 gene expression in AML12dCas9-SPH transfected with sgPlxnb2 (n = 4) or sgNT (n = 2), as assessed by qRT-PCR. Log2FC normalized to Hprt. e, CFU per well of AKPSsLP-mCherry organoids after co-culture with AML12dCas9-SPH cells overexpressing Plxnb2. Dots indicate individual wells (n = 3 per condition). f, Representative fluorescent micrograph of VSVG (red) and E-cadh (green) immunoreactivity in AML12 transduced with pLVX-Plxnb2-VSVG or pLVX-EV. DAPI in blue as nuclear counterstain. Scale bar, 5 μm. g, Plexin B2-PE mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) in VSVG+ and VSVG– AML12 cells, as assessed by flow cytometry. Two-tailed unpaired Wilcoxon test. Boxplots indicate median, first and third quartiles. Whiskers extend from the hinges to the largest value no further than 1.5× the inter-quartile range. h, CFU per well of AKPS organoids seeded as single cells on AML12 cells treated with rmPlexin B2. Dots indicate individual wells (n = 4 per condition). i, CFU per well of PDOs cultured on PTA-5565 cells treated with rhPlexin B2. Dots indicate individual wells (n = 3 per condition). j, Representative fluorescent micrograph of a PDO colony (indicated by arrowhead) growing on PTA-5565H2B-mCherry cells. DAPI in blue as nuclear counterstain. Scale bar, 20 μm. c-e, h, i, Barplots indicate mean ± s.d. c,h,i Ordinary one-way ANOVA, comparing each treatment group to vehicle control. Dunnet’s correction for multiple testing. d,e Two-tailed unpaired t-test.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Plxnb2 OE in mouse hepatocytes after AAV-mediated sgRNA transduction.
a, Percentage of GFP+ hepatocytes in AlbCre;dCas9-SPH mice injected with AAV8-U6-sgPlxnb2OE-EF1a-EGFP (sgPlxnb2 OE, n = 5) or AAV8-U6-sgNT-EF1a-EGFP (sgNT, n = 7). b, Representative fluorescent micrograph of Plxnb2 mRNA (white) as detected by smFISH. DAPI in green as nuclear counterstain. Arrowheads indicate single mRNA molecules. Scale bar, 20 μm. c, Quantification of Plxnb2 mRNA molecules per cell, average of 3 fields of view per mouse in n = 2 mice per condition. d,e,f, Representative fluorescent micrographs and quantification of Plexin B2 immunoreactivity (grey) in AlbCre;dCas9-SPH mice injected with AAV8-U6-sgPlxnb2OE-EF1a-EGFP (sgPlnxb2 OE, n = 4) or AAV8-U6-sgNT-EF1a-EGFP (sgNT, n = 5), and AlbCre;Cas9 mice injected with AAV8-U6-sgPlxnb2KO-EF1a-EGFP (sgPlxnb2 KO, n = 4). DAPI in blue as a nuclear counterstain. Scale bar, 20 μm. Two-tailed unpaired t-test. g, Representative fluorescent micrographs of Plexin B2 immunoreactivity (grey) in Plxnb2wt/wt and Plxnb2flox/flox mice injected with AAV8-AlbCre-moxGFP. DAPI in blue as a nuclear counterstain. Scale bar, 200 μm. Inset shows residual Plexin B2 on endothelial cells lining the central vein. Scale bar, 100 μm. h, Representative micrographs of AKPS metastases growing in WT, Plxnb2 OE or KO livers. a,c,e,f, Dots represent individual mice. Barplots indicate mean ± s.d.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Plexin B2 is required for spontaneous metastatic seeding.
a, Representative micrograph of colonoscopy-guided submucosal injection of CRC organoids. Arrowhead indicates the site of injection. b,c, Representative H&E section and quantification of spontaneous APTAK metastases in AlbCre;dCas9SPH mice injected with sgPlxnb2 OE or sgNT (n = 7 mice per group). Two-tailed unpaired T-test. d, Representative micrographs of primary APTAK tumours (bottom) and liver metastases (top) in Plxnb2wt/wt and Plxnb2flox/flox mice injected with AAV8-AlbCre-moxGFP. e, f, Representative H&E section and quantification of spontaneous APTAK metastases in Plxnb2wt/wt and Plxnb2flox/flox mice injected with AAV8-AlbCre-moxGFP (n = 7 mice per group). Two-tailed unpaired T-test. g, Multiplexed in situ hybridization (Molecular Cartography) of Plxnb2 as well as portal and central hepatocyte markers in WT mouse liver. h, Quantification of Plxnb2 mRNA abundance in cells from pericentral n = 89; periportal n = 66 areas pooled from 4 mice from. Two-tailed unpaired Wilcoxon test. i, Representative fluorescent micrograph of Plexin B2 (grey) immunoreactivity in metastatic livers. Scale bar, 100 μm. j, Plexin B2 staining intensity in peritumoral (2-3 hepatocyte layers) vs. distal areas. Dots represent individual peritumoral areas (n = 6) pooled from 3 mice per group. Two-tailed unpaired T-test. k, DEGs in livers of primary CRC-bearing vs. naive mice (n = 3 mice per condition). Quasi-likelihood F-test, FDR-adjusted p-values. l, BLI signal over time in Plxnb2flox/flox (n = 4) or Plxnb2wt/wt (n = 3) mice injected with AKPSLuciferase;zsGreen organoids and subsequently AAV8-AlbCre-moxGFP (AAV). Two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. Data presented as mean ± s.d. m, Representative H&E section of AKPSLuciferase;zsGreen metastases in livers of Plxnb2flox/flox or Plxnb2wt/wt mice injected with AAV8-AlbCre-moxGFP. c,f,h,j,l, Data are presented as mean ± s.d.
Extended Data Fig. 6 AKPS metastases in Plxnb2 OE livers have an altered stromal and endothelial compartment.
a, Representative fluorescent micrographs and quantification of α-SMA (green) and periostin (POSTN, red) immunoreactivity in AKPS metastases in Plxnb2 OE and control livers, DAPI in blue as nuclear counterstain. Dashed line indicates the tumour border. Scale bar, 100 μm, inset, 20 μm. Dots indicate average staining intensity of individual metastases (n = 20) pooled from 3 mice per group. b, Representative fluorescent micrographs and quantification of CD146+ immunoreactivity in AKPS metastases in Plxnb2 OE and control livers. Arrowheads indicate vessels. Scale bar, 200 μm, inset, 100 μm. Dots indicate average staining intensity of individual metastases (n = 6) pooled from 3 mice per group. c, Representative fluorescent micrographs and quantification of α-SMA (green) and CD146 (red) immunoreactivity in Plxnb2 OE and control livers, DAPI in blue as nuclear counterstain. Scale bar, 100 μm. Dots indicate average staining intensity of individual FOV (n = 8 for α-SMA, n = 4 for CD146) pooled from 2 mice per group. d,e, DEGs and GSEA in Plxnb2 OE vs. control livers (n = 3 mice per group). Quasi-likelihood F-test, FDR-adjusted p-values. f, Cell type enrichment analysis using Tabula Muris as reference (Odds ratio test) in bulk RNASeq of Plxnb2 OE vs. control livers (n = 3 mice per group). a-c, Two-tailed unpaired t-test, barplots indicate mean ± s.d.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Multiomic characterization of AKPS metastases in Plxnb2 OE and control livers.
a, Edu+/Edu- cells in 2D AKPS organoid cultures treated with rmPlexin B2. Dots represent individual wells (n = 3). b, Left, Edu+/Edu- cells in 2D PDO cultures treated with rhPlexin B2. Dots represent individual wells (n = 3). Right, representative fluorescent micrograph of Edu+ PDO colonies. Scale bar, 10 μm. c, Representative fluorescent micrograph and quantification of E-cadh (grey) and cleaved caspase-3 (yellow) immunoreactivity in AKPS metastases in Plxnb2 OE and control livers, DAPI in cyan as nuclear counterstain. Dots represent individual liver metastases (n = 4) pooled from 2 mice per group. d, UMAP of RNA profile of nuclei isolated from Plxnb2 OE and control livers harbouring AKPS metastases. Dots indicate single nuclei, coloured by cell type. e, Marker gene expression across cell types. f, DEGs in tumour cells isolated from Plxnb2 OE vs. control livers. Two-tailed unpaired Wilcoxon test. g, Representative fluorescent micrograph and quantification of F-actin in 2D PDO cultures treated with rhPlexin B2. Scale bar, 10 μm. Dots indicate individual wells (n = 6). h, F-actin intensity in KPC cultures treated with rmPlexin B2. Dots indicate individual wells (n = 4). i, Representative fluorescent micrograph and quantification of E-cadh (yellow), CD4 (cyan, T cells) and CD68 (magenta, macrophages) immunoreactivity in AKPS metastases in Plxnb2 OE and control livers, nuclear DAPI stain in grey. Scale bar, 20 μm. Dots represent individual metastases (n = 5) pooled from 2 mice per group. j, Expression of Klf4 and KLF4-target genes in AKPS organoids treated with rmPlexin B2, and of AKPS metastases grown in Plxnb2 OE livers. k, Representative fluorescent micrograph and quantification of Epcam (red) immunoreactivity in AKPS metastases in Plxnb2 OE and control livers. Scale bar, 20 μm. Dots represent individual metastases (n = 4) pooled from 3 mice per group. l, Representative brightfield micrograph of 2D AKPS cultures treated with the KLF4 inhibitor WX2-43. m,n, Representative fluorescent micrograph and quantification of F-actin (grey) and EdU (red) in 2D AKPS cultures treated with the KLF4 inhibitor WX2-43, DAPI in blue as nuclear counterstain. Scale bar, 10 μm. Dots represent individual wells (n = 10). o, CFU per well of AKPS organoids treated with WX2-43 (KLF4 inhibitor) with or without rmPlexin B2. Dots represent individual wells (n = 5) a-c, g-i,k,n,o, Barplots indicate mean ± s.d. a,c,h,i,k,n Two-tailed unpaired T-test. b,g,o Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s correction for multiple testing. d-f,k, Data pooled from 2 independent experiments, n = 2 mice per condition.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Plexin B2 promotes acquisition of epithelial traits in AKPS metastases.
a, Expression density of EMT and MET gene signatures in AKPS organoids profiled by scRNASeq. b, Representative fluorescent micrographs and quantification of E-cadh (grey) and Zeb1 (red) immunoreactivity in WT colon vs. AKPS organoids. Arrow shows E-cadhhighZeb1low cell, arrowhead indicates E-cadhlowZeb1high. Bars show mean ± s.d. Two-tailed unpaired T-test. c, Zeb1 nuclear intensity in 2D AKPS cultures treated with rmPlexin B2 and/or with WX2-43. Barplots indicate mean ± s.d. Barplots indicate mean ± s.d., dots represent nuclear values averaged for individual wells (n = 9). Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s correction for multiple testing. d, Representative fluorescent micrograph and quantification Grhl2, Elf3 and Zeb1 (red) and F-actin (grey) immunoreactivity of AKPS metastases in Plxnb2 OE, Plxnb2 KO and control livers. DAPI in blue as nuclear counterstain. Scale bar, 50 μm. Inset 1 shows Grhl2+ nuclei in Plxnb2 OE livers. Inset 2 shows Zeb1+ nuclei in Plxnb2 KO livers. Scale bar, 50 μm. e, DEGs between AKPS organoid lines derived from metastases (n = 2) and AKPS-organoid lines kept only in culture (n = 3). Quasi-likelihood F-test. f, GO terms enriched in AKPS lines derived from metastases. g, CFU per well upon single-cell seeding of AKPS organoids kept in culture (culture) or derived from metastases. Barplots indicate mean ± s.d., dots represent individual wells (n = 8), two-tailed unpaired t-test.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Class IV semaphorin expression in mouse and human CRC.
a, CFU per well of PDOs cultured with rhPlexin B2 and NSC23766. Dots represent individual wells (n = 4). b, Metastases per liver section of AKPS organoids treated ex vivo with rmPlexinB2 and/or NSC323766. Dots represent individual mice (n = 3 mice per group). c, Representative fluorescent micrograph of Sema4A+ tumour cells (red) in contact with GFP+ hepatocytes (green). 2 FOV shown. DAPI in blue as nuclear counterstain. d, Multiplexed in situ hybridization (Molecular Cartography) and normalized expression level per cell type of Sema4a, 4c, 4d, 4g and Plxnb2 transcripts in AKPS liver metastases. Data pooled from n = 3 mice. e, Immunohistochemistry for SEMA4A, C, D, and G in healthy human colon and CRC (n = 4) obtained from the Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org/). f,g, Averaged expression of SEMA4A, 4C, 4D, 4G in human primary CRC (epithelial cells only, KUL dataset includes 5 patients18). Cells grouped as high-relapse cells (HRCs) vs. other cells, or iCMS2 vs. iCMS3 cells. h, Averaged expression of SEMA4A, SEMA4C, SEMA4D, SEMA4G (green) projected on epithelial cells of the Samsung dataset and blended with expression of KLF4-target genes or of the MET signature (red). i, Expression of the core HRC signature in AKPS organoids treated with or without rmPlexin B2. j, Averaged expression of SEMA4A, SEMA4C, SEMA4D, SEMA4G in epithelial cells from CRC liver metastases (LM) or matched primary tumours in two independent datasets of metastatic CRC (Wang et al. n = 521, Che et al. n = 622). k, Kaplan-Meier analysis (http://kmplot.com) of the recurrence free survival (RFS) of CRC patients (n = 1211) stratified by SEMA4A, SEMA4C, SEMA4D or SEMA4G expression. Log Rank test. Pie charts indicate CNV analysis SEMA4A, SEMA4C, SEMA4D and SEMA4G in the COAD dataset (n = 290 patients). f,g,i,j, Two-tailed unpaired Wilcoxon test. a,b,f,g,i,j Data are presented as mean ± s.d.
Extended Data Fig. 10 Class IV semaphorins on tumour cells are required for metastatic seeding.
a, Gene expression of Sema4a, Sema4c, Sema4d and Sema4g in AKPSSema4KD vs. AKPSEV organoids. Log2FC normalized to Gapdh. Crosses indicate technical replicates (n = 3). b,c, GO terms and DEGs in AKPSSema4KD vs. AKPSEV organoids. Quasi-likelihood F-test, n = 3 per group. d, Left, representative fluorescent micrographs of pre-injection 1:1 mix of AKPSSema4KD organoids (GFP+) and control organoids (GFP-). Scale bar, 100 μm. Right, representative GFP immunoreactivity of AKPSSema4KD metastases (GFP+, green dashed line) and AKPSEV (GFP-, grey dashed line). Scale bar, 200 μm. e, Representative fluorescent micrograph of Sema4A, C, D and G immunoreactivity in AKPSSema4KO and AKPSSemaWT organoids. Scale bar, 20 μm. f, Edu+/Edu- cells in 2D AKPSSema4KO and AKPSSemaWT organoids. Dots indicate individual wells (n = 3), barplots indicate mean ± s.d. Two-tailed unpaired t-test. g, Representative images of livers (top) and primary colon tumours (bottom) in mice orthotopically injected with AKPSSema4KO or AKPSSemaWT organoids. h, Incidence of spontaneous liver metastases in mice orthotopically injected with AKPSSema4KO or AKPSSemaWT organoids. Two-tailed unpaired t-test, n = 8 mice per group.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Fig. 1
The gating strategy used for sorting of GFP+mCherry+ hepatocytes.
Supplementary Table 1
sgRNA library for CRISPR-a screen.
Supplementary Table 2
Indel analysis AKPSSema4KO organoids.
Supplementary Table 3
Sequences of primers, sgRNAs and smFISH probes, gene sets and signatures.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Borrelli, C., Roberts, M., Eletto, D. et al. In vivo interaction screening reveals liver-derived constraints to metastasis. Nature 632, 411–418 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07715-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07715-3
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Cancer spread in the liver is unlocked from within
Nature (2024)