Skip to main content
Log in

INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY IN 2018

Advancing the evidence base in interventional cardiology

  • Year in Review
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Cardiology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

The main advances in interventional cardiology in 2018 include the new European guidelines on revascularization, new developments in the treatment of cardiogenic shock, novel stent technology from Asia and clinical trial data showing no benefit of dropping aspirin after stenting.

Key advances

  • The 2018 ESC guidelines on myocardial revascularization provide the most up-to-date, evidence-based consensus recommendations1.

  • For patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, multivessel disease and cardiogenic shock, we now know that the acute intervention should be to treat the culprit vessel only2.

  • New stent technologies with thin struts, absorbable polymers and reduced drug doses are proving to be equivalent to current technology in the first year after implantation and might show benefits with longer follow-up3.

  • The first absorbable scaffolds have not met clinical expectations and have been removed from the market4.

  • Ticagrelor monotherapy after stent implantation did not show a benefit at 2 years compared with standard dual antiplatelet therapy5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Neumann, F. J. et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur. Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Thiele, H. et al. One-year outcomes after PCI strategies in cardiogenic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 1699–16710 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lansky, A. et al. Targeted therapy with a localised abluminal groove, low-dose sirolimus-eluting, biodegradable polymer coronary stent (TARGET All Comers): a multicentre, open-label, randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 392, 1117–1126 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stone, G. W. et al. Blinded outcomes and angina assessment of coronary bioresorbable scaffolds: 30-day and 1-year results from the ABSORB IV randomised trial. Lancet 392, P1530–P1540 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vranckx, P. et al. Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months versus aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet 392, 940–949 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thiele, H. et al. PCI strategies in patients with acute cyocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 2419–2432 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wald, D. S. et al. Preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 283 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Serruys, P. W. et al. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 136–146 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Byrne, R. A. et al. Report of a European Society of Cardiology-European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions task force on the evaluation of coronary stents in Europe: executive summary. Eur. Heart J. 36, 2608–2620 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Baumbach.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.B. has received consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Cardinal Health and Microport, and speaker fees from Astra Zeneca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baumbach, A. Advancing the evidence base in interventional cardiology. Nat Rev Cardiol 16, 79–81 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0142-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0142-5

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation