Abstract
Physics is one of the least diverse of all science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines with damaging stereotypes about who belongs and who can excel in it. Physics learning environments are generally not inclusive or equitable, with students from historically marginalized groups often reporting an unwelcoming climate. In general, the culture of physics is competitive with a dearth of humanity in interpersonal interactions and communications. Here we provide a narrative review of the research on diversity, equity and inclusion in undergraduate physics learning environments, focusing on women and ethnic and racial minority students, and make recommendations for how to improve this dire current situation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Li, Y. & Singh, C. The impact of perceived recognition by physics instructors on women’s self-efficacy and interest. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 19, 020125 (2023).
Percent of Physics Bachelors and PhDs Earned by Women, Classes of 1975 Through 2016 (AIP Statistics, accessed 15 November 2023); https://www.aip.org/statistics/data-graphics/percent-physics-bachelors-and-phds-earned-women-classes-1975-through-2016
TEAM-UP Report (American Institute of Physics, 2020).
Proc. 6th IUPAP International Conference on Women in Physics (Wilkin, N. et al.) Vol. 2109 (American Institute of Physics, 2017).
Blue, J., Traxler, A. L. & Cid, X. C. Gender matters. Phys. Today 71, 40–46 (2018).
Singh, C. Inclusive mentoring: the mindset of an effective mentor. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01227 (2021).
Seymour, E. & Hunter, A.-B. Talking about Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education (Springer, 2019).
Whitcomb, K., Cwik, S. & Singh, C. Not all disadvantages are created equal: racial/ethnic minority students have largest disadvantage among demographic groups in both STEM and non-STEM GPA. AERA Open 7, 1–16 (2021).
Barthelemy, R., McCormick, M. & Henderson, C. Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020119 (2016).
Rodriguez, I., Potvin, G. & Kramer, L. H. How gender and reformed introductory physics impacts student success in advanced physics courses and continuation in the physics major. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020118 (2016).
Brewe, E. et al. Toward equity through participation in modeling instruction in introductory university physics. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 010106 (2010).
Van Dusen, B. & Nissen, J. Equity in college physics student learning: a critical quantitative intersectionality investigation. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 57, 33–57 (2020).
Watkins, J. E. Examining Issues of Underrepresented Minority Students in Introductory Physics (Harvard Univ., 2010).
Dew, M., Perry, J., Ford, L., Bassichis, W. & Erukhimova, T. Gendered performance differences in introductory physics: a study from a large land-grant university. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 010106 (2021).
Walton, G. M., Logel, C., Peach, J. M., Spencer, S. J. & Zanna, M. P. Two brief interventions to mitigate a ‘chilly climate’ transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. J. Educ. Psychol. 107, 468–485 (2015).
Danielsson, A. T. Exploring woman university physics students ‘doing gender’ and ‘doing physics’. Gend. Educ. 24, 25–39 (2012).
Gonsalves, A. J., Danielsson, A. & Pettersson, H. Masculinities and experimental practices in physics: the view from three case studies. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020120 (2016).
Marchand, G. C. & Taasoobshirazi, G. Stereotype threat and women’s performance in physics. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 35, 3050–3061 (2013).
Steele, C. M. & Aronson, J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 69, 797–811 (1995).
Johnson, A., Ong, M., Ko, L. T., Smith, J. & Hodari, A. Common challenges faced by women of color in physics, and actions faculty can take to minimize those challenges. Phys. Teach. 55, 356360 (2017).
Appel, M. & Kronberger, N. Stereotypes and the achievement gap: stereotype threat prior to test taking. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 24, 609–635 (2012).
Lindstrøm, C. & Sharma, M. D. Self-efficacy of first year university physics students: do gender and prior formal instruction in physics matter? Int. J. Innov. Sci. Math. Educ. 19, 1–19 (2011).
Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D. & Ito, T. A. Fitting in or opting out: a review of key social-psychological factors influencing a sense of belonging for women in physics. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020110 (2016).
Little, A. J., Humphrey, B., Green, A., Nair, A. & Sawtelle, V. Exploring mindset’s applicability to students’ experiences with challenge in transformed college physics courses. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 010127 (2019).
Hazari, Z. & Cass, C. Towards meaningful physics recognition: what does this recognition actually look like? Phys. Teach. 56, 442–446 (2018).
Li, Y. & Singh, C. Do female and male students’ physics motivational beliefs change in a two- semester introductory physics course sequence? Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010142 (2022).
Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z. & Lock, R. Identity, critical agency, and engineering: an affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. J. Eng. Educ. 105, 312–340 (2016).
Wang, J. & Hazari, Z. Promoting high school students’ physics identity through explicit and implicit recognition. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 020111 (2018).
Hazari, Z., Chari, D., Potvin, G. & Brewe, E. The context dependence of physics identity: examining the role of performance/competence, recognition, interest, and sense of belonging for lower and upper female physics undergraduates. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 57, 1583–1607 (2020).
Cwik, S. & Singh, C. Damage caused by societal stereotypes: women have lower physics self-efficacy controlling for grade even in courses in which they outnumber men. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 020138 (2021).
Marshman, E., Kalender, Z. Y., Nokes-Malach, T., Schunn, C. & Singh, C. Female students with A’s have similar physics self-efficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: a cause for alarm? Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 020123 (2018).
Sawtelle, V., Brewe, E. & Kramer, L. H. Exploring the relationship between self-efficacy and retention in introductory physics. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 49, 1096–1121 (2012).
Cwik, S. & Singh, C. How perception of learning environment predicts male and female students’ grades and motivational outcomes in algebra-based introductory physics courses. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 020143 (2021).
Bøe, M. V. & Henriksen, E. K. Love it or leave it: Norwegian students’ motivations and expectations for postcompulsory physics. Sci. Educ. 97, 550–573 (2013).
Mujtaba, T. & Reiss, M. J. What sort of girl wants to study physics after the age of 16? Findings from a large-scale UK survey. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 35, 2979–2998 (2013).
Ong, M. Body projects of young women of color in physics: intersections of gender, race, and science. Soc. Probl. 52, 593–617 (2005).
Johnson, A. in Physics Education and Gender: Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research (eds Gonsalves, A. J. & Danielsson, A. T.) 53–80 (Springer, 2020).
Boveda, M. & Weinberg, A. E. Facilitating intersectionally conscious collaborations in physics education. Phys. Teach. 58, 480 (2020).
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W. & McCall, L. Toward a field of intersectionality studies: theory, applications, and praxis. Signs J. Women Cult. Soc. 38, 785–810 (2013).
Mitchell, J. D., Simmons, C. Y. & Greyerbiehl, L. A. Intersectionality & Higher Education (Peter Lang, 2014).
Morton, T. R. & Parsons, E. C. #BlackGirlMagic: the identity conceptualization of Black women in undergraduate STEM education. Sci. Educ. 102, 1363–1393 (2018).
Avraamidou, L. I am a young immigrant woman doing physics and on top of that I am Muslim’: identities, intersections, and negotiations. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 57, 311–341 (2020).
Mendick, H., Berge, M. & Danielsson, A. A critique of the stem pipeline: young people’s identities in Sweden and science education policy. Br. J. Educ. Stud. 65, 481–497 (2017).
Rosa, K., Blue, J., Hyater-Adams, S., Cochran, G. & Prescod-Weinstein, C. Resource letter RP-1: race and physics. Am. J. Phys. 89, 751–768 (2021).
Crenshaw, K. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev. 43, 1241 (1990).
Charleston, L., Adserias, R. P., Lang, N. M. & Jackson, J. F. Intersectionality and STEM: the role of race and gender in the academic pursuits of African American women in STEM. J. Progress. Policy Pract. 2, 273–293 (2014).
Traxler, A. L., Cid, X. C., Blue, J. & Barthelemy, R. Enriching gender in physics education research: a binary past and a complex future. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020114 (2016).
Kanim, S. & Cid, X. C. Demographics of physics education research. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 020106 (2020).
Rodriguez, I., Brewe, E., Sawtelle, V. & Kramer, L. H. Impact of equity models and statistical measures on interpretations of educational reform. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8, 020103 (2012).
Hasse, C. & Sinding, A. B. in Science Education Research and Practice in Europe. Cultural Perpectives in Science Education Vol. 5 (eds Jorde, D. & Dillon, J.) Ch. 10 (SensePublishers, 2012).
McCullough, L. Gender, context, and physics assessment. J. Int. Womens Stud. 5, 20–30 (2004).
Lorenzo, M., Crouch, C. H. & Mazur, E. Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom. Am. J. Phys. 74, 118–122 (2006).
Hazari, Z., Tai, R. H. & Sadler, P. M. Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: the influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors. Sci. Educ. 91, 847–876 (2007).
Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D. & Kost, L. E. Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom: how sufficient is interactive engagement? Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 010107 (2007).
Kost, L. E., Pollock, S. J. & Finkelstein, N. D. Characterizing the gender gap in introductory physics. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 5, 010101 (2009).
Kost-Smith, L. E., Pollock, S. J. & Finkelstein, N. D. Gender disparities in second-semester college physics: the incremental effects of a ‘smog of bias’. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6, 020112 (2010).
Madsen, A., McKagan, S. B. & Sayre, E. C. Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: what is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors influence the gap? Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 9, 020121 (2013).
Henderson, R., Stewart, G., Stewart, J., Michaluk, L. & Traxler, A. Exploring the gender gap in the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 13, 020114 (2017).
Karim, N. I., Maries, A. & Singh, C. Do evidence-based active-engagement courses reduce the gender gap in introductory physics? Eur. J. Phys. 39, 025701 (2018).
Henderson, R., Miller, P., Stewart, J., Traxler, A. & Lindell, R. Item-level gender fairness in the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 020103 (2018).
Traxler, A. et al. Gender fairness within the force concept inventory. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 010103 (2018).
Mears, M. Gender differences in the force concept inventory for different educational levels in the United Kingdom. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020135 (2019).
Salehi, S., Burkholder, E., Lepage, G. P., Pollock, S. & Wieman, C. Demographic gaps or preparation gaps?: The large impact of incoming preparation on performance of students in introductory physics. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020114 (2019).
Maries, A., Karim, N. & Singh, C. Active learning in an inequitable learning environment can increase the gender performance gap: the negative impact of stereotype threat. Phys. Teach. 58, 430–433 (2020).
Stewart, J. et al. Mediational effect of prior preparation on performance differences of students underrepresented in physics. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 010107 (2021).
Blue, J., Traxler, A. & Cochran, G. Resource Letter: GP-1: gender and physics. Am. J. Phys. 87, 616–626 (2019).
Maries, A., Whitcomb, K. & Singh, C. Gender inequities throughout STEM. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 51, 27–36 (2022).
Whitcomb, K. M. & Singh, C. Underrepresented minority students receive lower grades and have higher rates of attrition across STEM disciplines: a sign of inequity? Int. J. Sci. Educ. 43, 1054–1089 (2021).
Malespina, A. & Singh, C. Gender differences in grades versus grade penalties: are grade anomalies more detrimental for female physics majors? Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 020127 (2022).
Whitcomb, K. M. & Singh, C. For physics majors, gender differences in introductory physics do not inform future physics performance. Eur. J. Phys. 41, 065701 (2020).
Andersson, S. & Johansson, A. Gender gap or program gap? Students’ negotiations of study practice in a course in electromagnetism. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 1–12 (2016).
Blickenstaff, J. C. Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gend. Educ. 17, 369–386 (2005).
Wong, B., Chiu, Y.-L. T., Murray, Ó. M., Horsburgh, J. & Copsey-Blake, M. ‘Biology is easy, physics is hard’: student perceptions of the ideal and typical student across STEM higher education. Int. Stud. Sociol. Educ. 32, 118–139 (2023).
Nyström, A.-S., Jackson, C. & Karlsson, M. S. What counts as success? Constructions of achievement in prestigious higher education programmes. Res. Pap. Educ. 34, 465–482 (2018).
Pettersson, H. Multiple masculinities and gendered research personas: between experiments, career choice and family. Int. J. Gend. Sci. Technol. 10, 108–129 (2018).
Wong, B. in Science Identities: Theory, Method and Reseach (eds Tolstrup Holmegaard, H. & Archer, L.) Ch. 5 (Springer Nature, 2022).
Johansson, A. Negotiating intelligence, nerdiness, and status in physics master’s studies. Res. Sci. Educ. 50, 2419–2440 (2018).
Francis, B. et al. The construction of physics as a quintessentially masculine subject: young people’s perceptions of gender issues in access to physics. Sex. Roles 76, 156–174 (2017).
Bøe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., Terry, L. & Camilla, S. Participation in science and technology: young people’s achievement-related choices in late-modern societies. Stud. Sci. Educ. 47, 37–72 (2011).
Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M. & Freeland, E. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 347, 262–265 (2015).
Upson, S. & Friedman, L. F. Where are all the female geniuses? Sci. Am. Mind 23, 6365 (2012).
Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J. & Cimpian, A. Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science 355, 389–391 (2017).
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J. & Handelsman, J. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16474 (2012).
Hasse, C. The material co-construction of hard science fiction and physics. Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 10, 921–940 (2015).
Daane, A., Decker, S. R. & Sawtelle, V. Teaching about racial equity in introductory physics courses. Phys. Teach. 55, 328–333 (2017).
Beilock, S. L., Rydell, R. J. & McConnell, A. R. Stereotype threat and working memory: mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136, 256 (2007).
LaCosse, J., Sekaquaptewa, D. & Bennett, J. STEM stereotypic attribution bias among women in an unwelcoming science setting. Psychol. Women Q. 40, 378–397 (2016).
Quinn, K. N. et al. Group roles in unstructured labs show inequitable gender divide. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 010129 (2020).
Doucette, D. & Singh, C. Share it, don’t split it: can equitable group work improve student outcomes? Phys. Teach. 60, 166–168 (2022).
Due, K. Who is the competent physics student? A study of students’ positions and social interaction in small-group discussions. Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 9, 441–459 (2014).
Rosa, K. & Mensah, F. M. Educational pathways of Black women physicists: stories of experiencing and overcoming obstacles in life. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020113 (2016).
Barthelemy, R. S. & Knaub, A. V. Gendered motivations and aspirations of university physics students in Finland. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 010133 (2020).
Bandura, A. in Encyclopedia of Psychology Vol. 3 (ed. Raymond J. Corsini) 368–369 (Wiley, 1994).
Nissen, J. M. & Shemwell, J. T. Gender, experience, and self-efficacy in introductory physics. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020105 (2016).
Kelly, A. M. Social cognitive perspective of gender disparities in undergraduate physics. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 12, 020116 (2016).
Dweck, C. S. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success (Random House Digital, 2008).
Binning, K. R. et al. Changing social contexts to foster equity in college science courses: an ecological-belonging intervention. Psychol. Sci. 31, 1059–1070 (2020).
Hyater-Adams, S., Fracchiolla, C., Finkelstein, N. & Hinko, K. Critical look at physics identity: an operationalized framework for examining race and physics identity. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14, 010132 (2018).
Carlone, H. B. & Johnson, A. Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: science identity as an analytic lens. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 44, 11871218 (2007).
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M. & Shanahan, M.-C. Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: a gender study. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 47, 978–1003 (2010).
Hazari, Z., Brewe, E., Goertzen, R. M. & Hodapp, T. The importance of high school physics teachers for female students’ physics identity and persistence. Phys. Teach. 55, 96–99 (2017).
Monsalve, C., Hazari, Z., McPadden, D., Sonnert, G. & Sadler, P. M. Examining the relationship between career outcome expectations and physics identity. In Proc. Physics Education Research Conference (eds Jones, D. L., Ding, L. & Traxler, A.) 228–231 (Per Central, 2016).
Quichocho, X. R., Conn, J., Schipull, E. M. & Close, E. W. Who does physics? Understanding the composition of physicists through the lens of women of color and LGBTQ+ women physicists. In 2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proc. (eds Cao, Y., Wolf, S. & Bennett, M. B) 24–25 (Per Central, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Quichocho
Kalender, Z. Y., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes-Malach, T. J. & Singh, C. Damage caused by women’s lower self-efficacy on physics learning. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 010118 (2020).
Maloney, E. A., Sattizahn, J. R. & Beilock, S. L. Anxiety and cognition. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 5, 403–411 (2014).
Li, Y. & Singh, C. Effect of gender, self-efficacy, and interest on perception of the learning environment and outcomes in calculus-based introductory physics courses. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 010143 (2021).
Cwik, S. & Singh, C. Students’ sense of belonging in introductory physics course for bioscience majors predicts their grade. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010139 (2022).
Li, Y., Whitcomb, K. & Singh, C. How perception of being recognized or not recognized by instructors as a ‘physics person’ impacts male and female students’ self-efficacy and performance. Phys. Teach. 58, 484–487 (2020).
Cwik, S. & Singh, C. Not feeling recognized as a physics person by instructors and teaching assistants is correlated with female students’ lower grades. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18, 010138 (2022).
Canning, E. A., Muenks, K., Green, D. J. & Murphy, M. C. STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau4734 (2019).
Coletta, V. P., Phillips, J. A. & Steinert, J. FCI normalized gain, scientific reasoning ability, thinking in physics, and gender effects. AIP Conf. Proc. 1413, 23–26 (2012).
Theobald, E. J. et al. Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 6476–6483 (2020).
Espinosa, T., Miller, K., Araujo, I. & Mazur, E. Reducing the gender gap in students’ physics self-efficacy in a team-and project-based introductory physics class. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 010132 (2019).
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T. & Tesch-Romer, C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol. Rev. 100, 363–406 (1993).
Gutmann, B. & Stelzer, T. Values affirmation replication at the University of Illinois. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 17, 020121 (2021).
Miyake, A. et al. Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: a classroom study of values affirmation. Science 330, 1234–1237 (2010).
Aguilar, L., Walton, G. & Wieman, C. Psychological insights for improved physics teaching. Phys. Today 67, 43–49 (2014).
Dasgupta, N. Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: the stereotype inoculation model. Psychol. Inq. 22, 231–246 (2011).
Malespina, A. & Singh, C. Gender differences in test anxiety and self-efficacy: why instructors should emphasize low-stakes formative assessments in physics courses. Eur. J. Phys. 43, 035701 (2022).
Archer, L., Moote, J., Francis, B., DeWitt, J. & Yeomans, L. The ‘exceptional’ physics girl: a sociological analysis of multimethod data from young women aged 10–16 to explore gendered patterns of post-16 participation. Am. Educ. Res. J. 54, 88–126 (2017).
Whitcomb, K., Maries, A. & Singh, C. Progression in self-efficacy, interest, identity, sense of belonging, perceived recognition and effectiveness of peer interaction of physics majors and comparison with non-majors and Ph.D. students. Res. Sci. Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10068-4 (2022).
Solomon, D., Battistich, V., Kim, D.-I. & Watson, M. Teacher practices associated with students’ sense of the classroom as a community. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 1, 235–267 (1996).
Kalender, Z. Y., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes-Malach, T. J. & Singh, C. Gendered patterns in the construction of physics identity from motivational factors. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 15, 020119 (2019).
Step Up for Women: Curriculum Materials (STEP UP, accessed 15 November 2023); https://engage.aps.org/stepup/curriculum
Santana, L. M. & Singh, C. Negative impacts of an unwelcoming physics environment on undergraduate women. In 2021 Physics Education Research Conference Proc. 377–383 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2021.pr.Santana
Hogan, K. & Sathy, V. Inclusive Teaching: Strategies for Promoting Equity in the College Classroom (West Virginia Univ. Press, 2022).
Cwik, S. & Singh, C. in The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Special Topics (eds Fatih Taşar, M. & Heron, P. R. L.) Ch. 17 (AIP, 2023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Physics thanks Anna Danielsson and Kelly Miller for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Maries, A., Singh, C. Towards meaningful diversity, equity and inclusion in physics learning environments. Nat. Phys. 20, 367–375 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02391-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02391-6
- Springer Nature Limited