Abstract
Blue organic light-emitting diode (OLED) technology requires further advancements, and hyperfluorescent (HF) OLEDs have emerged as a promising solution to address stability and colour-purity concerns. A key factor influencing the performance of HF-OLEDs is Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET). Here we investigate the FRET mechanism in blue HF-OLEDs using contrasting thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) sensitizers. We demonstrate that the molecular structure of the sensitizer profoundly impacts the FRET efficiency, exemplified by the spiro-linked TADF molecule ACRSA, which suppresses the dihedral-angle inhomogeneity and any lower-energy conformers that exhibit minimal FRET to the terminal emitter. Consequently, the FRET efficiency can be optimized to nearly 100%. Further, we demonstrate how the properties of a near-ideal sensitizer diverge from ideal TADF emitters. As a result, blue HF-OLEDs utilizing a greenish sensitizer exhibit a remarkable tripling of external quantum efficiency (~30%) compared with non-HF devices. This new understanding opens avenues for sensitizer design, indicating that green sensitizers can efficiently pump blue terminal emitters, thereby reducing device exciton energies and improving blue OLED stability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Commercial organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) still require better blue emitters1,2. Even today, fluorescent and/or triplet fusion emitters are used for commercial blue OLED pixels, as these materials alone provide acceptable device lifetimes3, despite lower efficiency compared with blue phosphorescent or thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) emitters4,5. The potential benefits of stable higher-performance blue emitters are even more pressing because of newly envisioned OLED display architectures, which exclusively utilize blue pixels with external fluorescent colour conversion layers6,7. These offer ~30% reduction in power consumption, and in the future could save more than 150 TWh in annual global residential electricity consumption (Supplementary Information).
Hyperfluorescent (HF) OLEDs offer ways to achieve this, circumvent the limitations of both TADF or phosphorescent blue emitters, and using them as sensitizers for separate terminal emitters8, but this approach is still relatively immature and not well understood9,10,11. A high-performance deep-blue ‘triplet-harvesting’ sensitizer with good spectral overlap to a terminal emitter is required, enabling efficient Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)10,12,13. The broad emission spectra and low radiative rates of a TADF sensitizer can, thus, be compensated for by the fast and narrowband emission from the terminal emitter and 100% triplet excitons are utilized by the former14,15,16. Concomitantly, we have shown that some green-emitting sensitizers can support blue HF-OLEDs17. This translates to a lowering of the singlet and triplet energies of all the materials in the emission layer, improving the device stability.
However, many papers report HF-TADF OLEDs with external quantum efficiencies (EQEs) lower than their TADF counterparts12,18. Where EQEs are higher10,19, no clear pattern or identifiable underlying cause is given. Multiresonance TADF terminal emitters14 that also harvest triplet excitons yield HF-OLEDs that typically outperform non-HF devices20,21,22,23,24. Along with EQE, in many cases, the HF-OLED efficiency roll-off performance is better, but in some cases, it is worse15,24. In almost all the reports, the ‘best’ TADF emitters are used in pre-optimized OLED stacks with a small concentration of the terminal emitter added to make an HF-OLED—prima facie, a sensible strategy12,25,26,27. However, the TADF emitter may already be performing at its maximum potential, and the introduction of a terminal emitter opens up additional loss pathways, for example, charge or triplet trapping on the terminal emitter. The terminal emitter can contribute to higher performance through higher photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) or improved light outcoupling, but these do not always outweigh the additional losses16,28.
The performance of such best TADF emitters also relies on a delicately balanced highest occupied molecular orbital–lowest unoccupied molecular orbital overlap29. A high overlap will increase the oscillator strength and PLQY (the ratio of radiative and non-radiative decay rates), but is detrimental to triplet-harvesting reverse intersystem crossing rates (krISC) and vice versa30. Thus, donor–acceptor TADF emitters with the fastest reverse intersystem crossing (rISC) rates but limited PLQYs do not produce high-performance OLEDs and are typically not investigated in HF-OLEDs. Counterintuitively, in HF-OLEDs, the PLQY of the sensitizer is not crucial if the FRET rate (kFRET) outcompetes the non-radiative decay, and instead, the higher krISC is the most beneficial.
Here we demonstrate extraordinary HF-OLED performance enhancement using TADF sensitizers, which themselves only give moderate non-HF device performance. Starting from our recent work using the high-performance TADF emitter DMAC-TRZ as a benchmark17,31, we demonstrate that ACRSA (moderate OLED performance) gives HF-OLEDs with an almost tripled EQEmax (refs. 10,32). Similar results are also demonstrated with the deeper-blue TADF emitter AZB-TRZ (ref. 33), which has fast rISC but low PLQY. Surprisingly, despite the photoluminescence (PL) spectra of ACRSA and DMAC-TRZ being energetically similar (comparable J factors), ACRSA exhibits notably higher FRET efficiency with ν-DABNA, even compared with the deeper-blue AZB-TRZ sensitizer, which has better spectral overlap. We demonstrate that this arises because of ACRSA’s rigid structure and long-lived excited states, normally a detriment in OLEDs. These findings establish new and unexpected design rules for high-performance HF sensitizers.
Results
Photophysics
The steady-state PL spectra of ACRSA and DMAC-TRZ at 10 wt% in the 3,3′-di(carbazol-9-yl)-5-cyano-1,1′-biphenyl (mCBPCN) host are shown in Fig. 1. The intrinsic broadness of the DMAC-TRZ charge transfer (CT) emission, centred at 500 nm, is due to contributions from different molecular configurations with different donor–acceptor dihedral angles in the film, together with some aggregate emission (Supplementary Fig. 2b)34,35. These contributions are resolved in time-resolved spectra even when FRET to a terminal emitter is active (in this case, ν-DABNA)14,27 (Supplementary Fig. 1c). In ACRSA, the absence of dihedral-angle inhomogeneity results in a narrower intrinsic PL spectrum, as evident in the deconvoluted spectra of ACRSA (Supplementary Fig. 2a) and as reported previously35,36.
Excluding the mCBPCN contribution to the ACRSA PL spectrum, comparing the spectral overlap in the two TADF emitters with ν-DABNA absorption27, ACRSA displays slightly increased spectral overlap because of its higher energy PL onset (Fig. 1, red-filled area), compared to the DMAC-TRZ overlap which is highlighted in green. For both emitters, only the blue edge of their emission overlaps with the narrow S0–S1 absorption of ν-DABNA, but efficient FRET surprisingly still ensues for both materials (although for different reasons, as discussed below). The calculated FRET radii between ν-DABNA and ACRSA or DMAC-TRZ are estimated to be 2.8 and 3.2 nm, respectively (Supplementary Information). ACRSA:ν-DABNA has slightly better spectral overlap but the calculated FRET radius is lower than DMAC-TRZ:ν-DABNA because the ACRSA PLQY is three times smaller.
The FRET dynamics in the two HF systems were investigated using time-resolved emission spectroscopy. For the ACRSA:mCBPCN (10 wt%) film (Fig. 2a), three species are identified; mCBPCN, ACRSA singlet CT (1CT) and ACRSA excimers (Table 1 lists their lifetimes). The very long 1CT decay lifetime arises from the highly decoupled spiro-linked donor–acceptor in ACRSA (ref. 37). The FRET-accelerated prompt fluorescence (PF) lifetime of ACRSA in the HF film reduces from 322.03 to 39.27 ns (Table 1). Comparably, the PF lifetime of DMAC-TRZ in mCBPCN reduces from 21.66 to 15.55 ns with 1 wt% ν-DABNA. This substantial lifetime quenching has an enormous impact on the FRET efficiency (ηFRET) and subsequent HF-OLED performance of ACRSA:ν-DABNA (Supplementary Table 1).
The kFRET and ηFRET values of the HF systems can be estimated from the changes in the sensitizer PF lifetime in the presence of the terminal emitter (Supplementary Information)9. For the ACRSA HF system, ηFRET is calculated as 87.8% (Supplementary Table 6), which is very high given such limited spectral overlap (Fig. 1). In the DMAC-TRZ HF system, ηFRET is calculated as 28.2%. This value is obviously at odds with our previously reported PL and electroluminescence (EL) spectra of HF-OLEDs, because we only considered the quasi-equatorial conformer emission17. Additional FRET from the quasi-axial conformer to the terminal emitter means that the FRET radius, kFRET and ηFRET are larger in the actual DMAC-TRZ:ν-DABNA HF17.
The very long ACRSA 1CT emission lifetime enables relatively slow FRET to achieve high ηFRET, despite ACRSA:ν-DABNA’s smaller R0 and r values. Indeed, considering the rate constants derived from the emission decays38, we calculate a kFRET value of 2.24 × 107 s−1 for ACRSA:ν-DABNA, very similar to the DMAC-TRZ HF system (1.81 × 107 s−1; Supplementary Table 6). In DMAC-TRZ:ν-DABNA, kFRET is in direct competition with the intersystem crossing rate (kISC = 3.37 × 107 s−1) and fluorescence rate (kF = 4.62 × 107 s−1; Supplementary Table 4). As the PLQY of DMAC-TRZ is high (~0.98), the non-radiative rates must be small39. In ACRSA, kISC and kF are both much slower, namely, 1.0 × 106 and 3.1 × 106 s−1, respectively. Non-radiative rates must also be slow to support such a long singlet exciton lifetime, thereby allowing FRET to dominate far beyond what it can achieve with DMAC-TRZ:ν-DABNA, despite the similar kFRET values (Supplementary Table 5). To generalize, sensitizers with slow radiative and slow non-radiative rates provide enough time for kFRET to accumulate and dominate the exciton dynamics. These same properties, however, limit the performance of the sensitizer as a TADF emitter in its own right.
Although FRET properties can be estimated with great confidence40, this is not the case for Dexter rates9. We estimated the average distance between the sensitizer and terminal emitter based on the kFRET and R0 calculations (Supplementary Table 6). In both cases, the average intermolecular distance is greater than a reasonable estimate of the effective Dexter radius (~1 nm, required for direct orbital overlap)9, and thus, we assume that Dexter transfer is negligible in these films.
We also note that the calculated ηFRET values represent the probability for singlet energy transfer during the singlet exciton lifetime. Although appropriate for standard fluorescent materials, instead, for excitons cycling (potentially multiple times) between singlet and triplet states (as in a TADF sensitizer), the overall/cumulative probability of FRET substantially increases with each cycle. Here we estimate ηFRET using only the PF lifetimes; thus, TADF materials with a fast rISC rate and high delayed fluorescence (DF)/PF ratio will have a much higher cumulative FRET efficiency. This can be observed in HF systems where experimental ηFRET and PL spectra are in contrast, indicating a far more complete FRET than the calculated ηFRET values otherwise imply (as discussed later).
An additional factor contributing to the small calculated ηFRET in the DMAC-TRZ HF system is the notable emission from lower-energy configurations, evident in late PF and early DF (time delay, 20–5,000 ns; Supplementary Fig. 1c,d34). Although not noticeably detrimental in DMAC-TRZ OLEDs, these low-energy states have vanishing spectra overlap with ν-DABNA and effectively zero ηFRET. The ACRSA HF system does not have this broad distribution of states (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 6), such that all the excited states have similar ηFRET values. This comparison highlights how homogeneous emitter conformations in TADF materials are a key benefit in HF-OLEDs supporting complete FRET.
The sensitizer rISC controls triplet exciton harvesting and lifetimes that support high efficiency in devices. ACRSA:ν-DABNA has a DF lifetime of 4.5 μs, which matches ν-DABNA:mCBPCN (Table 1), whereas it is 7.9 μs for 10 wt% ACRSA:mCBPCN, being influenced by the excimer states (Fig. 2). Thus, the ACRSA sensitization step to ν-DABNA prevents ACRSA excimer formation entirely (supported by the time-resolved spectra; Fig. 2a,c), even at 10 wt% loading, such that all ACRSA excitons are transferred to ν-DABNA, giving near-perfect sensitization.
DMAC-TRZ:ν-DABNA, in contrast, clearly has different DF contributions (Supplementary Fig. 1). A fast component exists in the early DF regime (~1 μs) with high contribution to the time-resolved PL emission, from the highly twisted DMAC-TRZ conformers (emission at 510 nm), which have weak overlap with the terminal emitter and thus low ηFRET (Supplementary Fig. 1d). The second regime is similar to the ν-DABNA:mCBPCN film DF, yielding efficient sensitization and a long DF tail from the slow sensitization of unfavourable DMAC-TRZ species (less twisted conformers with slow krISC). The average DF lifetime is 11 μs (Supplementary Table 1), indicating that these slow species greatly increase the overall DF lifetime of the HF system, an undesirable phenomenon in OLEDs.
The ACRSA emission and ν-DABNA absorption overlap is small (Fig. 1), but this does not limit ηFRET. This crucial realization allows us to maintain efficient cumulative FRET as the excited-state energy of the sensitizer is minimized. This is not unique to ACRSA, but arises from the long excited-state lifetime so that the singlet excited-state population primarily resides in the S1 zeroth vibrational level (Fig. 3). In ν-DABNA, the S0–S1 transition has very high oscillator strength and narrow bandwidth. Thus, the overlap between the sensitizer populated states and the spectrally narrow ν-DABNA remains suitably strong, making the ACRSA:ν-DABNA HF system ideal for maximal ηFRET despite the minimal spectral overlap. From this, surprisingly low sensitizer singlet and triplet excited-state energies can be used to sensitize blue terminal emitters, considerably increasing the range of usable low-energy hosts and emitter materials. This realization redefines the photophysical design requirements for sensitizer and terminal emitters to achieve optimal FRET alongside minimal sensitizer excited-state energies in HF-OLEDs.
Devices
OLEDs were fabricated using the same device architecture for all the devices as the sensitizers used have similar highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital values. (Fig. 4a). Although device performance could improve in devices individually optimized for each emitter, comparing the sensitizer, terminal emitter and HF combinations in the same device structure provides an insight into the sensitization processes in each emitter.
It is well established that the slow rISC of multiresonance TADF materials such as ν-DABNA leads to unsatisfactory efficiency roll-off at higher current densities in non-triplet-harvesting host devices20,21 (Fig. 4d–f, blue curve). We note that ν-DABNA performs exceptionally well in a DOBNA-OAr host, but this is not well understood41. ACRSA does not perform as well in OLEDs as DMAC-TRZ (refs. 10,32). In our device stack, the EQEmax value is limited to ~11% compared with ~25% for DMAC-TRZ (10 wt% sensitizer in the mCBPCN host). The roll-off for ACRSA is also worse than DMAC-TRZ OLEDs, a result of its slower rISC and longer exciton lifetimes (Supplementary Table 4). However, introducing 1 wt% ν-DABNA to the ACRSA devices, the EQEmax almost triples to 28.5%, whereas DMAC-TRZ:ν-DABNA HF-OLEDs show little change (Fig. 4). Furthermore, FRET is virtually complete in the ACRSA HF-OLEDs (Fig. 4c).
We propose that this remarkablet performance enhancement in ACRSA HF-OLEDs arises from the same properties that make ACRSA a less effective TADF emitter. In particular, the slow radiative and non-radiative rates of ACRSA are extensively outcompeted by FRET to ν-DABNA, overcoming its low PLQY. This long energy transfer window as well as the absence of any unfavourable conformers with poor ηFRET supports complete ACRSA:ν-DABNA FRET. In contrast, kISC and kF are comparably faster in DMAC-TRZ, leading to less complete FRET despite similar spectral overlap (Supplementary Table 3). The high PLQY in DMAC-TRZ means that radiative decay already outcompetes non-radiative decay, and therefore, the FRET processes cannot further improve the device performance. There also exists a sub-population of DMAC-TRZ molecules in unfavourable dihedral-angle configurations with redshifted emission inaccessible for FRET (Fig. 4c).
The similar EQE roll-off in the ACRSA TADF and HF devices indicate that triplet harvesting remains the exclusive role of the sensitizer, not the ν-DABNA terminal emitter (Supplementary Table 7). The possibility of device degradation during the J–V–L measurements is excluded by the identical consecutive sweeps of the same pixel (Supplementary Fig. 11). Nonetheless, the roll-off slope is improved at high luminance, indicating that the HF-OLED probably reduces the accumulation of ACRSA excitons through rapid FRET. The demonstrated devices open a new path for blue OLEDs, through which deep-blue sensitizers and associated high triplet hosts are not necessary4,5,15. Green-emitting TADF sensitizers with lower-triplet hosts can instead be used (offering substantially better stability in devices); combined with a highly absorbing red edge terminal emitter, these surprisingly effective HF systems with seemingly inadequate FRET overlap demonstrate an unexpected path to highly efficient blue OLEDs.
Supplementary Fig. 12 provides the stability of these devices. Surprisingly, the LT50 value for DMAC-TRZ OLEDs (at 1,500 cd m−2) is four times longer than the corresponding HF-OLEDs (34.0 to 8.5 h). However, the opposite trend occurs in ACRSA-based devices, in which the lifetime improves by 2.5 times in HF-OLEDs (28 to 69 min at 2,500 cd m−2), following efficient FRET and EQE improvements.
To explore this strategy further, we investigated an additional non-rigid TADF molecule, with blueshifted emission compared with DMAC-TRZ. AZB-TRZ (Fig. 4e) has fast non-radiative decay rate, fast krISC and low PLQY compared with DMAC-TRZ (Supplementary Table 2)33. Similar to DMAC-TRZ, a clear distribution of dihedral angles is observed through the time-dependent emission spectra (Supplementary Fig. 5a), giving redshifted emission with limited spectral overlap to ν-DABNA. Nonetheless, the spectral overlap is higher compared with ACRSA and DMAC-TRZ sensitizers (Supplementary Fig. 4), giving the highest J factor and FRET radius (Supplementary Tables 3 and 6) in this series of sensitizers.
Unsurprisingly, the CT energy dispersion together with fast kF and kISC of AZB-TRZ compete with kFRET (Supplementary Table 6), leading to a seemingly low ηFRET of 37%, but a high triplet population. The latter indicates why ηFRET appears to be underestimated; the HF-OLED spectra indicate near-complete energy transfer, that is, a small contribution from the sensitizer in the EL spectrum (~510 nm; Fig. 4c). Intersystem crossing/rISC cycling can efficiently harvest the high triplet population and FRET occurs throughout the DF/triplet regime, giving a larger cumulative ηFRET.
The combination of FRET and fast rISC, therefore, helps to greatly enhance the AZB-TRZ HF device efficiency, but the energy transfer is not as complete as in ACRSA. The fast radiative and non-radiative singlet decay rates do not allow FRET to completely dominate the exciton dynamics in AZB-TRZ HF devices, and their colour coordinates do not shift as much as that in ACRSA HF-OLEDs, despite AZB-TRZ having a higher energy emission and spectral overlap (Fig. 5). The device EQEmax, nonetheless, quadruples from 5% to 20%, and the already excellent roll-off from rapid rISC in AZB-TRZ devices is enhanced in HF devices.
The power and current efficiencies of both ACRSA and AZB-TRZ HF-OLEDs show enhancement (Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8), only partially explained by the improved quantum efficiencies. In ACRSA, they rise from 31 cd A−1 and 28 lm W−1 in the greenish TADF OLEDs to 37 cd A−1 and 36 lm W−1 in the deeper-blue HF-OLEDs (Supplementary Table 7). The effect is even greater for AZB-TRZ HF-OLEDs, rising from 12 cd A−1 and 9 lm W−1 in TADF OLEDs to 30 cd A−1 and 27 lm W−1 in HF-OLEDs (Supplementary Fig. 8). In contrast, DMAC-TRZ HF-OLEDs show a decrease in power efficiency as EQE remains unchanged and only the spectrum changes (Supplementary Fig. 9). Considering the eye spectral response, a green emitter with similar radiance to a deeper-blue emitter will always have higher power efficiency—a trend that the overwhelming efficiency enhancements of our HF-OLEDs disrupts.
Discussion
We have elucidated key photophysical parameters that yield optimal triplet upconversion sensitization in HF-OLEDs. We show that these parameters considerably differ from those required for an efficient non-HF-TADF OLED emitter. Importantly, rigid TADF molecules with homogeneous CT emission energy, exemplified by the spiro-linked TADF molecule ACRSA, allow all the molecules in the film to undergo efficient, complete FRET. Long radiative lifetimes and low intersystem crossing rates are ideal for sensitization, allowing small spectral overlaps to achieve efficient cumulative FRET to the terminal emitter. High rISC (and consequently high intersystem crossing) rates remain desirable for fast triplet-harvesting and minimal triplet annihilation/quenching phenomena in TADF OLEDs. In HF-OLEDs, a much slower kISC and kr can still support efficient sensitization if they can strike a delicate balance between being fast enough to ensure device stability and slow enough to allow FRET to outcompete the sensitizer’s radiative and non-radiative processes, removing the need for high sensitizer PLQY. This strategy also enables the sensitizer excitation energies to be pushed lower and retaining deep-blue terminal emission, with substantial benefits on the choice of host material and device longevity.
These results reveal an interesting blind spot in TADF HF research. By limiting the scope to only the best-performing TADF materials as sensitizers, that is, DMAC-TRZ, many excellent HF pairs using ‘less ideal’ TADF sensitizers have probably been overlooked, and would probably never be considered or discovered. Because of this ability to turn intrinsically ‘poor’ TADF emitters into blue HF-OLEDs with exceptional performance (Supplementary Fig. 10), a re-evaluation of many previously reported and unreported TADF materials should be stimulated.
Methods
Photophysical measurements
Solid-state samples were evaporated on quartz substrates into a Kurt J. Lesker Super Spectros deposition chamber, at pressures below 10–7 mbar. Steady-state absorption and emission spectra were measured using a double-beam Shimadzu UV-3600 UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer and a Horiba Jobin Yvon Fluorolog-3 spectrofluorometer, respectively. Time-resolved measurements were performed using a spectrograph (Horiba Triax) and a Stanford Computer Optics 4 Picos intensified charge-coupled device camera, where samples were excited with a Nd:YAG laser (EKSPLA, 10 Hz, 355 nm) under a vacuum.
Device fabrication
OLEDs were fabricated on patterned indium-tin-oxide-coated glass (VisionTek Systems) with a sheet resistance of 15 Ω sq–1. After sonicating in acetone and isopropanol, oxygen-plasma-cleaned substrates were loaded into a Kurt J. Lesker Super Spectros deposition chamber, and both small-molecule and cathode layers were thermally evaporated at pressures below 10–7 mbar. The materials used for the production of the OLEDs were N,N-bis(naphthalene-1-yl)-N,-bis(phenyl)benzidine (NPB) as the hole transport layer; 3,3′-di(9H-carbazol-9-yl)-1,1′-biphenyl (mCBP) as the electron blocking layer; the emission layer had mCBPCN or 1,3-bis(N-carbazolyl)benzene (mCP) as the host, DMAC-TRZ, ACRSA and AZB-TRZ as the sensitizer, ν-DABNA as the terminal emitter, 2,4,6-tris(biphenyl-3-yl)-1,3,5-triazine (T2T) as the hole blocking layer, T2T and 8-hydroxyquinolinolato-lithium (Liq) as the electron transport/injection layer and an aluminium (Al) cathode. NPB, mCP, mCBP and T2T were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and mCBPCN and ACRSA were purchased from Ossila; they were sublimed before use. Sublimed DMAC-TRZ was purchased from Lumtec. ν-DABNA was synthesized and purified by T. Hatakeyama’s group. AZB-TRZ was synthesized and purified by E. Zysman-Colman’s group.
Device characterization
Freshly evaporated devices were transferred into a calibrated six-inch integrating sphere (Labsphere) in a glovebox, and their electrical properties were measured using a source meter (Keithley 2400). The emission spectra were simultaneously measured using both calibrated fibre-coupled spectrometer (Ocean Optics USB4000) and photodiode, for low luminance. All the devices were evaluated at 293 K and under a N2 atmosphere.
Device lifetime
The OLED lifetime measurements were measured in a glovebox under a N2 atmosphere using an Ossila LED Measurement System.
Data availability
The data that support the plots within this paper and the Supplementary Information and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
On the way to becoming the world market leader in the OLED sector; https://www.techtag.de/digitalisierung/digitale-pioniere/cynora-auf-dem-weg-zum-weltmarktfuehrer-im-oled-bereich-interview/
Hong, G. et al. A brief history of OLEDs—emitter development and industry milestones. Adv. Mater. 33, 2005630 (2021).
Samsung Display researching phosphorescent blue OLED material; https://www.thelec.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=4044
Ihn, S. et al. Dipole moment‐ and molecular orbital‐engineered phosphine oxide‐free host materials for efficient and stable blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Adv. Sci. 9, 2102141 (2022).
Wright, I. A. et al. Conformational dependence of triplet energies in rotationally hindered N‐ and S‐heterocyclic dimers: new design and measurement rules for high triplet energy OLED host materials. Chem. Eur. J. 27, 6545–6556 (2021).
Aksoy, E., Danos, A., Varlikli, C. & Monkman, A. P. Navigating CIE space for efficient TADF downconversion WOLEDs. Dyes Pigm. 183, 108707 (2020).
Monkman, A. Why do we still need a stable long lifetime deep blue OLED emitter? ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 20463–20467 (2022).
Baldo, M. A., Thompson, M. E. & Forrest, S. R. High-efficiency fluorescent organic light-emitting devices using a phosphorescent sensitizer. Nature 403, 750–753 (2000).
Haase, N. et al. Are the rates of Dexter transfer in TADF hyperfluorescence systems optically accessible? Mater. Horiz. 8, 1805–1815 (2021).
Nakanotani, H. et al. High-efficiency organic light-emitting diodes with fluorescent emitters. Nat. Commun. 5, 4016 (2014).
Abroshan, H. et al. Thermally activated delayed fluorescence sensitization for highly efficient blue fluorescent emitters. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2005898 (2020).
Furukawa, T., Nakanotani, H., Inoue, M. & Adachi, C. Dual enhancement of electroluminescence efficiency and operational stability by rapid upconversion of triplet excitons in OLEDs. Sci. Rep. 5, 8429 (2015).
Fukagawa, H., Shimizu, T., Iwasaki, Y. & Yamamoto, T. Operational lifetimes of organic light-emitting diodes dominated by Förster resonance energy transfer. Sci. Rep. 7, 1735 (2017).
Hatakeyama, T. et al. Ultrapure blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence molecules: efficient HOMO-LUMO separation by the multiple resonance effect. Adv. Mater. 28, 2777–2781 (2016).
Stavrou, K. et al. Emission and absorption tuning in TADF B,N-doped heptacenes: toward ideal-blue hyperfluorescent OLEDs. Adv. Opt. Mater. 10, 2200688 (2022).
Alam, M. I. et al. Acceptor interlocked molecular design for solution‐processed stable deep‐blue TADF and hyper fluorescence organic LED enabling high‐efficiency. Adv. Opt. Mater. 10, 2200376 (2022).
Stavrou, K. et al. Unexpected quasi‐axial conformer in thermally activated delayed fluorescence DMAC‐TRZ, pushing green OLEDs to blue. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2300910 (2023).
Wada, Y., Nakagawa, H., Matsumoto, S., Wakisaka, Y. & Kaji, H. Organic light emitters exhibiting very fast reverse intersystem crossing. Nat. Photon. 14, 643–649 (2020).
Kim, J. H., Lee, K. H. & Lee, J. Y. Design of thermally activated delayed fluorescent assistant dopants to suppress the nonradiative component in red fluorescent organic light‐emitting diodes. Chem. Eur. J. 25, 9060–9070 (2019).
Jeon, S. O. et al. High-efficiency, long-lifetime deep-blue organic light-emitting diodes. Nat. Photon. 15, 208–215 (2021).
Chan, C.-Y. et al. Stable pure-blue hyperfluorescence organic light-emitting diodes with high-efficiency and narrow emission. Nat. Photon. 15, 203–207 (2021).
Lee, Y. et al. Investigating HOMO energy levels of terminal emitters for realizing high‐brightness and stable TADF‐assisted fluorescence organic light‐emitting diodes. Adv. Electron. Mater. 7, 2001090 (2021).
Naveen, K. R. et al. Achieving high efficiency and pure blue color in hyperfluorescence organic light emitting diodes using organo‐boron based emitters. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2110356 (2022).
Naveen, K. R., Palanisamy, P., Chae, M. Y. & Kwon, J. H. Multiresonant TADF materials: triggering the reverse intersystem crossing to alleviate the efficiency roll-off in OLEDs. Chem. Commun. 59, 3685–3702 (2023).
Naveen, K. R., Yang, H. I. & Kwon, J. H. Double boron-embedded multiresonant thermally activated delayed fluorescent materials for organic light-emitting diodes. Commun. Chem. 5, 149 (2022).
Cheng, Y. et al. A highly twisted carbazole‐fused DABNA derivative as an orange‐red TADF emitter for OLEDs with nearly 40% EQE. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202212575 (2022).
Stavrou, K., Danos, A., Hama, T., Hatakeyama, T. & Monkman, A. Hot vibrational states in a high-performance multiple resonance emitter and the effect of excimer quenching on organic light-emitting diodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 8643–8655 (2021).
Naqvi, B. A. et al. What controls the orientation of TADF emitters? Front. Chem. 8, 750 (2020).
Penfold, T. J., Dias, F. B. & Monkman, A. P. The theory of thermally activated delayed fluorescence for organic light emitting diodes. Chem. Commun. 54, 3926–3935 (2018).
Kukhta, N. A. et al. Revealing resonance effects and intramolecular dipole interactions in the positional isomers of benzonitrile-core thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials. J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 9184–9194 (2019).
Tsai, W.-L. et al. A versatile thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitter for both highly efficient doped and non-doped organic light emitting devices. Chem. Commun. 51, 13662–13665 (2015).
Nasu, K. et al. A highly luminescent spiro-anthracenone-based organic light-emitting diode exhibiting thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Chem. Commun. 49, 10385–10387 (2013).
Sudhakar, P. et al. Azaborine as a versatile weak donor for thermally activated delayed fluorescence. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 25806–25818 (2023).
Stavrou, K., Franca, L. G. & Monkman, A. P. Photophysics of TADF guest–host systems: introducing the idea of hosting potential. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2, 2868–2881 (2020).
Kelly, D., Franca, L. G., Stavrou, K., Danos, A. & Monkman, A. P. Laplace transform fitting as a tool to uncover distributions of reverse intersystem crossing rates in TADF systems. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 6981–6986 (2022).
Franca, L. G., Danos, A. & Monkman, A. Spiro donor–acceptor TADF emitters: naked TADF free from inhomogeneity caused by donor acceptor bridge bond disorder. Fast rISC and invariant photophysics in solid state hosts. J. Mater. Chem. C 10, 1313–1325 (2022).
Franca, L. G., Danos, A. & Monkman, A. Donor, acceptor, and molecular charge transfer emission all in one molecule. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 2764–2771 (2023).
Tsuchiya, Y. et al. Exact solution of kinetic analysis for thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials. J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 8074–8089 (2021).
Sem, S. et al. Determining non-radiative decay rates in TADF compounds using coupled transient and steady state optical data. J. Mater. Chem. C 10, 4878–4885 (2022).
FRET—Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (Wiley, 2013).
Kondo, Y. et al. Narrowband deep-blue organic light-emitting diode featuring an organoboron-based emitter. Nat. Photon. 13, 678–682 (2019).
Acknowledgements
We thank T. Hatakeyama and E. Zysman-Colman for providing the ν-DABNA and AZB-TRZ emitters, respectively. K.S. and L.G.F. acknowledge the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme for funding under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 812872 (TADFlife). A.P.M. acknowledges the EPSRC for funding under grant no. EP/T02240X/1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.S. and A.P.M. conceived the idea. K.S. designed the experiments. K.S. performed the photophysics, FRET calculations, device fabrication and analysis. K.S. and L.G.F. conducted the time-resolved PL measurements. A.D. measured the PLQY. All authors contributed to the discussion, writing and editing of the manuscript. A.P.M. supervised the project.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Photonics thanks Hironori Kaji, Zhongjie Ren and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–12, Tables 1–7, discussions and references.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stavrou, K., Franca, L.G., Danos, A. et al. Key requirements for ultraefficient sensitization in hyperfluorescence organic light-emitting diodes. Nat. Photon. 18, 554–561 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-024-01395-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-024-01395-1
- Springer Nature Limited