Abstract
Star–planet interactions play, among other things, a crucial role in planetary orbital configurations by circularizing orbits, aligning the star and planet spin and synchronizing stellar rotation with orbital motions. This is especially true for innermost giant planets, which can be schematized as binary systems with a very large mass ratio. Despite a few examples where spin–orbit synchronization has been obtained, there is no demographic study on synchronous regimes in those systems yet. Here we use a sample of 1,055 stars with innermost planet companions to show the existence of three observational loci of star–planet synchronization regimes. Two of them have dominant fractions of subsynchronous and supersynchronous star–planet systems, and a third less populated regime of potentially synchronized systems. No synchronous star–planet system with a period higher than 40 days has been detected yet. This landscape is different from eclipsing binary systems, most of which are synchronized. We suggest that planets in a stable asynchronous spin state belonging to star–planet systems in a supersynchronized regime offer the most favourable conditions for habitability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information). Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Christiansen, J. L. Five thousand exoplanets at the NASA Exoplanet Archive. Nat. Astron. 6, 516–519 (2022).
Borucki, W. J. et al. Kepler Planet-Detection Mission: introduction and first results. Science 327, 977–980 (2010).
Ricker, G. R. et al. Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst. 1, 014003 (2015).
Ford, E. B. Architectures of planetary systems and implications for their formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12616–12621 (2014).
Winn, J. N. & Fabrycky, D. C. The occurrence and architecture of exoplanetary systems. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 409–447 (2015).
Funk, B., Wuchterl, G., Schwarz, R., Pilat-Lohinger, E. & Eggl, S. The stability of ultra-compact planetary systems. Astron. Astrophys. 516, A82 (2010).
Kane, S. R., Hinkel, N. R. & Raymond, S. N. Solar System moons as analogs for compact exoplanetary systems. Astron. J. 146, 122–128 (2013).
Donati, J.-F. et al. Magnetic cycles of the planet-hosting star τ Bootis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 385, 1179–1185 (2008).
Udry, S. et al. The CORALIE survey for southern extra-solar planets. VIII. The very low-mass companions of HD 141937, HD 162020, HD 168443, and HD 202206: brown dwarfs or ‘superplanets’? Astron. Astrophys. 390, 267–279 (2002).
Aigrain, S. et al. Transiting exoplanets from the CoRoT space mission. IV. CoRoT-Exo-4b: a transiting planet in a 9.2-day synchronous orbit. Astron. Astrophys. 488, L43–L46 (2008).
Lanza, A. F. et al. Photospheric activity and rotation of the planet-hosting star CoRoT-4a. Astron. Astrophys. 506, 255–262 (2009).
Barnes, R. Tidal locking of habitable exoplanets. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 129, 509–536 (2017).
Drake, S. A., Pravdo, S. H., Angelini, L. & Stern, R. A. Synchronization timescales for three solar-type stars that have Jupiter-mass companions in short-period orbits. Astron. J. 115, 2122–2124 (1998).
Canto Martins, B. L. et al. A search for rotation periods in 1000 TESS objects of interest. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 250, 20–31 (2020).
McQuillan, A., Mazeh, T. & Aigrain, S. Stellar rotation periods of the Kepler objects of interest: a dearth of close-in planets around fast rotators. Astrophys. J. Lett. 775, 11–14 (2013).
Walkowicz, L. M. & Basri, G. S. Rotation periods, variability properties and ages for Kepler exoplanet candidate host stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 1883–1895 (2013).
Mazeh, T., Perets, H. B., McQuillan, A. & Goldstein E. S. Photometric amplitude distribution of stellar rotation of KOIs—indication for spin–orbit alignment of cool stars and high obliquity for hot stars. Astron. J. 801, 3–12 (2015).
De Medeiros, J. R. et al. Overview of semi-sinusoidal stellar variability with the CoRoT satellite. Astron. Astrophys. 555, A63 (2013).
Leão, I. C. et al. Rotation period distribution of CoRoT and Kepler Sun-like stars. Astron. Astrophys. 582, A85 (2015).
Masuda, K., Petigura, E. A. & Hall, O. J. Inferring the rotation period distribution of stars from their projected rotation velocities and radii: application to late-F/early-G Kepler stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, 5623–5638 (2022).
Ekström, S. et al. Grids of stellar models with rotation. I. Models from 0.8 to 120 M◉ at solar metallicity (Z = 0.014). Astron. Astrophys. 537, A146 (2012).
Gallet, F. & Bouvier, J. Improved angular momentum evolution model for solar-like stars. Astron. Astrophys. 556, A36 (2013).
Gallet, F. & Bouvier, F. Improved angular momentum evolution model for solar-like stars. II. Exploring the mass dependence. Astron. Astrophys. 577, A98 (2015).
Masuda, K. On the evolution of rotational modulation amplitude in solar-mass main-sequence stars. Astrophys. J. 933, 195–213 (2022).
Correia, A. C. M. & Laskar, J. Tidal Evolution of Exoplanets (Univ. of Arizona Press, 2010).
Jackson, B., Greenberg, R. & Barnes, R. Tidal evolution of close-in extrasolar planets. Astrophys. J. 678, 1396–1406 (2008).
Lurie, J. C. et al. Tidal synchronization and differential rotation of Kepler eclipsing binaries. Astron. J. 154, 250–265 (2017).
Leconte, J., Wu, H., Menou, K. & Murray, N. Asynchronous rotation of Earth-mass planets in the habitable zone of lower-mass stars. Science 347, 632–635 (2015).
Menou, K. Water-trapped worlds. Astrophys. J. 774, 51–58 (2013).
Leconte, J. et al. 3D climate modeling of close-in land planets: circulation patterns, climate moist bistability, and habitability. Astron. Astrophys. 554, A69 (2013).
Edson, A. R. et al. The carbonate–silicate cycle and CO2/climate feedbacks on tidally locked terrestrial planets. Astrobiology 12, 562–571 (2012).
Menou, K. Climate stability of habitable Earth-like planets. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 429, 20–24 (2015).
Joshi, M. M., Haberle, R. M. & Reynolds, R. T. Simulations of the atmospheres of synchronously rotating terrestrial planets orbiting M dwarfs: conditions for atmospheric collapse and the implications for habitability. Icarus 129, 450–465 (1997).
Auclair-Desrotour, P. & Heng, K. Atmospheric stability and collapse on tidally locked rocky planets. Astron. Astrophys. 638, A77 (2020).
Auclair-Desrotour, P. et al. The rotation of planets hosting atmospheric tides: from Venus to habitable super-Earths. Astron. Astrophys. 603, 108A (2017).
Correia, A. C. M. & Laskar, J. The four final rotation states of Venus. Nature 411, 767–770 (2001).
Ahuir, J., Mathis, S. & Amard, L. Dynamical tide in stellar radiative zones. General formalism and evolution for low-mass stars. Astron. Astrophys. 651, 3–29 (2021).
Teitler, S. & Königl, A. Why is there a dearth of close-in planets around fast-rotating stars? Astrophys. J. 786, 139–146 (2014).
Benbakoura, M., Réville, V., Brun, A. S., Le Poncin-Lafitte, C. & Mathis, S. Evolution of star–planet systems under magnetic braking and tidal interaction. Astron. Astrophys. 621, 124–144 (2019).
Pettengill, G. H. & Dyce, R. B. A radar determination of the rotation of the planet Mercury. Nature 206, 1240 (1965).
Showalter, M. R. & Hamilton, D. P. Resonant interactions and chaotic rotation of Pluto’s small moons. Nature 522, 45–49 (2015).
Smith, B. A. et al. A new look at the Saturn system: the Voyager 2 images. Science 215, 504–537 (1982).
Bryan, M. L. et al. As the worlds turn: constraining spin evolution in the planetary-mass regime. Astrophys. J. 905, 37–47 (2020).
Bryan, M. L. et al. Constraints on the spin evolution of young planetary-mass companions. Nat. Astron. 2, 138–144 (2018).
Snellen, I. A. G. et al. Fast spin of the young extrasolar planet β Pictoris b. Nature 509, 63–65 (2014).
Kane, S. R. Atmospheric dynamics of a near tidally locked Earth-sized planet. Nat. Astron. 6, 420–427 (2022).
Akeson, R. L. et al. The NASA Exoplanet Archive: data and tools for exoplanet research. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 989–999 (2013).
Gordon, T. A. et al. Stellar rotation in the K2 sample: evidence for modified spin-down. Astrophys. J. 913, 70–83 (2021).
Messias, Y. S. et al. A dearth of close-in planets around rapidly rotating stars or a dearth of data? Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L23 (2022).
Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A. et al. Gaia data release 1. Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 595, A2 (2016).
Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A. et al. Gaia data release 2. Summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 616, A1 (2018).
Paxton, B. et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA). Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 3–37 (2011).
Paxton, B. et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): planets, oscillations, rotation, and massive stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 208, 4–45 (2013).
Paxton, B. et al. Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): binaries, pulsations, and explosions. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 220, 15–58 (2015).
Choi, J. et al. MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled models. Astrophys. J. 823, 102–149 (2016).
Dotter, A. MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: methods for the construction of stellar isochrones. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 222, 8–18 (2016).
Davenport, J. R. A. & Covey, K. R. Rotating stars from Kepler observed with Gaia DR2. Astrophys. J. 868, 151–158 (2018).
Hartman, J. D. et al. Deep MMT transit survey of the open cluster M37. III. Stellar rotation at 550 Myr. Astrophys. J. 691, 342–364 (2009).
Van Saders, J. L. Weakened magnetic braking as the origin of anomalously rapid rotation in old field stars. Nature 529, 181–184 (2016).
Masuda, K. & Hirano, T. Tidal effects on the radial velocities of V723 Mon: additional evidence for a dark 3M◉ companion. Astrophys. J. Lett. 910, L17 (2021).
Acknowledgements
Research activities of the board of observational astronomy at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte are supported by continuous grants from the Brazilian funding agencies CNPq and FAPERN. The present project was supported by grants from the CNPq (Universal/409345/2021-0) and CAPES (PRINT/88881.310208/2018-01). This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001. Y.S.M., M.I.A.G., R.L.G., L.F.B. and D.O.F. acknowledge CAPES graduate fellowships. CNPq research fellowships are acknowledged by B.L.C.M., I.C.L. and J.R.D.M. This work includes data collected by the TESS and Kepler missions. This research made use of the NASA Exoplanet Archive, which is operated by the California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under the Exoplanet Exploration Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.L.C.M. and J.R.D.M. led the project and wrote the manuscript. Y.S.M. and I.C.L. led the data analysis and artwork preparation. I.C.L., R.L.G., L.F.B. and D.O.F. led software preparation and data reduction. M.I.S.G. revised the manuscript. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Astronomy thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–6 and references therein.
Supplementary Table 1
The list of 1,055 selected TOI and KOI main sequence stars. The following information is listed: the TIC and KIC ID, TOI and KOI ID, status of planet detection, rotation period (Prot), planetary orbital period (Porb), planet radius, semi-major axis and stellar mass.
Supplementary Data Fig. 1
Excel data used to make Supplementary Fig. 1.
Supplementary Data Fig. 2
Excel data used to make Supplementary Fig. 2.
Supplementary Data Fig. 3
Excel data used to make Supplementary Fig. 3.
Supplementary Data Fig. 4
Excel data used to make Supplementary Fig. 4.
Supplementary Data Fig. 5
Excel data used to make Supplementary Fig. 5.
Supplementary Data Fig. 6
Excel data used to make Supplementary Fig. 6.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Excel data used to make Fig. 1.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Canto Martins, B.L., Messias, Y.S., Arruda Gonçalves, M.I. et al. On the behaviour of spin–orbit connection of exoplanets. Nat Astron 7, 900–904 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-01976-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-01976-0
- Springer Nature Limited