Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with mesenchymal stem-like (MSL) subtype have responded poorly to chemotherapy whereas patients with basal-like 1 (BL1) subtype achieved the best clinical response. In order to gain insight into pathways that may contribute to the divergent sensitivity to chemotherapy, we compared the inflammatory profile of the two TNBC subtypes treated with docetaxel. Cellular signaling analysis determined that docetaxel activated MAPK pathway in MSL TNBCs but not BL1 TNBCs. The subsequent MAPK pathway activation in MSL TNBCs led to an IL-1A mediated cascade of autocrine inflammatory mediators including IL-6. Utilizing the humanized IL-6R antibody, tocilizumab, our in vitro and in vivo data show that MSL TNBCs treated with tocilizumab together with chemotherapy results in delayed tumor progression compared to MSL TNBCs treated with docetaxel alone. Our study highlights a molecular subset of TNBC that may be responsive to tocilizumab therapy for potential translational impact.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) account for 15–20% of all breast cancer cases and ~1 million new TNBC cases are diagnosed globally1,2. Unfortunately, TNBC patients do not benefit from endocrine and growth factor receptor neutralizing therapies as they are receptor-independent cancer cells. TNBC remains very difficult to treat and most patients develop recurrence or distant metastasis3,4. Indeed, metastatic TNBC patients have a grim overall survival of 9–12 months undergoing conventional therapies5,6. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of TNBC results in numerous chemoresistance pathways that are not yet fully delineated. This necessitates ongoing research to elucidate the cellular biology of TNBC to develop novel therapeutics to improve patient survival.
Previous molecular signaling pathway investigations by others identified that TNBC can be subdivided into distinct subtypes based on gene expression signatures7. The basal-like 1 (BL1) subtype had genes enriched in cell cycle and division7, and TNBC patients with BL1 tumors achieved the best clinical responses8,9. In contrast, the mesenchymal stem-like (MSL) subtype had gene enrichment in hallmark cancer pathways: metastasis, angiogenesis, and stem cell7. Patients with MSL subtype are more chemoresistant and achieve one of the worst clinical response rates8,9. Although this TNBC subtyping method is reproducible and early studies show that BL1 tumors are susceptible to antineoplastic agents, it is not yet clear what resistance mechanisms are utilized by MSL tumors in response to chemotherapy. Therefore, elucidating MSL chemoresistance mechanisms will allow integration of targeted therapies aimed to neutralize unique MSL pathways to complement conventional therapy.
Numerous inflammatory cytokines have been shown to activate pro-tumor pathways in various cancers10,11,12,13,14. It has also been established that various chemotherapy regimens correlate with elevated cytokine levels in cancer patients15,16,17. Therefore, it is plausible that the resulting chemotherapy-associated inflammatory cytokines may promote resistance mechanisms in TNBC cells. Given that MSL TNBC had gene enrichment in the inflammatory NF-kB pathway7, we hypothesized that MSL TNBCs may resist docetaxel therapy with self-induced proinflammatory cytokines.
As single agent taxanes are frontline therapy for TNBC patients18, we investigated potential chemoresistant mechanisms by analyzing the inflammatory profile differences between MSL and BL1 TNBCs treated with docetaxel. Our results suggest that docetaxel-treated MSL TNBCs initiate an autocrine IL-1A circuit to promote tumor production of IL-6. This mechanism is unique to MSL TNBCs and not observed in BL1 TNBCs. IL-6 is a well-established inducer of STAT3 signaling19,20, and STAT3 signaling mediates cancer proliferation21,22,23. Therefore, targeting tumor-derived IL-6 with pharmacological inhibitors may negate chemoresistance pathways in docetaxel-treated MSL TNBCs. We tested our hypothesis by investigating the therapeutic efficacy of tocilizumab, a humanized anti-IL6R antibody with FDA approval for various auto-immune diseases24,25. This study aims to elucidate the upstream pathway promoting autocrine cytokine production in MSL TNBCs, and investigate the potential benefit of a novel regimen combining tocilizumab with docetaxel against different TNBC subtypes.
Results
Differential inflammatory gene expression in MSL vs. BL1 TNBC cell lines
RNA sequencing was performed on four human MSL TNBC cell lines and four human BL1 TNBC cell lines that were untreated or treated with docetaxel. Gene expression profile differences were compared between untreated MSL vs. BL1 TNBCs, and docetaxel-treated MSL vs. BL1 TNBCs. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) demonstrated that MSL TNBCs had a higher inflammatory gene signature compared to BL1 TNBCs7. IPA predicted that the IL-1 cytokine family was upstream regulators in MSL TNBCs at baseline levels (Supplementary Fig. 1A) and after docetaxel (Fig. 1a), which was missing in the BL1 TNBC cell lines. IL-1A and IL-1B are both potent inflammatory cytokines with multi-faceted roles in homeostasis, immunity, and inflammatory diseases26,27. Pathogen-mediated activation is required for mature IL-1B and given that our model is in the context of “sterile” inflammation with the absence of microbial antigens, we hypothesized that upregulation of the IL-1B transcript would not result in biologically active IL-1B. We confirmed that all TNBC cell lines did not produce any detectable levels of mature IL-1B protein (data not shown). Next, we investigated the inflammatory network regulated by IL-1A in MSL TNBCs. IPA network pathway results showed that MSL TNBC gene expression profiles had an IL-1A regulated interaction with other inflammatory mediators such as IL-6, IL-8, CSF2, CXCL2, CXCL3, IL-32, IL-11 at both baseline levels (Supplementary Fig. 1B) and after docetaxel treatment (Fig. 1b). Given that we observed an upregulated cytokine network in MSL TNBCs, analysis was performed on a database for innate immune signaling pathways (InnateDB). Results indicated that MSL TNBCs had a significant upregulation of cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction compared to BL1 TNBCs (p < 0.05, Fig. 1c). In addition, heatmap analysis of the RNA sequencing results confirmed that MSL TNBCs had higher gene expression of various inflammatory mediators compared to their BL1 counterparts (Supplementary Fig. 1C), which were validated by confirmatory RT-PCR of select target genes (Supplementary Fig. 1D). Cumulatively, these data suggest that MSL TNBCs had an inflammatory gene expression profile that may be regulated by IL-1A in a mechanism that is absent in BL1 TNBCs.
Docetaxel induces inflammatory mediators in MSL TNBCs and not BL1 TNBCs
Next, we confirmed our RNA sequencing results by measuring select inflammatory mediators following docetaxel treatment in vitro by examining protein induction. Docetaxel treatment induced statistically significant levels of IL-6 in MSL TNBCs ranging from ~2 to 63 ng/ml (Fig. 1d), whereas docetaxel induced IL-6 inconsistently from BL1 TNBCs ranging from not detectable to 1 ng/ml. Similarly, docetaxel treatment mediated statistically significant production of mature IL-1A in three out of four MSL TNBC cell lines (Fig. 1e) compared to a complete absence of detectable extracellular IL1A in BL1 TNBCs. COX-2 was also upregulated following docetaxel treatment in MSL TNBCs (Fig. 1f), which did not occur in BL1 TNBCs. As both mature and full-length forms of IL-1A are biologically active26,27, we determined the expression of pro IL-1A by western blot in the representative TNBC cell lines. In alignment with the extracellular IL-1A data (Fig. 1e), docetaxel induced pro IL-1A only in the surveyed MSL TNBCs compared to virtual absence in BL1 TNBCs (Supplementary Fig. 2). Because IL-6 is a well-characterized cytokine that is utilized for the benefit of various cancers21,22,23, we explored the biological relevance of this cytokine in TNBCs. The signaling component of IL-6 requires both the IL-6R and gp130 as the downstream signal transducer for subsequent Jak/STAT activation28. Although we found that all TNBC cell lines had ubiquitous expression of IL-6R (Supplementary Fig. 2), we also found that MSL TNBCs had a trend of higher expression of the gp130 signal transducer in comparison to BL1 TNBCs. Docetaxel however did not alter the expression of the IL-6 signaling component in any TNBC cell line. These data confirms that docetaxel augments an inflammatory cytokine profile unique to MSL TNBCs which is notably absent in BL1 TNBCs.
MAPK pathway mediated IL-1A promotes the inflammatory cascade in MSL TNBCs
As our previous results indicated that IL-1A is an upstream in MSL TNBCs (Fig. 1a), we investigated whether elimination of IL-1A would diminish the inflammatory profile in MSL TNBCs. Two representative MSL TNBC cell lines, SUM-159 and MDA-MB-436, were treated with docetaxel in the presence or absence of IL-1A neutralizing antibody. IL-1A neutralizing antibody resulted in 72-77% reduction of docetaxel mediated production of IL-6 in the MSL TNBC cell lines versus isotype control (p < 0.001 in both cell lines, Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 3A). IL-1A neutralizing antibody also resulted in virtual elimination of PGE2, the main metabolite of COX-229, following docetaxel treatment in the MSL TNBC cell lines (p < 0.05 for MDA-MB-436 and p < 0.001 for SUM-159, Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 3A). Because IL-6 and IL-8 are often reported in tandem to promote TNBC growth, metastasis, and chemoresistance21,30,31, we also evaluated if IL-1A neutralization diminished docetaxel mediated production of IL-8. Indeed, IL-1A neutralization resulted in 66–73% reduction of IL-8 in the MSL TNBC cell lines (p < 0.01 for MDA-MB-436 and p < 0.001 for SUM-159, Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 3A). We have previously shown that BL1 TNBCs do not produce IL-1A (Fig. 1e). We, therefore, investigated whether BL1 TNBCs are capable of downstream IL-1 signaling by treating two representative BL1 TNBC cell lines, MDA-MB-468 and HCC38, with recombinant human IL-1A. Treatment of BL1 TNBCs with recombinant human IL-1A resulted in significant production of IL-6 and IL-8 (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 3B) indicating that BL1 TNBCs are capable of downstream IL-1 signaling and only lacking in endogenous production of IL-1.
Next, we and others have previously shown that taxane therapy induces endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress32,33,34. Surprisingly, docetaxel treatment increased the ER stress sensor IRE1α in MSL TNBCs, whereas BL1 TNBCs had no change after therapy (Fig. 2c, d and Supplementary Fig. 3C). Due to inconsistent findings with phosphorylated IRE1α between MSL and BL1 TNBCs, we verified docetaxel mediated inflammation was downstream of IRE1 with Kira6. Kira6 is an established IRE1 inhibitor35,36, and we found consistent abrogation of docetaxel induced IL-1A and IL-6 by Kira6 in both MSL TNBCs (Supplementary Fig. 3D). Furthermore, ER stress has been well-characterized for activation of MAPK pathway37,38,39. In alignment with previous reports, we observed that docetaxel treatment of MSL TNBC showed a correlative increase in both ERK1/2 phosphorylation and IL-1A (Fig. 2e). Cumulatively, our data show that docetaxel induces ER stress and inflammation in MSL TNBCs which is not observed in BL1 TNBCs.
To investigate the potential relevance of asymmetrical MAPK pathway activation in the two TNBC subtypes, we found docetaxel treatment resulted in the phosphorylation of MEK1/2 in MSL cell lines SUM-159 and MDA-MB-436 (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 4A), whereas docetaxel did not activate MEK1/2 in BL1 cell lines MDA-MB-468 and HCC38. To confirm the relevance of the MAPK pathway, MSL TNBC cell lines were treated in the presence or absence of docetaxel with MEK inhibitor PD 032590140. MEK inhibition led to a statistically significant reduction of IL-1A both at baseline levels (p < 0.001) and after docetaxel treatment (p < 0.001, Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 4B) in both MSL TNBC cell lines. Furthermore, the reduction of IL-1A likewise led to decreased production of the downstream cytokine IL-6 in SUM-159 (p < 0.001, Fig. 3c). We next investigated the phosphorylation of downstream targets ERK1/2 to validate that the effect of PD 0325901 was the result of MEK inhibition41. We confirmed that PD 0325901 significantly reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation both in the absence and presence of docetaxel (p < 0.01, Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 4C) for both MSL TNBC cell lines. In addition, we also determined that MEK inhibition resulted in a clear reduction of pro-IL-1A (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 4C) which aligned with the extracellular IL-1A reduction results as in Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 4B. These results indicate that docetaxel mediates activation of the MAPK pathway to initiate the IL-1A driven inflammation in MSL TNBCs (Fig. 3b). This mechanism does not occur in BL1 TNBCs as the MAPK pathway remains unchanged following docetaxel treatment. Furthermore, we found that MSL TNBCs responded dose-dependently to MEK inhibition by PD 0325901 (Supplementary Fig. 5A). Cumulatively, our data aligns with previous reports that MAPK pathway activates transcription factors that bind to the IL-1A promoter in tumorigenesis42. As IL-1A can be produced through MEK independent pathways43,44, we investigated the role of other reported pathways that can induce IL-1A. Inhibition of AP-1 resulted in no reduction of IL-1A and IL-6 in MSL TNBC cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 5B), whereas inhibition of NF-kB resulted in inconsistent reduction of IL-6 in MSL TNBC cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 5C). This suggests that NF-kB does not contribute to the MAPK/IL-1A axis, yet may play a minor independent role in IL-6 production. Cumulatively, these results show that docetaxel activates the MAPK pathway in MSL TNBCs which triggers an autocrine IL-1A cascade for subsequent inflammation. This mechanism is virtually absent in BL1 TNBCs as docetaxel treatment results in no MAPK activation.
Docetaxel synergizes with IL-6 neutralization against MSL TNBCs in vitro
As IL-6 has a multi-factorial role in promoting cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and cancer stem cell induction19,20,21,22,23, we investigated in vitro the potential efficacy of neutralizing MSL TNBC autocrine IL-6 production in combination with docetaxel treatment. Dual treatment of MSL TNBC cell lines with docetaxel and an IL-6 neutralizing antibody led to a significant reduction in phosphorylation of STAT3, a potent transcription factor for cancer proliferation (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 6A). In contrast, IL-6 inhibition resulted in inconsistent reduction of STAT3 phosphorylation in BL1 TNBCs. We then determined whether IL-6 neutralization reduced TNBC cell migratory capability. Scratch migration assays showed that docetaxel in combination with IL-6 neutralizing antibody led to a significant decrease in wound closure in MSL TNBC cell lines and not BL1 TNBCs (Fig. 4b, c and Supplementary Fig. 6B). Tocilizumab is a humanized anti-IL6R antibody with FDA approval for arthritis but not yet for any cancer immunotherapy applications. As mammospheres are used as an in vitro surrogate for cancer stem cells45, we investigated the efficacy of tocilizumab in abrogating mammosphere formation efficiency (MFE). MSL cell line SUM-159 had diminished secondary mammosphere colonies when co-treated with docetaxel and tocilizumab compared to chemotherapy alone (Fig. 4d). Although mono-therapy of tocilizumab resulted in decreased mammospheres in only one MSL TNBC cell line, combination therapy of docetaxel and tocilizumab led to a significant reduction of MFE in both MSL cell lines compared to docetaxel treatment alone (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Fig. 6C). Surprisingly, docetaxel combined with tocilizumab also led to a significant reduction of MFE in a BL1 TNBC cell line (Fig. 4f). Despite these unexpected results, our cumulative data clearly shows a consistent benefit of IL-6 targeted therapy against MSL TNBCs compared to inconsistent benefit against BL1 TNBCs in vitro.
Tocilizumab combined with docetaxel has efficacy against MSL and not BL1 xenografts
To validate the relevance of docetaxel induced MAPK activity in vivo, we implanted cell line xenografts into NSG female mice. Concurrent with our in vitro data, docetaxel treatment led to significant phosphorylation of MEK1/2 in MSL xenografts and not BL1 xenografts (Fig. 5a). Furthermore, docetaxel increased human IL-6 production in mice bearing MSL TNBC xenografts and not BL1 xenografts (Fig. 5b). Although we found inconsistent induction of IL-1A in MSL xenografts, we confirmed virtually no detectable IL-1A in BL1 xenografts (Supplementary Fig. 7A, B). Next, to investigate the efficacy of tocilizumab in vivo, we distributed mice bearing MSL or BL1 xenografts into groups receiving mono-therapy of docetaxel, tocilizumab, or dual therapy. MDA-MB-436 (MSL) bearing animals had a statistically significant delayed tumor growth when receiving dual therapy compared to chemotherapy alone (p < 0.001), whereas dual therapy provided no benefit for MDA-MB-468 (BL1) bearing animals (Fig. 5c). Furthermore, in a second MSL (S159) xenograft model, animals receiving docetaxel in combination with tocilizumab had a median increase in survival of 2 weeks (p < 0.01) compared to animals receiving chemotherapy alone (Fig. 5d). Our lab has previously characterized TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDX) as MSL and BL1 subtypes46. We, therefore, investigated the efficacy of our anti-inflammatory regimen in mice bearing MSL and BL1 PDXs. Similar to our cell line xenografts data, animals bearing MSL PDX benefited when receiving docetaxel with tocilizumab (p < 0.001) as compared to chemotherapy alone (Fig. 5e) and the benefit of dual therapy did not occur for animals bearing BL1 PDX. Although host murine IL-6 will not bind to human IL-6R47, we validated that docetaxel induction of IL-6 was unique for a TNBC subtype rather than a broad cellular response to chemotherapy. Both immunocompromised NSG and immunocompetent C57BL/6 animals had no statistical induction of mouse IL-6 after chemotherapy (Supplementary Fig. 7C).
Discussion
TNBC patients currently lack specific targeted therapeutics and have shown marginal benefit to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. It has previously been shown by others that high expression of IL-1A and IL-6 both correlate with poor prognosis for breast cancer patients21,42. Other preclinical studies have investigated the efficacy of tocilizumab against breast cancers broadly without necessarily delineating which TNBC patients would benefit the most from tocilizumab48,49,50. Here, we provide evidence that a molecular subset of TNBC resists conventional chemotherapy by a MAPK mediated autocrine IL-1A/IL-6 axis (Fig. 5f). Furthermore, our data potentially identifies a population of TNBC patients that may benefit from supplementing chemotherapy with tocilizumab to eliminate autocrine tumor production of IL-6. Currently, tocilizumab is not FDA approved for any tumor malignancies. Previous clinical trials have found that targeted IL-6 therapies provided no benefit in hematological malignancies, renal, and prostate cancer51,52. To the best of our knowledge, no clinical trial has completed an investigation of the potential efficacy of tocilizumab for TNBC patients.
We hypothesize that differential benefit from IL-6 blockade may be due to a gradient physiological effect of IL-6. BL1 TNBCs produce quantifiable levels of IL-6 both in vitro and in vivo, but to a lesser extent compared to MSL TNBCs. Neutralization of BL1 autocrine IL-6 provided no benefit in reducing tumor cell proliferation in vivo. In contrast, MSL TNBCs producing substantial IL-6 were effectively targeted with tocilizumab possibly providing insight that a gradient effect from autocrine IL-6 is necessary to promote tumor resistance. Therefore, our model demonstrates that tocilizumab will not be beneficial universally for TNBC patients. This novel therapeutic regimen will likely only improve the outcome for patients with chemoresistant tumors driven by MAPK induced IL-6.
This study identified MAPK activity-induced expression of other inflammatory mediators that may also be candidates for targeted therapy against MSL tumors. Although COX-2 has been well characterized to promote tumor angiogenesis and downregulate anti-tumor immunity, TNBC clinical trials targeting COX-2 have been largely unsuccessful53,54,55. Our data shows that only a subset of TNBCs undergo MAPK induced expression of COX-2 after docetaxel therapy, which may indicate that COX-2 inhibitors may not provide benefit for all TNBC patients. We, therefore, hypothesize that upon subtyping TNBC patients and performing a retrospective analysis of completed clinical trials investigating COX-2 inhibitors, there may be a differential response rate to COX-2 inhibitors based on tumor subtypes and MAPK activity of patient tumors.
IL-8 is a chemokine that recruits macrophages and neutrophils into the tumor microenvironment, and tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils have been demonstrated to favor a pro-tumor niche56. We identified IL-8 as another downstream inflammatory mediator produced by docetaxel resistant MAPK active tumor cells. IL-8 anti-biologic therapy has already been established to be safe in phase I trials against metastatic tumors and is currently under investigation in several phase II studies57. Cumulatively, we endeavor to provide a rationale for a clinical trial that identifies TNBC patients with chemo-refractory tumors driven by MAPK activity. In essence, these patients may benefit from supplementing conventional chemotherapy with targeted therapies against MAPK-driven production of IL-6, COX-2, and IL-8.
The chief limitation of our study is the absence of immune cellular contribution in the context of IL-6 blockade in vivo. Although we acknowledge that IL-6 has a broad cellular effect and is produced by diverse cell types, we provide clear evidence that docetaxel mediated MAPK/IL-6 activity is specific for a subtype of TNBCs. This is evident as docetaxel failed to induce host mouse IL-6 in both immunocompromised and immune-competent animals. Finally, tocilizumab will neutralize IL-6 signaling by antagonizing IL-6R regardless of the cellular source of IL-6 in the tumor microenvironment.
It should be noted that while we have consistently completed two representative MSL cell lines vs. two representative BL1 cell lines (i.e., S159 and M436 vs. M468 and H38), there were two notable exceptions: 1. Scratch migration (Supplementary Fig. 6B), M436 did not migrate during the indicated time conditions. We, therefore, substituted with M231 as a second MSL TNBC for scratch migration. 2. Mammospheres (Fig. 4f), we failed to initiate mammospheres with M468 after 2 months. Published literature confirmed that M468 does not form mammospheres. We could not find evidence that others established successful H38 mammospheres. H1937 was the only BL1 TNBC cell line that others established mammospheres; we, therefore, investigated only H1937 as the sole BL1 cell line for mammospheres.
Although BL1 TNBCs can produce autocrine IL-6, tocilizumab provides no benefit against two BL1 xenografts in vivo. Due to inconsistent benefit of neutralizing IL-6 against BL1 tumors in vitro (Fig. 4f and Supplementary Fig. 6A), we acknowledge that tocilizumab may possibly provide benefit for some non-MSL TNBC patients. However, our principal hypothesis is that tocilizumab therapy may provide greater efficacy against tumors with MAPK-driven IL-6 production. To investigate our hypothesis, we would design a phase 2 clinical trial screening 100–200 TNBC patients by RNA sequencing for sufficient enrollment of MSL patients as MSL is representative of 10–19% of TNBC patients8,9. All enrolled MSL trial patients would receive taxane therapy in combination with tocilizumab and evaluated for regimen efficacy. In addition, baseline tissue analysis for MAPK expression between responders and non-responders will be evaluated as potential predictive biomarkers for tocilizumab therapy.
Our investigation potentially identifies a population of TNBC patients that may benefit from supplementing conventional chemotherapy with a novel anti-inflammatory cocktail regimen to negate MAPK-driven autocrine cytokines. In addition, our results may also apply to other cancer pathologies reliant on MAPK pathway for therapy resistance. Ultimately, it is a paramount objective to improve the identification of cancer patients for targeted therapy regimens.
Methods
Cell culture, reagents, and antibodies
The following human MSL and BL1 TNBC cell lines were used for this study7: SUM-159, MDA-MB-436, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-157, MDA-MB-468, HCC38, HCC1937, and HCC1599. Cell lines were purchased from ATCC, authenticated, and regularly tested for mycoplasma. All cell lines were cultured in DMEM (HyClone- Logan, Utah) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), Antibiotic-Antimycotic (GenDepot- Katy, Texas), and L-glutamine (Corning- Manassas, Virginia) in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. For the indicated in vitro conditions, the following tissue culture reagents were used at following concentrations unless noted differently: docetaxel (NovaPlus, 4 ng/ml from Ebewe Pharma, Austria), human IL-1A neutralizing antibody (R&D clone 4414, 1 μg/ml), mouse IgG2A isotype control antibody (R&D clone 20102, 1 μg/ml), recombinant human IL-1A (R&D 200-LA, 2 ng/ml), DMSO (Sigma D2650), PD 0325901 (R&D 4192, 1 μM), human IL-6 neutralizing antibody (BD Biosciences clone MQ2-13A5, 0.1 μg/ml), rat IgG1 isotype control antibody (BD Biosciences clone R3-34, 0.1 μg/ml), tocilizumab (Roche, 30 ng/ml from San Francisco, CA), and Kira6 (Cayman Chemical 19151 from Ann Arbor, MI).
Anti-human antibodies used for ELISAs: IL-1A capture and detection (R&D clone 4414 and catalog# BAF200, respectively), IL-6 capture and detection (BD Biosciences clones MQ2-13A5 and MQ2-39C3, respectively), IL-8 capture and detection (BD Biosciences clones G265-5 and G265-8, respectively). R&D items from Minneapolis, MN; Sigma items from St. Louis, MO; BD Biosciences items from San Jose, Ca.
The following Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA) anti-human antibodies were used for western blots: COX2 (12282), β-actin (4970), GP130 (3732), β-tubulin (2146), ERK1/2 (4695), phospho-ERK1/2 (9101), MEK1/2 (4694), phospho-MEK1/2 (9154), GAPDH (5174), STAT3 (9139), IRE1α (3294), and phospho-STAT3 (9145). Abcam (Cambridge, MA) anti-human IL-1A (ab206410), anti-human phosphor-IRE1 (ab124945) and anti-human IL-6R (ab128008) were also used for western blots.
RNA sequencing analysis
Human TNBC cell lines were treated in the presence or absence of docetaxel (4 ng/ml) for 48 h and RNA was extracted with RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen from Hilden, Germany). Genomic DNA was removed with gDNA eliminator spin columns and total RNA purification was done according to manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA library preparation and RNA Sequencing was performed by the Genome Sequencing Facility of Greehey Children’s Cancer Research Institute at the University of Texas Health San Antonio as previously described58. RNA sequencing data processing and analysis of RPKM values were done as previously described59. In brief, RNAseq reads were quality filtered using Trimmomatic (https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170) and aligned to the human reference genome assembly GRCh38.p12 using HISAT2. Next, HTSeq was used to determine how many reads mapped to each features (https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638). Differential gene expression was performed using a permutation test for linear models. A total of 921 out of 24850 ENTREZ gene ID passed a fold-change cutoff of 4 and a p-value cutoff of 0.05 for pathway analysis on InnateDB (https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1147). Pathway over-representation analysis was performed using hypergeometric distribution test and Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction.
Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA)
One RNA sequencing dataset analyzed fold change ratio of averaged RPKM gene expression from untreated MSL TNBCs compared to averaged RPKM gene expression from untreated BL1 TNBCs. The other dataset analyzed fold change ratio of averaged RPKM gene expression from docetaxel-treated MSL TNBCs compared to averaged RPKM gene expression from docetaxel-treated BL1 TNBCs. Fold change ratio cut-off of 5 or −5 was utilized for both datasets and the “Core Analysis” function on IPA was utilized for upstream analysis of uploaded datasets. Estimated RPKM values were used to visualize heatmaps.
Western blot analysis
Human TNBC cell lines were treated under the indicated conditions and whole-cell lysates were collected with RIPA buffer (Sigma), 1% protease inhibitor, and 1% phosphatase inhibitor. In brief, cells were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice and lysed with complete RIPA buffer. Culture wells were then scraped with cell scrapers, lysate solutions were collected and incubated on ice for 20 min. Following centrifugation at 4 °C max speed for 10 min, whole-cell lysates were collected for western blot. Protein gel electrophoresis was performed on Bolt™ 4–12% Bis-Tris Plus Gels (ThermoFisher- Carlsbad, CA) followed by transfer onto 0.2 μm PVDF membranes. After 1 hr blocking in 5% milk, blots were stained overnight with previously listed primary antibodies at 4 °C in 5% BSA.
All primary antibodies for western blot (WB) were diluted 1:1000, except anti-human IL-6R (ab128008) was diluted at 1:500. Following overnight incubation, blots were developed with Cell Signaling Technology secondary antibodies anti-rabbit IgG HRP-linked (#7074, 1:2000 dilution) or anti-mouse IgG HRP-linked (#7076, 1:2000 dilution). Blot signals were detected with the BioRad XRS+ and densitometry analysis was performed with BioRad’s Image Lab software. After development of phosphorylated targets, blots were stripped with Restore™ Western Blot Stripping Buffer (ThermoFisher) and re-probed with relevant total protein antibody. All blots derive from the same experiment and were processed in parallel, except Figs. 1f, 5a and Supplementary Fig. 7A (see individual figure legends for more details).
ELISA analysis
Cultured supernatants from TNBC cell lines treated under indicated conditions were collected after 48 h. Human IL-1A, IL-6, and IL-8 ELISAs were performed with previously listed paired capture and detection antibodies according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Human prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Cayman 514010- Ann Arbor, MI).
For in vivo analysis of human IL-6 in mice implanted with human cell lines, serum was collected after 2 days of treatment with vehicle or docetaxel. Mouse sera were analyzed with the previously listed human-specific ELISA antibodies for human TNBC produced IL-6 in vivo.
RT-PCR
Human TNBC cell lines were cultured in the presence or absence of docetaxel (4 ng/ml) for 48 h, and RNA was isolated with Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (74104) according to manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA synthesis was performed with BioRad’s iScript cDNA synthesis kit (1708891) and real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was performed with BioRad’s iQ SYBR Green Supermix (1708882) following the manufacturer’s instructions on BioRad’s CFX96. BioRad items are from Hercules, CA. Primers are listed under Supplementary Table 1.
Mammosphere formation efficiency
TNBC cell lines were cultured as primary mammospheres with MammoCult medium (Stem Cell Tech #05620) supplemented with heparin (Stem Cell Tech #07980) and hydrocortisone (Stem Cell Tech # 07925) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Stem Cell Tech items are from Cambridge, MA. Cells were seeded at 24,000 cells per well in 2 mL of complete MammoCult medium in six-well ultra-low attachment plates. Every 2–3 days, 1 mL of fresh MammoCult medium was added to the wells. After 8–11 days, cells were collected with 0.05% trypsin and neutralized with 10% FBS for secondary mammosphere assays. The cells were then re-suspended in complete MammoCult medium and seeded at 8000 cells per well in 24-well ultra-low attachment plates. Secondary mammospheres were treated under the presence or absence of docetaxel (500 pg/ml) and tocilizumab (30 ng/ml) on day zero. On day 3, cells were re-fed with complete MammoCult medium and tocilizumab (30 ng/ml final) was re-added to applicable wells. On day 7, mammospheres were quantified with Incucyte Live-Cell Imaging System and its bundled software. Quantification included a minimum cell area of 1256 μm2 and MFE was calculated as follows: (number of spheres/8000) × 100%. Mammosphere assays were repeated with eight replicates for each treatment group.
Scratch migration assay
TNBC cell lines were seeded overnight in six-well culture plates and grown to 60–90% confluence. The cell monolayer was then scratched with a p200 pipette tip, and the monolayer was washed with PBS. The monolayer was then left untreated or treated with docetaxel (4 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of IL-6 neutralizing antibody or isotype control antibody (1 μg/ml). The scratch widths were then captured on the EVOS brightfield microscope (ThermoFisher) at ×2 magnification for time = 0 h. Cells were incubated for 40–48 h, and then the scratch widths were re-captured at ×2 magnification. At all time points, average scratch widths were determined from n = 5 measurements. Percent wound closure was calculated as follows: 100 × [(scratch width at T = 0 h) − (scratch width at T = final h)]/(scratch width at T = 0 h).
Immunofluorescence
SUM-159 cell lines were cultured overnight in eight chambered cell culture slides (Corning 354118) pre-coated with Poly-L-lysine (Sigma P1399). Cells were then treated in the presence or absence of docetaxel (4 ng/ml) for 48 h and then stained for immunofluorescence. In brief, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 100% methanol. After blocking, cells were stained for Phospho ERK1/2 (R&D MAB1018) overnight at 4 C. The next day, cells were washed and stained with goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 546 (ThermoFisher A-11035). Afterwards, cells were washed and stained for IL-1A (R&D MAB200) followed by goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (ThermoFisher A-11001). Slides were mounted with Vectashield (Vector Labs H-1200 from Burlingame, Ca) and sealed with coverslips. Slides were imaged on the EVOS FL Auto Imaging System.
In vivo experiments
The Houston Methodist Hospital Research Institute Animal Care and Use Review Office approved this study. All tumor models were developed orthotopically in the mammary fat pad of female NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice and handled as described previously58. In brief, cell lines were injected into the right mammary fat pad of female NSGs: SUM-159 (3 × 106), MDA-MB-436 (9 × 106), and MDA-MB-468 (2 × 106). PDX were derived and subtyped as MSL and BL1 as previously described46,58. After tumors were grown orthotopically to 100–200 mm3 in volume, mice were randomized into groups of (i) vehicle control, (ii) docetaxel (20 mg/kg), (iii) tocilizumab (20 mg/kg), (iv) docetaxel and tocilizumab (both 20 mg/kg). All groups were treated intraperitoneally once every 2 weeks.
For in vivo analysis of murine IL-6 production following docetaxel therapy, female NSG and C57BL/6 mice were treated with vehicle or docetaxel (20 mg/kg). Sera were collected after 2 days and analyzed with mouse IL-6 ELISA kit (BD Biosciences 550950).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using two-tailed unpaired t-tests in Microsoft Excel. For all mice model experiments, outcomes of interest included tumor growth kinetics, biomarker expression and disease specific survival. Survival outcomes were compared using log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test and visualized using Kaplan–Meier curves. Two-way ANOVA and log-rank (Mantel–Cox) tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The datasets supporting the conclusions for the current study are stored in a secured shared drive and will be shared by the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The raw sequencing files were uploaded to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database with the project number PRJNA767195. It will be released as manuscript is published.
References
Stovgaard, E. S., Nielsen, D., Hogdall, E. & Balslev, E. Triple negative breast cancer—prognostic role of immune-related factors: a systematic review. Acta Oncol. 57, 74–82 (2018).
Yao, H. et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: is there a treatment on the horizon? Oncotarget 8, 1913–1924 (2017).
Collignon, J., Lousberg, L., Schroeder, H. & Jerusalem, G. Triple-negative breast cancer: treatment challenges and solutions. Breast Cancer8, 93–107 (2016).
Denkert, C., Liedtke, C., Tutt, A. & von Minckwitz, G. Molecular alterations in triple-negative breast cancer-the road to new treatment strategies. Lancet 389, 2430–2442 (2017).
Bianchini, G., Balko, J. M., Mayer, I. A., Sanders, M. E. & Gianni, L. Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 13, 674–690 (2016).
Khosravi-Shahi, P., Cabezon-Gutierrez, L. & Custodio-Cabello, S. Metastatic triple negative breast cancer: optimizing treatment options, new and emerging targeted therapies. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 14, 32–39 (2018).
Lehmann, B. D. et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J. Clin. Investig. 121, 2750–2767 (2011).
Jovanovic, B. et al. A Randomized Phase II Neoadjuvant Study of Cisplatin, Paclitaxel With or Without Everolimus in Patients with Stage II/III Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Responses and Long-term Outcome Correlated with Increased Frequency of DNA Damage Response Gene Mutations, TNBC Subtype, AR Status, and Ki67. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 4035–4045 (2017).
Masuda, H. et al. Differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among 7 triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 5533–5540 (2013).
Khazali, A. S., Clark, A. M. & Wells, A. Inflammatory cytokine IL-8/CXCL8 promotes tumour escape from hepatocyte-induced dormancy. Br. J. Cancer 118, 566–576 (2018).
Kulbe, H. et al. The inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha generates an autocrine tumor-promoting network in epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 67, 585–592 (2007).
Ortiz-Montero, P., Londono-Vallejo, A. & Vernot, J. P. Senescence-associated IL-6 and IL-8 cytokines induce a self- and cross-reinforced senescence/inflammatory milieu strengthening tumorigenic capabilities in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Cell Commun. Signal 15, 17 (2017).
Snell, L. M., McGaha, T. L. & Brooks, D. G. Type I interferon in chronic virus infection and cancer. Trends Immunol. 38, 542–557 (2017).
Wu, F. et al. The Role of Interleukin-17 in Lung Cancer. Mediators Inflamm. 2016, 8494079 (2016).
Boyette-Davis, J. A., Walters, E. T. & Dougherty, P. M. Mechanisms involved in the development of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. Pain. Manag 5, 285–296 (2015).
Eyob, T., Ng, T., Chan, R. & Chan, A. Impact of chemotherapy on cancer-related fatigue and cytokines in 1312 patients: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Curr. Opin. Support Palliat. Care 10, 165–179 (2016).
Pusztai, L. et al. Changes in plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines in response to paclitaxel chemotherapy. Cytokine 25, 94–102 (2004).
Schmid, P. et al. Atezolizumab and Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 2108–2121 (2018).
Hillmer, E. J., Zhang, H., Li, H. S. & Watowich, S. S. STAT3 signaling in immunity. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 31, 1–15 (2016).
Zhong, Z., Wen, Z. & Darnell, J. E. Jr. Stat3: a STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6. Science 264, 95–98 (1994).
Hartman, Z. C. et al. Growth of triple-negative breast cancer cells relies upon coordinate autocrine expression of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8. Cancer Res. 73, 3470–3480 (2013).
Johnson, D. E., O’Keefe, R. A. & Grandis, J. R. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 234–248 (2018).
Kumari, N., Dwarakanath, B. S., Das, A. & Bhatt, A. N. Role of interleukin-6 in cancer progression and therapeutic resistance. Tumour Biol. 37, 11553–11572 (2016).
Horneff, G. et al. Experience with etanercept, tocilizumab and interleukin-1 inhibitors in systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients from the BIKER registry. Arthritis Res. Ther. 19, 256 (2017).
Karkhur, S. et al. Interleukin-6 inhibition in the management of non-infectious uveitis and beyond. J. Ophthalmic Inflamm. Infect. 9, 17 (2019).
Afonina, I. S., Muller, C., Martin, S. J. & Beyaert, R. Proteolytic processing of interleukin-1 family cytokines: variations on a common theme. Immunity 42, 991–1004 (2015).
Mantovani, A., Dinarello, C. A., Molgora, M. & Garlanda, C. Interleukin-1 and related cytokines in the regulation of inflammation and immunity. Immunity 50, 778–795 (2019).
Hunter, C. A. & Jones, S. A. IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease. Nat. Immunol. 16, 448–457 (2015).
Echizen, K., Hirose, O., Maeda, Y. & Oshima, M. Inflammation in gastric cancer: Interplay of the COX-2/prostaglandin E2 and Toll-like receptor/MyD88 pathways. Cancer Sci. 107, 391–397 (2016).
Fu, S. & Lin, J. Blocking interleukin-6 and Interleukin-8 signaling inhibits cell viability, colony-forming activity, and cell migration in human triple-negative breast cancer and pancreatic cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 38, 6271–6279 (2018).
Samanta, D., Gilkes, D. M., Chaturvedi, P., Xiang, L. & Semenza, G. L. Hypoxia-inducible factors are required for chemotherapy resistance of breast cancer stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E5429–E5438 (2014).
Davila-Gonzalez, D. et al. Pharmacological inhibition of NOS activates ASK1/JNK pathway augmenting docetaxel-mediated apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 1152–1162 (2018).
Liao, P. C., Tan, S. K., Lieu, C. H. & Jung, H. K. Involvement of endoplasmic reticulum in paclitaxel-induced apoptosis. J. Cell Biochem. 104, 1509–1523 (2008).
Mhaidat, N. M., Thorne, R., Zhang, X. D. & Hersey, P. Involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress in Docetaxel-induced JNK-dependent apoptosis of human melanoma. Apoptosis 13, 1505–1512 (2008).
Ghosh, R. et al. Allosteric inhibition of the IRE1alpha RNase preserves cell viability and function during endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell 158, 534–548 (2014).
Mahameed, M. et al. The unfolded protein response modulators GSK2606414 and KIRA6 are potent KIT inhibitors. Cell Death Dis. 10, 300 (2019).
de Galarreta, M. R. et al. Unfolded protein response induced by Brefeldin A increases collagen type I levels in hepatic stellate cells through an IRE1alpha, p38 MAPK and Smad-dependent pathway. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 1863, 2115–2123 (2016).
Smith, J. A. Regulation of cytokine production by the unfolded protein response; implications for infection and autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 9, 422 (2018).
Darling, N. J. & Cook, S. J. The role of MAPK signalling pathways in the response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 1843, 2150–2163 (2014).
LoRusso, P. M. et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral MAPK/ERK kinase inhibitor PD-0325901 in patients with advanced cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 1924–1937 (2010).
Zhao, Y. & Adjei, A. A. The clinical development of MEK inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 11, 385–400 (2014).
Liu, S. et al. HER2 overexpression triggers an IL1alpha proinflammatory circuit to drive tumorigenesis and promote chemotherapy resistance. Cancer Res. 78, 2040–2051 (2018).
Kayama, H. et al. Heme ameliorates dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis through providing intestinal macrophages with noninflammatory profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8418–8423 (2018).
Murakami, Y. et al. N-myc downstream-regulated gene 1 promotes tumor inflammatory angiogenesis through JNK activation and autocrine loop of interleukin-1alpha by human gastric cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 25025–25037 (2013).
Manuel Iglesias, J. et al. Mammosphere formation in breast carcinoma cell lines depends upon expression of E-cadherin. PLoS One 8, e77281 (2013).
Reddy, T. P. et al. Simultaneous targeting of HER family pro-survival signaling with Pan-HER antibody mixture is highly effective in TNBC: a preclinical trial with PDXs. Breast Cancer Res. 22, 48 (2020).
Hammacher, A. et al. Structure-function analysis of human IL-6: identification of two distinct regions that are important for receptor binding. Protein Sci. 3, 2280–2293 (1994).
Alraouji, N. N. et al. Tocilizumab potentiates cisplatin cytotoxicity and targets cancer stem cells in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol. Carcinog. 59, 1041–1051 (2020).
Wang, D. et al. IL6 blockade potentiates the anti-tumor effects of gamma-secretase inhibitors in Notch3-expressing breast cancer. Cell Death Differ. 25, 330–339 (2018).
Weng, Y. S. et al. MCT-1/miR-34a/IL-6/IL-6R signaling axis promotes EMT progression, cancer stemness and M2 macrophage polarization in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol. Cancer 18, 42 (2019).
Kampan, N. C. et al. Immunotherapeutic interleukin-6 or interleukin-6 receptor blockade in cancer: challenges and opportunities. Curr. Med. Chem. 25, 4785–4806 (2018).
Rossi, J. F., Lu, Z. Y., Jourdan, M. & Klein, B. Interleukin-6 as a therapeutic target. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 1248–1257 (2015).
Chen, E. P. & Smyth, E. M. COX-2 and PGE2-dependent immunomodulation in breast cancer. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 96, 14–20 (2011).
Hamy, A. S. et al. Celecoxib with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer might worsen outcomes differentially by COX-2 expression and ER status: exploratory analysis of the REMAGUS02 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 624–635 (2019).
Ruegg, C., Dormond, O. & Mariotti, A. Endothelial cell integrins and COX-2: mediators and therapeutic targets of tumor angiogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1654, 51–67 (2004).
Yuan, A., Chen, J. J., Yao, P. L. & Yang, P. C. The role of interleukin-8 in cancer cells and microenvironment interaction. Front. Biosci. 10, 853–865 (2005).
Bilusic, M. et al. Phase I trial of HuMax-IL8 (BMS-986253), an anti-IL-8 monoclonal antibody, in patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors. J. Immunother. Cancer 7, 240 (2019).
Rosato, R. R. et al. Evaluation of anti-PD-1-based therapy against triple-negative breast cancer patient-derived xenograft tumors engrafted in humanized mouse models. Breast Cancer Res. 20, 108 (2018).
Lardone, R. D. et al. Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Alters Melanoma Microenvironment Favoring Antitumor T Cell Responses and Improving M2 Macrophage Function. Front. Immunol. 8, 965 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Zannatul Ferdous (Houston Methodist Cancer Center) for editorial assistance. This study was supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.W.C., A.J.K., W.Q., J.Z., A.C.A., A.A.C., and D.J.L. performed data curation and investigation. A.W.C., A.A.C., and D.J.L. performed formal analysis. A.W.C., P.Y.P., and J.C.C. conceptualized the project. A.W.C. and J.C.C. wrote the manuscript. J.C.C. acquired funds and resources.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
D.J.L. has personal stock shares with Biogen/Idec. J.C.C. is the Inventor and holds patent, LNMMA targets breast cancer stem cells and is effective in reversing treatment resistance in triple-negative breast cancer, OTT 201336. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chung, A.W., Kozielski, A.J., Qian, W. et al. Tocilizumab overcomes chemotherapy resistance in mesenchymal stem-like breast cancer by negating autocrine IL-1A induction of IL-6. npj Breast Cancer 8, 30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00371-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00371-0
- Springer Nature Limited