Abstract
M1 macrophages enter a glycolytic state when endogenous nitric oxide (NO) reprograms mitochondrial metabolism by limiting aconitase 2 and pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activity. Here, we provide evidence that NO targets the PDH complex by using lipoate to generate nitroxyl (HNO). PDH E2-associated lipoate is modified in NO-rich macrophages while the PDH E3 enzyme, also known as dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLD), is irreversibly inhibited. Mechanistically, we show that lipoate facilitates NO-mediated production of HNO, which interacts with thiols forming irreversible modifications including sulfinamide. In addition, we reveal a macrophage signature of proteins with reduction-resistant modifications, including in DLD, and identify potential HNO targets. Consistently, DLD enzyme is modified in an HNO-dependent manner at Cys477 and Cys484, and molecular modeling and mutagenesis show these modifications impair the formation of DLD homodimers. In conclusion, our work demonstrates that HNO is produced physiologically. Moreover, the production of HNO is dependent on the lipoate-rich PDH complex facilitating irreversible modifications that are critical to NO-dependent metabolic rewiring.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Macrophages undergo profound metabolic changes that support their function in health and disease. The combination of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interferon-γ leads to differentiation of pro-inflammatory macrophages, often referred to as “M1” cells, with enhanced glycolytic flux and glutamine intake, and substantially reduced oxidative phosphorylation1. Glycolysis supplies the pentose phosphate pathway supporting the generation of NADPH to fuel the NADPH-oxidases for pathogen killing, as well biosynthetic pathways through the production of ribose2. Concurrently, nitric oxide (NO) following activation is directly lethal to microorganisms, while supporting glycolytic commitment by shutting down the use of pyruvate in the TCA cycle3,4,5. In addition, NO suppresses mitochondrial aconitase (ACO2) activity, leading to the accumulation of citrate, which upon export to the cytoplasm supports inflammatory lipid production6,7,8. Lastly, upregulation of aconitate decarboxylase (Acod)−1 leads to the production of the antimicrobial metabolite itaconate from the TCA intermediate cis-aconitate until NO concentration reaches levels that inhibit ACO2 function6,9. Given that various metabolites such as NO drive unique phenotypic and metabolic characteristics8,10, more study is required to investigate closely the molecular mechanisms driving metabolic adaptation during stimulation.
A critical, but less studied, component of this metabolic re-organization is the inhibition of the pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complex slowing glucose-derived carbon from entering the TCA cycle11,12. Due to the relatively rapid kinetics of NOS2-dependent PDH shutdown during macrophage polarization, as well as the apparent lack of involvement of HIF-1α in enzyme inhibition6, we hypothesized that NO might directly target components of the PDH complex.
The PDH complex consists of three different enzymes, E1, E2, and E3, which catalyze the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-Coenzyme A (CoA), yielding NADH. Lipoate covalently bound to E2 is fundamental in accepting the acetyl group from E1, and transferring it to reduced CoA13. The resulting dihydrolipoate undergoes oxidation by the E3 enzyme (also referred to as dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase; DLD) producing NADH. Interestingly, the DLD enzyme functions as a homodimer not only in PDH but also in α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase (OGDH), branched-chain amino acid-dehydrogenase (BCKDH) and the glycine cleavage system (GCS), all within the mitochondrial matrix14,15.
Over the last 30 years, substantial attention has been given to then biological effects of NO and related oxidized nitrogen oxides such as NO2 and N2O3. Nitroxyl (HNO) is more reduced than NO, and while the possibility of endogenous formation has long been hypothesized16,17,18,19,20, the mechanisms have yet to be definitively established. Plausible routes for endogenous HNO production include the reaction of NO with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and nucleophilic attack of an S-nitrosothiol (RSNO) by an adjacent thiol17,21,22,23,24,25,26,27.
Compared with NO and other reactive nitrogen species (RNS), HNO has higher electrophilicity28, a distinct mechanism of action20,29,30 and high reaction rates with critical targets including thiols29,31. Modification of thiols by HNO, to produce a reduction-resistant, irreversible sulfinamide (RS(O)NH2) has been observed in a varity of cellular systems17,28. In part due to its ability to mediate reduction-resistant modifications driving enzyme inhibition32, there has been substantial interest in a physiological role for HNO as an alternative signaling agent to NO. HNO donors induce vasodilation and contribute to the prevention of atherosclerosis and vascular thrombosis, and HNO is a promising alternative clinical cardiac inotropic agent in heart failure33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41. HNO donors also show efficacy in the treatment of alcoholism, cancer42 and pain43,44. In sum, the distinct chemistry of HNO compared to NO suggest that biological targeting by HNO may be selective and localized, with critical thiols being hot spots or privileged targets45. As such, HNO has high potential to function as a tightly controlled signaling molecule, which can be exploited therapeutically19,32,39.
Although there are numerous chemical processes by which HNO could be generated physiologically, and ample evidence of its effects, until now endogenous HNO and its biochemical fingerprint has yet to be fully established, perhaps in part due to it propensity for self-reaction28. Here, we investigate the mechanism of inhibition of PDH and identify a model of intramolecular generation of HNO during macrophage M1 polarization. This mechanism involves NO attack of PDH-E2 associated lipoates. The unique thiol configuration of lipoate facilitates the subsequent generation of HNO in close proximity with PDH-distal DLD. Irreversible, HNO-derived modification of DLD results in potent inhibition of PDH and mitochondrial adaptation to stimulation. This mechanism is consistent with the parallel inhibition of other DLD-containing enzyme complexes including OGDH and BCKDH. Intramolecular HNO generation in biological settings may provide a mechanism to induce site-specific responses while preventing uncontrolled modifications.
Results
Metabolic reprogramming of macrophages at PDH is dependent on NO fluxes and is associated with alterations of PDH-E2 cofactor lipoate
We previously showed that metabolic adaptation due to PDH inhibition is NOS2-dependent6 and we sought to examine this mechanism in more detail. Using bone-marrow derived macrophages (BMDM), we first measured PDH enzymatic activity and oxygen consumption rates (OCR) of permeabilized cells fueled with pyruvate; both decrease in an NO-dependent manner (Fig. 1a, b). As lipoate levels have been shown by us and others to be altered during macrophage activation46,47, we supplemented cell cultures with lipoate and found that this ameliorated reduction of OCR by NO (Fig. 1c). Since NO-derived RNS such as N2O3 interact with thiol groups, we considered that NO might target PDH through its E2-bound cofactor, lipoate (Fig. 1d). To test this possibility, we performed high resolution proteomics on the E2 enzyme of BMDMs (Fig. S1a). We detected lipoyl-bound peptides containing Lys131 and Lys258 of E2 (Fig. 1e) and higher abundance and lipoylation rates for Lys131 compared to Lys258 was observed (Fig. S1b–e). When NO was present, our analysis detected a form of lipoate consistent with S-nitrosation on one thiol and acetylation of the second thiol of the same molecule (K-C10H16O3S2N) (Fig. 1f). Although less abundant than on Lys131, this acetyl-nitroso lipoate modification was also found on Lys258 (Fig. S1f). We did not detect substantial signal consistent with a mixed S-nitroso/reduced thiol (Fig. S1g) or a dual S-nitroso modification on lipoate (Fig. S1h). Due in part to steric interactions, the latter case is not expected, while S-nitrosation of thiols is commonplace48. The apparent lack of a mixed S-nitroso/reduced thiol lipoate, (K-C8H15O3S2N), compatible also with a lipoyl-sulfinamide or a lipoyl-hydroxyl-disulfenamide, is consistent with increased reactivity. In particular, when thiol/-SNO ratios are low such as when protein -SNOs are accessible only to other proximal protein thiols, HNO generation is a possibility17. Moreover, in the presence of NO, BMDM peptides accumulated that contain lysine bound to dithiol- and acetylated-lipoate (Fig. 1g, h). This suggests that the enzyme is inhibited in this configuration most likely because of lack of cofactor recycling. Thus, the S-nitroso-acetyl-lipoate modification likely represents S-nitrosation occurring after the enzyme is inhibited at the acetylated state.
Modifications on DLD and the E3 binding protein of PDH are compatible with HNO exposure
We previously demonstrated a decline in DLD activity in macrophages stimulated with LPS + IFNγ that is dependent on NOS2 and occurs concurrently with altered migration in native gels6, suggesting direct modification of DLD by NO. This raises the possibility that other mitochondrial dehydrogenases sharing DLD (Fig. S2a) would be similarly targeted in macrophages. Metabolomics from stimulated WT and Nos2 −/− macrophages suggest that BCKDH, OGDH and GCS are indeed targeted in a NO-dependent manner (Fig. S2b). To further strengthen this conclusion, we performed isotope tracing analysis using [U-13C6]Leucine to assess BCKDH activity (Fig. 2a). A 4-h pulse with [U-13C6]Leucine resulted in >70% of intracellular leucine being labeled. Approximately 40% of α-ketoisocaproate was also labeled suggesting prompt transamination, with equal rates of fractional labeling between WT and Nos2 −/− that was independent of stimulation status (Fig. S2c). As anticipated, we observed decreased [U-13C6]Leucine-derived carbon incorporation downstream of BCKDH in stimulated WT BMDMs but not in stimulated Nos2 −/− cells (Figs. 2b, c and S2d, e). The isotopologue incorporation pattern confirmed predominant changes in the M + 5 and M + 3 isotopologues of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarate (HMG) and acetoacetate, respectively, indicative of disruption of BCKDH activity in a NOS2-dependent manner (Fig. 2b, c).
NO was sufficient to inhibit DLD activity (Fig. 2d), and treating intact cells with lipoate restored DLD functionality (Fig. S2f), consistent with our OCR results (Fig. 1c). However, adding lipoate to lysates did not restore DLD diaphorase activity (Fig. 2d), suggesting its actions are not due to reduction. Accordingly, treatment with DTT was also not effective in restoring DLD activity, indicating non-reversible modification (Fig. 2d). Exogenous lipoate caused no substantial changes in GSSG/GSH levels but led to an increase in lipoyl-GMP, suggesting activation of lipoate consistent with use of the salvage pathway for protein lipoylation (Fig. S2g, h)49,50. Altogether, these data suggest that rather than acting as a reducing agent, exogenous lipoate is likely supporting lipoylation of newly formed E2.
Having determined that NO modifies lipoate, and that lipoate adducts regulate DLD in association with loss of activity, we investigated the chemistry responsible for DLD modification. The reactivity was compatible with formation of a sulfinamide by HNO formed through nucleophilic attack of a lipoyl-SNO by the vicinal thiol (Fig. 2e). Reaction of HNO with a thiol leads to an intermediate that can spontaneously rearrange to a sulfinamide or in the presence of excess thiol can react to produce a disulfide and hydroxylamine (Fig. 2f)28. Generation of a sulfinamide in a biological system represents a nearly irreversible thiol modification51. Treatment with Angeli’s salt (AS), an HNO donor, was sufficient to inhibit DLD activity in BMDMs (Fig. 2g, h) and confirmed the propensity for HNO self-reactivity at high concentrations, where its effect on PDH is lost. Moreover, compared with an NO donor (DEA/NO) with a comparable half-life of release to AS, AS was a more effective inhibitor in culture (Fig. 2h). Similarly, OGDH activity is preferentially inhibited by HNO as compared to NO (Fig. S2i, j). Lastly, in experiments of potential rescue with DTT, glutathione (GSH) or Cysteine (Cys) in lysates52, these reducing agents did not substantially restore DLD activity in NO-rich cells (Fig. 2i). In addition, migration of the lipoate containing-E3-binding protein (E3bp) of PDH53 (Fig. 2j) on native gels changes during stimulation or treatment with AS, but not NO, and this migration is not affected by DTT (Figs. 2k and S2k, l). These data suggest that HNO may be responsible for lipoate-related biochemical alterations in these physiological settings, and that components of PDH and other cellular dehydrogenases may be both HNO producers and targets of inhibition by HNO.
HNO is generated by NO in the presence of reduced lipoate and is detectable in BMDMs
Given the possible involvement of lipoate groups in endogenous HNO generation, we used chemical approaches to assess if the interaction of lipoate with NO can generate HNO in vitro. Although cellular dithiols can react with S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO)54 to generate HNO, lipoate-mediated generation of HNO from NO and thiols has not been shown. We treated GSH with AS or DEA/NO in the presence of reduced or oxidized lipoate and GSH modifications were analyzed by ESI-LC/MS-MS (Fig. S3a). In this system GSH functions as an HNO trap and GSH-sulfinamide (GS(O)NH2) is a selective biomarker for exposure to HNO17,29,51,55. As expected GSH-sulfinamide was detected in the presence of AS (Fig. 3a). Remarkably, we measured substantial GSH-sulfinamide after incubation with DEA/NO and reduced lipoate but not oxidized lipoate (Fig. 3a), highly suggestive that exposure of reduced lipoate to NO can generate free HNO. We also assessed GSH modifications in reactions containing human recombinant DLD (rhDLD) and found that GSH-sulfinamide and sulfinic acid (-SO2H), a downstream hydrolyzed product, could be further increased (Figs. 3b, c and S3c) with GSH concentrations dictating the amount of HNO-derived sulfinamide.
Next, we evaluated whether HNO was produced endogenously in our cell system. We incubated murine BMDM with a fluorescent probe for HNO quantification56 and readily detected an increase in fluorescence in LPS + IFNγ-treated vs unstimulated cells that was probe-specific (Figs. 3d and S3d) and ablated with pre-treatments with the NOS2 inhibitor aminoguanidine (AG). Lastly, to interrogate the requirement of lipoate groups in endogenous HNO generation, we used ML226, an inhibitor of ABHD11, a mitochondrial hydrolase responsible for maintaining correct lipoylation of major α-keto-acid dehydrogenases57(Fig. 3e). ML226 treatment partially inhibited HNO-specific fluorescence (Fig. 3f).
Taken together, these data demonstrate the ability of lipoate to generate HNO, that can be facilitated with additional DLD, and confirm that HNO generation within macrophages is NOS2- and lipoate-dependent, and capable of inducing reduction resistant modifications.
Proteomic analysis reveals stable Cys-modifications in M1 BMDMs
Next, we sought to detect the effects of endogenous HNO in BMDMs by surveying reduction resistant modified proteins at the level of Cys residues in the mitochondrial-enriched proteome. We undertook an approach with TCEP reduction followed by alkylation and tandem mass tag (TMT) proteomics analysis (Fig. 4a). The rationale included the possibility of detecting sulfinamides, sulfinic acid and sulfonic acid (-SO3H), which, unlike traditional -SNO modifications would be stable during reduction. Moreover, a decrease in alkylation-derived carbamidomethyl (CAM)-modification for a given peptide would indicate increased irreversible modification.
We detected stimulation-induced, reduction resistant modifications at Cys on more than 200 proteins in WT macrophages. GO analysis of the 149 significantly modified targets (Fig. 4b) revealed proteins involved in metabolic processes, cellular respiration and oxidative pathways (Figs. 4c and S4a–c). Network analysis of protein-protein interactions showed clusters associated with distinct functions, most importantly RNA metabolism, signaling and cellular respiration (Fig. 4d, e). These results indicate that many metabolic proteins are oxidized in inflammatory conditions and these cysteine residues are susceptible to reduction-resistant, and therefore unlikely reversible, modifications. Among these modified proteins, we found DLD with a modification at Cys477, together with multiple proteins (31 out of 149, ~20%) belonging to components of the known interactome of DLD (Fig. 4f, g). These are proteins that are likely to be in the proximity of PDH/lipoate-generated HNO. This highlights potential strong susceptibility of DLD, and proteins in its network, to be inhibited by HNO-mediated irreversible oxidation under inflammatory conditions.
We then performed the same proteomic screen using stimulated Nos2 −/− BMDMs and attributed ~54% of the reduction-resistant proteins in WT BMDMs to NOS2 expression (Fig. S4d). These proteins were enriched in pathways involving phagocytosis, cellular metabolism and respiration (Fig. S4e, f), with a major subgrouping in organic acid metabolism and, reassuringly, nitrogen-compound metabolic processes (Fig. S4g). Finally, we treated stimulated Nos2 −/− BMDMs with AS to identify possible direct HNO-modified proteins and found 75 proteins significantly modified (Fig. 4h), 32 of which overlap with reduction-resistant proteins in WT cells (Fig. 4i). Enrichment analysis of these targets showed dominant representation in mitochondrial transport as well as sugar and lipid metabolism related proteins (Fig. 4j, k).
Within DLD, our proteome dataset detected only the CAM-versions of Cys477- and Cys484-containing peptides indicating reversible modifications. When interrogating NOS2 dependency of modifications, the data on Cys477 did not pass our filtering parameters, although CAM-peptides of Cys477 in Nos2 −/− cells indicated decreased modification (Fig. S4h) in the absence of NO.
In addition to identifying targets of modification we used this dataset to gain insight into the biological effects of macrophage exposure to HNO. We assessed relative total abundance of peptide/proteins across the proteome and we measured secreted cytokine/chemokine levels. We found 64 proteins to be significantly upregulated and 47 proteins downregulated in Nos2 −/− macrophages stimulated in the presence of AS (using a cutoff of FC = 1.25) (Fig. S4i). This target list suggests that the addition of HNO alters the levels of proteins involved mainly in phagocytosis, intracellular transport and autophagy (Fig. S4j, k). Our analysis of secreted factors showed that although cytokines classically associated with macrophage pro-inflammatory activation such as IL-6 and TNFα were not affected by the presence of the HNO, the production of CCL1, IL-1α, C5a, and GCSF was increased with HNO exposure. In contrast, the secretion of CXCL10 and KC was reduced with AS treatment (Fig. S4l). Together these data show that exogenous HNO may tune the inflammatory status of macrophages.
HNO drives susceptibility of modification at Cys484 within DLD
To look more closely at specific effects on DLD, we performed kinetic studies of DLD dehydrogenase activity upon incubation of rhDLD with either HNO or NO donors. These experiments revealed a stronger inhibitory effect of AS (Figs. 5a, b and S5a, b) than DEA/NO, recapitulating what we found in BMDMs (Fig. 2h). This is generally consistent with the reactivity of these related nitrogen oxides. In these assays we also excluded the possible effect of nitrite, a major byproduct of AS decomposition, on DLD activity (Fig. S5a), strengthening our hypothesis that HNO itself is responsible for DLD inhibition.
We next sought to identify post-translational modifications (PTM)s on DLD using high-resolution proteomics and to confirm the presence of HNO-dependent PTM(s). We confirmed that AS-driven modifications would appear as sulfinic acid rather than the Cys sulfinamide; oxidation from sulfinamide to sulfinic acid during proteomics sample prep is indeed a previously described phenomenon58(Fig. S5c, d). Experiments on recombinant DLD (Fig. S5e) using both label free and TMT, showed five cysteines modified by RNS: Cys80, Cys302, Cys312, Cys477 and Cys484. Cys80, together with Cys302 and Cys312, were only seen in the sulfonic acid state (+48) (Fig. S5d, f–h) which was increased with all treatments tested when compared to control. These Cys modifications were not specific to HNO, but rather reflect a sensitivity to oxidation. In contrast, Cys477 was detected carrying either a sulfinamide (+31), sulfinic acid (+32) or sulfonic acid in the presence of AS or DEA/NO (Figs. 5c and S5i) with sulfinamide and sulfonic acid modifications specific for AS. Assessments of Cys484 showed a greater increase in sulfinic acid with AS vs DEA/NO (Fig. 5d). Importantly these two cysteines (Cys477 and Cys484) were also detected by our TMT assay on BMDMs mitochondrial-enriched proteomes, revealing the importance of these two sites for oxidative modifications in physiological settings. Here also we excluded nitrite to be responsible for modifying DLD (Fig. S5j).
It is important to note that the pattern of modifications of Cys477 and Cys484 was different suggesting distinct reactivity. Although both Cys are clearly modified in an AS-dependent manner, Cys477 seemed to be particularly sensitive to degrees of oxidation which affected detectability (Fig. S5k). In contrast, Cys484 was consistently detected as sulfinic acid-modified across our approaches. Moreover, analysis of the unmodified peptides showed reductions on Cys484 in treatments with AS or DEA/NO consistent with reduction-resistant modification (Fig. 5d), while this was not the case for Cys477 (Fig. 5c).
As a result of these observations, we focused further analysis of physiologically relevant modifications in BMDMs on Cys484 specifically. We used labeled, chemically synthesized Cys484 peptides of DLD (Fig. S5a) to track PTM status through our targeted proteomics pipeline. We found that concentrations of AS higher than 0.2 mM result in the highest HNO-specific oxidation state, peaking at modification of ~6% of total protein (Fig. S6b, c). When applying this assay to stimulated BMDMs, we failed to detect Cys484 sulfinic acid modified peptides. However, we readily measured reductions in the levels of unmodified peptide when macrophages were stimulated or treated with donors (Fig. 5e) indicating a conversion of these peptides to a reduction-resistant modification state. Importantly, levels of unmodified peptide fall in a NOS2-dependent manner and crucially, Nos2 −/− cells restored likelihood of modification of Cys484 during exposure to HNO (Fig. 5e).
PTMs like lipid peroxidation or modifications with phosphine groups derived from TCEP-RNS interactions were not detected, suggesting they are unlikely to account for the peptide loss of unmodified DLD. While these data do not definitively prove specific HNO-mediated modifications, when cellular GSH was depleted with BSO, pushing the equilibrium of HNO chemistry towards sulfinamide (Fig. 2f), even greater decreases in unmodified Cys484 peptide were seen, consistent with increases in modification specifically at this site (Figs. 5f and S6d). We further confirmed this using rhDLD (Fig. 5g) demonstrating that GSH levels control the degree of bioavailability of HNO and likely limit the detectability of modified Cys484 in our cellular systems.
Considering this, we contemplated the possibility that the cellular pool of DLD may encompass forms with both reversible and reduction-resistant modifications driven or perturbed by RNS. Therefore, we used IAM-PEG2-biotin tags to alkylate reduced (free) Cys thiols to assess sites that may undergo modification in macrophages, and enriched conjugated peptides were assessed by MS (Fig. S6e). Samples clustered differently at PCA analysis (Fig. 5h, i), highlighting differences induced by stimulation and the presence of NO and HNO. Peptides containing Cys69 and Cys484 of DLD showed enrichment in this assay. LPS + IFNγ stimulated WT cells had higher levels of IAM-PEG2 tagged Cys484 peptides than unstimulated, indicating higher free Cys (Fig. 5j). Interestingly stimulated Nos2 −/− macrophages showed even higher levels of IAM-PEG2 Cys484 peptides, while AS treatment brought these levels down to the stimulated WT. This effect was specific for Cys484 (Fig. S6f).
Together these data support the notion that during macrophage stimulation, Cys484, and to a lesser extent Cys477, of DLD can be modified by HNO resulting in a reduction-resistant PTM detectable as Cys-sulfinic acid. Although this exact modification in intact stimulated cells appears difficult to detect, our data suggest that Cys484 may be substantially oxidized in resting macrophages, likely to a disulfide, that may be reduced to modify enzyme activity during stimulation. Moreover, it appears that HNO may dictate the extent to which the disulfide is present. Once available, the increased free Cys484 in LPS + IFNγ treated cells is subject to direct modification by HNO resulting in a reduction-resistant drop in PDH activity.
Cys477 and Cys484 sulfinamide impair DLD homodimer formation
To assess how the Cys484 DLD modifications might affect PDH activity we undertook an in silico modeling approach utilizing available structural data. Current human DLD (hDLD) structures show that known disease-causing mutations map to three locations in the human enzyme: the dimer interface, the active site, and the FAD and NAD (+)-binding sites59,60. We used PyMOL to build energetically minimized structural models of the hDLD (PDB_ID: 3rnm) modified at Cys484 by adding a sulfinamide functional group in place of the native thiol. Our analysis showed that Cys484 likely forms intra- and inter-chain reciprocal H-bond interactions at the monomer-monomer interface61 with residues His364; Asp368; Cys388; Pro390; Ala457; Arg482; Val483; His485. All the above cited residues, alternatively from both chains, locate within 4 Å from Cys484 from chain A or chain B. Notably, along conformation samplings, Cys484 and Cys388 occupy positions less than 2.5 Å distant, making them likely involved in a possible (transient) interchain disulfide bond.
Our structural analysis shows that introduction of a sulfinamide group at Cys484 perturbs the local H-bond interaction network and would prevent the formation of a disulfide bridge between Cys484 and Cys388. Specifically, interactions between Cys484 (chain A) and His364 (chain B) are weakened (their distance becomes greater than 4 Å) and new interactions with Arg495 (chain B) are strengthened (Fig. 6a, b). Notably, Cys484 is the cysteine closest to the FAD cofactor, being only 8 Å away from it (see also Fig. S6g). Cys477 is the cysteine residue closest to the DLD-E2b subunit (chain E), mapping to 10 Å from it.
We next used the FOLDX repair tool and the Yasara Minimization server to optimize and relax the 3D models, as described in the Methods section. The interaction energies calculated at the monomer-monomer interface within the DLD dimer or at the dimer-monomer interface within the DLD E3-E2b trimer, both in the unmodified and in the DLD E3-E2b Cys484 sulfinamide modified complex, gave a negative binding energy value (Table 1) that was lower in the native configuration than in the modified complex. This confirmed the expectation of a weakened binding interaction in presence of the modified Cys484 sulfinamide residue. This was further confirmed also by relaxing the models in the Rosetta force field (Table 2).
Lastly, we deployed the “residue_energy_breakdown” tool and confirmed reciprocal monomer-monomer interchain interactions between Cys484 and His485, Ala486 and Arg495 residues (Supp. Table 1) are weakened in the presence of the sulfinamide group. Notably, the introduction of sulfinamide modification at Cys484 appears to weaken interactions between Cys484 of chain A and residues Asp368, Val389 and Pro390 of chain B (Supp. Table 1) even more substantially. The presence of a sulfinamide on Cys447 slightly decreases the interaction energy at the DLD monomer-monomer interface and slightly increases it at the interface of DLD E2b subunit with the DLD dimer (Supp. Table 2), perhaps due to a different rearrangement of the local H-bond interaction network. This different rearrangement causes a different orientation of several side-chains, including the side-chains of Cys484 and Cys388 (Fig. S6g).
A role for Cys484 in DLD activity is totally unexplored experimentally. Therefore, we changed Cys484 to alanine (C484A) to eliminate the possibility of disulfide linking without steric separation of DLD dimers, or tryptophan (C484W) to eliminate disulfide linking and exert a steric force to interfere with non-covalent dimerization. In silico modeled interaction energies supported these selections (Supp. Table S3). Transient overexpression of Myc-DDK tagged proteins in HEK293T cells showed that the mutations did not prevent the expression of the DLD protein (Fig. 6c). In addition, dehydrogenase activity was almost completely ablated in both mutants (Fig. 6d) proving the fundamental role of this residue in DLD function. Moreover, in native gels, the mutant proteins showed reduced ability to form dimers, and in gel diaphorase activity was largely absent (Fig. 6e). Interestingly, while dehydrogenase activity was comparably reduced in both mutants, the C484A mutant partially retained some dimerization capacity as opposed to C484W. Both mutations lead to lower Vmax values, indicating reduced catalytic efficiency, as represented by the classical Michaelis-Menten curve (Fig. 6f). Further enzyme kinetics showed that these mutants behave as if the enzyme is in the presence of an uncompetitive inhibitor, as shown by the Lineweaver–Burk plot, consistent with an enzyme-substrate complex that is highly stable, preventing the release of the product and slowing down the reaction (Fig. 6f).
Hepatocyte PDH is regulated in NO-dependent manner consistent with the generation of HNO
Utilization of lipoylated PDH and the generation of NO are not characteristics limited to macrophages. Therefore, we investigated the possibility that PDH-generated HNO may modify enzyme function in other environments. Hepatocytes upregulate NOS2 and produce NO under certain conditions62,63,64. Thus, as a first approach we used liver mitochondria to assess the metabolic response to NO-related donor compounds in vitro. We found that both AS and DEA/NO were capable of decreasing liver PDH activity (Fig. 7a, b) with AS being a more powerful inhibitor, consistent with observed effects in BMDMs and rhDLD (Fig. 2h and Fig. 5a, b). Moreover, electron flow assays showed that hepatocyte pyruvate respiration is compromised strongly with AS (Fig. 7c) whereas the activity of other ETC complexes was not affected (Fig. 7d, e).
Based on our identification of DLD reacting with HNO, we tested CI respiration from fuel sources dependent on OGDH65,66. Here, too, the effect of HNO was detectable (Fig. S7a, b). To address whether HNO-mediated inhibition of PDH occurred in vivo, we assessed hepatic PDH status in endotoxin-treated mice (Fig. 7f) and found a decrease in PDH activity in liver mitochondria of these mice (Fig. 7g, h). Moreover, similar to macrophages, we found these reductions to be resistant to reversal with DTT, Cys or GSH (Fig. 7i). Studies in Nos2 −/− mice confirmed this effect on PDH to be NOS2 dependent (Figs. 7j–l and S7c).
To dissect whether hepatocyte intrinsic Nos2 expression is capable of inhibiting PDH we isolated primary cells from perfused murine livers and confirmed their ability to produce NO at comparable levels to those in macrophages (Fig. 7m). Here, also we found that stimulated cells have compromised pyruvate-elicited OCR (Figs. 7n and S7d), and decreased PDH activity (Figs. 7o and S7e). Cytokine-induced NOS2 was even more effective than lower doses of NO donors (Fig. 7p). In parallel, we extracted metabolites from these primary cultures and evaluated GSH-sulfinamide using ESI-LC/MS-MS. We found that cells treated with cytokines accumulated GSH-sulfinamide as did cells treated with HNO or NO donors and pre-treatment with AG prevented this phenomenon (Figs. 7q and S7f). Lastly we confirmed in this system that, as predicted, high intracellular GSH67 limits HNO-derived sulfinamide (Fig. S7g–j).
Taken together these data show that modifications of PDH activity consistent with HNO chemistry are generated in hepatocytes during sepsis as a result of endogenous, NOS2 -dependent NO and that intracellular levels of GSH are critical in influencing the development of HNO-derived reduction-resistant modifications. This suggests that the PDH-derived HNO generation we propose here is applicable across various cell types as long as the GSH environment is amenable.
Discussion
Multiple groups have shown the PDH and OGDH complexes to be targeted during proinflammatory stimulation of macrophages, and some have attributed this finding to the loss of the lipoate cofactor without a well-defined mechanism or consideration of involvement of RNS47. PTMs via the kinase PDK have also been suggested12,68. Nevertheless, we and others have shown that although relevant, this phenomenon does not account for the metabolic reprogramming at PDH in macrophages6,47,69. The mechanism we describe here is, to our knowledge, previously unrecognized and reveals a biochemical link between reduced radicals of NO and cellular metabolism, where a key role is played by the microenvironment. Our data suggest a model where, in the presence of NO, the thiol-rich environment represented by the multiple lipoate moieties of PDH-E2, acts as an intramolecular HNO generator (Fig. 8). Within the PDH complex, this HNO is produced in close proximity to the cysteines of DLD resulting in rapid reaction of HNO with the DLD thiols leading to stimulation-dependent, reduction-resistant, sulfinamide modification and inhibition. Molecular modeling and mutagenesis confirm that modification at Cys484 interferes with the dimeric composition of DLD while shutting down enzymatic activity. This demonstrates physiologically relevant generation of HNO, highlighting a potential role for this species in metabolism and biology.
Our model of generation of HNO by the lipoate moieties of PDH is supported by multiple lines of evidence. (1) We extend previous work showing disruption of PDH in activated macrophages6,47 and of modifications of lipoate levels46, and we can reconsitute pyruvate oxidation with exogenous lipoate. (2) Proteomics of lipoate status in cells exposed to NO is uniquely consistent with NO-lipoate chemistry. (3) We detected HNO-mediated modifications on trapping GSH when NO donors reacted with reduced lipoate. (4) Proteomics show reduction-resistant Cys modifications in recombinant protein and activated macrophages consistent with HNO. (5) Use of HNO detectors confirmed lipoate-dependent production of HNO in macrophages. Thus, we propose that the PDH complex might represent a particularly efficient HNO generator.
In the past decade, research on HNO has revealed a distinct bioactivity profile compared to NO. The primary cellular targets for HNO are thiols and oxidized metals while NO principally interacts with other free radicals and reduced metals29,70. Unlike NO, the high reactivity of HNO for thiols will limit diffusion such that HNO will likely need to be produced in close proximity to its target. Compartmentalization of HNO targets within organelles like mitochondria has been proposed as a way to promote reactivity by avoiding scavengers such as GSH20. Still, unequivocal evidence for physiological generation of HNO and its mechanism of action remained elusive until now.
According to models of PDH structure, inter-lipoyl-domain coupling might help in shuttling the reducing equivalents from E1 to E371,72,73 representing a supportive context for endogenous HNO production. The patterns of E3bp modification observed in native gels support current models of the complex53, and we find that RNS perturb clusters of E3bp:E3 dimers, possibly involving modifications of Cys on the E3 dimer and/or E3bp- bound lipoate.
Using a broad approach, we identify a spectrum of proteins that are modified in a reduction-resistant manner during macrophage stimulation and ascribe patterns of irreversibility to NOS2. These findings are in line with a previous ex vivo study58, and our work moves this forward by demonstrating production of HNO in cells and describing a likely model for its involvement in metabolic rewiring. Although we could not identify the exact modifications on DLD in cellular settings, we conclude that NOS2-mediated signaling during inflammatory activation may drive oxidation of these targets via reduced RNS, as the pattern of CAM-modified peptides in BMDMs suggests.
Our experiments with recombinant DLD identified Cys484 as a likely target of reaction with lipoate-generated HNO in PDH. Computational analysis of DLD revealed that introduction of a sulfinamide group at Cys484 would be expected to perturb interactions both at the interface of the DLD monomers and at the interactions between the DLD dimer and human dihydrolipoamide transacylase (E2b). We also found that Cys484 may form a disulfide inter-chain with Cys388 that would be disrupted by sulfinamide on Cys484. This possibility is supported by our findings from our IAM-PEG2 dataset on free cysteines and by our observations of CAM-Cys388 peptide and its apparent similarity to other disulfides (Fig. S6h–i). Notably, the predicted disulfide is only 12 Å from FAD, suggesting that it might be involved in the electron tunneling phenomena74,75 involved in the reoxidation of FADH276,77. We then confirmed the importance of Cys484 using mutagenesis by showing that alanine or tryptophan substitutions ablated DLD activity and altered dimerization capability, therefore demonstrating Cys484 to be crucial for the proper functioning of DLD.
Our implication of Cys477 and Cys484 of DLD in HNO-mediated inhibition of PDH is supported by proteomic studies that revealed them as susceptible to modification78, but our data demonstrate importance of these cysteines as sites of physiologically relevant, reduction-resistant modification in proinflammatory macrophages, and define their involvement in regulation of enzyme activity.
In total, our data show that it is very likely that local HNO production takes place in environments around lipoate and may involve not only DLD but other proteins associated with DLD or belonging to its interactome. This would drive irreversible modifications and alterations of activity. Moreover, the finding of a lower Ki for HNO than NO on PDH underlines the importance of the localization in driving inhibition. Location of HNO production together with target protein environments have been suggested as potential mechanisms controlling HNO specificity. While GSH concentrations can affect HNO-mediated inhibition55,79,80, protein structures that result in lower thiol pKa values may facilitate reaction with HNO even in the presence of relatively high levels of GSH.
It should be noted that the mechanism we describe here would suggest that HNO reacts with other mitochondrial dehydrogenases sharing the DLD subunit (Fig. S2a). Other groups have found OGDH activity to be inhibited in a NO-dependent manner in macrophages, and we report here its sensitivity to HNO. In addition, we use isotopic labeling experiments to demonstrate that BCKDH is also inhibited in a NOS2-dependent way. However, no one has ascribed this action to HNO generation before or reported the inhibition of these enzymes to be due to DLD subunit inactivation specifically. The kinetics of inhibition of PDH vs OGDH, BCKDH and others may be different considering cellular localization but we propose that the key consideration is the proximity of lipoyl moieties to facilitate the generation of, and then reaction with HNO81,82.
In summary, our data provide compelling evidence of a mechanism of intramolecular HNO production by the lipoate moieties associated with PDH. We document a physiological generation of HNO that does not involve H2S83, and suggest that HNO is critical in the inhibition of PDH flux mediated by NO working in cis- and trans- in primary macrophages and hepatocytes. Although treatment with AS revealed additional putative protein targets of endogenously produced HNO (Fig. 4j, k), direct parallels are difficult to make given the relative lack of information regarding physiological HNO levels and/or location. Regardless, our data suggest that HNO may not be strictly involved in the classical inflammatory capacity of macrophages per se, but rather this species may have distinct roles in regulating aspects of intracellular transport, ER homeostasis and cell migration, which are important in tuning inflammatory response and/or directing response towards resolution. Further studies will be required to examine the full implications of this in situ HNO production and to address the proportion of protein targets that are dependent specifically on lipoylated-protein -mediated HNO production.
Methods
Mice
Wild-type C57BL/6J mice (strain #:000664) and Nos2 −/− (strain #002609) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory and bred and maintained at the NCI Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center in specific pathogen-free/SPF conditions at ambient temperature and humidity. Animal care was provided in accordance with the procedures in, “A Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals”. Ethical approval for the animal experiments detailed in this manuscript was received from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Permit Number: 000386) at the NCI-Frederick. All mice used were used between 6 and 10 weeks old and were age- and sex-matched for each experiment. All mice were euthanized using carbon dioxide and cervical dislocation.
Macrophage culture and stimulation
For murine BMDM isolation, total cells from the bone marrow were plated at 7.0 × 105/mL for 5–7 days in complete Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Gibco #11965) supplemented with 2 mM Glutamine, 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin and 20 ng/ml mouse M-CSF allowing for BMDM differentiation and growth3. After a 6-day incubation, BMDM were placed in complete culture media and treated with vehicle (PBS) or 100 ng/mL of LPS E. coli Olll:B4 (Sigma Aldrich) or a combination of LPS (100 ng/mL) and 50 ng/mL of IFNγ for 4–18 h. “Activation”, “stimulation” and “(M1) polarization” in the manuscript are referred to LPS + IFNγ treatment, unless specified. Where indicated, cells where pretreated with Aminoguanidine (AG; 1 mM, Sigma Aldrich) or ML226 (3 μM, Cayman Chemical) for 1 h before stimulation. In culture treatments with Lipoic acid (200μM, Sigma T1395) or Buthionine-sulfoximine (BSO; 500 μM Sigma Aldrich) were performed respectively for 2 h and 4 h before harvest. Resting cells where additionally treated with DETA/NO (NO donor)(100 up to 500 μM) for 18 h, DEA/NO (NO donor) or Angeli’s Salt (AS) (HNO donor) (400μM or otherwise specified, chemically synthesized in house and prepared fresh in 10 mM NaOH) (4–18 h) where indicated.
Cell lines
HEK293T cells were purchased from ATCC. Cells were propagated in DMEM with 4.5 g/L glucose, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 2 mM glutamine, at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.
Isolation of hepatocytes and culture
Mouse hepatocytes were isolated from male mice as previously described using a modification of the in situ collagenase (type I, Worthington) perfusion technique of Seglen62,84.
Hepatocytes (0.25 × 106/ml) were plated onto Collagen I-coated dishes and maintained in DMEM with L-arginine (0.50 mM), insulin-transferrin-selenium (Thermo Fisher), L-glutamine, penicillin, streptomycin, and 5% FBS. After a 3-h incubation at 37 °C, the media was changed and the following agents added at the indicated dose and duration: murine recombinant TNFα (R&D) (20 ng/mL), murine recombinant IFNγ (Peprotech) (50 ng/mL), IL1β(R&D) (20 ng/mL), LPS (1μg/mL), or DETA/NO (100–500 μM). “Mix” in the figures refers to IL-1β + IFNγ + TNFα combination treatment. Treatments with AG, BSO, DEA/NO, and AS were performed as in BMDMs. After stimulation for 24 to 48 h, hepatocytes were harvested in Trypsin 0.05%, cell supernatants were assayed for nitrites and cell pellets processed for metabolic analyses.
Sepsis in mice
Male and female mice (mixed sex in all groups) were challenged i.p with 100 μg LPS (0.1 ml of a solution of LPS in saline) (4 mg/kg) or saline control injection. The liver was harvested after 24 h.
NO detection
Nitrite, the oxidation product of NO, was measured in cell supernatants using a Griess reagent kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen™, #G7921).
Immunoblotting
Protein expression was determined by western blot as previously described3 using 20 μg of total protein per sample. SDS immunoblots were performed to evaluate steady-state protein levels. Antibodies in this study are as follows: Anti-Pyruvate Dehydrogenase E2 antibody (1:1000, Abcam, #ab172617) Anti-Lipoamide Dehydrogenase antibody (1:3000, Abcam, #ab133551), Anti-Lipoic Acid antibody (1:3000, EMD Millipore #437695), Anti -PDHX (1:1000, R&D systems AF6014), Anti DDK (Myc-DKK Tag) (1:5000, Origene #TA50011). For loading control Anti TOM20 (1:5000, Santa Cruz, #sc-136211) and Anti β-actin (1:3000 Abcam, #ab6276) were used.
Spectrophotometric measurement of total pyruvate dehydrogenase
For mitochondrial enzymatic activity measurements, 20 × 106 cells were permeabilized beforehand with 0.007% digitonin as described6 to remove cytoplasmic proteins. Formation of NADH was used to measure pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity85. The reaction mixture here contained 2.5 mM NAD, 0.1 mM Coenzyme A, 5 mM pyruvate and 1 mM MgCl2. A baseline was determined with sample and reference both containing the entire reaction mixture except for pyruvate. Spectrophotometric readings were measured every 20 s for 30 min.
Metabolic analyses
OCR and ECAR were examined using the XF96 Seahorse Metabolic Analyzer from Seahorse Biosciences (North Billerica, MA)65. Briefly, BMDM at day 7 of differentiation and activated for 16 h or primary hepatocytes at day 2 of culture were plated at a seeding density respectively of 0.8 × 105 cells/well and 0.15 × 105 cells/well in 200 μl of complete medium. Upon XF96 run, media was replaced with MAS buffer (220 mM Mannitol, 70 mM Sucrose, 10 mM KH2PO4, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM HEPES, 1 mM EGTA, 0.2% Fatty Acid Free BSA). Oxygen consumption was monitored permeabilizing cells with 1 nM or 3 nM PMP (Seahorse Biosciences), for either BMDMs or hepatocytes. State III respiration, defined as ADP-stimulated respiration in intact, unpoisoned mitochondria, in the presence of excess substrate was assessed66.
Pyruvate elicited respiration was assessed in permeabilized cells offered 5 mM pyruvate, 2.5 mM malate (port A) and 0.2 μM rotenone (port B)6,65. The concentration of the aforementioned substrates are meant as final concentrations in wells after drug/substrate injections.
For Electron Flow Assay experiments, to allow examination of sequential electron flow through different complexes of the electron transport chain, isolated liver mitochondria were diluted in cold 1X MAS + substrate (10 mM pyruvate, 2 mM malate, and 4uM FCCP), to the concentration required for plating 3 µg mitochondria/well. 25 μL of mitochondrial suspension was aliquoted to each well of Seahorse XF96 Cell Culture Microplate and spun at 2000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. After centrifugation, 155 μL of prewarmed (37 °C) 1x MAS + substrate was added to each well, the plate was then transferred to the Agilent Seahorse XFe/XF96 Analyzer and the run initiated. 2 μM rotenone was injected in port A, 10 mM succinate in port B, 4 μM antimycin A in port C and 10 mM ascorbate/100 μM TMPD in port D86.
CI, CII activities were calculated subtracting respectively to basal OCR rotenone-elicited values, to succinate OCR antimycin A-elicited values; for CIV activity maximal values after ascorbate/TMPD were considered.
Modification of this protocol were made when other CI sources were tested; in this case isolated mitochondria were diluted in cold 1X MAS + 10 mM glutamate (in the presence or absence of 2 mM malate), and 4 μM FCCP87.
Metabolomics
WT and Nos2 −/− BMDM (~107 cells per sample) were treated with vehicle (PBS) or LPS + IFNγ for 16 h. Cells were then washed, gently scraped, pelleted, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and sent to Metabolon, Inc for metabolomic analyses.
Quantification of metabolites from lipoate treated cells was performed in house with high resolution qTOF ESI-LC/MS as previously described88.
13C tracing studies
Leucine tracing buffer was made by adding dialyzed 10% FBS (Gibco), L-glutamine (1 mM) and L-Leucine U13 C6 (1 mM) (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) to RPMI-1640.
Cells were activated for 16 h with LPS + IFNγ in RPMI media and then washed with PBS and incubated in tracing buffer at 37 °C for 4 h (confirmation of steady-state). After incubation cells were washed, extracted and analyzed in house as described above.
Isotopologue analysis of acquired negative and positive MS data was performed with MassHunter Profinder 8.0, which performed simultaneous data processing and quantitation of 13C incorporation in a list of target metabolites derived from an in-house AMRT metabolite standard library. Extracted isotopologue abundancies were corrected for their natural isotope abundance and corrected abundance percentages were calculated6,88,89. M + 0 to M + n indicate the different mass isotopologues for a given metabolite with n carbons, where mass increases due to 13C-labeling.
Reactions of NO reduction
To analyze the products of NO reduction in the presence of GSH90, 0.25 or 0.5 mM DEA/NO were incubated with 0.25 or 0.4 mM of either reduced (Sigma, # T8260) or oxidized (Sigma, # T1395) lipoate for 1 h at 37 °C with different concentrations of GSH (50 or 100 μM). Reactions were conducted in 100 μL total volumes in 96 well plates. Vehicle controls were used in DEA/NO alone with GSH reactions as baseline. As positive control of HNO-derived conjugation with GSH, AS was used at 0.1, 0.5 or 1 mM. After the indicated reaction time reaction mixtures were directly analyzed by ESI-LC/MS-MS. To evaluate any contribution of DLD in NO reduction 7 μg of rhDLD was added to reaction mixtures.
Direct HNO detection
BMDMs were treated with 12.5 μM HNO probe56 for 30 min, then washed, and either left untreated or stimulated with LPS + IFNγ for 4 h. Additional conditions were represented by treatments with AS or DEA/NO (400 μM) for 30 min incubations. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer and HNO-induced fluorescence (excitation 465 nm/emission 520 nm) was measured. DMSO vehicle controls were used as fluorescence background.
HNO-derived metabolite quantification
Targeted measurements on crude reaction mixtures were performed through electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-LC–MS/MS) analysis in multiple reaction monitoring mode with an Agilent 6410B Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer interfaced with a 1200 Series HPLC quaternary pump (Agilent) available in house at NCI-Frederick. Chromatographic resolution was obtained in reverse phase on a SB C18 column (1.8 μm; Agilent) with a flow rate set at 0.4 mL/min. The MRM transitions in the positive ion mode were m/z 308.09 > 179 for GSH, m/z 613 > 355 for GSSG, m/z 337 > 307/231.9 for GSNO, m/z 339.2 > 322 for GSONH2 and m/z 340.2 > 322 for GSO2H90. Reaction mixtures containing rhDLD were mixed with 100% methanol, precipitated, dried using a vacuum concentrator and resuspended in milli-Q for analysis.
For detection of HNO metabolites in primary hepatocytes, cell pellets (0.5 × 106 cells) were washed and resuspended in 80% methanol. Phase separation was achieved by centrifugation at 4 °C and the methanol-water phase containing polar metabolites was separated and dried using a vacuum concentrator. The dried metabolite samples were stored at −80 °C and resuspended in milli-Q water the day of analysis.
Immunoaffinity purification
DLAT and DLD (respectively PDH-E2 and E3) immunoaffinity purifications (IPs) from BMDMs for proteomic studies were performed using protein G Agarose resin (Pierce, #20398) coupled with 2μg of Anti-Pyruvate Dehydrogenase E2 antibody (Abcam, #ab172617) or Anti-Lipoamide Dehydrogenase antibody (Abcam, #ab133551). 7 × 107 cells were resuspended in 450 μl Lysis Buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.2, 300 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40 with protease and phosphatase inhibitors). Lysed cells were vortexed three times for 20 s each during incubation for 10 min at 4 °C. Insoluble material (pellet) was removed by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and DLAT or DLD were immunoisolated by incubation with pre-associated resin and antibodies for 2 h at 4 °C mixed by rotation in a final volume of 1 mL. The resin containing protein complexes was then washed three times with RIPA buffer and incubated with 2X SDS non-reducing Sample Buffer for 10 min at 70 °C.
Isolation of mitochondria
For experiment in cultured cells, cellular fractionation into cytosol and intact mitochondria was done essentially as previously described91,92. Briefly, mitochondria from BMDM pellets (~107 cells) were isolated from the cytosolic fractions after cell permeabilization with a buffer containing 0.1% digitonin in 210 mM mannitol, 20 mM sucrose and 4 mM HEPES. The pellets after centrifugation at 700 × g for 5 min contained mitochondria.
Further differential centrifugation at 100,000 × g of these mitochondrial-enriched lysates was used to purify the mitochondrial matrix fraction. Swelling of the mitochondrial outer membrane was performed by hypotonic shock, followed by sonication (four repeats of 5 s- bursts at high settings with 30 s pauses), supplementation with 150 mM NaCl and 5% glycerol and centrifugation at 20,000 × g 30 min. The supernatant was saved as soluble mitochondrial matrix fraction.
For isolation of mitochondria from whole liver, homogenization was performed as previously described91,92 with glass–Teflon potter for 4–5 strokes. Total protein (mg/mL) was determined using the Bradford Assay reagent (Thermo). Mitochondria were resuspended in MAS IX buffer and incubated 1 h at 25 °C with 500 μM Angeli’s salt or DEA/NO in gentle agitation. Then mitochondria were pelleted by centrifugation at 7000 × g, 10 min, 4 °C and used for subsequent assays.
Native PAGE (BN-PAGE) and native immunoblots
The NativePAGE Novex Bis-Tris gel system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for the analysis of native proteins as performed as in ref. 92; 30 μg of mitochondrial matrix lysates were loaded/well; the electrophoresis was performed at 150 V for 1 h and 250 V for 1 h on ice. Where indicated, lysates were incubated additionally with DTT (10–100 mM, Sigma) for 1 h at 37 °C before electrophoresis. For the native IB, PVDF was used as the blotting membrane. The transfer was performed at 25 V for 1 h at 4 °C. After transfer, the membrane was washed with 8% acetic acid for 20 min to fix the proteins, and then rinsed with water before air-drying. The dried membrane was washed 5–6 times with methanol (to remove residual Coomassie Blue G-250), rinsed with water and then blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 5% milk, before incubating with the desired antibodies diluted in 2.5% milk O.N. at 4 °C. In order to avoid strip and reprobing of the same membrane, which might allow detection of signals from the previous IBs, samples were loaded and run in replicates on adjacent wells of the same gel, and probed independently with different antibodies.
DLD in gel activity assay (diaphorase)
30 μg of mitochondrial matrix lysates, 0.25 μg of rhDLD or 30 μg of whole cell HEK293T lysates were run on Blue Native PAGE at 150 V for 1 h, followed by 1 h at 250 V on ice. Where indicated, lysates were incubated additionally with either DETA/NO (500 μM)/DTT/Lipoate (1 mM, Sigma) for 1 h at 37 °C before electrophoresis. The gel was soaked into 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) assay buffer, containing 0.2 mg/ml NBT and 0.1 mg/ml NADH for 30–45 min until DLD activity developed, according to a previously published protocol.
DLD dehydrogenase activity
30 μg of mitochondria or cell derived mitochondria-enriched lysates, 0.1 μg of rhDLD (incubated with increasing concentration of AS or DEA/NO for 30 min at 37 °C) or 30 μg of whole cell HEK293T lysates were used to measure DLD activity by depletion of NADH. Where indicated, whole mitochondria or cell-derived mitochondria-enriched pellets were incubated additionally with either Cysteine/GSH/DTT (10 mM, Sigma)52 in MAS buffer for 1 h at 37 °C before lysis. The reaction mixture contained 0.1 mM NAD, 0.2 mM NADH and 1 mM lipoic acid93. A baseline was determined through a sample containing the reaction mixture and enzyme diluting buffer. Spectrophotometric readings at 340 nm were measured every 20 s for 10 min. For kinetics studies non-linear regression of activity curves was calculated for Michealis–Menten model and linear regression of reciprocal axes to generate Lineweaver-Burk plot.
OGDC activity
30 μg of cell derived mitochondria-enriched lysates were used to measure α-ketoglutarate dependent NADH production by monitoring NADH absorbance at 340 nm, according to a previously established method94.
Cytokine assay
The mouse cytokine array kit (R&D Systems, ARY006) was utilized for the parallel determination of the selected mouse cytokines levels produced by BMDMs. After treatments, cell culture supernatant was centrifuged to eliminate any suspended cells and 1 ml was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Proteomics
DDA analysis on immunoprecipitated DLAT
Gel slice (cut at ~70 kDa) from SDS-PAGE of immunoprecipitated DLAT was dried with acetonitrile, washed, incubated with 20 mM iodoacetamide (IAM) for 1 h at 25 °C in the dark, treated for 1 h on ice with 10 ng/µL GluC95 in 50 mM HEPES pH 8 and further incubated with 50 mM HEPES pH 8 at 37 °C overnight. Supernatant was removed and slice acidified to pH ~2 with TFA, then desalted on Oasis HLB µ-elution plate, eluted and dried in speedvac. Peptides were analyzed on an Easy-nLC 1200 system in front of a Orbitrap Fusion (Thermo) equipped with a Flex ion source. Solvent A consisted of 0.1%FA in water and Solvent B of 0.1%FA in 80%ACN. Samples were loaded onto the trap column (Acclaim™ PepMap™ 100 C18 HPLC Column, 3 μm, 75 μm I.D., 2 cm, Thermo PN 164535) and separated on the analytical column (Acclaim™ PepMap™ 100 C18 HPLC Column, 3 μm, 75 μm I.D., 25 cm, Thermo PN 164569). Samples were acquired using the TopSpeed method with a 3 s cycle time that consisted of the following: Spray voltage was 1700V and ion transfer temperature of 300 °C. MS1 scans were acquired in the Orbitrap with resolution of 120,000, m/z range of 380–1550, automatic gain control (AGC) of 1e6 ions; MS2 scans were acquired in the Orbitrap using 30,000 resolution, AGC of 5e4. Data was searched in Proteome Discoverer using the most recent version of the Uniprot reviewed murine database, 2 max missed cleavages, peptide length of 6–60 amino acids, an MS1 mass tolerance of 10 ppm, and MS2 mass tolerance of 0.02 Da. Fixed modification of carbamidomethyl (+57.021 Da) on cysteine was included.
Synthetic peptides with AS
The synthetic peptide SGVENPGGYCL (1 µg) was treated with 20 mM AS (200 μM final) for 35 min at 37 °C. Samples were treated with 10% TFA, desalted and dried in speedvac. Dried peptide was resuspended in 0.5%FA and loaded for LC/MS analysis. All samples were analyzed in triplicate on an Easy-nLC 1200 system in front of a Q-Exactive (Thermo) equipped with a Flex ion source. Samples were acquired using the Top5 ions for MS2 method. Data processing was carried out in Skyline 21.1, using the sum of MS1 isotopic peak areas.
Label-free quantification (LFQ) and tandem mass tag (TMT) analysis of rhDLD
rhDLD (0.5 µg/condition) in 25 mM HEPES pH 7.3 was treated with 10 mM NaOH or either 200 µM AS, 200 µM DEA/NO, 200 µM NaNO2 (all in 10 mM NaOH), with or without 200 µM GSH. All reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 35 min then HEPES pH 8, TCEP and IAM were added and incubated at 25 °C in the dark for 30 min. Then samples were digested with trypsin/LysC (#Thermo A40009) and each sample underwent TMTpro labeling (#Thermo A52045), then quenching of excess TMTpro before samples were combined together. Samples were cleaned and dried in speedvac. For LFQ analysis, FA was used to acidify the samples, which were cleaned and dried in speedvac. All samples were analyzed on an Dionex U3000 RSLC in front of a Orbitrap Eclipse (Thermo) equipped with an EasySpray ion source with FAIMSTM interface. For TMTpro samples, the dried peptides were resuspended in 50 µL 0.1% FA and 15 µL was injected three times, each using a method with different FAIMS compensation voltage (CV) combinations. MS1 scans were acquired in the Orbitrap with resolution of 120,000, AGC of 4e5 ions, mass range of 350-1600 m/z; MS2 scans were acquired in the Orbitrap using TurboTMT method with resolution of 15,000, AGC of 1.25e5, intensity threshold of 2.5e4 and charges 2–6 for MS2 selection. The only difference in the methods was the CVs used (method 1 used −45, −60, −75; method 2 used −50, −65, −80, and method 3 used −55, −70, −85. For label free samples, the dried peptides were resuspended in 50 µL 0.1% FA and 10 µL was injected once using a method consisting four FAIMS CVs (−45, −55, −70, −85). MS1 scans were acquired in the Orbitrap with resolution of 120,000, AGC of 4e5 ions; MS2 scans were acquired in the Ion Trap using rapid acquisition, AGC of 1e5, intensity threshold of 1e4 for MS2 selection. Data processing was carried out in the most recent version of Skyline, using the sum of MS1 isotopic peak areas. All data were searched in Proteome Discoverer 2.4 using the Sequest node. Both datasets were searched against the Uniprot Mouse database from Feb 2020 using a full tryptic digest, 2 max missed cleavages, peptide length of 6–40 (TMTpro) and 6-60 (LFQ) amino acids, an MS1 mass tolerance of 10 ppm, and MS2 mass tolerance of 0.02 Da. For both TMTpro and LFQ datasets the following variable modifications were included with the search: oxidation on methionine (+15.995 Da), modification of carbamidomethyl (+57.021 Da), trioxidation/sulfonic acid (+47.985 Da), sulfinic acid (+31.990), and Sulfinamide (+31.005) on cysteine. For TMTpro data variable modification of TMTpro (+304.207 Da) was included for lysine residues and peptide N-terminal amines. TMTpro reporter ions were quantified using the Reporter Ion Quantifier node and LFQ data was quantified using precursor abundance intensity. Both TMTpro and LFQ data were normalized on total peptide abundance.
PRM analysis on DLD Cys484-peptide
rhDLD in 25 mM HEPES pH 7.3 was treated with 10 mM NaOH, or 200/400/800 µM AS, or 200/400/800 µM DEA/NO. All reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 35 min then HEPES pH 8 with TCEP and IAM were added and incubated at 25 °C in the dark for 30 min followed by trypsin/LysC at 37 °C for 3.5 h. Samples were digested with trypsin and dried in speedvac. For analysis on mitochondria enriched lysates, proteins were precipitated, resuspended in EasyPep lysis buffer and treated with reducing and alkylating solutions and then heated at 95 °C for 10 min. Samples were digested with trypsin/LysC and dried in speedvac. The dried 50 µL aliquot was resuspended in water and peptide concentration was determined using the Pierce™ Quantitative Colorimetric Peptide Assay. Equal amounts of peptides were resuspended in the heavy isotope peptide mixture directly. All samples were analyzed in triplicate on an Easy-nLC 1200 system in front of a Q-Exactive HF (Thermo) equipped with a Flex ion source. Samples were acquired using targeted parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) for the both endogenous and heavy isotopes (on the C-terminal K or R) for the following DLD peptides: VVHVNGYGK (charge +2, m/z = 486.767/490.774, HCD = 27%), GRIPVNTR (charge +2, m/z = 465.772/461.776, HCD = 35%), EANLAASFGK (charge +2, m/z = 504.262/508.269, HCD = 27%), VC[ + 57]HAHPTLSEAFR (charge +3, m/z = 508.917/512.293, HCD = 27%), VC[ + 48]HAHPTLSEAFR (charge +3, m/z = 505.905/509.241, HCD = 27%), VC[ + 32]HAHPTLSEAFR (charge +3, m/z = 500.574/5031.910, HCD = 27%). Data processing was carried out in Skyline, using the sum of fragment ion areas for each peptide PRM. The ratio of Light to Heavy (L/H) for each peptide was calculated, then the ratio of ratios was calculated for modified peptides versus the VVHVNGYGK peptide to account for differences in total DLD amounts.
TMT – global mitochondrial proteomic analysis
Proteins from mitochondria-enriched lysates (see first step of mitochondria isolation from cultured cells above) were precipitated, resuspended in EasyPep lysis buffer and probe sonicated to aid in solubilization. Samples were treated with reducing and alkylating solution provided with EasyPep kit and digested with trypsinc/LysC. 25 µg for each sample was treated with 30 µL of 5 µg/µL TMTpro label and incubated at 25 °C for 1 h followed by quenching before samples were combined together. The combined TMTpro labeled peptides were desalted and dried in speedvac. Aliquots of TMTpro labeled peptides were analyzed an Dionex U3000 RSLC in front of a Orbitrap Eclipse (Thermo) equipped with an EasySpray ion source with FAIMSTM interface. All data were searched in Proteome Discoverer 2.4 using the Sequest node. Both datasets were searched against the Uniprot Mouse database from Feb 2020 using a full tryptic digest, two max missed cleavages, peptide length of 6-144 amino acids, an MS1 mass tolerance of 10 ppm, MS2 mass tolerance of 0.02 Da, fixed TMTpro modification (304.207 Da) on lysine and N-terminal amines, variable oxidation on methionine (+15.995 Da), and the following variable modification on cysteine: carbamidomethyl (+57.021 Da), trioxidation/sulfonic acid (+47.985 Da), sulfinic acid (+31.990), Sulfinamide (+31.005), and TCEP modification (+266.208). TMTpro reporter ions were quantified using the Reporter Ion Quantifier node and normalized on total peptide amount. Sum of peptides/ protein and normalized Cys-modified peptide abundances were converted to a Log2 scale, and biological replicates were grouped by experimental condition. Peptide modification was normalized for protein abundance, providing the normalized modification level for each cysteine-containing peptide in the analyzed proteome (cutoff log2FC > 0.15 of stimulated vs untreated). Data were visualized using a Volcano plot, which shows the log10 fold change on the x-axis and the adjusted p value on the y-axis. Intersection with proteins in DLD interactome was performed interrogating UniProt database at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/intact/search?query=id:P09622*#interactor. Over-representation analysis of significant changes were assessed using Metascape96, GO97,98,99 and Enrichr100.
TMT - free cysteine analysis
Mitochondria enriched lysates were treated with 15.3 mM Iodoacetyl-PEG2-Biotin (#Thermo 21334) to label free cysteine residues and incubated for 18 h with shaking at 25 °C in the dark. Proteins were precipitated and resuspended in EasyPep lysis buffer (Thermo #A40006, A45734, A45733) and treated with reducing and alkylating solution. Then trypsin/Lys-C digestion was performed and each sample was incubated with TMTpro label at 25 °C for 1 h. Excess TMTpro was quenched before samples were combined together. The mixed TMTpro sample was desalted and dried in speedvac. Aliquots were combined and enriched using High-Capacity Streptavidin Agarose slurry (50% aqueous slurry, 200 μg of beads)(# Thermo 20537) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The bound peptides were eluted with 50%ACN, 0.5%TFA and the eluted fractions were combined and dried. TMTpro labeled Global peptide and streptavidin enriched IAM-PEG2 peptides were analyzed on an Dionex U3000 RSLC in front of a Orbitrap Eclipse (Thermo) equipped with an EasySpray ion source with FAIMSTM interface. All data were searched in Proteome Discoverer 2.4 using the Sequest node. Both datasets were searched against the Uniprot Mouse database from Feb 2020 using a full tryptic digest, two max missed cleavages, peptide length of 6–60 amino acids, an MS1 mass tolerance of 10 ppm, MS2 mass tolerance of 0.02 Da, fixed TMTpro modification (+304.207 Da) on lysine and N-terminal amines, variable oxidation on methionine (+15.995 Da), and variable modification of carbamidomethyl (+57.021 Da) and IAM-PEG2-Biotin (+414.194 Da) on cysteine. TMTpro reporter ions were quantified using the Reporter Ion Quantifier node and normalized on total peptide amount.
Molecular modeling investigations
PyMOL was used to build structural models of the human dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLD) modified at Cys484 or at Cys477 by adding a sulfinamide functional group in place of the native thiol functional group, by using as a protein template the crystallized structure of the human DLD (also known as E3, PDB_ID: 3rnm). DLD_E3 reported in 3rnm.pdb was solved as a FAD containing DLD_E3 homodimer in complex with the subunit binding of human dihydrolipoamide transacylase (E2b)101. The sulfinamide functional groups was introduced at Cys484 or at Cys477 of both monomers of 3rnm.pdb. In order to investigate the role played by C484 in protein function, in silico site directed mutagenesis was performed for building C484A and C484W single mutants by using the obtained 3D models and the mutagenesis tool implemented in PyMOL.
For docking NAD+ cofactor in DLD-NAD+ binding region within 3rnm.pdb entry, the crystallized structure of another human DLD_E3 crystallized in complex with FAD and NAD+ (1zmd.pdb)59 was superposed on 3rnm.pdb. Thus, a NAD+ object was duplicated from 1zmd.pdb superimposed to 3rnm.pdb and saved within the aligned DLD-NAD+ binding region of the 3rnm.pdb entry, by using the super command from PyMOL. The “super” command allows aligning the selected proteins under investigation for performing a comparative structural analysis, due to its ability in providing a sequence-independent structure-based pairwise alignment, more efficient than the sequence based pairwise alignment obtained by using the “align” command74,102.
All the generated 3D all-atom models were optimized by using the FOLDX repair tool103 and then energetically minimized using the Yasara Minimization server104 or the Rosetta “relax” application within the Rosetta “scoring and prep” tools105,106, independently. Relaxation as the energy minimization process used to optimize protein structures involves iteratively adjusting the conformation of the atoms in the protein to find a low-energy state. This step is crucial for refining and improving protein structures obtained from experimental data or generated through modeling approaches. It helps to relieve steric clashes, correct small-scale structural errors, and optimize side-chain conformations, ultimately resulting in energetically favorable and more accurate protein models. The obtained final models were examined in VMD, PyMOL, and SPDBV by visual inspection searching for putative unsolved clashes74,75,102,107.
The FoldX AnalyseComplex assay was performed to determine the interaction energy at the interface between the two DLD-E3 monomers or at the interface between the two DLD-E3 monomers and the E2b subunit, both in the wild-type crystallized 3rnm.pdb structure and in the Cys484-sulfinamide modified protein, or in the Cys477-sulfinamide modified protein for comparative purposes. The interaction energy at the protein-protein interface of the investigated mutants C484A and C484W was also calculated by using the same FoldX AnalyseComplex assay.
The way the FoldX AnalyseComplex operates is by unfolding the selected targets and determining the stability of the remaining molecules and then subtracting the sum of the individual energies from global energy. More negative energies indicate a better binding. Positive energies indicate no binding103,108. The interaction energies calculated for the crystallized structure at the monomer-monomer interface within the DLD_E3 dimer or at the dimer-monomer interface within the DLD_E3-E2b trimer were used as a reference value. “InterfaceAnalyzer” application from Rosetta “scoring and prep” tools was used was used for evaluating interactions at the monomer-monomer interface within the DLD_E3 dimer or at the dimer-monomer interface within the DLD_E3-E2b trimer both in the DLD_E3-E2b wild type and in the DLD_E3-E2b_C484 sulfinamide modified protein complex106,109. Furthermore, the “residue_energy_breakdown”109,110 application was also used to examine the contribution of each protein residue to the score for the lowest energy backbone relaxed structures in the investigated protein complexes (WT.vs.C484sulfinamide modified protein; WT.vs.C477sulfinamide modified protein).
Transfection of HEK293T cells
Empty vector (pCMV6-Entry) and WT human DLD Tagged ORF Clone were purchased from Origene (#PS100001 and #RC200639), DLD C484A and C484W mutant Tagged ORF Clones were custom synthesized through GenScript.
HEK293T cells (2 × 105) were seeded in 10 cm2 tissue culture dishes. The next day, cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 25 μg plasmid DNA was mixed with 600 μl serum free medium + 17 μl P3000 reagent. The solution containing DNA was gently mixed with 600 μl serum free medium containing 25 μl Lipofectamine and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The entire DNA:Lipofectamine complexes were added dropwise onto the cells and mixed by gentle swirling. After 24 h, the transfected cells were used for downstream applications. Whole cell lysates for native gels were generated by adding a buffer containing 50 mM Bis-Tris, 50 mM NaCl, 10% w/v Glycerol, 0.001% Ponceau S, 1% lauryl maltoside, pH 7.2 and protease inhibitors to intact cells followed by incubation of 10 min in ice and centrifugation at 20,000 × g at 4 °C for 20 min.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as means ± standard error of mean and are representative of at least two independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9. One-way or two-way ANOVAs followed post tests and linear regression were used when multiple groups were analyzed as are indicated in figure legends. Student’s t test was used for statistical analysis when two groups were analyzed. All data are assumed normally distributed and were log transformed where appropriate before analysis. Statistical significance was set at *p < 0.05. Exact p values for significant comparisons are reported in the figures. P values > 0.05 are reported as “ns” unless otherwise specified.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are available with the article, and can also be obtained from the corresponding author. Publicly available crystallized structure of the human DLD (PDB_ID: 3rnm) and hDLD crystallized in complex with FAD and NAD+ (PDB ID: 1zmd) were used in this study. The proteomics data have been deposited in MASSive under accession code MSV000092336. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
O’Neill, L. A. J., Kishton, R. J. & Rathmell, J. A guide to immunometabolism for immunologists. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 553–565 (2016).
O’Neill, L. A. & Pearce, E. J. Immunometabolism governs dendritic cell and macrophage function. J. Exp. Med. 213, 15–23 (2016).
Baseler, W. A. et al. Autocrine IL-10 functions as a rheostat for M1 macrophage glycolytic commitment by tuning nitric oxide production. Redox Biol. 10, 12–23 (2016).
Thwe, P. M. & Amiel, E. The role of nitric oxide in metabolic regulation of dendritic cell immune function. Cancer Lett.412, 236–242 (2018).
Everts, B. et al. Commitment to glycolysis sustains survival of NO-producing inflammatory dendritic cells. Blood 120, 1422–1431 (2012).
Palmieri, E. M. et al. Nitric oxide orchestrates metabolic rewiring in M1 macrophages by targeting aconitase 2 and pyruvate dehydrogenase. Nat. Commun. 11, 698 (2020).
O’Neill, L. A. A broken krebs cycle in macrophages. Immunity 42, 393–394 (2015).
Palmieri, E. M., McGinity, C., Wink, D. A. & McVicar, D. W. Nitric oxide in macrophage immunometabolism: hiding in plain sight. Metabolites 10, 429 (2020).
Michelucci, A. et al. Immune-responsive gene 1 protein links metabolism to immunity by catalyzing itaconic acid production. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7820–7825 (2013).
Somasundaram, V. et al. Inducible nitric oxide synthase-derived extracellular nitric oxide flux regulates proinflammatory responses at the single cell level. Redox Biol. 28, 101354 (2019).
Tan, Z. et al. Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 participates in macrophage polarization via regulating glucose metabolism. J. Immunol. 194, 6082–6089 (2015).
Kim, J.-w, Tchernyshyov, I., Semenza, G. L. & Dang, C. V. HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia. Cell Metab. 3, 177–185 (2006).
Reed, L. J. Multienzyme complexes. Acc. Chem. Res. 7, 40–46 (1974).
Cronan, J. E. Assembly of lipoic acid on its cognate enzymes: an extraordinary and essential biosynthetic pathway. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 429–450 (2016).
Hackert, M. L., Oliver, R. M. & Reed, L. J. Evidence for a multiple random coupling mechanism in the alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase multienzyme complex of Escherichia coli: a computer model analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80, 2226–2230 (1983).
Singh, S. P., Wishnok, J. S., Keshive, M., Deen, W. M. & Tannenbaum, S. R. The chemistry of the S-nitrosoglutathione/glutathione system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14428–14433 (1996).
Wong, P. S. et al. Reaction between S-nitrosothiols and thiols: generation of nitroxyl (HNO) and subsequent chemistry. Biochemistry 37, 5362–5371 (1998).
Hausladen, A., Gow, A. & Stamler, J. S. Flavohemoglobin denitrosylase catalyzes the reaction of a nitroxyl equivalent with molecular oxygen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 98, 10108–10112 (2001).
Paolocci, N. et al. The pharmacology of nitroxyl (HNO) and its therapeutic potential: not just the Janus face of NO. Pharmacol. Ther. 113, 442–458 (2007).
Miranda, K. M. The chemistry of nitroxyl (HNO) and implications in biology. Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 433–455 (2005).
Marti, M. A., Álvarez, L., Suarez, S. A. & Doctorovich, F. 18 - Is azanone endogenously produced in mammals? The Chemistry and Biology of Nitroxyl (HNO). (eds. F. Doctorovich, P. J. Farmer & M. A. Marti) 337–351 (Elsevier, 2017).
Adak, S., Wang, Q. & Stuehr, D. J. Arginine conversion to nitroxide by tetrahydrobiopterin-free neuronal nitric-oxide synthase: implications for mechanism*. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 33554–33561 (2000).
Niketić, V., Stojanović, S., Nikolić, A., Spasić, M. & Michelson, A. M. Exposure of Mn and FeSODs, but not Cu/ZnSOD, to NO leads to nitrosonium and nitroxyl ions generation which cause enzyme modification and inactivation: an in vitro study. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 27, 992–996 (1999).
Fukuto, J. M., Cisneros, C. J. & Kinkade, R. L. A comparison of the chemistry associated with the biological signaling and actions of nitroxyl (HNO) and nitric oxide (NO). J. Inorg. Biochem. 118, 201–208 (2013).
DeMaster, E. G., Quast, B. J., Redfern, B. & Nagasawa, H. T. Reaction of nitric oxide with the free sulfhydryl group of human serum albumin yields a sulfenic acid and nitrous oxide. Biochemistry 34, 11494–11499 (1995).
Suarez, S. A. et al. Nitric oxide is reduced to HNO by proton-coupled nucleophilic attack by ascorbate, tyrosine, and other alcohols. a new route to HNO in biological media? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 4720–4727 (2015).
Arnelle, D. R. & Stamler, J. S. NO+, NO., and NO− donation by S-nitrosothiols: implications for regulation of physiological functions by s-nitrosylation and acceleration of disulfide formation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 318, 279–285 (1995).
Bianco, C. L., Toscano, J. P., Bartberger, M. D. & Fukuto, J. M. The chemical biology of HNO signaling. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 617, 129–136 (2017).
Miranda, K. M. et al. A biochemical rationale for the discrete behavior of nitroxyl and nitric oxide in the cardiovascular system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9196–9201 (2003).
Bartberger, M. D., Fukuto, J. M. & Houk, K. N. On the acidity and reactivity of HNO in aqueous solution and biological systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 2194–2198 (2001).
Jackson, M. I. et al. Kinetic feasibility of nitroxyl reduction by physiological reductants and biological implications. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 47, 1130–1139 (2009).
DeMaster, E. G., Redfern, B. & Nagasawa, H. T. Mechanisms of inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogenase by nitroxyl, the active metabolite of the alcohol deterrent agent cyanamide. Biochem. Pharmacol. 55, 2007–2015 (1998).
Irvine, J. C., Favaloro, J. L. & Kemp-Harper, B. K. NO− activates soluble guanylate cyclase and Kv channels to vasodilate resistance arteries. Hypertension 41, 1301–1307 (2003).
Bermejo, E. et al. Effect of nitroxyl on human platelets function. Thromb. Haemost. 94, 578–584 (2005).
Wanstall, J. C., Jeffery, T. K., Gambino, A., Lovren, F. & Triggle, C. R. Vascular smooth muscle relaxation mediated by nitric oxide donors: a comparison with acetylcholine, nitric oxide and nitroxyl ion. Br. J. Pharmacol. 134, 463–472 (2001).
Wink, D. A. et al. Orthogonal properties of the redox siblings nitroxyl and nitric oxide in the cardiovascular system: a novel redox paradigm. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 285, H2264–H2276 (2003).
Tocchetti, C. et al. Nitroxyl anion: a novel thiol-sensitive positive inotrope that enhances SR Ca2+ release and uptake in cardiomyocytes. Circulation 112, U363 (2005).
Cheong, E., Tumbev, V., Abramson, J., Salama, G. & Stoyanovsky, D. A. Nitroxyl triggers Ca2+ release from skeletal and cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum by oxidizing ryanodine receptors. Cell Calcium 37, 87–96 (2005).
Paolocci, N. et al. Positive inotropic and lusitropic effects of HNO/NO- in failing hearts: independence from beta-adrenergic signaling. Pro. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5537–5542 (2003).
Pagliaro, P. et al. Nitroxyl affords thiol-sensitive myocardial protective effects akin to early preconditioning. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 34, 33–43 (2003).
Mancardi, D. et al. HNO protects the myocardium against reperfusion injury, inhibiting the mPTP opening via PKCε activation. Antioxidants 11, 382 (2022).
Norris, A. J. et al. Nitroxyl inhibits breast tumor growth and angiogenesis. Int. J. Cancer. 122, 1905–1910 (2008).
Zarpelon, A. C. et al. The nitroxyl donor, Angeli’s salt, inhibits inflammatory hyperalgesia in rats. Neuropharmacology 71, 1–9 (2013).
Staurengo-Ferrari, L. et al. Nitroxyl inhibits overt pain-like behavior in mice: role of cGMP/PKG/ATP-sensitive potassium channel signaling pathway. Pharmacol. Rep. 66, 691–698 (2014).
Dai, T. et al. Nitroxyl increases force development in rat cardiac muscle. J. Physiol. 580, 951–960 (2007).
Tong, W. H. et al. TLR-activated repression of Fe-S cluster biogenesis drives a metabolic shift and alters histone and tubulin acetylation. Blood Adv. 2, 1146–1156 (2018).
Seim, G. L. et al. Two-stage metabolic remodelling in macrophages in response to lipopolysaccharide and interferon-γ stimulation. Nat. Metab. 1, 731–742 (2019).
Williams, D. L. H. S-Nitrosation, in Nitrosation Reactions and the Chemistry of Nitric Oxide. (ed. D. L. H. Williams) 117–135 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2004).
Fujino, T. et al. Molecular identification and characterization of two medium-chain acyl-CoA synthetases, MACS1 and the Sa gene product. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 35961–35966 (2001).
Fujiwara, K., Takeuchi, S., Okamura-Ikeda, K. & Motokawa, Y. Purification, characterization, and cDNA cloning of lipoate-activating enzyme from bovine liver. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 28819–28823 (2001).
Johnson, G. M., Chozinski, T. J., Gallagher, E. S., Aspinwall, C. A. & Miranda, K. M. Glutathione sulfinamide serves as a selective, endogenous biomarker for nitroxyl after exposure to therapeutic levels of donors. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 76, 299–307 (2014).
Yan, L. J., Sumien, N., Thangthaeng, N. & Forster, M. J. Reversible inactivation of dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase by mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic. Res. 47, 123–133 (2013).
Brautigam, C. A., Wynn, R. M., Chuang, J. L. & Chuang, D. T. Subunit and catalytic component stoichiometries of an in vitro reconstituted human pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 13086–13098 (2009).
Stoyanovsky, D. A. et al. Thioredoxin and lipoic acid catalyze the denitrosation of low molecular weight and protein S-nitrosothiols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 15815–15823 (2005).
Donzelli, S. et al. Discriminating formation of HNO from other reactive nitrogen oxide species. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 40, 1056–1066 (2006).
Miao, Z. et al. A selective phosphine-based fluorescent probe for nitroxyl in living cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25, 16–19 (2015).
Bailey, P. S. J. et al. ABHD11 maintains 2-oxoglutarate metabolism by preserving functional lipoylation of the 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex. Nat. Commun. 11, 4046 (2020).
Hoffman, M. D., Walsh, G. M., Rogalski, J. C. & Kast, J. Identification of nitroxyl-induced modifications in human platelet proteins using a novel mass spectrometric detection method. Mol. Cell Proteom. 8, 887–903 (2009).
Brautigam, C. A., Chuang, J. L., Tomchick, D. R., Machius, M. & Chuang, D. T. Crystal structure of human dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase: NAD+/NADH binding and the structural basis of disease-causing mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 350, 543–552 (2005).
Szabo, E. et al. Underlying molecular alterations in human dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase deficiency revealed by structural analyses of disease-causing enzyme variants. Hum. Mol. Genet. 28, 3339–3354 (2019).
Håkansson, A. P. & Smith, A. W. Enzymatic characterization of dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase from streptococcus pneumoniae harboring its own substrate*. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 29521–29530 (2007).
Geller, D. A. et al. A central role for IL-1 beta in the in vitro and in vivo regulation of hepatic inducible nitric oxide synthase. IL-1 beta induces hepatic nitric oxide synthesis. J. Immunol. 155, 4890–4898 (1995).
Taylor, B. S., Alarcon, L. H. & Billiar, T. R. Inducible nitric oxide synthase in the liver: regulation and function. Biochem. Biokhimiia 63, 766–781 (1998).
Geller, D. A. et al. Cytokines, endotoxin, and glucocorticoids regulate the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in hepatocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 522–526 (1993).
Salabei, J. K., Gibb, A. A. & Hill, B. G. Comprehensive measurement of respiratory activity in permeabilized cells using extracellular flux analysis. Nat. Protoc. 9, 421–438 (2014).
Korzeniewski, B. ‘Idealized’ state 4 and state 3 in mitochondria vs. PLoS One 10, e0117145 (2015).
Meister, A. & Anderson, M. E. Glutathione. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 52, 711–760 (1983).
Papandreou, I., Cairns, R. A., Fontana, L., Lim, A. L. & Denko, N. C. HIF-1 mediates adaptation to hypoxia by actively downregulating mitochondrial oxygen consumption. Cell Metab. 3, 187–197 (2006).
Rodriguez-Prados, J. C. et al. Substrate fate in activated macrophages: a comparison between innate, classic, and alternative activation. J. Immunol. 185, 605–614 (2010).
Liochev, S. I. & Fridovich, I. The mode of decomposition of Angeli’s salt (Na2N2O3) and the effects thereon of oxygen, nitrite, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 34, 1399–1404 (2003).
Stepp, L. R., Bleile, D. M., McRorie, D. K., Pettit, F. H. & Reed, L. J. Use of trypsin and lipoamidase to study the role of lipoic acid moieties in the pyruvate and alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complexes of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 20, 4555–4560 (1981).
Prajapati, S. et al. Structural and functional analyses of the human PDH complex suggest a “division-of-labor” mechanism by local E1 and E3 clusters. Structure 27, 1124–1136.e1124 (2019).
Škerlová, J., Berndtsson, J., Nolte, H., Ott, M. & Stenmark, P. Structure of the native pyruvate dehydrogenase complex reveals the mechanism of substrate insertion. Nat. Commun. 12, 5277 (2021).
Trisolini, L. et al. FAD/NADH dependent oxidoreductases: from different amino acid sequences to similar protein shapes for playing an ancient function. J. Clin. Med. 8, 2117 (2019).
Bossis, F. et al. Prediction of high- and low-affinity quinol-analogue-binding sites in the aa3 and bo3 terminal oxidases from Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli1. Biochem. J. 461, 305–314 (2014).
Fass, D. & Thorpe, C. Chemistry and enzymology of disulfide cross-linking in proteins. Chem. Rev. 118, 1169–1198 (2018).
Farver, O., Marshall, N. M., Wherland, S., Lu, Y. & Pecht, I. Designed azurins show lower reorganization free energies for intraprotein electron transfer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, 10536–10540 (2013).
Akter, S. et al. Chemical proteomics reveals new targets of cysteine sulfinic acid reductase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 995–1004 (2018).
Wink, D. A. et al. The cytotoxicity of nitroxyl: possible implications for the pathophysiological role of NO. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 351, 66–74 (1998).
Hammond, A. H. & Fry, J. R. Effect of cyanamide on toxicity and glutathione depletion in rat hepatocyte cultures: differences between two dichloropropanol isomers. Chem. Biol. Interact. 122, 107–115 (1999).
Packman, L. C., Hale, G. & Perham, R. N. Repeating functional domains in the pyruvate dehydrogenase multienzyme complex of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 3, 1315–1319 (1984).
Reed, L. J. & Hackert, M. L. Structure-function relationships in dihydrolipoamide acyltransferases. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 8971–8974 (1990).
Eberhardt, M. et al. H2S and NO cooperatively regulate vascular tone by activating a neuroendocrine HNO–TRPA1–CGRP signalling pathway. Nat. Commun. 5, 4381 (2014).
Charni-Natan, M. & Goldstein, I. Protocol for primary mouse hepatocyte isolation. STAR Protoc. 1, 100086 (2020).
Hinman, L. M. & Blass, J. P. An NADH-linked spectrophotometric assay for pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in crude tissue homogenates. J. Biol. Chem. 256, 6583–6586 (1981).
Rogers, G. W. et al. High throughput microplate respiratory measurements using minimal quantities of isolated mitochondria. PLOS ONE 6, e21746 (2011).
Doerrier, C. et al. High-resolution fluorespirometry and OXPHOS protocols for human cells, permeabilized fibers from small biopsies of muscle, and isolated mitochondria. Methods Mol. Biol. 1782, 31–70 (2018).
Weiss, J. M. et al. Itaconic acid underpins hepatocyte lipid metabolism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in male mice. Nat. Metab. 5, 981–995 (2023).
Molina, J. R. et al. An inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation exploits cancer vulnerability. Nat. Med. 24, 1036–1046 (2018).
Staab, C. A. et al. Reduction of S-nitrosoglutathione by alcohol dehydrogenase 3 is facilitated by substrate alcohols via direct cofactor recycling and leads to GSH-controlled formation of glutathione transferase inhibitors. Biochem. J. 413, 493–504 (2008).
Frezza, C., Cipolat, S. & Scorrano, L. Organelle isolation: functional mitochondria from mouse liver, muscle and cultured fibroblasts. Nat. Protoc. 2, 287–295 (2007).
Maio, N., Kim, K. S., Singh, A. & Rouault, T. A. A single adaptable cochaperone-scaffold complex delivers nascent iron-sulfur clusters to mammalian respiratory chain complexes I-III. Cell Metab. 25, 945–953.e946 (2017).
Babady, N. E., Pang, Y. P., Elpeleg, O. & Isaya, G. Cryptic proteolytic activity of dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 6158–6163 (2007).
Allen, E. L. et al. Differential aspartate usage identifies a subset of cancer cells particularly dependent on OGDH. Cell Rep. 17, 876–890 (2016).
Rowland, E. A. et al. Sirtuin lipoamidase activity is conserved in bacteria as a regulator of metabolic enzyme complexes. mBio 8, e01096–01017 (2017).
Zhou, Y. et al. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 10, 1523 (2019).
The Gene Ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D325-d334 (2021).
Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).
Mi, H., Muruganujan, A., Ebert, D., Huang, X. & Thomas, P. D. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D419–D426 (2018).
Kuleshov, M. V. et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W90–W97 (2016).
Brautigam, C. A. et al. Structural and thermodynamic basis for weak interactions between dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase and subunit-binding domain of the branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase complex. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 23476–23488 (2011).
Carrozzo, R. et al. Riboflavin responsive mitochondrial myopathy is a new phenotype of dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase deficiency. the chaperon-like effect of vitamin B2. Mitochondrion 18, 49–57 (2014).
Schymkowitz, J. et al. The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W382–W388 (2005).
Krieger, E. et al. Improving physical realism, stereochemistry, and side-chain accuracy in homology modeling: four approaches that performed well in CASP8. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 77, 114–122 (2009).
Conway, P., Tyka, M. D., DiMaio, F., Konerding, D. E. & Baker, D. Relaxation of backbone bond geometry improves protein energy landscape modeling. Protein Sci. 23, 47–55 (2014).
Alford, R. F. et al. The Rosetta all-atom energy function for macromolecular modeling and design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 3031–3048 (2017).
Pierri, C. L., Parisi, G. & Porcelli, V. Computational approaches for protein function prediction: A combined strategy from multiple sequence alignment to molecular docking-based virtual screening. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Proteins Proteom. 1804, 1695–1712 (2010).
Van Durme, J. et al. A graphical interface for the FoldX forcefield. Bioinformatics 27, 1711–1712 (2011).
Lewis, S. M. & Kuhlman, B. A. Anchored design of protein-protein interfaces. PLOS ONE 6, e20872 (2011).
Stranges, P. B. & Kuhlman, B. A comparison of successful and failed protein interface designs highlights the challenges of designing buried hydrogen bonds. Protein Sci. 22, 74–82 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported, in part, by the intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute USA. Structural analyses were supported by Italian Association for Mitochondrial Research resources made available by ReCaS, a project funded by the MIUR (Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research) in the “PON Ricerca e Competitività 2007–2013-Azione I-Interventi di rafforzamento strutturale” PONa3_00052, Avviso 254/Ric, University of Bari (“Fondi Ateneo ex-60%”2016”; “ProgettoCompetitivo 2018” and “FFABR 2017–2018”) (to C.L.P. and V.T.). The content of this publication does not reflect views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organization simply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Illustrations in Figs. 1d, 2a,j, 3e, 4a, 7f, 8, S1a, S2a,h, S3a, S5d,e, S6a,e were created with BioRender.com.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.M.P. conceived and performed experiments, and wrote the manuscript. R.H., N.M., and J.W. performed experiments. C.M verified chemical methods and conditions. D.W.M helped design studies, wrote the manuscript and secured funding. C.L.P. and V.T. conducted structural analysis. R.H. acquired and analyzed proteomics data. D.A.W, T.A.R, T.A., and K.M.M. provided reagents, expertise, and feedback.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Sanne Verberk, Shu-Hai Lin and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Palmieri, E.M., Holewinski, R., McGinity, C.L. et al. Pyruvate dehydrogenase operates as an intramolecular nitroxyl generator during macrophage metabolic reprogramming. Nat Commun 14, 5114 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40738-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40738-4
- Springer Nature Limited