Abstract
Emerging evidence indicates that protein activities regulated by receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) are crucial for a variety of cellular processes, such as proliferation, apoptosis, and immunological response. Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O (PTPRO), an RPTP, has been revealed as a putative suppressor in the development of particular tumors. However, the function and the underlying mechanisms of PTPRO in regulating of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are not well understood. In this view, the present work investigated the role of PTPRO in LUAD. Analysis of 90 pairs of clinical LUAD specimens revealed significantly lower PTPRO levels in LUAD compared with adjacent non-tumor tissue, as well as a negative correlation of PTPRO expression with tumor size and TNM stage. Survival analyses demonstrated that PTPRO level can help stratify the prognosis of LUAD patients. Furthermore, PTPRO overexpression was found to suppress the progression of LUAD both in vitro and in vivo by inducing cell death via mitochondria-dependent apoptosis, downregulating protein expression of molecules (Bcl-2, Bax, caspase 3, cleaved-caspase 3/9, cleaved-PARP and Bid) essential in cell survival. Additionally, PTPRO decreased LUAD migration and invasion by regulating proteins involved in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and Snail). Moreover, PTPRO was shown to restrain JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathways. Expression of PTPRO was negatively correlated with p-JAK2, p-STAT3, Bcl-2, and Snail levels in LUAD tumor samples. Furthermore, the anti-tumor effect of PTPRO in LUAD was significant but compromised in STAT3-deficient cells. These data support the remarkable suppressive role of PTPRO in LUAD, which may represent a viable therapeutic target for LUAD patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Tyrosine phosphorylation is a crucial regulator of various human physiological phenomena, including cellular activation, gene transcription, and environmental homeostasis. This process is tightly regulated by the coordinated action of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) [1, 2]. While numerous researchers focus on PTKs, which have dominated the cancer target therapeutics sphere. Increasing articles have reported that PTPs play a role in certain physiological and pathological activities by regulating tyrosine dephosphorylation, which is an opposing but equally significant mechanism as PTKs [3, 4]. Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O (PTPRO), one of the receptor-type PTPs (RPTPs), was first found in renal glomerular epithelial cells [5]. As a transmembrane protein and expressed in several parenchymal and inflammatory cells (including lung, liver, breast, macrophages, and lymphocytes) [6], PTPRO has been linked to both elemental biological processes and development of inflammatory diseases, such as embryogenesis [7], osteoclast function [8], immune response [9], neuron differentiation [10, 11], atherosclerosis [6], lung injury [12, 13] and hepatitis [14]. Increasing studies demonstrated the critical functions of PTPRO in tumor suppression of certain cancer types. For example, PTPRO exhibits tumor-suppressive properties in chronic lymphocytic leukemia through negative regulating of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling [15]. In the case of breast cancer, PTPRO promoter methylation is a prognostic factor for HER2-positive patients and suppresses ERBB2-driven breast cancer growth by promoting ERBB2 dephosphorylation and endocytotic degradation [9, 16]. Moreover, PTPRO-mediated autophagy inhibits tumorigenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [17], and PTPRO downregulation is associated with an IL-6-driven increase in PD-L1 expression in monocytes and macrophages [18]. In addition, by increasing immunological infiltrates, PTPRO may serve as a therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer [19]. However, its role and mechanisms in lung cancer remain unknown.
Lung cancer is the most prevalent cause of cancer-related death, contributing to the highest morbidity and mortality rates worldwide [20,21,22]. Lung cancer is expected to account for 12% of all new cancer diagnoses in 2023 [22]. The two primary histological subtypes of lung cancer are non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). NSCLC, which accounts for about 80% of all lung cancer cases, is classified into two main subtypes: lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD, ~48% of NSCLC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC, ~28%) [21]. With significant advances in LUAD treatment such as targeted therapies and immunotherapies, LUAD survival has increased remarkably in the last decade [23]. The development of targeted therapeutics for lung cancer greatly benefits from abnormal tyrosine phosphorylation catalyzed by RPTKs, such as the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). On the other hand, RPTPs-mediated tyrosine dephosphorylation counterbalance oncogenic tyrosine kinase signaling [24, 25]. Nevertheless, limited research focuses on the roles of RPTPs, including PTPRO, in LUAD. In the present investigation, we examine the patterns of PTPRO expression in LUAD and its prognostic significance. Moreover, we performed systematic tests via in vitro and in vivo strategies to explore the inhibitory effect and the underlying molecular mechanism of PTPRO in LUAD, which could serve as a novel anticancer target.
Methods
In silico test
PTPRO mRNA levels in lung cancer and normal tissues were retrieved from the TCGA and GEO datasets (GEO19188, GEO19804). GSEA was performed on TCGA cohorts using software from Broad Institute (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp). Low- or high-PTPRO expression was distinguished using the mean cutoff based on their risk score expression. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between these two groups were subjected to gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and KEGG pathway analysis to investigate possible differences in biological processes and signaling pathways.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining
The protein expression profile of PTPRO in lung adenocarcinomas and adjacent nontumorous lung tissues was assessed using a commercially available tissue microarray (Shanghai Outdo Biotech, Shanghai, China) with the IHC method. LUAD biopsy were acquired from ten patients in Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital. Briefly, the tissue microarray and LUAD tissues were subjected to the following procedures: deparaffinization, rehydration, antigen retrieval by microwave, inactivation of endogenous peroxidase, primary antibody incubation, secondary antibody incubation, stain development, and counterstaining [26]. Two independent pathologists blinded to patients’ information analyzed IHC results based on staining intensity and proportion of positively stained cells.
Cells and transient transfection
The human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines HCC827, PC9, and H1975 were employed in this investigation and cultured as previously described [21]. GeneChem (Shanghai, China) helped insert the PTPRO coding region into the GV230 vector. Transient transfection was performed using Lipofectamine3000 following the manufacturer’s protocol. Blank vector GV230 served as a negative control. Transfection efficiency was validated by Western blotting. Each experiment was repeated at least three times independently.
Lentivirus and CRISPR plasmids
The lentivirus vector GV492 (Ubi-MCS-3FLAG-CBh-gcGFP-IRES-puromycin) containing PTPRO coding region and empty vector were purchased from Genechem (Shanghai, China). For lentivirus infection, cells were initially cultured in 6-well plates at a concentration of 3 × 104 cells per well for a duration of 24 h. Subsequently, they were subjected to transduction with an optimal quantity of prepared lentiviral vectors as previously detailed [21]. Following a post-transfection incubation period of 3–4 days, cells were subjected to selective pressure using a puromycin-containing growth medium, rendering them suitable for subsequent experimentation.
The preparation of CRISPR-Cas9/gRNA plasmid DNA followed established procedures, as detailed in previous studies [27]. In brief, gRNAs against STAT3 were designed and annealed into LentiCRISPRv2 plasmids (Supplementary Table 1). Positive clones harboring the gRNA-encoding DNA sequences were rigorously validated through DNA sequencing. Lipofectamine 3000 was employed for plasmid transfection, and the assessment of transfection efficacy was subsequently conducted through Western blot.
Western blotting (WB)
Protein levels in cells and tissues were measured using WB. Cells or isolated tissues were lysed with RIPA buffer (Beyotime, Nantong, China) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and PMSF (Roche), and total protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford strategy. Subsequently, 20–30 µg protein was separated by electrophoresis, followed by membrane transfer, blocking, primary antibody incubation, secondary antibody incubation, and immunodetection [28]. Detailed antibody information was listed in Supplementary Table 2. Immunoblotting results from three independent repeats were semi-quantified using ImageJ Plus Software.
2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay
The MTT assay was used to evaluate cell proliferation. Briefly, transfected cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 3000 cells/well. The cells were then cultured for 1, 2, 3, and 4 days, respectively. At each time point, 10 µl MTT solution was added to each well to achieve a working concentration of 0.45 mg/ml. Following another 3-h incubation, the medium was removed and 100 µl solubilization solution was added to each well to dissolve MTT crystals. Absorbance was recorded at 570 nm using a microplate reader (SpectraMax iD5). Each experiment was repeated three times.
Colony formation
Colony formation was performed to assess the survival ability of single cells. Transfected cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 500 cells/well. Cells were cultured for 2 weeks in an 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C, and subsequently fixed, and stained with crystal violet. Colony numbers were photographed and counted. Each experiment was repeated three times.
Flow cytometry
Cells were trypsinized 48 h after transfection and subjected to an Annexin V/PI assay using a flow cytometric method to evaluate apoptosis, as previously described [21]. Experiments on apoptosis were conducted in triplicate.
JC-1 staining
The JC-1 assay kit (Beyotime Biotech, Nantong, China) was used to assess mitochondrial membrane potential of LUAD cells, following the manufacturer’s protocol [29]. Briefly, the JC-1 (1×) working solution was added in the prepared cells and incubated at 37 degrees for 20 min and then photographed using a fluorescence microscope. The shift in fluorescence emission from red to green indicated the decline in mitochondrial membrane potential, a characteristic feature in the early stages of apoptosis.
Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) assay
The opening of MPTP is a critical event leading to cell death, which was assessed using an MPTP kit (Beyotime Biotech, Nantong, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol [29]. Briefly, cells on the coverslip were washed and labeled for 30 min in a dark room at 37 degrees and examined under a Leica Thunder DMi8 microscope. Diminished green fluorescence indicates increased MPTP opening.
Transwell assay
Cell migration and invasion potentials were evaluated using the Transwell assays [30]. Briefly, transfected cells were seeded into the transwell insert (8 μm pore size) at a density of 30,000 cells/well for migration test. The upper chamber was filled with 2% FBS medium, while the lower chamber was filled with 15% FBS medium. Cells that migrated to the bottom side of the insert were fixed and stained for counting after 24 h. The invasion assay was performed similarly to the migration assay, except that the seeding density was 80,000 cells/well and the transwell insert was pre-coated with Matrigel (Cat. 356234, Corning, NY, USA).
Subcutaneous xenograft and tail vein injection mice models
The subcutaneous xenograft model and tail vein injection model were developed using BALB/c nude male mice (4–5 weeks old), respectively. Lentivirus-mediated stable transfected cells (~1 × 107) were subcutaneously injected into nude mice. Tumor length and width were recorded every 5 days using a vernier caliper. The tumor volume was calculated using the formula: length × width × width × 0.5. Mice were sacrificed and xenografts were excised 20 days later.
The same amount of transfected cells was injected into the tail vein to establish the tail vein injection model, and mice were cultured for 4 weeks before being sacrificed. The lungs of mice were then resected to assess metastatic tumor.
Statistics
Data were processed using SPSS 22.0, Graphpad Prism 7.0, and R 4.0 Software. Overall survival time was defined as the period between disease diagnosis and death or the last follow-up date. A Chi-square test was performed for the difference test. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis. The Cox hazard regression model was utilized for multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors. Student’s t test and one-way ANOVA test were used to distinguish differences between groups. Two-tail p < 0.05 denoted statistical difference.
Results
Low PTPRO expression is associated with advanced TNM stage and poor prognosis of LUAD patients
Pan-cancer analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort revealed distinguished expression of PTPRO in different tumor types (Fig. 1A). For example, PTPRO was upregulated in cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL) and colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), while downregulated in bladder cancer (BLCA) and kidney chromophobe (KICH). This may be attributed to several factors, including the complexity of cancer biology and the unique characteristics of each tumor type. The tumor microenvironment, including interactions with immune cells, stromal cells, and the extracellular matrix, can influence gene expression. The differential regulation of one gene in different tumor types is a reflection of the intricate and multifaceted nature of cancer. This once again underscores the importance of considering the specific context of each tumor type when studying gene expression patterns and their functional significance in the context of tumorigenesis.
Specifically, downregulation of PTPRO was observed in lung cancer, including adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. TCGA, GSE19188, and GSE19804 were then used to further assess the expression of PTPRO mRNA in LUAD specimens. In all three datasets, the mRNA level of PTPRO was significantly lower in LUAD tissues than in normal or adjacent tissues (Fig. 1B, C). Moreover, the PTPRO transcript was found to be significantly lower in LUAD patients with advanced TNM stage or positive lymph node metastases (Fig. 1D, E). Subsequently, Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that low levels of PTPRO mRNA were linked to poor overall survival in LUAD patients in the TCGA cohort alone (Fig. 1F) or a mixed cohort including GEO, EGA and TCGA datasets (Fig. 1G).
Considering that protein level may be different with mRNA level, we further evaluated PTPRO protein expression using a tissue microarray containing 90 pairs of primary LUAD and matched normal tissues. IHC experiments revealed a significant proportion of patients with lower PTPRO protein levels in tumor specimens compared with the adjacent non-tumor tissues, and the overall PTPRO staining scores were remarkably lower in the tumor than in the non-tumorous lung (Fig. 1H). To investigate the correlation between PTPRO expression, LUAD prognosis, and clinicopathological features, LUAD cases were separated into the high expression (staining score ≥4) and low expression (staining score <4) groups based on mean PTPRO IHC score (representative IHC staining was shown in Fig. 1I). Chi-square analyses revealed positive associations of PTPRO protein accumulation with small tumor size (p < 0.05) and early T stage (p < 0.05), indicating that advanced LUAD patients had relatively low protein expression levels of PTPRO in cancer tissues (Table 1), which was consistent with its mRNA levels in Fig. 1D.
Similarly, according to Kaplan–Meier analysis of the microarray cohort, high PTPRO protein expression predicted favorable outcomes in LUAD patients (Fig. 1J), which was also consistent with the predictive role of its mRNA level in Fig. 1F, G. Furthermore, multivariate analyses demonstrated that low PTPRO protein level and distant metastasis can both independently predict a poor overall survival of LUAD (Table 2). These findings strongly suggested PTPRO as an independent prognostic factor for LUAD.
PTPRO overexpression attenuates LUAD growth both in vitro and in vivo
Clinical and dataset analyses revealed that PTPRO was downregulated in LUAD; in this view, we employed GV230-PTPRO plasmid-mediated overexpression to investigate its functional role in LUAD cells. Western blot analysis revealed a significant increase following PTPRO plasmid transfection in HCC827, PC9, and H1975 cells (Fig. 2A). In a 4-day MTT assay, PTPRO-overexpression significantly decreased cell growth rate in the three LUAD cell lines (p < 0.01, Fig. 2B). The cell growth-inhibitory effect of PTPRO was further validated by monolayer colony formation in all the three cell lines with a substantially reduced number and size of colonies following PTPRO overexpression (Fig. 2C). These results demonstrated that PTPRO overexpression decreased LUAD cell proliferation in vitro.
The effect of PTPRO on LUAD growth was then explored in vivo. PC9 cells stably transfected with GV492-vector and GV492-PTPRO plasmids were subcutaneously injected into nude mice. Detectable tumor volumes were monitored and recorded every 5 days. The mice were sacrificed and tumor xenografts were isolated 20 days post-inoculation (Fig. 2D and Supplementary Fig. 1, two independently repeated experiments). As a result, PTPRO overexpression drastically suppressed tumor growth in nude mice, as evidenced by significantly lighter tumor weight and smaller tumor size in the PTPRO group compared with the vector group (Fig. 2E, F). These findings suggested the anti-oncogenic potential of PTPRO both in vitro and in vivo.
PTPRO induces LUAD cell death via mitochondria-dependent apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo
We investigated the putative biological function pathways of PTPRO in the TCGA cohort using GSEA analysis since the previous data showed a proliferation-suppression function of PTPRO. The results indicated that PTPRO expression was linked to systemic lupus erythematosus, phagocytosis, autoimmune thyroid disease, NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and apoptosis (Fig. 3A, B). Therefore, the PTPRO-transfected LUAD cells were tested for apoptosis using an Annexin V/PI assay. The results showed that HCC827, PC9, and H1975 cells transfected with PTPRO had a much greater proportion of apoptosis as compared with vector-transfected cells (Fig. 3C). These findings indicated that elevated PTPRO expression could induce apoptosis of LUAD cells.
A network of interrelated signals may induce apoptosis via two primary pathways: the death receptor pathway (extrinsic pathway) and the mitochondrial pathway (intrinsic pathway) [31]. To further illustrate the PTPRO-mediated apoptosis mechanisms, expression of apoptotic proteins was evaluated by Western blot. As shown in Fig. 4A, the protein levels of Bcl-2 and caspase 3 significantly decreased following PTPRO transfection, while the expressions of proapoptotic proteins Bax, cleaved-caspase 9, cleaved-caspase 3, cleaved-PARP and Bid markedly increased. Consistently, the gene expression of Bid substantially increased in PTPRO overexpression cells (Supplementary Fig. 2). Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic protein which inhibits all mitochondrial apoptogenic alterations, including mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP, Δψm) loss and mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) opening [32]. Consistently, our data showed that overexpression of PTPRO decreased red JC-1 fluorescence while increasing green JC-1 fluorescence, as well as significantly lowering the red/green ratio, suggesting Δψm loss in LUAD cells (Fig. 4B). The MPTP assay yielded similar results on that weaker green MPTP fluorescence was observed in PTPRO-overexpression cells, indicating a higher proportion of “active” mitochondria with MPTP opening (Fig. 4C). These findings revealed that mitochondrial dysfunction played a pivotal role in PTPRO-mediated apoptosis, which were accompanied by changes in the expression of Bcl-2 family members.
IHC and Western blot were used to further examine the expression of crucial proteins linked to the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway in abovementioned isolated xenografts to validate the proapoptotic effect of PTPRO in LUAD in vivo. Ki-67 immunoreactivity was decreased in the PTPRO group compared with the vector group (Fig. 5A), indicating that PTPRO suppressed LUAD proliferation in xenografts. Bcl-2 expression was also significantly decreased following PTPRO transfection. In contrast, IHC assay revealed remarkably increments of Bax, cleaved-caspase 3 and Bid protein levels in tumors with PTPRO overexpression (Fig. 5A). Consistently, Western blot analysis revealed that PTPRO overexpression down-regulated anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and up-regulated proapoptotic Bax, cleaved-caspase 9, cleaved-caspase 3 and Bid (Fig. 5B). Statistically analyses of western blot results were shown in Fig. 5C as the mean ± SEM (n = 9). These data suggested the involvement of mitochondria-dependent apoptosis pathway in PTPRO-induced apoptosis.
PTPRO overexpression suppresses LUAD metastasis both in vitro and in vivo
The capacity of cell migration and invasion was evaluated to further explore the inhibitory role of PTPRO in LUAD progression. Transwell assays showed overexpression of PTPRO significantly decreased the migration and invasion capacities of HCC827, PC9, and H1975 cells (Fig. 6A, B). Meanwhile, PTPRO significantly decreased the protein expression of the mesenchymal marker N-cadherin and the EMT-inducing transcription factor Snail while increasing epithelial marker E-cadherin’s level (Fig. 6C), which concur with the transwell assay results.
PC9 cells stably transfected with PTPRO or vector were injected into the tail vein of immunodeficient mice to determine whether PTPRO inhibited tumor metastasis in vivo. As a result, PTPRO group had a substantially lower number of metastatic nodules than the vector group (Fig. 6D, two independent replicated experiments). Moreover, H&E staining of mice lung slices revealed that PTPRO overexpression decreased the size and number of the metastatic nodules (Fig. 6E), as illustrated by quantifying metastatic lesions on lung sections (Fig. 6F). These results indicated that PTPRO not only reduced cancer growth viability but also suppressed the metastatic potential, highlighting its potential as an effective LUAD treatment target.
JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway is potentially involved in PTPRO anti-tumor activity in LUAD
To explore the molecular mechanism of the tumor-suppression role of PTPRO in LUAD, we retrieved the PTPRO correlation genes from TCGA database for pathway enrichment analysis. KEGG pathway analysis implied the involvement of JAK/STAT signaling pathway (Fig. 7A). JAK2/STAT3 signaling has been widely implicated in mitochondria-dependent apoptosis and cancer metastasis [33, 34], thus attracted our attentions and western blotting was applied to compare JAK2/STAT3 pathway activity in PTPRO-overexpressing and control groups. According to our data, PTPRO significantly decreased phosphorylation-mediated activation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling by dephosphorylating JAK2-pY1007 and subsequent STAT3-pY705 residues in LUAD cell lines (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, decreased JAK2-pY1007 and STAT3-pY705 levels were also identified in LUAD xenografts by western blotting in the PTPRO overexpression group in vivo (Fig. 7C). Meanwhile, IHC analysis was conducted to assess the protein expressions of p-JAK2, p-STAT3, Bcl-2, Snail, and PTPRO in tissue sections obtained from ten cases of clinical lung adenocarcinoma specimens (Fig. 7D). Subsequently, Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was employed to determine the associations between these proteins. The analysis revealed significant negative correlations between PTPRO and p-JAK2, p-STAT3, Bcl-2, as well as Snail (Fig. 7E). These findings suggested a potential association of PTPRO with JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway and its downstream molecules.
PTPRO exerts slight anti-tumor effects in STAT3-deficient LUAD cells
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated STAT3 knockout was employed to evaluate the anti-tumor effects of PTPRO in STAT3-deficient cells. Western blot analysis confirmed the successful depletion of STAT3 using CRISPR/Cas9 in PC9 cells (Fig. 8A). Subsequently, MTT assay was conducted, revealing that PTPRO overexpression can still lead to a reduction in cell viability at 48 and 72 h in STAT3-deficient cells (Fig. 8B). Nevertheless, the inhibitory effect of PTPRO on cell proliferation was compromised following STAT3 knockout, in contrast to the results observed in MTT assay presented in Fig. 2B. The Annexin V/PI assay revealed that STAT3-deficient PC9 cells transfected with PTPRO exhibited a marginally higher proportion of apoptotic cells when compared to vector-transfected cells (16.6 ± 1.99 vs. 12.9 ± 1.28, Fig. 8C). While PTPRO induced a greater degree of apoptosis in original PC9 cells (15.59 ± 1.70 vs. 6.7 ± 2.71, Fig. 3C). Consistently, although PTPRO was demonstrated to exert inhibitory effects on invasion and metastasis in STAT3-deficient PC9 cells, its inhibitory efficacy was compromised comparing to the non-STAT3-deficient PC9 cells (Figs. 6A, B and 8D).
STAT3 is a signal transducer and transcription activator that dimerized and translocated to the nucleus upon phosphorylation, regulates tumor-related genes (such as Bcl-2 and Snail) involved in cell growth, apoptosis, and migration [35]. According to published studies [34, 36], JAK2 is a well-known upstream regulator of STAT3. Taken together, PTPRO can downregulate JAK2/STAT3 phosphorylation, and inhibit oncogenic signals by suppressing expressions of Bcl-2 and Snail; these events may subsequently induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis and suppress tumor metastasis (Fig. 8E).
Discussion
PTPs are critical in counteracting the activity of tyrosine kinases, which are speculated to block oncogenic transformation and function as tumor suppressors. Recent evidence shows that PTPs are potential targets for cancer therapy; they play a role in cancer development and progression by dephosphorylation of tumor-related proteins and regulating signaling pathways [37]. PTPRO decrease has been linked to promoter hypermethylation in several cancer types [38,39,40]. Several pieces of research have suggested the potential growth-suppressor and anti-tumorigenesis properties of PTPRO, notably in hepatocellular carcinoma [18, 41], breast cancer [9, 42, 43] and colorectal tumor [44]. However, the comprehensive functions and mechanisms of PTPRO in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) progression are poorly understood. According to public datasets and LUAD specimens, we found that PTPRO is downregulated in LUAD, and its expression is negatively correlated with tumor size and TNM stage. Further clinical survival and multivariate analyses demonstrated that low PTPRO expression predicted a poor prognosis in LUAD patients and that it can serve as an independent risk factor in LUAD progression. Moreover, both in vitro and in vivo tests proved that PTPRO overexpression slowed the progression of LUAD and triggered cell death by the mitochondria-dependent apoptosis pathway.
Apoptosis is a well-known type of programmed cell death that plays a crucial role in the development and treatment of malignant tumors. It is activated by different extrinsic and intrinsic stimuli via two major mechanisms: the extrinsic pathway via death receptors and the intrinsic pathway via mitochondrial pathways [45]. The mitochondria-dependent apoptosis pathway is critical for tissue homeostasis and a variety of human pathologies, including tumorigenesis and cancer progression [31]. The mitochondria, as a typical executing organelle of programmed cell death, contain a variety of cell death-promoting and inhibiting factors. The mitochondria apoptosis pathway is primarily mediated by two factors following activation by various apoptotic stimuli. On the one hand, decreased Bcl-2 and increased Bax proteins integrate within the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM), allowing for mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) and the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondrial matrix into the cytoplasm. In addition, Bid accelerates mitochondrial permeabilization through the activation of Bax and inhibition of anti‐apoptotic BCL‐2 members [46]. Following that, the initiator caspase, procaspase-9, is activated into cleaved-caspase 9, culminating in the development of an apoptosome. The apoptosome stimulates the cleavage and activation of executioner caspases, such as caspase-3 and -7, which then react on various downstream effectors, eventually causing cell apoptosis [47, 48]. On the other hand, the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) results in the shuttling of metabolic products such as ATP, ROS, and Ca2+, as well as matrix enlargement and rupture of the outer membrane [49, 50]. In the present investigation, protein analysis demonstrated that PTPRO downregulated anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and upregulated pro-apoptotic Bax, resulting in mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and LUAD cell death.
STAT3 (Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), a DNA-binding transcription factor and a site of convergence for the majority of initiated oncogenic pathways, plays a role in the pathogenesis of cancers, including apoptosis and metastasis [34]. STAT3 is activated transiently and tightly regulated in normal cells. Nonetheless, abnormal JAK2-mediated STAT3 activation has been identified in the onset and progression of various tumors [51]. B6, for example, induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells by constitutively inhibiting STAT3 phosphorylation through allosteric interaction with JAK2, implying that JAK2 is essential for STAT3 activation [52]. Inhibiting JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway activation was found to decrease pancreatic cancer growth and induce apoptosis both in vivo and in vitro [53]. A previous study found that acylglycerol kinase overexpression augmented JAK2/STAT3 sustained activation, promoting tumorigenicity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) [54]. Moreover, PTPRO dephosphorylated JAK2 and downregulated JAK2/STAT3 signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma [41]. Our study confirmed that the inhibitory efficacy of PTPRO on LUAD growth and metastasis were compromised in STAT3-deficient LUAD cells, unlike the strong inhibitory effects observed in non-STAT3-deficient cells. These results suggested that the depletion of STAT3 might partially counteract the anti-tumor effect of PTPRO, providing valuable insights into the interplay between PTPRO and JAK2/STAT3 pathway in cancer progression. Besides, these results indicate the existence of other possible mechanisms contributing to PTPRO’s anti-tumor role. Based on our results and prior research, we concluded the mechanism as followings: PTPRO suppresses the phosphorylation and activation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway, inducing LUAD apoptosis by modulating the Bcl-2 family and boosting mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) loss as well as MPTP opening.
Aside from rapid proliferation and decreased apoptosis, metastasis is also a vital life-threatening component in the progression of LUAD. Recent findings have emphasized the potent oncogenic function of JAK2/STAT3 signaling in tumor invasion and metastasis, emphasizing the inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 pathway as a potential therapy in malignancies [55]. For example, colorectal cancer-derived mesenchymal stem cells promoted EMT and increased the migration and invasion of colorectal cancer by activating IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling [56]. Brusatol inhibited human laryngeal squamous carcinoma migration and invasion presumably by blocking JAK2/STAT3 signaling [57]. In gastric cancer cells, single stranded interacting protein 1 (RBMS1) was discovered to activate the JAK2/STAT3 downstream signaling pathway after binding to the transcription factor MYC, subsequently increasing cancer migration and invasion [58]. Moreover, Snail was confirmed to be one of the downstream molecules of JAK2/STAT3 in promoting tumor metastasis [59, 60]. In this study, protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPRO consistently decreased JAK2/STAT3 tyrosine dephosphorylation and blocked downstream signaling, reducing LUAD migration and invasion. Although the above events may be independent instead of subsequent, our data suggest that PTPRO may be a viable therapeutic target for LUAD.
Data availability
The publicly data are provided in the article or Supplementary Materials. The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Arimura Y, Yagi J. Comprehensive expression profiles of genes for protein tyrosine phosphatases in immune cells. Sci Signal. 2010;3:rs1.
He R, Zeng LF, He Y, Zhang S, Zhang ZY. Small molecule tools for functional interrogation of protein tyrosine phosphatases. FEBS J. 2013;280:731–50.
Chen L, Juszczynski P, Takeyama K, Aguiar RC, Shipp MA. Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor-type O truncated (PTPROt) regulates SYK phosphorylation, proximal B-cell-receptor signaling, and cellular proliferation. Blood. 2006;108:3428–33.
Kang MM, Shan SL, Wen XY, Shan HS, Wang ZJ. Tumor-suppression mechanisms of protein tyrosine phosphatase O and clinical applications. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:6215–23.
Thomas PE, Wharram BL, Goyal M, Wiggins JE, Holzman LB, Wiggins RC. GLEPP1, a renal glomerular epithelial cell (podocyte) membrane protein-tyrosine phosphatase. Identification, molecular cloning, and characterization in rabbit. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:19953–62.
Liang C, Wang X, Hu J, Lian X, Zhu T, Zhang H, et al. PTPRO promotes oxidized low-density lipoprotein induced oxidative stress and cell apoptosis through toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor kappaB pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42:495–505.
Gatto G, Dudanova I, Suetterlin P, Davies AM, Drescher U, Bixby JL, et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O inhibits trigeminal axon growth and branching by repressing TrkB and Ret signaling. J Neurosci. 2013;33:5399–410.
Granot-Attas S, Elson A. Protein tyrosine phosphatases in osteoclast differentiation, adhesion, and bone resorption. Eur J Cell Biol. 2008;87:479–90.
Dong H, Ma L, Gan J, Lin W, Chen C, Yao Z, et al. PTPRO represses ERBB2-driven breast oncogenesis by dephosphorylation and endosomal internalization of ERBB2. Oncogene. 2017;36:410–22.
Liao W-H, Cheng C-H, Hung K-S, Chiu W-T, Chen G-D, Hwang P-P, et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O (Ptpro) regulates cerebellar formation during zebrafish development through modulating Fgf signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:2367–81.
Chen B, Bixby JL. A novel substrate of receptor tyrosine phosphatase PTPRO is required for nerve growth factor-induced process outgrowth. J Neurosci. 2005;25:880–8.
Huan Z, Tang Y, Xu C, Cai J, Yao H, Wang Y, et al. PTPRO knockdown protects against inflammation in hemorrhage shock-induced lung injury involving the NF-κB signaling pathway. Respir Res. 2022;23:195.
Chen Y, Sun B. PTPRO activates TLR4/NF-κB signaling to intensify lipopolysaccharide-induced pneumonia cell injury. Allergol Immunopathol. 2022;50:119–24.
Jiang R, Chen D, Hou J, Tan Z, Wang Y, Huang X, et al. Survival and inflammation promotion effect of PTPRO in fulminant hepatitis is associated with NF-kappaB activation. J Immunol. 2014;193:5161–70.
Motiwala T, Kutay H, Zanesi N, Frissora FW, Mo X, Muthusamy N, et al. PTPROt-mediated regulation of p53/Foxm1 suppresses leukemic phenotype in a CLL mouse model. Leukemia. 2015;29:1350–9.
Huang YT, Li FF, Ke C, Li Z, Li ZT, Zou XF, et al. PTPRO promoter methylation is predictive of poorer outcome for HER2-positive breast cancer: indication for personalized therapy. J Transl Med. 2013;11:245.
Zhang W, Hou J, Wang X, Jiang R, Yin Y, Ji J, et al. PTPRO-mediated autophagy prevents hepatosteatosis and tumorigenesis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:9420.
Zhang W, Liu Y, Yan Z, Yang H, Sun W, Yao Y, et al. IL-6 promotes PD-L1 expression in monocytes and macrophages by decreasing protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:e000285.
Hou X, Du J, Fang H. PTPRO is a therapeutic target and correlated with immune infiltrates in pancreatic cancer. J Cancer. 2021;12:7445–53.
Zhang Q, Fan H, Zou Q, Liu H, Wan B, Zhu S, et al. TEAD4 exerts pro-metastatic effects and is negatively regulated by miR6839-3p in lung adenocarcinoma progression. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22:3560–71.
Zhang Q, Fan H, Liu H, Jin J, Zhu S, Zhou L, et al. WNT5B exerts oncogenic effects and is negatively regulated by miR-5587-3p in lung adenocarcinoma progression. Oncogene. 2020;39:1484–97.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:17–48.
Howlader N, Forjaz G, Mooradian MJ, Meza R, Kong CY, Cronin KA, et al. The effect of advances in lung-cancer treatment on population mortality. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:640–9.
Im J-Y, Kim B-K, Lee K-W, Chun S-Y, Kang M-J, Won M. DDIAS promotes STAT3 activation by preventing STAT3 recruitment to PTPRM in lung cancer cells. Oncogenesis. 2020;9:1–11.
Stoker AW. RPTPs and Cancer. In: Neel BG, Tonks NK, editors. Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases in Cancer. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2016. p. 13-45.
Zhang Q, Yuan L, Liu D, Wang J, Wang S, Zhang Q, et al. Hydrogen sulfide attenuates hypoxia-induced neurotoxicity through inhibiting microglial activation. Pharm Res. 2014;84:32–44.
Feng X, Tubbs A, Zhang C, Tang M, Sridharan S, Wang C, et al. ATR inhibition potentiates ionizing radiation-induced interferon response via cytosolic nucleic acid-sensing pathways. EMBO J. 2020;39:e104036.
Zhang Q, Yuan L, Zhang Q, Gao Y, Liu G, Xiu M, et al. Resveratrol attenuates hypoxia-induced neurotoxicity through inhibiting microglial activation. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015;28:578–87.
Liu P, Huang W, Ding Y, Wu J, Liang Z, Huang Z, et al. Fasudil dichloroacetate alleviates SU5416/hypoxia-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension by ameliorating dysfunction of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2021;15:1653–66.
Zhang. TEAD4 exerts pro-metastatic effects and is negatively regulated by miR6839-3p in lung adenocarcinoma progression. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:7680–2.
Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35:495–516.
Nakazawa Y, Kamijo T, Koike K, Noda T. ARF tumor suppressor induces mitochondria-dependent apoptosis by modulation of mitochondrial Bcl-2 family proteins. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:27888–95.
Darvin P, Baeg SJ, Joung YH, Sp N, Kang DY, Byun HJ, et al. Tannic acid inhibits the Jak2/STAT3 pathway and induces G1/S arrest and mitochondrial apoptosis in YD-38 gingival cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2015;47:1111–20.
Mengie Ayele T, Tilahun Muche Z, Behaile Teklemariam A, Bogale Kassie A, Chekol Abebe E. Role of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in the tumorigenesis, chemotherapy resistance, and treatment of solid tumors: a systemic review. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:1349–64.
Sulaiman NBS, Mohan CD, Basappa S, Pandey V, Rangappa S, Bharathkumar H, et al. An azaspirane derivative suppresses growth and induces apoptosis of ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cells through the modulation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Int J Oncol. 2016;49:1221–9.
Huang B, Lang X, Li X. The role of IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in cancers. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1023177.
Sivaganesh V, Sivaganesh V, Scanlon C, Iskander A, Maher S, Lê T, et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatases: mechanisms in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:12865.
Calvisi DF, Ladu S, Gorden A, Farina M, Lee JS, Conner EA, et al. Mechanistic and prognostic significance of aberrant methylation in the molecular pathogenesis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:2713–22.
Motiwala T, Ghoshal K, Das A, Majumder S, Weichenhan D, Wu YZ, et al. Suppression of the protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O gene (PTPRO) by methylation in hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncogene. 2003;22:6319–31.
Motiwala T, Majumder S, Kutay H, Smith DS, Neuberg DS, Lucas DM, et al. Methylation and silencing of protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3174–81.
Hou J, Xu J, Jiang R, Wang Y, Chen C, Deng L, et al. Estrogen-sensitive PTPRO expression represses hepatocellular carcinoma progression by control of STAT3. Hepatology. 2013;57:678–88.
Dong H, Xie C, Yao Z, Zhao R, Lin Y, Luo Y, et al. PTPRO-related CD8(+) T-cell signatures predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in patients with breast cancer. Front Immunol. 2022;13:947841.
Dong H, Xie C, Jiang Y, Li K, Lin Y, Pang X, et al. Tumor-derived exosomal protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O polarizes macrophage to suppress breast tumor cell invasion and migration. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:703537.
Dai W, Xiang W, Han L, Yuan Z, Wang R, Ma Y, et al. PTPRO represses colorectal cancer tumorigenesis and progression by reprogramming fatty acid metabolism. Cancer Commun. 2022;42:848–67.
Fuchs Y, Steller H. Programmed cell death in animal development and disease. Cell. 2011;147:742–58.
Flores-Romero H, Hohorst L, John M, Albert MC, King LE, Beckmann L, et al. BCL-2-family protein tBID can act as a BAX-like effector of apoptosis. EMBO J. 2022;41:e108690.
Chipuk JE, Moldoveanu T, Llambi F, Parsons MJ, Green DR. The BCL-2 family reunion. Mol Cell. 2010;37:299–310.
Wang Z, Li H, Yan J, Liu Y. Flavonoid compound breviscapine suppresses human osteosarcoma Saos-2 progression property and induces apoptosis by regulating mitochondria-dependent pathway. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2021;35:e22633.
Kinnally KW, Peixoto PM, Ryu S-Y, Dejean LM. Is mPTP the gatekeeper for necrosis, apoptosis, or both? Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2011;1813:616–22.
Yamada K, Yoshida K. Mechanical insights into the regulation of programmed cell death by p53 via mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2019;1866:839–48.
Lu K, Li B, Zhang H, Xu Z, Song D, Gao L, et al. A novel silicone derivative of natural osalmid (DCZ0858) induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma via the JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:31.
Shan H, Yao S, Ye Y, Yu Q. 3-Deoxy-2β,16-dihydroxynagilactone E, a natural compound from Podocarpus nagi, preferentially inhibits JAK2/STAT3 signaling by allosterically interacting with the regulatory domain of JAK2 and induces apoptosis of cancer cells. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2019;40:1578–86.
Zhang Z, Wang F, Du C, Guo H, Ma L, Liu X, et al. BRM/SMARCA2 promotes the proliferation and chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer cells by targeting JAK2/STAT3 signaling. Cancer Lett. 2017;402:213–24.
Chen X, Ying Z, Lin X, Lin H, Wu J, Li M, et al. Acylglycerol kinase augments JAK2/STAT3 signaling in esophageal squamous cells. J Clin Investig. 2013;123:2576–89.
Park S-Y, Lee C-J, Choi J-H, Kim J-H, Kim J-W, Kim J-Y, et al. The JAK2/STAT3/CCND2 axis promotes colorectal cancer stem cell persistence and radioresistance. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:399.
Zhang X, Hu F, Li G, Li G, Yang X, Liu L, et al. Human colorectal cancer-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote colorectal cancer progression through IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:25.
Zhou J, Hou J, Wang J, Wang J, Gao J, Bai Y. Brusatol inhibits laryngeal cancer cell proliferation and metastasis via abrogating JAK2/STAT3 signaling mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Life Sci. 2021;284:119907.
Liu M, Li H, Zhang H, Zhou H, Jiao T, Feng M, et al. RBMS1 promotes gastric cancer metastasis through autocrine IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:287.
Fu XT, Dai Z, Song K, Zhang ZJ, Zhou ZJ, Zhou SL, et al. Macrophage-secreted IL-8 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by activating the JAK2/STAT3/Snail pathway. Int J Oncol. 2015;46:587–96.
Jia M, Wang Y, Guo Y, Yu P, Sun Y, Song Y, et al. Nitidine chloride suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stem cell-like properties in glioblastoma by regulating JAK2/STAT3 signaling. Cancer Med. 2021;10:3113–28.
Funding
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82002438), Fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M671396), Fellowship of Jiangsu Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020Z239).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YD, SS, WD, HZ, CL and LJ performed the experiments. QZ and HL contributed to writing preparation. QZ, YD and HL participated in formal analysis and organized the figures. QZ, HK and WX designed the experiments. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by Institutional Review Board from The Ethic Committee of Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Professor Stephen Tait
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dai, Y., Shi, S., Liu, H. et al. Protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPRO represses lung adenocarcinoma progression by inducing mitochondria-dependent apoptosis and restraining tumor metastasis. Cell Death Dis 15, 11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06375-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06375-x
- Springer Nature Limited