Abstract
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumor of bone derived from osteoblasts, which is a noteworthy threat to the health of children and adolescents. In this study, we found that MCM8 has significantly higher expression level in osteosarcoma tissues in comparison with normal tissues, which was also correlated with more advanced tumor grade and pathological stage. In agreement with the role of MCM proteins as indicators of cell proliferation, knockdown/overexpression of MCM8 inhibited/promoted osteosarcoma cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Also, MCM8 knockdown/overexpression was also significantly associated with the promotion/inhibition of cell apoptosis and suppression/promotion of cell migration. More importantly, mechanistic study identified CTGF as a potential downstream target of MCM8, silencing of which could enhance the regulatory effects of MCM8 knockdown and alleviate the effects of MCM8 overexpression on osteosarcoma development. In summary, MCM8/CTGF axis was revealed as critical participant in the development and progression of osteosarcoma and MCM8 may be a promising therapeutic target for osteosarcoma treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumor of bone derived from osteoblasts, the main predisposing population of which is children and adolescents1,2. Osteosarcoma mostly occurs in the epiphysis of the long diaphysis, which grows rapidly and characterized by strong invasiveness. Therefore, lung metastases may appear in the early stage of the disease3. In recent years, with the development of limb salvage surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, the overall survival rate of osteosarcoma patients has reached 60–75%4. However, the survival rate of osteosarcoma patients has not been significantly improved for more than 20 years, which means that the current treatment of osteosarcoma has entered a bottleneck period5. More importantly, the survival rate of patients with advanced osteosarcoma, especially those with distant metastasis, is only about 20% even treated with chemotherapy drugs such as methotrexate, adriamycin, and cisplatin, which is far from satisfactory6,7. As one of the emerging cancer treatment methods, molecular targeted drugs have attracted extensive attention in recent years due to its better accuracy and less side effects. Therefore, it has become a new way to improve the prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma to identify the overexpressed marker molecules in the process of osteosarcoma progression and use them as molecular targets of targeted drugs8,9.
The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex is an important component of the prereplication complex, and is the key participant in DNA replication and extension10,11. The members of the MCM family include MCM2–7, as well as MCM8, MCM9, and MCM10 that have recently attracted attention12. MCM family proteins have similar structures, containing a conserved domain called MCM box in its central domain, which is a DNA-dependent ATPase motif composed of 200 amino acid residues. At present, the MCM complex is considered to be the helicase in the process of DNA replication, and it plays a key role in mediating the extension of the replication fork13. Previous studies have shown that the expression level of MCM protein and its mRNA is directly proportional to the cell proliferation activity, which also indicates that MCM protein can be used as a marker of cell proliferation to a certain extent, which has attracted the attention of tumor researchers14. Subsequent studies showed that MCM protein is closely related to the occurrence and development of a variety of malignant tumors15. Among them, a study on MCM8 showed that the expression of MCM8 was upregulated by 2–5.2-fold in human cancers including breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, liver cancer, glioblastoma multiforme, and myeloblastoma, indicating that overexpression of MCM8 has extensive significance in human malignant tumors16. Bearing all these in mind, this study aims to clarify the expression characteristics of MCM8 in osteosarcoma and its role in tumor progression.
Herein, MCM8 was identified as a key participant in the development and progression of osteosarcoma. The analysis using clinical specimens as object showed the upregulation of MCM8 in osteosarcoma and its significant association with the malignant grade and pathological stage. In vitro and in vivo investigations suggested that MCM8 silencing could be an effective strategy to suppress the development and even the metastasis of osteosarcoma. Further exploration of the downstream mechanism indicated connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) as a potential target molecule of MCM8, knockdown of which could enhance the inhibitory effects of MCM8 silencing, while weakening the promotion effects of MCM8 overexpression on osteosarcoma development.
Materials and methods
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis
Osteosarcoma tissue and adjacent normal tissue samples were obtained from Zhengzhou University. A total of 78 cases were collected and related information of these osteosarcoma patients was collected as well. All patients were completely informed and written informed consent was provided before operation. The experimental design was approved by the institutional committees of the Animal Research Committee and Animal Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University. For IHC, the microarrays were baked at 65 °C for 30 min, then dewaxed in xylene and hydrated in ethanol with different concentrations. Citrate buffer was used for antigen repairing at 180 °C for 5 min. After blocked with 3% H2O2, target gene antibodies (Table S1) were incubated with the microarrays at 4 °C overnight. Secondary antibody was added and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Finally, the tissue microarrays were stained with diaminobenzidine and exanimated by microscopic. IHC scoring of specimens was classified into four categories based on the sum of the staining intensity and staining extent scores.
Cell culture
Human osteosarcoma cell lines MNNG/HOS, Saos-2, U-2OS, and MG-63 were obtained from the Bena Technology (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China). MNNG/HOS and MG-63 cells were maintained in 90% DMEM-H with 10% FBS additive (Gibco, Rockville, MD, USA). Saos-2 and U-2OS cells were cultured in 90% RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS. All cells were maintained in an incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The lentivirus with target sequences and green fluorescent protein (GFP) labeling were prepared to infect cells (at ~80% confluence). After culturing for 72 h, the cell infection efficiency was evaluated by observing GFP expression under fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan).
Target RNA interferes and lentiviral vector
First, RNA interference (RNAi) specifically targeting MCM8 or CTGF were designed and synthesized by Shanghai Yibeirui Bioscienceres (Shanghai, China) (Table S2). Then, the RNAi sequences were connected to BR-V-108 or BR-V-112 lentivirus vector (Shanghai Bioscienceres, Co., Ltd), respectively. The recombined lentivirus vector plasmid together with the auxiliary plasmid (Helper 1.0 and Helper 2.0) was cotransfected to 293T cells. Then, plasmids were extracted by EndoFree maxi plasmid kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) and qualified plasmid was packaged with virus and lentivirus quality and titer was determined.
In addition, MCM8 overexpression construct (MCM8 group, using vector as the negative control) was also designed and prepared by Shanghai Yibeirui Bioscienceres (Shanghai, China).
RNA extraction and RT-qPCR
Cells were infected with target lentivirus or control virus and cultured for 72 h. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and the quality was evaluated by Nanodrop 2000/2000C spectrophotometer (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two micrograms of RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA and quantitative real-time PCR was conducted using SYBR Green Master Mixes Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) on the platform of VII7 Sequence Detection system (ABI, Waltham, MA, USA). GAPDH was utilized as inner control, and related primers used were showed in Table S3. The relative quantitative analysis in gene expression data were analyzed by the 2−ΔΔCt method.
Western blotting and co-IP assay
Total protein was collected after infected cells were lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) and the protein concentrations were detected by BCA Protein Assay Kit (HyClone-Pierce, Logan, UT, USA). Twenty micrograms of proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), then transferred onto PVDF membranes. After blocked at room temperature for 1 h with TBST solution containing 5% non‑fat milk, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight and continuingly incubated with the secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. The outcomes were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) (Amersham, Chicago, IL, USA).
For co-IP, 1.0 mg prepared proteins were incubated with diluted antibodies at 4 °C overnight, then the solution was incubated with 20 μL beads at 4 °C for 2 h. After centrifugation, the precipitates were cleaned with IP cracking solution, then were denatured in the IP lysate buffer and 5 × loading buffer at 100 °C boiling water for 5 min. The obtained reactants were subjected to WB assay with antibodies. Antibodies used in WB and co-IP were detailed in Table S1.
MTT assay
Infected cells in exponential growth phase were trypsinized and seeded into a 96-well plate with 2000 cells per well and continuously incubated at 37 °C for 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h. Four hours before each termination, 20 μL MTT solution (5 mg/mL, Genview, El Monte, CA, USA) was added. Next, 100 μL DMSO solution was added to dissolve formazan crystal. OD490 were measured by a microplate reader (Tecan infinite, Männedorf, Zürich, Switzerland).
Flow cytometry for apoptosis and cell cycle
Lentivirus infected cells were seeded in six-well plates in triplicate and further cultured for 5 days. Floating cells were collected, trypsinized, and washed with 4 °C ice-cold D-Hanks. After centrifugation(1000 × g), cells were resuspended with binding buffer, then 5 μL Annexin V-APC (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) was added for staining lightless. Apoptosis analysis was measured using FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).
For cell cycle detection, prepared cells were stained by Propidium Iodide solution (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). Cell cycle distribution was detected by FACSCalibur and observed by micropublisher (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Wound-healing assay
Briefly, infected cells (5 × 104cells/well) were seeded onto a 96-well dish. Scratches crossing the cell monolayer were made by a 96-wounding replicator (VP scientific, San Diego, CA, USA) while cell confluence reached over 90%. After rinsing gently with serum-free medium for 2–3 times, medium with 0.5% FBS was added and cultured for 20 h and photographs were taken by a fluorescence microscope at 6 and 20 h and migration rate was calculated.
Transwell assay
Transwell assay was performed by Corning Transwell Kit (Corning, NT, USA). First, infected cells were collected, trypsinized, counted, and incubated in the upper chamber with 100 μL medium without FBS in a 24-well plate (5 × 104 cells/well). Six hundred microliters of medium supplemented with 30% FBS was added in the lower chamber. After 12 or 48 h of incubation at 37 °C with 5% CO2, nonmetastatic cells were removed with a cotton swab. Four hundred microliters of Giemsa was added for staining and the migration ability of cells was analyzed.
Celigo cell counting assay
Infected cells were cultured for 72 h and then the cells were seeded into 96-well plates (2000 cells/well). Cells were further cultured in MEM (10% FBS) at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 5 days. MEM medium was changed every 3 days. Celigo image cytometer (Nexcelom Bioscience, Lawrence, MA, USA) was applied for cell counting at days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 and the cell proliferation curve of 5 days was drawn.
Colony formation assay
Infected cells in the logarithmic growth phase were seeded into six-well plates (1000 cells/well) in triplicate and further cultured for 8 days with the culture medium exchanged every 3 days. Cell clones were photographed under a fluorescence microscope. Next, all clones were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde, stained by Giemsa, and photographed with a digital camera. Colony forming rate = (colony number/inoculated cell number) × 100%.
PrimeView Human Gene Expression Array
Gene expression profile in infected MNNG/HOS cells was detected by PrimeView Human Gene Expression Array. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol method. RNA concentration and values of A260/A280 were determined by Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). Gene expression array was performed with Affymetrix human GeneChip PrimeView according to the manufacturer’s instruction and the outcomes were scanned by Affymetrix Scanner 3000 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Raw data statistical significance assessment was accomplished using a Welch t-test with Benjamini–Hochberg FDR (|fold change| ≥ 1.3 and FDR < 0.05 as significant). Significant difference analysis and functional analysis based on ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was executed, and |Z-score | > 2 is considered meaningful.
Human apoptosis antibody array
Briefly, proteins from infected MNNG/HOS cells were collected and the concentrations were measured by BCA Protein Assay Kit (HyClone-Pierce, Logan, UT, USA). Each array antibody membrane was blocked, then incubated with protein samples (0.5 mg/mL) overnight at 4 °C, and continuingly incubated with HRP linked Streptavidin conjugate for 1 h. ECL (Amersham, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for visualizing and the signal the spots. Gray was viewed by ImageJ and analyzed.
Animal experiments
Our animal study was reviewed and approved by the institutional committees of the Animal Research Committee and Animal Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University. Female 4-week-old BALB/c nude mice were purchased from Beijing Charles River Experimental Animals Co., Ltd (Beijing, China) and housed at 24 °C with a 12 h light/dark cycle controlled condition. 0.2 mL shMCM8 or shCtrl MNNG/HOS cell suspension (2 × 107 cells/mL) was subcutaneously injected into 20 mice which were randomly divided into two groups (shMCM8 group and shCtrl group) for tumor formation. The growth of tumor was monitored and longest dimension (L) and dimension perpendicular to length (W) was record once a week to calculate tumor volume (V = π/6 × L × W2). In vivo fluorescence images were captured applying IVIS Spectrum Imaging System (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Then, all mice were sacrificed and the tumor tissues were removed for Ki-67 immunostaining using Ki-67 antibody. Stained slides were examined with a microscopic at 100× and 200× objective lens.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD and P values are determined using Student’s t test with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 (IBM, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6.01 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Multiple groups were compared by one-way ANOVA. MCM8 expression difference between osteosarcoma tissues and adjacent normal tissues were analyzed with rank sum test analysis. The relation of MCM8 expression and tumor characteristics was analyzed with Mann–Whitney U analysis and Spearman rank correlation analysis.
Results
MCM8 was highly expressed in osteosarcoma tissues and cells, and linked to the pathological stage
With the objective of determining the roles of MCM8 in osteosarcoma, we evaluated the differential expression of MCM8 between normal and osteosarcoma tissues, and between stages of disease. IHC results confirmed significantly higher expression of MCM8 in tumor tissues than in adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 1A and Table 1). The Mann–Whitney U analysis of the correlation between tumor characteristics and MCM8 expression in clinical samples of osteosarcoma showed that MCM8 was positively correlated to age, pathological stage, and grade malignancy (Table 2), which was further verified by the Pearson correlation analysis (Table S4). For performing experiments to study mechanism, we evaluated MCM8 levels in human osteoblast hFOB1.19 and a panel of osteosarcoma cell lines so as to find the most appropriate model (P < 0.001, Fig. 1B). Since the relatively higher expression was observed in the MNNG/HOS and U-2OS cells, we selected these both cell lines for application in the subsequent experiments.
MCM8 depletion reduced osteosarcoma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion but ameliorated apoptosis and cycle in vitro
Aiming to further explore the roles of MCM8 in osteosarcoma, MNNG/HOS cells were transfected with the lentivirus plasmids (shMCM8 or shCtrl). As expected, the expression of MCM8 was significantly decreased, especially in shMCM8-3 group (Fig. 1C). In addition, the fluorescence of cells, which were transfected with shMCM8-3 for 72 h, observed by microscope demonstrated a >80% efficiency of transfection (Fig. 1D). At the same time, the results of qRT-PCR and western blot indicated that after the transfection of shMCM8-3, compared with the shCtrl group, both mRNA and protein levels of MCM8 in shMCM8 group were downregulated (P < 0.001, Fig. 1E, F).
We next examined whether MCM8 depletion altered the proliferation of osteosarcoma cell lines. It was evident that MCM8 depletion in MNNG/HOS and U-2OS osteosarcoma cell lines significantly decreased cell proliferation (P < 0.001, Fig. 2A). The wound-healing assay and transwell assay demonstrated that the migration and invasion of MNNG/HOS and U-2OS cells were significantly slowed upon transfection of shMCM8-3 (P < 0.001, Fig. 2B, C). The results from flow cytometry showed that MCM8 depletion significantly accelerated the apoptosis of MNNG/HOS and U-2OS cells (P < 0.001, Fig. 2D), which was caused by the regulation of apoptosis-related proteins. In detail, the results of a human apoptosis antibody array showed that the expression patterns of CD40, HTRA, IGFBP-6, p21, and p27 were augmented, while those of Bcl-w, IGF-II, and sTNF-R1 were decreased after silencing MCM8 (Fig. 2E, Supplementary Fig. 1A, B). Besides, the cell cycle analysis showed that MCM8 depletion increased the percentage of cells in G2 phase in both MNNG/HOS and U-2OS cells (P < 0.001, Fig. 2F). Some cancer-related proteins were consistently changed in MNNG/HOS cells after knocking down MCM8, including the downregulation of P-Akt, CDK1, and CDK6, as well as the upregulation ofMAPK9 (Fig. 2G). As per the results presented so far, we indicated that MCM8 downregulation repressed proliferation, migration, and invasion but promoted apoptosis and cycle of osteosarcoma cells.
MCM8 depletion curbed osteosarcoma tumorigenesis in vivo
After establishing a possible involvement of MCM8 in osteosarcoma in vitro, we turned to in vivo models for further verification. We injected MNNG/HOS cells with MCM8 depletion subcutaneously in mice, which was observed by in vivo imaging (Fig. 3A). Such decrease in the fluorescence was considered to be impaired tumor growth in shMCM8 group (P < 0.05, Fig. 3B). We indeed found significant reduction in tumor volume and weight (P < 0.01, Fig. 3C–E). Finally, the expression patterns of factors related to proliferation in tumor tissues were determined. The results showed that MCM8 depletion led to diminished expression of Ki-67 (Fig. 3F). As presented above, these data suggested that MNNG/HOS cells with MCM8 depletion curbed osteosarcoma tumorigenesis as xenografts in nude mice.
MCM8 depletion inhibited osteosarcoma development through CTGF
We were interested in finding downstream mechanism that was functionally involved in MCM8’s actions towards promoting osteosarcoma. In this regard, we turned to PrimeView Human Gene Expression Array to make clear the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in shMCM8 and shCtrl MNNG/HOS cells. It followed that there were 629 upregulated DEGs and the other 867 downregulated DEGs in shMCM8 group based on the threshold of absolute fold change ≥ 1.3 and FDR < 0.05 (Fig. 4A, Supplementary Fig. 1C). Subsequently, all the DEGs were enriched by the interaction network analysis based on IPA disease and function, indicating the downregulation of AKT2, CTGF, CHEK1, EGR1, EXOSC6, FNDC3B, MCM9, MDM2, MYO6, NEK9, PIM1, PLAC8, POLE2, PTEN, RPS15A, SMAD5, SMAD6, THBS1, TMED2, TMED4, WNT5A, and XIAP in MCM8 depletion treatment (Fig. 4B). Among them, 19 DEGs were selected for qPCR detection in shMCM8 and shCtrl MNNG/HOS cells, 4 of which were used for the western blot analysis. The results indicated that CTGF, POLE2, THBS1, and XIAP mRNA levels (Fig. 4C) and protein levels (Fig. 4D) both exhibited a significant downward trend. Finally, in the co-IP assay, the protein obtained by coprecipitation with Flag antibody was detected by CTGF antibody, which demonstrated that the expression of CTGF protein in MCM8-Flag group was significantly increased (Fig. 4E), indicating that there was an interaction between MCM8 and CTGF. Herein, it was speculated that CTGF was the downstream target of MCM8 involved in the regulation of osteosarcoma.
CTGF was involved in the MCM8-induced regulation of osteosarcoma
Initially, IHC results illustrated the upregulated CTGF expression in osteosarcoma tissues (Fig. 5A). Next, in an attempt to identify the synergistic function of CTGF and MCM8 in the development of osteosarcoma, MNNG/HOS cell models with mere CTGF depletion and concurrent MCM8 depletion and CTGF depletion were prepared, verified (Supplementary Fig. 2A–D), and used in the following functional experiments. It needed to be mentioned that cell phenotypes including proliferation, migration, and coupled with colony formation were impaired, especially in shCTGF + shMCM8 group (Fig. 5B–E). In addition to the alteration of cell proliferation and migration, we also tested cell apoptosis ability. Not surprisingly, the apoptosis level increased in both shCTGF and shCTGF + shMCM8 groups (P < 0.001, Fig. 5F). Furthermore, shCTGF was also used for transfecting MCM8 overexpression MNNG/HOS cell model to construct cell model with concurrent MCM8 overexpression and CTGF knockdown. The following detection of cell phenotypes indicated not only that MCM8 overexpression promotes cell proliferation (Fig. 6A), colony formation (Fig. 6B), and cell migration (Fig. 6C, D) as well as inhibits cell apoptosis (Fig. 6E) but also that CTGF knockdown could partially reverse the MCM8-induced regulatory effects on osteosarcoma cells (Fig. 6). Based on the results that were presented, it was quite apparent that CTGF might be a target of MCM8 in the regulation of osteosarcoma.
Discussion
Although MCM family members were initially recognized as key factors in DNA replication and extension, their biological functions in the development and progression of human diseases including cancer have attracted considerable attention in recent years14,15. Considering the significance of MCM proteins as representative of cell proliferation, it was identified as a potential diagnostic biomarker of breast cancer, together with the more famous Ki-67 and PCNA17. Previous studies showed that phosphorylation induced by various kinases is the key to regulate the activity and function of MCM proteins. These phosphorylation events are not only related to DNA replication but also to cell cycle progression and checkpoint reaction. Therefore, abnormal phosphorylation of MCM is related to the occurrence and development of cancer18. For instance, phosphorylation of MCM3 by PLK1 was proved to participate in the proliferation and apoptosis of renal cell carcinoma cells19. On the other hand, MCM5 was also manifested as a regulator in renal cell carcinoma development which was related with poor prognosis of patients20. MCM7, whose amplification was known to be responsible for prostate cancer development21, was recently found to promote hepatocellular carcinoma development through a CyclinD1-related path22. Liu et al. demonstrated that MCM6 is capable of promoting the expression levels of a series of cell cycle markers including CDK2, CDK4, CyclinA, CyclinB1, CyclinD1, and CyclinE and delaying cell cycle progression in S/G2 phase. Notably, they also found upregulation of MCM8 in hepatocellular carcinoma23. In view of the important role of MCM8-9 complex in DNA synthesis, the latest research showed that inhibiting the formation of this complex can increase the sensitivity of tumor cells to DNA damage drugs such as cisplatin and olaparib24. However, research concerning the role of MCM8 itself in the development and progression of human cancers is still rarely reported, which is only observed in gastric cancer 25.
In this study, we found that osteosarcoma tissues possessed generally higher MCM8 expression than normal bone tissues. High MCM8 expression was significantly correlated with more advanced tumor grade and pathological stage. In consistent with the role of MCM proteins as indicator of cell proliferation, we also found that knockdown of MCM8 could impede osteosarcoma cell proliferation, together with the promotion of cell apoptosis, arrest of cell cycle in G2 phase, and suppression of cell migration. Further mechanistic study revealed that MCM8 may regulate a variety of apoptosis-related proteins and Akt pathway to influence osteosarcoma development. We also use xenograft mice model to demonstrate the knockdown of MCM8 as a strategy to inhibit osteosarcoma development in vivo.
Furthermore, a GeneChip microarray analysis, followed by bioinformatics analysis, revealed CTGF as a potential downstream molecule of MCM8 with direct protein–protein interaction. Subsequent verification showed that CTGF exhibited a feature of coexpression with MCM8 in osteosarcoma tissues or cells. Knockdown of CTGF could deepen the regulatory effects of MCM8 silencing on osteosarcoma development. More importantly, upon CTGF knockdown, the MCM8-induced promotion of osteosarcoma development was significantly alleviated.
CTGF is a secreted peptide rich in cysteine, composed of 349 amino acids, and plays an important role in the process of cell hypertrophy and proliferation and the synthesis of extracellular matrix components. CTGF exists in lung, brain, liver, and other tissues, which regulates the physiological functions of cells by interacting with different ligands and integrins26,27. For example, the combination of CTGF and integrin α6β1 can effectively promote the adhesion, migration, and survival of epithelial cells and microvascular endothelial cells28; the combination of CTGF and IGF1 could regulate the proliferation and development of chondrocytes29; the interaction of CTGF and LRP can regulate cell adhesion and Wnt signal pathways30, etc. Although the initial study found that CTGF has chemotaxis and can promote the mitosis of fibroblasts, a large number of studies in recent years have shown that it plays an important role in the fibrosis of many tissues and organs throughout the body31,32,33. More importantly, recent research showed that CTGF also plays a critical role in the development of human cancers34. For example, it was illustrated that CTGF mediated the regulation of epithelial–mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis of colorectal cancer by miR-21835, and the promotion of pancreatic cancer by PD-136. Recently, CTGF was also found to play an important role in the growth of bone metastases from prostate and breast cancer through forming CTGF–Runx2–RANKL axis37. Moreover, the role of CTGF in osteosarcoma to be used was demonstrated by Wang et al., as a promotor of angiogenesis38, and by Hou et al., for promoting tumor metastasis through regulating VCAM-139. Herein, MCM8/CTGF turned out to be a new path that CTGF executes its regulatory effects in osteosarcoma.
In conclusion, the results of our study demonstrated that MCM8 is significantly associated with the promotion of cell proliferation and cell migration, and the inhibition of cell apoptosis in osteosarcoma, thus predicting more advanced tumor grade and pathological stage. Moreover, CTGF, whose effects of osteosarcoma have been reported to some extent, was revealed as a potential downstream target of MCM8. Dual target of MCM8 and CTGF exhibited stronger inhibitory effects on osteosarcoma development than mere MCM8 knockdown. Therefore, MCM8 may be considered as a novel therapeutic target of osteosarcoma.
References
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 70, 7–30 (2020).
Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J. Clin. 68, 394–424 (2018).
de Azevedo, J. W. V. et al. Biology and pathogenesis of human osteosarcoma. Oncol. Lett. 19, 1099–1116 (2020).
Anderson, P. M. Radiopharmaceuticals for treatment of osteosarcoma. in Current Advances in Osteosarcoma: Clinical Perspectives: Past, Present and Future (eds Kleinerman, E. S. & Gorlick, R.) 45–53 (Springer Int. Publ., 2020).
Saraf, A. J., Fenger, J. M. & Roberts, R. D. Osteosarcoma: accelerating progress makes for a hopeful future. Front. Oncol. 8, 4 (2018).
Zhang, Y. et al. Progress in the chemotherapeutic treatment of osteosarcoma. Oncol. Lett. 16, 6228–6237 (2018).
Hattinger, C. M., Patrizio, M. P., Magagnoli, F., Luppi, S. & Serra, M. An update on emerging drugs in osteosarcoma: towards tailored therapies?. Expert Opin. Emerg. Drugs 24, 153–171 (2019).
Sayles, L. C. et al. Genome-informed targeted therapy for osteosarcoma. Cancer Discov. 9, 46 (2019).
Rickel, K., Fang, F. & Tao, J. Molecular genetics of osteosarcoma. Bone 102, 69–79 (2017).
Forsburg, S. L. Eukaryotic MCM proteins: beyond replication initiation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68, 109 (2004).
Maiorano, D., Lutzmann, M. & Méchali, M. MCM proteins and DNA replication. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 130–136 (2006).
Griffin, W. C. & Trakselis, M. A. The MCM8/9 complex: a recent recruit to the roster of helicases involved in genome maintenance. DNA Repair 76, 1–10 (2019).
Bell, S. D. & Botchan, M. R. The minichromosome maintenance replicative helicase. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012807 (2013).
Neves, H. & Kwok, H. F. In sickness and in health: the many roles of the minichromosome maintenance proteins. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta 1868, 295–308 (2017).
Wang, Y. et al. MCM family in gastrointestinal cancer and other malignancies: from functional characterization to clinical implication. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta 1874, 188415 (2020).
He, D. et al. Oncogenic activity of amplified miniature chromosome maintenance 8 in human malignancies. Oncogene 36, 3629–3639 (2017).
Juríková, M., Danihel, L., Polák, S. & Varga, I. Ki67, PCNA, and MCM proteins: markers of proliferation in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Acta Histochem. 118, 544–552 (2016).
Fei, L. & Xu, H. Role of MCM2–7 protein phosphorylation in human cancer cells. Cell Biosci. 8, 43 (2018).
Gao, Z. et al. PLK1 promotes proliferation and suppresses apoptosis of renal cell carcinoma cells by phosphorylating MCM3. Cancer Gene Ther. 27, 412–423 (2020).
Gong, B. et al. MCM5 promotes tumour proliferation and correlates with the progression and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 51, 1517–1526 (2019).
Ren, B. et al. MCM7 amplification and overexpression are associated with prostate cancer progression. Oncogene 25, 1090–1098 (2006).
Qu, K. et al. MCM7 promotes cancer progression through cyclin D1-dependent signaling and serves as a prognostic marker for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 8, e2603–e2603 (2017).
Liu, Z. et al. MCM family in HCC: MCM6 indicates adverse tumor features and poor outcomes and promotes S/G2 cell cycle progression. BMC Cancer 18, 200 (2018).
Morii, I. et al. Inhibiting the MCM8-9 complex selectively sensitizes cancer cells to cisplatin and olaparib. Cancer Sci. 110, 1044–1053 (2019).
Huang, B. et al. Identification of mini-chromosome maintenance 8 as a potential prognostic marker and its effects on proliferation and apoptosis in gastric cancer. J. Cell. Mol. Med. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.16062 (2020).
Wang, X., Cui, H. & Wu, S. CTGF: a potential therapeutic target for Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 860, 172588 (2019).
Ramazani, Y. et al. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) from basics to clinics. Matrix Biol. 68-69, 44–66 (2018).
Leu, S., Lam, S. C. T. & Lau, L. F. Pro-angiogenic activities of CYR61 (CCN1) mediated through integrins αvβ3 and α6β1 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 46248–46255 (2002).
Tomita, N. et al. Cartilage-specific over-expression of CCN family member 2/connective tissue growth factor (CCN2/CTGF) stimulates insulin-like growth factor expression and bone growth. PLoS ONE 8, e59226–e59226 (2013).
Mercurio, S., Latinkic, B., Itasaki, N., Krumlauf, R. & Smith, J. C. Connective-tissue growth factor modulates WNT signalling and interacts with the WNT receptor complex. Development 131, 2137 (2004).
Toda, N., Mukoyama, M., Yanagita, M. & Yokoi, H. CTGF in kidney fibrosis and glomerulonephritis. Inflamm. Regen. 38, 14 (2018).
Montford, J. R. & Furgeson, S. B. A new CTGF target in renal fibrosis. Kidney Int. 92, 784–786 (2017).
Dorn, L. E., Petrosino, J. M., Wright, P. & Accornero, F. CTGF/CCN2 is an autocrine regulator of cardiac fibrosis. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 121, 205–211 (2018).
Chu, C., Chang, C., Prakash, E. & Kuo, M. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and cancer progression. J. Biomed. Sci. 15, 675–685 (2008).
Lun, W., Wu, X., Deng, Q. & Zhi, F. MiR-218 regulates epithelial–mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer via targeting CTGF. Cancer Cell Int. 18, 83 (2018).
Pu, N. et al. Cell-intrinsic PD-1 promotes proliferation in pancreatic cancer by targeting CYR61/CTGF via the hippo pathway. Cancer Lett. 460, 42–53 (2019).
Kim, B. et al. A CTGF-RUNX2-RANKL axis in breast and prostate cancer cells promotes tumor progression in bone. J. Bone Miner. Res. 35, 155–166 (2020).
Wang, L. et al. CTGF promotes osteosarcoma angiogenesis by regulating miR-543/angiopoietin 2 signaling. Cancer Lett. 391, 28–37 (2017).
Hou, C., Yang, R. & Tsao, Y. Connective tissue growth factor stimulates osteosarcoma cell migration and induces osteosarcoma metastasis by upregulating VCAM-1 expression. Biochem. Pharmacol. 155, 71–81 (2018).
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (81101366), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030313640), and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2019A1515012176).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Q.Q. and R.L. designed this program. Z.R. and J.L. operated the cell and animal experiments. Z.R., J.L., and S.Z. conducted the data collection and analysis and produced the manuscript which was checked by Q.Q. and R.L. All the authors have confirmed the submission of this manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics statement
Our animal study was reviewed and approved by the institutional committees of the Animal Research Committee and Animal Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by A. Stephanou
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, Z., Li, J., Zhao, S. et al. Knockdown of MCM8 functions as a strategy to inhibit the development and progression of osteosarcoma through regulating CTGF. Cell Death Dis 12, 376 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-03621-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-021-03621-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Function and mechanism of MCM8 in the development and progression of colorectal cancer
Journal of Translational Medicine (2023)
-
Enhancer-driven transcription of MCM8 by E2F4 promotes ATR pathway activation and glioma stem cell characteristics
Hereditas (2023)