Abstract
Mammary MCF-10A cells seeded on reconstituted basement membrane form spherical structures with a hollow central lumen, termed acini, which are a physiologically relevant model of mammary morphogenesis. Bcl-2-associated athanogene 1 (Bag-1) is a multifunctional protein overexpressed in breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. When present in the nucleus Bag-1 is predictive of clinical outcome in breast cancer. Bag-1 exists as three main isoforms, which are produced by alternative translation initiation from a single mRNA. The long isoform of Bag-1, Bag-1L, contains a nuclear localisation sequence not present in the other isoforms. When present in the nucleus Bag-1L, but not the other Bag-1 isoforms, can interact with and modulate the activities of estrogen-, androgen- and vitamin D-receptors. Overexpression of Bag-1 mRNA in MCF-10A is known to produce acini with luminal filling reminiscent of ductal carcinoma in situ. As this mRNA predominantly overexpresses the short isoform of Bag-1, Bag-1S, we set out to examine whether the nuclear Bag-1L isoform is sufficient to drive premalignant change by developing a Bag-1L-overexpressing MCF-10A model. Two clones differentially overexpressing Bag-1L were grown in two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cultures and compared with an established model of HER2-driven transformation. In 2D cultures, Bag-1L overexpression reduced proliferation but did not affect growth factor responsiveness or clonogenicity. Acini formed by Bag-1L-overexpressing cells exhibited reduced luminal clearing when compared with controls. An abnormal branching morphology was also observed which correlated with the level of Bag-1L overexpression, suggesting further malignant change. Treatment with Thio-2, a small-molecule inhibitor of Bag-1, reduced the level of branching. In summary, 3D cultures of MCF-10A mammary epithelial cells overexpressing Bag-1L demonstrate a premalignant phenotype with features of ductal carcinoma in situ. Using this model to test the small-molecule Bag-1 inhibitor, Thio-2, reveals its potential to reverse the atypical branched morphology of acini that characterizes this premalignant change.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Investigation of breast cancer progression has traditionally relied on two-dimensional (2D) in vitro cell models to elucidate the molecular drivers associated with this disease. However, 2D culture has spatial and cell differentiation limitations.1, 2 Three-dimensional (3D) cell models provide an important additional experimental tool as they recapitulate several aspects of normal and tumour tissue architecture. When seeded in reconstituted basement membrane (BM), human mammary epithelial normal cells and non-tumourigenic cell lines, such as MCF-10A, follow a highly regulated morphogenetic program to form organized growth-arrested 3D spherical structures with a central lumen termed acini.3, 4 This involves polarization of BM-attached outer cells with concomitant anoikis and metabolic changes of luminal cells that are no longer in contact with the BM (BM-detached).5, 6 Expression analysis of acini morphogenesis has led to the identification of a 3D molecular signature, comprising genes that are downregulated during this process, which accurately predicts outcome in breast cancer patients.7, 8
Contrary to normal breast cells, breast tumour cells and breast cancer cell lines continue to proliferate and give rise to larger acini with altered external morphology and no central lumen owing to defects in anoikis and metabolism of BM-detached cells;2, 3, 5, 9 these structures bear features of ductal carcinoma in situ, a precursor to invasive ductal carcinoma.10 Comparison of the transcriptional profiles of a panel of human breast cancer cell lines correlates with their 3D morphology and enables clustering into four main phenotypic subclasses, which are associated with clinically distinct subgroups.2 The majority of basal B subtype cell lines form invasive stellate structures, which lack E-cadherin and EGFR/HER2 expression, whereas luminal and basal A subtypes form round, mass, or grape-like structures, which often overexpress HER2, a marker of poor prognosis in breast cancer.2, 11 Consistent with this, HER2 overexpression or activation in MCF-10A cells results in atypical grape-like acinar morphology and impedes lumen formation by attenuating apoptosis and by driving metabolic changes in BM-detached cells.5, 9, 12, 13, 14 Culture of MCF-10A cells in 3D therefore constitutes a powerful tool for the study of oncogene-driven premalignant changes.
The co-chaperone protein Bcl-2-associated athanogene 1 (Bag-1) is expressed at low levels in most human tissues15 but is frequently overexpressed in invasive breast carcinoma and importantly also within the preinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ stage.15, 16, 17, 18, 19 In the clinical setting of breast cancer, Bag-1 mRNA is a prognostic biomarker included within the Oncotype DX and PAM50 multigene assays20, 21 and high nuclear Bag-1 immunoreactivity is an independent predictor of outcome and enhances the predictive power of IHC4 score (a combination of the prognostic information from ER, PgR, Ki67 and HER2 immunohistochemical staining).16, 22, 23, 24, 25 At the cellular level, Bag-1 interacts with a number of protein partners including Bcl-2, Hsc70/Hsp70 chaperones, and nuclear hormone receptors to promote cell survival.26 Proof-of-principle studies from our laboratory have shown that it is possible to restrict breast cancer and melanoma cell growth by targeting Bag-1 protein–protein interactions using synthetic peptides and small-molecule compounds like Thioflavin S and its biologically active constituent Thio-2.27, 28, 29 Bag-1 exists as three main isoforms Bag-1S and Bag-1M, which are mainly localized in the cytoplasm, and Bag-1L, which contains a nuclear localisation signal not present in the other isoforms and is predominantly localized in the nucleus.15, 19, 30, 31, 32, 33 Bag-1L, but not Bag-1M or Bag-1S, enhances the transcriptional activity of androgen receptor,32, 34, 35 vitamin D receptor,36 and oestrogen receptor.22 Xenograft studies show that Bag-1L overexpression drives growth of breast tumours formed by oestrogen-responsive ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells in an oestrogen-dependent manner.37 Although clinical studies and mouse models have shed some light on the role of Bag-1L in breast cancer pathology, little is known about the role of Bag-1L in initiating premalignant change in the breast.
Studies using a 3D cell culture model have shown that concomitant co-overexpression of the main Bag-1 isoforms (Bag-1S, Bag-1M and Bag-1L) in MCF-10A cells leads to the formation of lumenless acini, through attenuation of anoikis in BM-detached cells, without the grape-like abnormalities in morphology seen with HER2 overexpression.38 However, there is currently no evidence on the ability of individual Bag-1 isoforms to regulate acinar morphology. Based on published data supporting an important role of nuclear Bag-1L in breast cancer, in this study we sought to examine the effect of the individual Bag-1L isoform on acini morphogenesis to elucidate and describe its role in promoting premalignant change in 3D. We then examined the effect of a small-molecule inhibitor of Bag-1, Thio-2, in Bag-1L-driven premalignant change in this experimental model of ductal carcinoma in situ to determine whether these changes might be amenable to therapeutic intervention.
Results
Characterization of Bag-1L overexpression in 2D culture
To examine the potential role of Bag-1L in breast tumourigenesis, MCF-10A stable cell clones were generated by transfection of a pcDNA3 vector containing Bag-1 complementary DNA with an optimized Bag-1L start site.22 Immunoblot analysis revealed the presence of two clones overexpressing Bag-1L at low (Bag-1L/A) and high (Bag-1L/B) levels compared with two clones containing empty pcDNA3 vector of which clone 1, designated pcDNA, was used as a control for this study (Figure 1a). Immunofluorescence staining revealed higher but heterogeneous expression of Bag-1 in the nucleus of both clones compared with pcDNA and was more intense in Bag-1L/B (Figure 1b), which is consistent with overexpression of Bag-1L.
To characterize the effect of Bag-1L overexpression in 2D culture, cell morphology, colony-forming efficiency and proliferation were examined. Cell clones assumed a cobblestone appearance typically observed in parental MCF-10A cells with lamellipodia extending from the edges of clusters4 (Figure 1c). Bag-1L overexpression did not alter the colony-forming efficiency of MCF-10A cells (Figure 1d) and supported neither anchorage-independent growth in vitro nor tumour growth in vivo (data not shown). Moreover, Bag-1L/B cells displayed a significant decrease in proliferation compared with pcDNA, as shown by a 38% reduction in crystal violet absorbance, whereas Bag-1L/A cells proliferated comparably to pcDNA controls (Figure 1e).
Effect of Bag-1L overexpression on acini morphogenesis
MCF-10A acini provide a physiologically relevant model to study the influence of Bag-1L overexpression on 3D morphology. Compared with pcDNA acini, Bag-1L protein level was ninefold higher in Bag-1L/A and 16-fold higher in Bag-1L/B, thereby providing a basis for the study of Bag-1L in acini morphogenesis (Figure 2a). Confocal microscopy images at day 20 of culture indicated formation of a central lumen in MCF-10A parental and pcDNA acini as expected (Figure 2b). In contrast, 26% of Bag-1L/A and 86% of Bag-1L/B acini were lumenless compared to 9% lumenless acini formed by pcDNA cells (Figures 2b and c). Moreover, phase-contrast microscopical examination revealed that 16% of Bag-1L/A and 86% of Bag-1L/B acini assumed a branched morphology (Figures 2d and e), which resembled an atypical phenotype in breast cancer cells reported by Kenny et al.2 Quantification of confocal and phase-contrast data indicated that the increase in Bag-1L expression observed between Bag-1L/A and Bag-1L/B clones is associated with a significant 3.3-fold increase in the number of atypical acini formed with no central lumen (Figure 2c) and with altered external morphology (Figure 2e).
To further characterize the effect of Bag-1L overexpression on acinar phenotype, cell proliferation and apoptosis were examined by immunofluorescence staining (Figure 3). At day 6 of culture, Ki67, a protein marker of proliferation,39 was present in BM-attached cells situated at the periphery of control and Bag-1L/A-overexpressing acini, whereas in Bag-1L/B-overexpressing acini it was present throughout (Figure 3a). At day 20 of culture, cells in control and Bag-1L-overexpressing acini exhibited minimal Ki67 staining consistent with the induction of growth arrest (Figure 3a). In addition, luminal apoptosis that was detected by M30 (antibody recognising caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18) was markedly increased in parental and pcDNA acini but was almost undetectable in Bag-1L/A and Bag-1L/B acini (Figure 3b) at day 10 of culture. Taken together, these data show that overexpression of the Bag-1L isoform promotes an atypical acinar phenotype as it impedes formation of a central lumen by maintaining proliferation and attenuating apoptosis, and induces a branched acinar morphology.
Effect of HER2 overexpression on acini morphogenesis and comparison of 2D growth response with growth factors between Bag-1L- and HER2-overexpressing MCF-10A cells
We next compared the 3D phenotypic changes observed in response to Bag-1L overexpression with a described and recognized9, 13 3D model of HER2 transformation. HER2 protein overexpression was confirmed by immunoblotting (Figure 4a) and immunofluorescence staining (Figure 4b). Lumen formation in acini grown to day 12 and stained with phalloidin was examined by confocal microscopy (Figures 4c and d) and external morphology quantified from high-resolution phase-contrast microscopy images (Figure 4e). As expected, parental and pBABE-puro vector control puro cells (puro) gave rise to similar numbers of acini with a central lumen and a typical spherical structure (Figures 4c and e). In contrast, HER2 overexpression resulted in a fourfold increase in acini lacking a central lumen (Figure 4d) and a threefold increase in acini exhibiting branched morphology (Figure 4e) compared with puro control, in line with previous studies.9, 13 This 3D morphology was similar to that of Bag-1L-overexpressing clones.
Growth of MCF-10A cells requires insulin-like growth factor 1,40 which is chemically and functionally similar to insulin and facilitates cellular glucose uptake.41 Overexpression of HER2 causes metabolic transformation of MCF-10A cells, which is characterized by insulin-independent proliferation, and enhances glucose uptake in the absence of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor activity.5, 42, 43 Based on the phenotypic similarities between HER2- and Bag-1L-overexpressing MCF-10A cells in 3D, we investigated whether the atypical phenotype of Bag-1L-overexpressing MCF-10A clones could also be due to metabolic changes associated with loss of responsiveness to insulin. To this end, cells were cultured in insulin-free or insulin-containing media using HER2-overexpressing MCF-10A clones as a control. In line with previous studies,42 no significant difference in the growth of HER2-overexpressing clones was observed under these conditions (Figure 4f). Conversely, growth of puro and pcDNA controls displayed a significant increase of ~1.4-fold in the presence compared with the absence of insulin (Figure 4f). Similarly, a growth increase of ~1.6-fold in Bag-1L/A and ~1.5-fold in Bag-1L/B was observed in the presence compared with the absence of insulin, indicating responsiveness to this hormone. Moreover, all cell lines were responsive to epidermal growth factor for growth (Figure 4f), consistent with previous reports.43 These data suggest that the mechanism responsible for the morphological changes observed in response to Bag-1L overexpression is likely to be different to that of HER2 and requires further investigation.
Effect of Bag-1 inhibitors on 2D culture and acini morphogenesis
MCF-10A clones were examined in the presence of Thioflavin S and Thio-2 inhibitors of Bag-1 protein–protein interactions.28, 44 Viability assay data show that Thio-2 significantly decreased growth across all cell lines at 50 μM and 100 μM, whereas Thioflavin S had no effect (Figure 5a), confirming our previously published findings.44 Therefore, Thio-2 was used in subsequent experiments.
We examined whether the atypical morphology of Bag-1L-overexpressing acini could be pharmacologically reversed. MCF-10A cells grown in 2D were pre-treated with Thio-2 for 24 h before seeding on Matrigel with additional treatments administered on days 4 and 8 of 3D culture. Thio-2 treatment significantly reduced the number of atypical acini by 17% in Bag-1L/A and 29% in Bag-1L/B compared with dimethyl sulfoxide control (Figure 5b). Acini displaying atypical external morphology exhibited a reduced level of branching (Figure 5c), suggesting that changes in morphology could be due to Bag-1 protein–protein interactions. Furthermore, there was no noticeable inhibitory effect by Thio-2 treatment on the activities of ERK and AKT as shown by immunoblot analysis (Figure 5d), implying that these signalling pathways may not be involved in the atypical branching phenotype.
Discussion
Our data demonstrate, for the first time, that overexpression of the Bag-1L isoform alone is sufficient to suppress luminal apoptosis and drives the formation of MCF-10A acini with a branched morphology, which resemble transformed acini formed by HER2-overexpressing MCF-10A cells, generated here by us and published by others.9, 13 Although studies by Anderson et al.38 revealed the existence of reduced luminal clearing in acini co-overexpressing all three main Bag-1 isoforms (Bag-1S, Bag-1M, Bag-1L) no observation of abnormal branched morphology was reported. Similar to previous observations in non-tumourigenic HaCaT skin epidermal keratinocytes,45 our data also show that Bag-1L overexpression results in decreased MCF-10A cell growth in 2D cultures, an event that seems to be inversely correlated to its level of expression.
MCF-10A acini morphogenesis proceeds through a highly regulated sequence of events. Cell detachment from the BM in the lumen of acini induces cellular stresses resulting in anoikis and luminal clearing. This occurs through downregulation of ERK activity, resulting in potentiation of the pro-apoptotic activity of BimEL.1, 4, 6, 12 Studies by Anderson et al.38 in which Bag-1S, Bag-1M and Bag-1L isoforms were co-expressed in MCF-10A cells reveal that this process can be impeded by targeting the pro-apoptotic protein BimEL for proteasomal degradation through enhanced activation of the RAF-1/MEK/ERK signalling cascade. Although we have previously shown that Thio-2 downregulates the activity of ERK in MCF7 cells,44 this was not the case in this MCF-10A model. Studies by Debnath et al.6 have shown that apoptosis inhibition alone is insufficient to prevent luminal clearing, with Bcl-2 overexpression delaying but not completely preventing anoikis; this has implicated the existence of an additional metabolic mechanism involving the upregulation of cellular antioxidant defences.5, 46 To investigate the possibility that Bag-1L overexpression may suppress the metabolic impairments associated with detachment from the BM we examined insulin-stimulated growth based on the phenotypic resemblance observed between Bag-1L- and HER2-overexpressing acini. Although HER2 upregulation enhances glucose uptake independently of insulin-like growth factor 1 or insulin, leading to insulin insensitivity,42 Bag-1L-overexpression retained insulin responsiveness, implying dependence on insulin for glucose uptake. This suggests that despite the phenotypic similarities, Bag-1L-overexpressing acini can overcome the metabolic defects associated with detachment via a different transforming mechanism to HER2.
Targeting Bag-1 with its protein–protein interaction inhibitor Thio-2 attenuated the atypical branching of acini, suggesting that Bag-1L protein–protein interactions are important for determining the morphology displayed upon cell attachment to the BM. Importantly, the level of Bag-1L overexpression correlated with the phenotypic effect of compound treatment as Bag-1L/B clone exhibited the greatest reversal in morphology in response to treatment with Thio-2, thereby providing further evidence of a Bag-1L-driven phenotype. Although Anderson et al.38 described an inability of acini co-overexpressing Bag-1S, Bag-1M and Bag-1L to form a lumen, they did not report formation of a branched external morphology. This could be attributed to the regulatory balance exerted by the combined activities of individual Bag-1 isoforms on cell-to-cell contact. Evidence for this comes from studies by Hinnit et al.45 who measured single-cell movement from small colonies of HGF-stimulated HaCaT cells using scatter assays. They show that constitutive Bag-1L overexpression results in greater than twofold cell-to-cell dissociation, whereas Bag-1S and Bag-1M retain their cell-to-cell contacts and exhibit no scattering. When considered together with findings by Hinnit et al. and Anderson et al., our data emphasize the importance of the combined activities of distinct Bag-1 isoforms on cellular function, and support a role for Bag-1L in the formation of a premalignant phenotype that might potentially be amenable to therapeutic intervention.
In summary, our data describe a role for the Bag-1L isoform as a driver of phenotypic changes associated with a premalignant state in the breast using a 3D model of ductal carcinoma in situ. Such changes seen in 3D models highlight the efficacy of these models to test the effects of inhibitors of breast tumour initiation in 3D that may not be seen in 2D. The ability of Thio-2 to reverse some of these changes highlights the potential of Bag-1L-overexpressing MCF-10A acini as a model to test the effect of inhibitors of breast tumour initiation.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and generation of stable clones
MCF-10A cells were obtained from LGC Standards (Teddington, UK) and were cultured and maintained as described by Debnath et al.4 To generate cell clones, pcDNA3-Bag-1L or empty pcDNA3 vectors were transfected into MCF-10A cells using FuGene HD (Promega, Southampton, UK) and stable integrants selected with Geneticin (100 μg/ml; Sigma, Gillingham, UK). Single clones were harvested by trypsinisation using cloning rings and expanded. HER2 clones were generated as described by Debnath et al.4 In brief, MCF-10A cells were infected using 0.45 μm filtered viral supernatant derived from Phoenix HEK-293 cells transfected with either pBABEpuro/HER2 vector47 (Addgene plasmid 40978) or with empty pBABE-puro vector (puro) as control, and were selected with puromycin (0.5 μg/ml). Resistant HER2 or puro clones were harvested by trypsinisation and expanded as cell pools.
Immunocytochemistry, image acquisition and scoring of acini
For 2D immunofluorescence staining, cells were plated on type I rat tail collagen-coated (10 μg/ml) glass coverslips and processed as previously described.45 Acini were grown in eight-well culture slides (BD Falcon, Oxford, UK) and were fixed in paraformaldehyde (2% v/v final conc.), which was added directly into culture media to minimize acini loss through aspiration; staining was performed as described by Debnath et al.4 Immunodetection was performed using antibodies raised against Ki67 (#ab15580, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), HER2 (#2165S, CST, Hitchin, UK), keratin 18 Asp396 (M30 CytoDEATH mAb, #ALX-804-590-T200, Enzo Life Sciences, Exeter, UK), and Bag-1 (TB3 pAb, made in house19); phalloidin-TRITC (Dako, Ely, UK) was used to stain the cytoskeleton and nuclei were stained with 4’6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Sigma). Secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (#A-11001) and Alexa Fluor 546 goat anti-rabbit IgG (#A-11010) were from Life Technologies, Paisley, UK. Imaging of 2D cultures was performed with an Olympus IX81 microscope. To quantify the external morphology of acini, mounted slides were viewed using an Olympus BX51 microscope with an automated slide scanning system (Olympus Soft Imaging Systems, Munster, Germany) and high-resolution pictures covering the entire sample were captured using dotSlide v2.2 (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions, GmbH). Images were viewed with Olympus OlyVIA v2.4 and morphology was scored by manual counting. To score acini luminal clearing or morphology, cross-sectional examination of all acini within each chamber was performed with a Leica SP5 confocal microscope; representative images were captured and analysed with LEICA LAS AF v2.6.0.
Immunoblotting
Lysates of 2D or 3D cultures were prepared in ice-cold protease-supplemented (Sigma) radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (CST). Acini extracts were dissociated through a 27-gauge needle and cleared by centrifugation (13 000 r.p.m., 15 min, 4 °C). Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting were conducted according to standard protocols.48 Immunodetection was performed using antibodies raised against Bag-1 (#sc-56003, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Wembley, UK), HER2, ERK1/2 (#9102, CST), P-ERK1/2 Thr202/Tyr204 (#4376, CST), AKT (#9272, CST) and P-AKT Ser473 (#4060, CST). Anti-β-actin-HRP (#3854) was from Sigma. Secondary HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit (#P0448) and anti-mouse (#P0447) immunoglobulins were from Dako. Images were acquired with a BioRad Fluor-S MultiImager using Quantity One analysis software v4.6.3. Quantification of bands was performed using the volume tools in Quantity One analysis software v4.6.6 (where a volume is the sum of the intensities of the pixels within the volume boundary, times by the pixel area). Analysis was carried out on bands pre-saturation. All bands were adjusted for global background volume. Protein abundance was calculated by normalising bands for actin and expressed relative to pcDNA.
Cell growth assays
To measure growth, 20 000 cells/well were seeded in triplicate in 12-well plates and were fixed in ice-cold methanol on days 2 and 4 of culture. For insulin and epidermal growth factor responsiveness assays, cells which had been serum and growth factor starved for 24 h were grown in the absence or presence of the relative growth factor for 48 h and were subsequently fixed in ice-cold methanol. Fixed cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet, rinsed in a bath of distilled water and allowed to air dry. The cell-associated dye was dissolved in 20% acetic acid and the absorbance was measured at 595 nm.
Bag-1 inhibition
For dose–response experiments, 3000 cells/well were seeded in triplicate in 96-well plates and were treated with dimethyl sulfoxide, Thioflavin S (Sigma) or Thio-227 for 5 days. Cell viability was determined by CellTitre 96 Aqueous One solution assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For acini morphogenesis assays, cells were pre-treated with compounds in 2D 24 h before seeding in compound-free assay media in 3D. Acini were fed with compound-containing assay media on days 4 and 8 of culture. To examine the effect of Thio-2 on signalling cell monolayers were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline and kept for 4 h in insulin and epidermal growth factor-free media containing reduced horse serum (0.5%). Cells were subsequently treated with compounds for 1 h and lysates were prepared after stimulation with horse serum (10%) for 10 min. Unstimulated cells were used as negative controls for protein activation, whereas U0126 (Promega) was used as a positive control for inhibition of ERK activity.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.00 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) for Windows. Analyses of more than two groups were done using two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test.
References
Debnath J, Brugge JS . Modelling glandular epithelial cancers in three-dimensional cultures. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5: 675–688.
Kenny PA, Lee GY, Myers CA, Neve RM, Semeiks JR, Spellman PT et al. The morphologies of breast cancer cell lines in three-dimensional assays correlate with their profiles of gene expression. Mol Oncol 2007; 1: 84–96.
Petersen OW, Rønnov-Jessen L, Howlett AR, Bissell MJ . Interaction with basement membrane serves to rapidly distinguish growth and differentiation pattern of normal and malignant human breast epithelial cells. Pro Natl Acad Sci 1992; 89 (19): 9064–9068.
Debnath J, Muthuswamy SK, Brugge JS . Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods 2003; 30: 256–268.
Schafer ZT, Grassian AR, Song L, Jiang Z, Gerhart-Hines Z, Irie HY et al. Antioxidant and oncogene rescue of metabolic defects caused by loss of matrix attachment. Nature 2009; 461: 109–113.
Debnath J, Mills KR, Collins NL, Reginato MJ, Muthuswamy SK, Brugge JS . The role of apoptosis in creating and maintaining luminal space within normal and oncogene-expressing mammary acini. Cell 2002; 111: 29–40.
Martin KJ, Patrick DR, Bissell MJ, Fournier MV . Prognostic breast cancer signature identified from 3D culture model accurately predicts clinical outcome across independent datasets. PLoS ONE 2008; 3: e2994.
Fournier MV, Martin KJ, Kenny PA, Xhaja K, Bosch I, Yaswen P et al. Gene expression signature in organized and growth-arrested mammary acini predicts good outcome in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 7095–7102.
Muthuswamy SK, Li D, Lelievre S, Bissell MJ, Brugge JS . ErbB2 but not ErbB1, reinitiates proliferation and induces luminal repopulation in epithelial acini. Nature Cell Biol 2001; 3: 785–792.
Burstein HJ, Polyak K, Wong JS, Lester SC, Kaelin CM . Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1430–1441.
Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL . Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 1987; 235: 177–182.
Reginato MJ, Mills KR, Becker EBE, Lynch DK, Bonni A, Muthuswamy SK et al. Bim regulation of lumen formation in cultured mammary epithelial acini is targeted by oncogenes. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25: 4591–4601.
Pradeep CR, Zeisel A, Kostler WJ, Lauriola M, Jacob-Hirsch J, Haibe-Kains B et al. Modeling invasive breast cancer: growth factors propel progression of HER2-positive premalignant lesions. Oncogene 2012; 31: 3569–3583.
Grassian AR, Schafer ZT, Brugge JS . ErbB2 stabilizes epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression via Erk and Sprouty2 in extracellular matrix-detached cells. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 79–90.
Takayama S, Krajewski S, Krajewska M, Kitada S, Zapata JM, Kochel K et al. Expression and location of Hsp70/Hsc-binding anti-apoptotic protein BAG-1 and its variants in normal tissues and tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 3116–3131.
Turner BC, Krajewski S, Krajewska M, Takayama S, Gumbs AA, Carter D et al. BAG-1: a novel biomarker predicting long-term survival in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 992–1000.
Tang SC, Shehata N, Chernenko G, Khalifa M, Wang X, Shaheta N . Expression of BAG-1 in invasive breast carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1710–1719.
Tang SC, Beck J, Murphy S, Chernenko G, Robb D, Watson P et al. BAG-1 expression correlates with Bcl-2, p53, differentiation, estrogen and progesterone receptors in invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 84: 203–213.
Brimmell M, Burns JS, Munson P, McDonald L, O'Hare MJ, Lakhani SR et al. High level expression of differentially localized BAG-1 isoforms in some oestrogen receptor-positive human breast cancers. Br J Cancer 1999; 81: 1042–1051.
Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2817–2826.
Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC, Leung S, Voduc D, Vickery T et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 1160–1167.
Cutress RI, Townsend PA, Sharp A, Maison A, Wood L, Lee R et al. The nuclear BAG-1 isoform, BAG-1L, enhances oestrogen-dependent transcription. Oncogene 2003; 22: 4973–4982.
Millar EK, Anderson LR, McNeil CM, O'Toole SA, Pinese M, Crea P et al. BAG-1 predicts patient outcome and tamoxifen responsiveness in ER-positive invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Br J Cancer 2009; 100: 123–133.
Afentakis M, Dowsett M, Sestak I, Salter J, Howell T, Buzdar A et al. Immunohistochemical BAG1 expression improves the estimation of residual risk by IHC4 in postmenopausal patients treated with anastrazole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 140: 253–262.
Nadler Y, Camp RL, Giltnane JM, Moeder C, Rimm DL, Kluger HM et al. Expression patterns and prognostic value of Bag-1 and Bcl-2 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2008; 10: R35.
Townsend PA, Cutress RI, Sharp A, Brimmell M, Packham G . BAG-1: a multifunctional regulator of cell growth and survival. Biochim Biophys Acta 2003; 1603: 83–98.
Enthammer M, Papadakis ES, Gachet MS, Deutsch M, Schwaiger S, Koziel K et al. Isolation of a novel thioflavin S-derived compound that inhibits BAG-1-mediated protein interactions and targets BRAF inhibitor-resistant cell lines. Mol Cancer Ther 2013; 12: 2400–2414.
Sharp A, Crabb SJ, Johnson PW, Hague A, Cutress R, Townsend PA et al. Thioflavin S (NSC71948) interferes with Bcl-2-associated athanogene (BAG-1)-mediated protein-protein interactions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2009; 331: 680–689.
Sharp A, Cutress RI, Johnson PW, Packham G, Townsend PA . Short peptides derived from the BAG-1 C-terminus inhibit the interaction between BAG-1 and HSC70 and decrease breast cancer cell growth. FEBS Lett 2009; 583: 3405–3411.
Schneikert J, Hubner S, Martin E, Cato AC . A nuclear action of the eukaryotic cochaperone RAP46 in downregulation of glucocorticoid receptor activity. J Cell Biol 1999; 146: 929–940.
Packham G, Brimmell M, Cleveland JL . Mammalian cells express two differently localized Bag-1 isoforms generated by alternative translation initiation. Biochem J 1997; 328: Pt 3 807–813.
Knee DA, Froesch BA, Nuber U, Takayama S, Reed JC . Structure-function analysis of Bag1 proteins. Effects on androgen receptor transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 12718–12724.
Yang X, Hao Y, Ding Z, Pater A, Tang SC . Differential expression of antiapoptotic gene BAG-1 in human breast normal and cancer cell lines and tissues. Clinical Cancer Res 1999; 5: 1816–1822.
Froesch BA, Takayama S, Reed JC . BAG-1L protein enhances androgen receptor function. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 11660–11666.
Shatkina L, Mink S, Rogatsch H, Klocker H, Langer G, Nestl A et al. The cochaperone Bag-1L enhances androgen receptor action via interaction with the NH2-terminal region of the receptor. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23: 7189–7197.
Lee SS, Crabb SJ, Janghra N, Carlberg C, Williams AC, Cutress RI et al. Subcellular localisation of BAG-1 and its regulation of vitamin D receptor-mediated transactivation and involucrin expression in oral keratinocytes: Implications for oral carcinogenesis. Exp Cell Res 2007; 313: 3222–3238.
Kudoh M, Knee DA, Takayama S, Reed JC . Bag1 proteins regulate growth and survival of ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 1904–1909.
Anderson LR, Sutherland RL, Butt AJ . BAG-1 overexpression attenuates luminal apoptosis in MCF-10A mammary epithelial cells through enhanced RAF-1 activation. Oncogene 2010; 29: 527–538.
Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker HH, Schwab U, Stein H . Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol 1984; 133: 1710–1715.
Ram TG, Kokeny KE, Dilts CA, Ethier SP . Mitogenic activity of neu differentiation factor/heregulin mimics that of epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-I in human mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Physiol 1995; 163: 589–596.
Rechler MM, Nissley SP . The nature and regulation of the receptors for insulin-like growth factors. Annu Rev Physiol 1985; 47: 425–442.
Bollig-Fischer A, Dewey TG, Ethier SP . Oncogene activation induces metabolic transformation resulting in insulin-independence in human breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e17959.
Ignatoski KM, Lapointe AJ, Radany EH, Ethier SP . erbB-2 overexpression in human mammary epithelial cells confers growth factor independence. Endocrinology 1999; 140: 3615–3622.
Enthammer M, Papadakis ES, Salome Gachet M, Deutsch M, Schwaiger S, Koziel K et al. Isolation of a novel thioflavin S-derived compound that inhibits BAG-1-mediated protein interactions and targets BRAF inhibitor-resistant cell lines. Mol Cancer Ther 2013; 12: 2400–2414.
Hinitt CA, Wood J, Lee SS, Williams AC, Howarth JL, Glover CP et al. BAG-1 enhances cell-cell adhesion, reduces proliferation and induces chaperone-independent suppression of hepatocyte growth factor-induced epidermal keratinocyte migration. Exp Cell Res 2010; 316: 2042–2060.
Davison CA, Durbin SM, Thau MR, Zellmer VR, Chapman SE, Diener J et al. Antioxidant enzymes mediate survival of breast cancer cells deprived of extracellular matrix. Cancer Res 2013; 73: 3704–3715.
Greulich H, Kaplan B, Mertins P, Chen TH, Tanaka KE, Yun CH et al. Functional analysis of receptor tyrosine kinase mutations in lung cancer identifies oncogenic extracellular domain mutations of ERBB2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 14476–14481.
Green MR, Sambrook J . Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2012.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr David Johnston (Biomedical Imaging Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust) for help with confocal microscopy and slide scanning. RIC and ESP (project grant reference: 2011NovPR39), and JPB (project grant reference: 2010NovPR12) are funded by Breast Cancer Campaign (BCC). CRB is funded by the Medical Research Council (MR/J004103/1) and Cancer Research UK (C34999/A15992). We thank Professor G Packham for critical review of the manuscript. Funding source: Breast Cancer Campaign project grants (2011NovPR39 and 2010NovPR12).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Oncogenesis is an open-access journal published by Nature Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Papadakis, E., Barker, C., Syed, H. et al. The Bag-1 inhibitor, Thio-2, reverses an atypical 3D morphology driven by Bag-1L overexpression in a MCF-10A model of ductal carcinoma in situ. Oncogenesis 5, e215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/oncsis.2016.10
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/oncsis.2016.10
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
UBL/BAG-domain co-chaperones cause cellular stress upon overexpression through constitutive activation of Hsf1
Cell Stress and Chaperones (2017)