Skip to main content
Log in

Surgery

Are bioprosthetic plugs for complex anal fistulas effective?

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Surgical repair of complex anal fistulas has to achieve a balance between optimal primary healing and best preservation of continence. As traditional surgical techniques confer a risk of continence deterioration, innovative sphincter-preserving techniques have been introduced. A new study indicates that use of bioprosthetic plugs in the surgical treatment of complex anal fistulas is associated with a long-term success rate of 81%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ellis, C. N., Rostas, J. W. & Greiner, F. G. Long-term outcomes with the use of bioprosthetic plugs for the management of complex anal fistulas. Dis. Colon Rectum 53, 798–802 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Champagne, B. J. et al. Efficacy of anal fistula plug in closure of cryptoglandular fistulas: long-term follow-up. Dis. Colon Rectum 49, 1817–1821 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Connor, L. M. et al. Efficacy of anal fistula plug in closure of Crohn's anorectal fistulas. Dis. Colon Rectum 49, 1569–1573 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, E. K., Gaw, J. U. & Armstrong, D. N. Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas. Dis. Colon Rectum 49, 371–376 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwandner, O., Stadler, F., Dietl, O., Wirsching, R. P. & Fuerst, A. Initial experience on efficacy in closure of cryptoglandular and Crohn's transsphincteric fistulas by the use of the anal fistula plug. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 23, 319–324 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis, C. N. Bioprosthetic plugs for complex anal fistulas: an early experience. J. Surg. Educ. 64, 36–40 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ky, A. J. et al. Collagen fistula plug for the treatment of anal fistulas. Dis. Colon Rectum 51, 838–843 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Safar, B et al. Anal fistula plug: initial experience and outcomes. Dis. Colon Rectum 52, 248–252 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Christoforidis, D., Pieh, M. C., Madoff, R. D. & Mellgren, A. F. Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas by endorectal advancement flap or collagen fistula plug: a comparative study. Dis. Colon Rectum 52, 18–22 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ortiz, H. et al. Randomized clinical trial of anal fistula plug versus endorectal advancement flap for the treatment of high cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Br. J. Surg. 96, 608–612 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwandner, O. Are bioprosthetic plugs for complex anal fistulas effective?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 7, 419–420 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2010.110

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2010.110

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation