Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The visual attention network untangled

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Neuroscience

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Goals are represented in prefrontal cortex and modulate sensory processing in visual cortex. A new study combines TMS, fMRI and EEG to understand how feedback improves retention of behaviorally relevant visual information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1: Outline of the study by Zanto et al.4.

References

  1. Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193–222 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, E.K. & Cohen, J.D. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167–202 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kastner, S. & Ungerleider, L.G. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 315–341 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zanto, T.P., Rubens, M.T., Thangavel, A., & Gazzaley, A. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 656–661 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Driver, J., Blankenburg, F., Bestmann, S., Vanduffel, W. & Ruff, C.C. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 319–327 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore, T. & Armstrong, K.M. Nature 421, 370–373 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Awh, E., Vogel, E.K. & Oh, S.H. Neuroscience 139, 201–208 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zanto, T.P., Rubens, M.T., Bollinger, J. & Gazzaley, A. Neuroimage 53, 736–745 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G.L. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 201–215 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillyard, S.A., Vogel, E.K. & Luck, S.J. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 1257–1270 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fries, P. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 474–480 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gross, J. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13050–13055 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Siegel, M., Donner, T.H., Oostenveld, R., Fries, P. & Engel, A.K. Neuron 60, 709–719 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Buschman, T.J. & Miller, E.K. Science 315, 1860–1862 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gregoriou, G.G., Gotts, S.J., Zhou, H. & Desimone, R. Science 324, 1207–1210 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sander Nieuwenhuis is at the Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands,

    Sander Nieuwenhuis

  2. Tobias H. Donner is in the Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,

    Tobias H Donner

Authors
  1. Sander Nieuwenhuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tobias H Donner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sander Nieuwenhuis or Tobias H Donner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nieuwenhuis, S., Donner, T. The visual attention network untangled. Nat Neurosci 14, 542–543 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2812

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2812

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation