Abstract
replying to G. Tinghög et al. Nature498,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12194(2013)
Tinghög et al.1 take issue with two of the ten experiments in our paper2 (studies 6 and 7). Here we reanalyse the data from these experiments as suggested by Tinghög et al.1, and demonstrate that our reported positive effect of time pressure on cooperation is not an artefact. Furthermore, an aggregate analysis based on fifteen studies and 6,910 decisions also replicates this effect3.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tinghög, G. et al. Intuition and cooperation reconsidered. Nature 498, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12194 (2013)
Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D. & Nowak, M. A. Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489, 427–430 (2012)
Rand, D. G. et al. Intuitive cooperation and the social heuristics hypothesis: evidence from 15 time constraint studies. Preprint at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=2222683 (2013)
Piovesan, M. & Wengström, E. Fast or fair? A study of response times. Econ. Lett. 105, 193–196 (2009)
Rand, D. G. The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. J. Theor. Biol. 299, 172–179 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.G.R., J.D.G. and M.A.N. performed the analysis and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rand, D., Greene, J. & Nowak, M. Rand et al. reply. Nature 498, E2–E3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12195
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12195
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Effect of exogenous testosterone on cooperation depends on personality and time pressure
Neuropsychopharmacology (2019)
-
Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation
Nature Communications (2014)