Skip to main content
Log in

Is BID required for NOD signalling?

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

A Brief Communications Arising to this article was published on 22 August 2012

Abstract

Arising from G. Yeretssian et al. Nature 474, 96–99 (2011)10.1038/nature09982.

Innate immune signalling mediated by the nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain (NOD) receptors for pathogen-associated constituents regulates the response to intracellular peptidoglycans present in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Recently, Yeretssian et al.1 reported that the pro-apoptotic BH3-only BCL2 family member BID is essential for NOD-mediated immune signalling. This was on the basis of their finding that bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from Bid−/− mice failed to activate NF-κB and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and were unable to secrete inflammatory cytokines after stimulation with NOD ligands, and that BID-deficient mice were also defective in mounting a cytokine response to in vivo challenge with NOD ligands. Using the same strain of Bid−/− mice used by Yeretssian et al.1, we found that the mice responded like wild-type mice to NOD ligands, and that the levels of NF-κB or ERK activation and cytokine secretion from Bid−/− BMDMs were indistinguishable from the wild-type response. We therefore propose that the non-apoptotic role of BID in inflammation and innate immunity should be reassessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: BID is dispensable for NOD signalling.
Figure 2: Bid −/− BMDMs respond like wild-type BMDMs to various NOD-stimulating protocols.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yeretssian, G. et al. Non-apoptotic role of BID in inflammation and innate immunity. Nature 474, 96–99 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaufmann, T., Gugasyan, R., Gerondakis, S., Dixit, V. M. & Strasser, A. Loss of the BH3-only protein Bid does not rescue RelA-deficient embryos from TNF-R1-mediated fatal hepatocyte destruction. Cell Death Differ. 14, 637–639 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kobayashi, K. et al. RICK/Rip2/CARDIAK mediates signalling for receptors of the innate and adaptive immune systems. Nature 416, 194–199 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saiki, I. & Fidler, I. J. Synergistic activation by recombinant mouse interferon-gamma and muramyl dipeptide of tumoricidal properties in mouse macrophages. J. Immunol. 135, 684–688 (1985)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yin, X. M. et al. Bid-deficient mice are resistant to Fas-induced hepatocellular apoptosis. Nature 400, 886–891 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jost, P. J. et al. XIAP discriminates between type I and type II FAS-induced apoptosis. Nature 460, 1035–1039 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufmann, T. et al. The BH3-only protein bid is dispensable for DNA damage- and replicative stress-induced apoptosis or cell-cycle arrest. Cell 129, 423–433 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Silke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Competing Financial Interests Declared none.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nachbur, U., Vince, J., O’Reilly, L. et al. Is BID required for NOD signalling?. Nature 488, E4–E6 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11366

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11366

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation