Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary Biology

Evidence for sympatric speciation?

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Arising from: M. Barluenga, K. N. Stölting, W. Salzburger, M. Muschick & A. Meyer Nature 439, 719–723 (2006); Barluenga et al. reply

Sympatric speciation is difficult to demonstrate in nature and remains a hotly debated issue. Barluenga et al.1 present a case of putative sympatric speciation for two cichlid species in the Nicaraguan crater lake Apoyo, but they overlook or reinterpret some key published information on the system. Although sympatric speciation is possible in theory2,3, we show here that, when this information is taken into account, the results of Barluenga et al.1 do not provide conclusive evidence for sympatric speciation: this is because the null hypothesis of multiple invasion with introgression cannot be rejected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Contrasting information in two identical haplotype networks of Nicaragua cichlids.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barluenga, M., Stölting, K. N., Salzburger, W., Muschick, M. & Meyer, A. Nature 439, 719–723 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dieckmann, U., Doebeli, M., Metz, H. & Tautz, D. Adaptive Speciation (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Gavrilets, S. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Monographs in Population Biology 41 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barluenga, M. & Meyer, A. Mol. Ecol. 13, 2061–2076 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor, E. B. & McPhail, J. D. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 2375–2384 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernatchez, L. et al. Can. J. Fish. Aqu. Sci. 52, 179–185 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seehausen, O. Trends Evol. Ecol. 19, 198–207 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McKaye, K. R. et al. Cuadernos de Investigación de la UCA 12, 19–47 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stauffer, J. R. & McKaye, K. R. & Stauffer, J. R. Cuadernos de Investigación de la UCA 12, 1–18 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Machado, C. A. et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 472–488 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schliewen, U. K. & Klee, B. Front. Zool. 1, doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-1-5 (2004).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. K. Schliewen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schliewen, U., Kocher, T., McKaye, K. et al. Evidence for sympatric speciation?. Nature 444, E12–E13 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05419

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05419

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation