Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology

Measurement of growth rate of lung metastases in 21 patients with bone or soft-tissue sarcoma

  • Clinical Oncology/Epidemiology
  • Published:
British Journal of Cancer Submit manuscript

Abstract

The volume doubling time (T2) of 52 lung metastases in 21 patients was calculated from measurements done on plain chest radiographs. Follow-up times ranged from 14 to 819 days. The measurements were fairly well reproducible in the majority of patients, although considerable discrepancies in T2 estimates made by two independent observers were found in a few patients. The median doubling time was 34.9 days (estimated 95% range 3.9 to 352 days). The variation of T2:s between patients was significantly (P = 0.0001) larger than that between T2: of multiple metastases in the same patients. The growth of the metastases seemed to be well described by a simple exponential function in all patients with more than two measurements, without evidence of Gompertzian growth. There seemed to be a linear correlation between the logarithm of T2 and log-survival time from diagnosis of metastatic disease, even if only one third of the variation of survival times between patients could be explained by differences in T2. T2 was not a significant factor for survival in Cox-analysis (P = 0.10).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blomqvist, C., Wiklund, T., Tarkkanen, M. et al. Measurement of growth rate of lung metastases in 21 patients with bone or soft-tissue sarcoma. Br J Cancer 68, 414–417 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1993.351

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1993.351

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation