Skip to main content
Log in

Importance of ancestral DNA ages

  • Scientific Correspondence
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Recent publications consider the age of a common ancestor of samples of human DNA sequences1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. In particular, variation in Y chromosomes has been interpreted by different authors to give very different estimates of the time to the most recent common ancestor of the sample1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. The cause of the differences is that the data are being interpreted by various authors in terms of their preferred models of human demography. The data are so lacking in power that these estimates depend hardly at all on the data, and almost entirely on the demographic model assumed. However, if we knew the demography of early humans, we would have no real interest in the time to the most recent common ancestor of an individual gene, as the time is important only because it tells us about the demography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Dorit, R. L., Akashi, H. & Gilbert, W. Science 268, 1183–1185 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fu, Y.-X. & Li, W.-H. Science 272, 1356–1357 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donnelly, P., Tavaré, S., Balding, D. J. & Griffiths, R. C. Science 272, 1357–1359 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss, G. & von Haeseler, A. Science 272, 1359–1360 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fu, Y.-X. & Li, W.-H. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 195–199 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dorit, R. L., Akashi, H. & Gilbert, W. Science 272, 1361–1362 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hammer, M. F. Nature 378, 376–378 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Whitfield, L. S., Sulston, J. E. & Goodfellow, P. N. Nature 378, 379–380 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Knight, A. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 4360–4364 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brookfield, J. Importance of ancestral DNA ages. Nature 388, 134 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/40543

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/40543

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation