Skip to main content
Log in

Does partial melting reduce the creep strength of the upper mantle?

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

The seismic low-velocity zone has been thought to correspond to a zone of partial melting that significantly reduces the creep strength, making it possible for the plates to decouple from the underlying mantle1,2. This view is examined here in light of recent experimental results which show that water has more effect on the creep strength of olivine3–6 than does partial melting7,8 and that the former depends on the fugacity of water5,6. When there is a limited amount of water, partial melting will result in depletion of water from olivine, and therefore have a hardening, rather than a softening, effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ringwood, A. E., in The Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle (ed. Hart, P. J.) 1–17 (American Geophysics Union, Washington DC, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, D. L. & Sammis, C. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 3, 41–50 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chopra, P. N. & Paterson, M. S. Tectonophysics 78, 453–473 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chopra, P. N. & Paterson, M. S. J. geophys. Res. 89, 7861–7876 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Karato, S., Paterson, M. S. & FitzGerald, J. D. J. geophys. Res. (in the press).

  6. Mackwell, S. J., Kohlstedt, D. L. & Paterson, M. S. J. geophys. Res. (in the press).

  7. Cooper, R. F. & Kohlstedt, D. L. Tectonophysics 107, 207–233 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chopra, P. N. & Kohlstedt, D. L. EOS 64, 323 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burnham, C. W. in The Evolution of the Igneous Rocks (ed. Yoder, H. S. Jr) 439–482 (Princeton University Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hobbs, B. E. J. geophys. Res. 89, 4026–4038 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito, E., Harris, D. M. & Anderson, A. T. Jr Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 47, 1613–1624 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore, J. G. Contr. Miner. Petrol. 28, 272–279 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ringwood, A. E. Composition and Petrology of the Earth's Mantle (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shankland, T. J., O'Connell, R. J. & Waff, H. S. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 29,394–406 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Toramaru, A. & Fujii, N. J. geophys. Res. (submitted).

  16. Goetze, C. in High Pressure Research, Application in Geophysics (eds Manghnani, M. H. & Akimoto, S.) 3–23 (Academic, New York, 1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Karato, S. Tectonophysics 104, 155–176 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Molen, I. & Paterson, M. S. Contr. Miner. Petrol. 70, 299–318 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karato, S. Does partial melting reduce the creep strength of the upper mantle?. Nature 319, 309–310 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/319309a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/319309a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation