Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Darwin's1 hypothesis that male secondary sexual ornaments evolve through female preferences is theoretically plausible2–7, but there is little experimental field evidence that such preferences exist8–10. I have studied female choice in relation to male tail length in the long-tailed widowbird, Euplectes progne, and report here that males in which the tail was experimentally elongated showed higher mating success than males having normal or reduced tails. The possibility that intrasexual competition among males maintains the long tail was not supported: males with shortened tails held their territories as long as did other males. These results suggest that the extreme tail length in male long-tailed widowbirds is maintained by female mating preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (John Murray, London, 1871).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Maynard Smith, J. in A Century of Darwin (ed. Barnett, S. A.) 231–245 (Heineman, London, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  4. O'Donald, P. Theor. Populat. Biol. 12, 298–334 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O'Donald, P. Genetic Models of Sexual Selection (Cambridge University Press, 1980).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Lande, R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 3721–3725 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirkpatrick, M. Evolution 36, 1–12 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Halliday, T. R. in Behavioural Ecology, An Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 180–213 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andersson, M. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 17, 375–393 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Searcy, W. A. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13 (in the press).

  11. Craig, A. J. F. K. J. Orn. 121, 144–161 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lack, D. Ibis 77, 817–836 (1935).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Craig, A. J. F. K. Ostrich 45, 149–160 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Orians, G. H. Am. Nat. 103, 589–603 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Staddon, J. E. R. Am. Nat. 109, 541–545 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parker, G. A. in Current Problems in Sociobiology (Cambridge University Press, in the press).

  17. Borgia, G. in Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (eds Blum, M. S. & Blum, N. A.) 19–80 (Academic, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bradley, J. V. Distribution-free Statistical Tests (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1968).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, M. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299, 818–820 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/299818a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/299818a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation