Skip to main content
Log in

Antibodies to a neural cell adhesion molecule disrupt histogenesis in cultured chick retinae

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

Cell-surface proteins are believed to have important roles in cell–cell interactions during brain development, particularly in such processes as cellular adhesion, neurite outgrowth and synapse formation1–4. The chick neural cell adhesion molecule, CAM, is a cell-surface protein specific to the nervous system and has been implicated in cell adhesion among cells and neurites of the developing retina and brain5–8. Previous studies have shown that F(ab′) fragments of antibodies directed against CAM inhibit the in vitro aggregation of cells obtained from 9-day embryonic chick retina. The specific antibody fragments also reduce the diameter of neurite fascicles that grow out from cultured dorsal root ganglia, apparently by blocking side-to-side adhesion between the neurites. In addition, anti-CAM antibodies alter the appearance of histotypic patterns in retinal cell aggregates maintained in culture for several days7. We now demonstrate that the antibodies can disrupt histogenesis of the developing retina in organ culture, strengthening the notion that the cell–cell adhesion properties mediated by CAM are involved in the normal development of histological layers in the chick retina.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown, J. C. Expl Cell Res. 69, 440–442 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Santala, R., Gottlieb, D. I., Littman, D. & Glaser, L. J. biol. Chem. 252, 7625–7634 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stallcup, W. B. Brain Res. 126, 475–486 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahler, H. R. in Complex Carbohydrates of Nervous Tissue (eds Margaolis, R. U. & Margolis, R. K.) 165–184 (Plenum, New York, 1979).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Brackenbury, R., Thiery, J-P., Rutishauser, U. & Edelman, G. M. J. biol. Chem. 252, 6835–6840 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thiery, J-P., Brackenbury, R., Rutishauser, U. & Edelman, G. M. J. biol. Chem. 252, 6841–6845 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rutishauser, U., Thiery, J-P., Brackenbury, R. & Edelman, G. M. J. Cell Biol. 79, 371–381 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rutishauser, U., Gall, W. E. & Edelman, G. M. J. Cell Biol. 79, 382–393 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahn, A. J. Devl Biol. 38, 30–40 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mishima, H. & Fujita, H. Albrecht v. Graefes Arch. Ophthal. 206, 1–16 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McLoon, S. C. & Hughes, W. F. Brain Res. 150, 398–402 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hinds, J. W. & Hinds, P. L. J. comp. Neurol. 197, 277–300 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heaton, M. B., Alvarez, I. M. & Crandall, J. E. Anat. Embryol. 155, 161–178 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buskirk, D., Thiery, JP., Rutishauser, U. et al. Antibodies to a neural cell adhesion molecule disrupt histogenesis in cultured chick retinae. Nature 285, 488–489 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/285488a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/285488a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation