Skip to main content
Log in

Microtubules, cell wall deposition and the determination of plant cell shape

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE shape of Plant cells depends largely on the orientation of cellulose microfibrils in their cell walls1. In almost all cells where the microfibrils are regularly arranged, cortical microtubules lie parallel to the wall microfibrils. Experimental evidence indicates that these microtubules influence the arrangement of the deposition of wall microfibrils2. How microtubules determine the orientation of microfibrillar deposition is not yet known3,4, but it has been speculated that they may influence the alignment of cellulose synthetase enzymes on the Plasma membrane5. Microtubules act as a cytoskeleton in the formation and maintenance of cell shape in many types of cells6 including Plant cells which lack a cell wall7, or before a wall is deposited8, and it may be that microtubules, in those Plant cells where they are arranged congruently with recently deposited wall microfibrils, directly determine cell shape. However, using coumarin to inhibit cell wall regeneration by protoplasts of Mougeotia I demonstrate here the inability of microtubules to directly determine cell shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green, P. B., Erickson, R. D. & Richmond, P. A. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 175, 712–731 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hepler, P. K. & Palevitz, B. A. A. Rev. Pl. Physiol. 25, 309–362 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Brien, T. P. Bot. Rev. 38, 87–118 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson, D. G. Cytobiologie 15, 475–484 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heath, I. B. J. theor. Biol. 48, 445–449 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts, K. Prog. Biophys. molec. Biol. 28, 373–420 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bouck, G. B. & Brown, D. L. J. Cell Biol. 56, 340–359 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marchant, H. J. & Pickett-Heaps, J. D. Planta 116, 291–300 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marchant, H. J. & Fowke, L. C. Can. J. Bot. 55, 3080–3086 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marchant, H. J. Expl Cell Res. 115, 25–30 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hara, M., Umetsu, N., Miyamota, C., Tamari, K., Pl. Cell Physiol. 14, 11–28 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burgess, J. & Linstead, P. J. Planta 133, 267–273 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Itoh, T. Pl. Cell Physiol. 17, 385–398 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes, J. & McCully, M. E. Stain Technol. 50, 319–329 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marchant, H. J. Protoplasma (in the press).

  16. Schnepf, E. Port. Acta biol. A 14, 451–462 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MARCHANT, H. Microtubules, cell wall deposition and the determination of plant cell shape. Nature 278, 167–168 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/278167a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/278167a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation