Skip to main content
Log in

Resolution of X and Y spermatids by pulse cytophotometry

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

SEPARATION of sperm bearing X and Y chromosomes is limited by, among other difficulties, the inability to distinguish between the two cell types. The two types of sperm can be distinguished only in man because the Y chromosome is highly fluorescent when stained with quinicrine mustard1. Because of the greater length of the X chromosome than the Y chromosome, it is expected that X-bearing sperm will have a greater DNA content. Based on chromosome length measurements2, the difference in DNA content between X-bearing sperm of the mouse (Mus musculus), which carry 19 autosomes plus the X chromosome, and the Y-bearing sperm, which carry the autosomes plus the Y chromosome, is expected to be 3.4%. Distinguishing X and Y sperm on the basis of this difference requires a method of measurement of DNA content with high precision. We have been able to resolve the two classes of spermatids by pulse cytophotometry (that is, flow microfluorometry).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sumner, A. T., Robinson, J. A. & Evans, A. J. Nature new Biol. 229, 231–233 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hsu, T. C. & Benirschke, K. An Atlas of Mammalian Chromosomes 5, folio 17 (Springer, New York, 1967).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Gledhill, B. L. et al. J. cell. Physiol. 87, 367–376 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Dilla, M. A. et al. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 25, 763–777 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Göhde, W., Schumann, J., Büchner, Th., Otto, F. & Barlogie, B. in Flow Cytometry and Sorting (eds Melamed, M. R., Mullaney, P. F. & Mendelsohn, M. L.) (Wiley, New York, in the press).

  6. Zante, J., Schumann, J., Barlogie, B., Göhde, W. & Büchner, Th. in Pulse Cytophotometry II (eds Göhde, W. et al.) 97–106 (European Press, Gent, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barlogie, B. et al. Blood 48, 245–258 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oakberg, E. F. Am. J. Anat. 99, 391–414 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grimes, S. R., Platz, R. D., Meistrich, M. L. & Hnilica, L. S. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 57, 182–189 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meistrich, M. L., Lake, S., Steinmetz, L. L. & Gledhill, B. L. Mutat. Res. 49, 383–396 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meistrich, M. L. in Methods in Cell Biology 13 (ed. Prescott, D. M.) (Academic, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grabske, R. J., Lake, S., Gledhill, B. L. & Meistrich, M. L. J. cell. Physiol. 86, 177–190 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meistrich, M. L., Lake, S., Steinmetz, L. L. & Gledhill, B. L. Mutat. Res. 49, 397–405 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zante, J., Schumann, J., Göhde, W. & Hacker, U. Histochemistry 54, 1–7 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gledhill, B. L., Gledhill, M. P., Rigler, R. & Ringertz, N. R. Expl Cell Res. 41, 652–665 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MEISTRICH, M., GÖHDE, W., WHITE, R. et al. Resolution of X and Y spermatids by pulse cytophotometry. Nature 274, 821–823 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/274821a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/274821a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation