Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Condensed Objects in the Crab Nebula

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

MANY studies of the Crab have shown that it is exceedingly difficult to understand its evolution and its high-energy particle content on the assumption that all the energy was injected at the time of the outburst of the supernova about 103 yr ago. Evidence of continuous activity is provided directly by the moving wisps (private communication from W. Baade, a preprint by J. Scargle and ref. 1) and the suggestion that some parts of the flux of high-energy electrons responsible for the radio and optical synchrotron radiation have lifetimes which are short compared with the time which has elapsed since the explosion. If all the energy released in a supernova explosion is emitted during the outburst and if the high-energy particles were generated in this way2, the continuous activity would not be explained. But there are now a number of lines of evidence each of which suggests that condensed supernova remnants are present, and it is these which probably maintain the overall activity in the Crab. We outline the arguments which lead to this conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oort, J. H., and Walraven, T., Bull. Astron. Insts. Neth., 12, 285 (1956).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Colgate, S., and Johnson, M. H., Phys. Rev. Lett., 5, 235 (1960). Colgate, S., and White, R. H., Astrophys. J., 143, 626 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hewish, A., and Okoye, S. E., Nature, 207, 59 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rees, M. J., Astrophys. Lett., 2, 1 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Demoulin, M-H., and Burbidge, G., Astrophys. J., 154, 3 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Staelin, D. H., and Reifenstein, E. C., Science, 162, 1481 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gold, T., Nature, 218, 731 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowyer, S., Byram, E. T., Chubb, T. A., and Friedman, H., Science, 146, 912 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Peterson, L., Jacobson, A., Pelling, R., and Schwartz, D., Canad. J. Phys., 47, 437 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oda, M., Bradt, H., Garmire, G., Spada, G., Sreenkantan, B. V., Gursky, H., Giacconi, R., Gorenstein, P., and Waters, J. R., Astrophys. J., L5 (1967).

  11. Tucker, W. H., Astrophys. J., 148, 745 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoyle, F., and Fowler, W. A., Quasi-Stellar Sources and Gravitational Collapse, 17 (Univ. Chicago Press, 1965). Hoyle, F., Fowler, W. A., Burbidge, G. R., and Burbidge, E. M., Astrophys. J., 139, 909 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burbidge, G. R., Nature, 216, 1287 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BURBIDGE, G., HOYLE, F. Condensed Objects in the Crab Nebula. Nature 221, 847–848 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/221847a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/221847a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation