Abstract
WHEN persons observe randomly generated events of different kinds and are afterwards required to report on the frequency with which each kind of event occurred, they tend to over-estimate the frequency of occurrence of infrequent events and under-estimate that of comparatively frequent ones1,2.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hornseth, J. P., unpublished Ph.D. thesis described in “Information Theory in Psychology”, edit. by Quastler (The Free Press).
Attneave, F., J. Exp. Psychol., 46, 81 (1953).
Preston, M. G., and Baratta, P., Amer. J. Psychol., 44, 183 (1948).
Griffith, R. M., Amer. J. Psychol., 62, 290 (1949).
Coombs, C. H., and Komorita, S. S., Amer. J. Psychol., 71, 383 (1958).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DALE, H. A Priori Probabilities in Gambling. Nature 183, 842–843 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1038/183842a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/183842a0
- Springer Nature Limited
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.