Skip to main content
Log in

Tumour-inhibiting Action of 1 : 6-Dimethanesulphonyl-D-mannitol

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

EXTENSIVE clinical experience with ‘Myleran’ (I, n= 4) in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukæmia1 has shown that when over-dosage is avoided the drug is free from side-effects. On the other hand, other alkylating agents which are used clinically, namely, ethyleneimine derivatives and nitrogen mustards, usually cause some side-effects. This contrast may be attributable to a different mechanism of action for ‘Myleran’ and for the other alkylating agents. Evidence for this difference arises from comparison of the effects of ‘Myleran’ and a mustard (chlorambucil) on rat bone-marrow2 and from a similar comparison where, when the drugs were used clinically in leukæmia, there was no enhanced excretion of uric acid after administration of ‘Myleran’ although nitrogen mustards and tri-ethylenemelamine caused a significant rise in uric acid excretion3. ‘Myleran’ and its congeners (I), while they inhibit experimental tumours, cause a marked depression of bone-marrow function and cannot therefore be considered suitable for the treatment of solid tumours in man. In the ‘Myleran’ series there is evidence that variations in neutrophil-depressing and also in tumour-inhibitory activity may depend very much on the ratio between the solubility of the particular compound in water and in ether4. In the hope that a very large relative increase in water solubility might possibly minimize the bone-marrow depressing properties of the ‘Myleran’ series while leaving unaffected tumour-inhibitory activity together with the apparent clinical virtues attributable to the ‘Myleran’ type of action, we decided to modify the series by the insertion of hydroxy groups in the polymethylene chain. Bis-l :6-2′-chloroethylamino-1:6-dideoxy-D-mannitol (II) had been made because it was a type of nitrogen mustard which it was thought might inhibit glycolysis5. The fact that its tetrahydroxylated hexamethylene chain structure was consistent with tumour-inhibiting activity led us to choose 1 : 6-dimethanesulphonyl-D-mannitol (III) as the first member of our new series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galton, D. A. G., and Till, M., Lancet, i, 425 (1955).

  2. Galton, D. A. G., Elson, L. A., and Till, M., Brit. J. Haematol. (in the press).

  3. Winkler, A., Ughazy, V., and Cerny, V., Neoplasma, 4, 340 (1957).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Timmis, G. M., and Hudson, R. F., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 68 (3), 727 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kellner, B., and Nemath, L., Z. Krebsforsch., 61, 165 (1956–57).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HADDOW, A., TIMMIS, G. & BROWN, S. Tumour-inhibiting Action of 1 : 6-Dimethanesulphonyl-D-mannitol. Nature 182, 1164–1165 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1038/1821164b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1821164b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation