Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reaction of Ferrimyoglobin with Phenols

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

IF, in a hæmoprotein, the hæm iron atom is held by bonds to the protein on both sides of the porphyrin ring, then the most likely mechanism for complex formation with the ligands CO, NO, F, CN, N3 , etc., entails breaking the weaker bond while leaving the stronger bond intact. The proton affinity of the group thus liberated would be an important factor in determining the pH variation of the equilibrium constants for complex formation. The limited extent to which such a mechanism can account for hæm-linked ionizations in hæmoglobin reactions, its direct application to cytochrome c reactions, and the way it can account for some of the differences found in peroxidase and catalase reactions have been discussed recently1,2. The question naturally arises whether any other functional groups in amino-acid side-chains can co-ordinate with the iron beside nitrogenous base groups, which in cytochrome c give rise to the characteristic hæmochromogen and parahæmatin spectra that set it apart from the other ferro- and ferri-hæmoproteins. Internal complex formation is a possibility in the ferric oxidation state via—COOH, alcoholic —OH and —SH groups in the side-chains, since complexes are known to be formed between ferrihæmoglobin and formic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, ethanol, hydrogen sulphide and ethyl mercaptan3–6. Furthermore, the following preliminary report on the reaction of ferrimyoglobin with phenols shows that the phenolic —OH group can be added to this list.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George, P., and Lyster, R. L. J., in “Conference on Hemoglobin, May 2–3” (Washington, National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council, 1957) (NAS–NRC Publication 557) (in the press).

    Google Scholar 

  2. George, P., and Lyster, R. L. J., Fed. Proc., 16, 1051 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scheler, W., Salewski, A., and Jung, F., Biochem. Z., 326, 288 (1955).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coryell, C. D., and Stitt, F., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 62, 2942 (1940).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Keilin, D., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 113, 393 (1933).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coryell, C. D., and Heussenstamm, P., see Coryell, C. D., in “Chemical Specificity in Biological Interactions”, pp. 108 and 113 (Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Theorell, H., Ark. Kemi Min. Geol., 16A, No. 3 (1942).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GEORGE, P., LYSTER, R. & BEETLESTONE, J. Reaction of Ferrimyoglobin with Phenols. Nature 181, 1534–1535 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1038/1811534a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1811534a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation