Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ozone sensitivity of wild field layer plant species of northern Europe. A review

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing tropospheric ozone (O3) concentration constitutes a potential threat to nature. Plants are known to react to O3, but knowledge of the sensitivity and type of responses of different species and plant communities is widely lacking. This review focuses on the ecological effects of O3 on northern wild field layer plant species. Most of the 65 species examined thus far have proven to be quite tolerant of O3. Visible symptoms were observed in 54% of the 61 species studied, and growth reduction in 31% of the 55 species studied for growth. There were no signs to suggest that certain families or vegetation types are more sensitive or tolerant than others. There were, however, clear differences in sensitivity between the different species. It seems that forbs are usually more sensitive than grasses. It should be kept in mind, however, that we still lack knowledge on the responses of many common and abundant key species. The long-term effects are also far from clear. Hardly any field examinations have been carried out on the effects of O3 on plant communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anfossi D., Sandroni S. and Viarengo S. 1991. Tropospheric ozone in the nineteenth century: The Moncalieri series. Journal of Geophysical Research 96: 17349-17352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkin O.K. and Cummins W.R. 1994. The effect of nitrogen source on growth, nitrogen economy and respiration of two high arctic plant sepcies differing in relative growth rate. Functional Ecology 8: 389-399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkin O.K., Botman B. and Lambers H. 1996. The causes of inherently slow growth in alpine plants: an analysis based on the underlying carbon economies of alpine and lowland Poa species. Functional Ecology 10: 698-707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore M.R., Thwaites R.H., Ainsworth N., Cousins D.A., Power S.A. and Morton A.J. 1995. Effects of ozone on calcareous grassland communities.Water, Air and Soil Pollution 85: 1527-1532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore M.R. and Davison A.W. 1996. Towards a critical level of ozone for natural vegetation. In: Kärenlampi L. and Skärby L. (eds), Critical Levels for Ozone in Europe: Testing and Finalizing the Concepts, UN-ECE Workshop Report. University of Kuopio, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, pp. 58-71.

  • Ashmore M.R., Power S.A., Cousins D.A. and Ainsworth N. 1996. Effects of ozone on native grass and forb species: a comparison of responses of individual plants and artificial communities. In: Kärenlampi L. and Skärby L. (eds), Critical Levels for Ozone in Europe: Testing and Finalizing the Concepts, UNECE workshop report. University of Kuopio, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, pp. 193-197.

  • Baker E.A. 1982. Chemistry and morphology of plant epicuticular waxes. In: Cutler D.F., Alvin K.L. and Price C.E. (eds), The plant cuticle: papers presented at an International Symposium organized by the Linnean Society of London, London, 8-11 September 1980. Linnean Society Symposium Series Nr 10. Academic Press, pp. 139-165.

  • Bergmann E., Bender J. and Weigel H.-J. 1999. Ozone threshold doses and exposure-response relationships for the development of ozone injury symptoms in wild plant species. New Phytologist 144: 423-435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black V.J., Black C.R., Roberts J.A. and Stewart C.A. 2000. Tansley Review No. 115 Impact of ozone on the reproductive development of plants. New Phytologist 147: 421-447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortier K., De Temmermam L. and Ceulemans R. 2000. Effects of ozone exposure in open-top chambers on poplar (Populus nigra) and beech (Fagus sylvatica): a comparison. Environmental Pollution 109: 509-516.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bungener P., Balls G.R., Nussbaum S., Geissmann M., Grub A. and Fuhrer J. 1999. Leaf injury characteristics of grassland species exposed to ozone in relation to soil moisture condition and vapour pressure deficit. New Phytologist 142: 271-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappelka A.H. and Chevone B.I. 1992. Tree responses to ozone. In: Lefohn A.S. (ed.), Surface Level Ozone Exposures and Their Effects on Vegetation. Lewis publishers, Chelsea, pp. 271-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsson H., Gelang J. and Pleijel H. 1999. Ozone sensitivity, growth and flower development in Phleum genotypes of different geographic origin in the Nordic countries. Environmental and Experimental Botany 42: 41-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsson H. and Pleijel H. 1999. Effects of ozone on wild plants. In: Pleijel H. (ed.), Ground-Level Ozone - A Threat to Vegetation, Sweden Environmental Protection Agency, Report 4970., pp. 79-90.

  • Davison A.W. and Reiling K. 1995. A Rapid change in ozone resistance of Plantago major after summers with high ozone concentrations. New Phytologist 131: 337-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison A.W. and Barnes J.D. 1998. Effects of ozone on wild plants. New Phytologist 139: 135-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra P. and Lambers H. 1989. A physiological analysis of genetic variation in relative growth rate within Plantago major L. Functional Ecology 3: 577-587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormann C.F. and Woodin S.J. 2002. Climate change in the Arctic: using plant functional types in a meta-analysis of field experiments. Functional Ecology 16: 4-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emberson L.D., Ashmore M.R., Cambridge H.M., Simpson D. and Tuovinen J.-P. 2000. Modelling stomatal ozone flux across Europe. Environmental Pollution 109: 403-413.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans L.S. and Ting I.P. 1974. Ozone sensitivity of leaves: relationship to leaf water content, gas transfer resistance, and anatomical characteristics. American Journal of Botany 61: 592-597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans L.S., Adamski J.H. II and Renfro J.R. 1996a. Relationships between cellular injury, visible injury of leaves, and ozone exposure levels for several dicotyledonous plant species at Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Environmental and Experimental Botany 36: 229-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans L.S., Albury K. and Jennings N. 1996b. Relationships between anatomical characteristics and ozone sensitivity of leaves of several herbaceous dicotyledonous plant species at Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Environmental and Experimental Botany 36: 413-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzaring J., Bergmann E., Bender J. and Weigel H.J. 1998. The impact of ozone on natural vegetaion - An ecological discussion of European studies. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft fur Ökologie 28: 355-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer J., Skärby L. and Ashmore M.R. 1997. Critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation in Europe. Environmental Pollution 97: 91-106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grunhage L. and Haenel H.-D. 1997. PLATIN (Plant-Atmosphere Interaction) I: A model of plant-atmosphere interaction for estimating absorbed doses of gaseous air pollutants. Environmental Pollution 98: 37-50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guzy M.R. and Heath R.L. 1993. Responses to ozone of varieties of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). New Phytologist 124: 617-625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunthardt-Goerg M.S., McQuattie J., Scheidegger C., Rhiner C. and Matyssek R. 1997. Ozone indused cytochemical and ultrastructural changes in leaf mesophyll cell walls. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 453-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämet-Ahti L., Suominen J., Ulvinen T. and Uotila P. (eds) 1998. Retkeilykasvio (Field Flora of Finland). Finnish Museum of Natural history, Botanical museum, Helsinki.

  • Heath R.L. 1994. Alterations of plant metabolism by ozone exposure. In: Alscher R.G. and Wellburn A.R. (eds), Plant Responses to the Gaseous Environment. Molecular, Metabolic and Physiological Aspects. Chapman & Hall, pp. 121-145.

  • Hough A.M. and Derwent R.G. 1990. Changes in the global concentrations of tropospheric ozone due to human activities. Nature 344: 645-648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R., Hand W.D., Hannah M.A. and Neal A.M. 1993. Further responses to CO2 enrichment in British herbaceous species. Functional Ecology 7: 661-668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R. and Cornelissen J.H.C. 1997. Components of relative growth rate and their interrelations in 59 temperate plant species. New Phytol. 135: 395-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janke R.A. 1970. Transpiration resistance in Vaccinium myrtillus. American Journal of Botany 57: 1051-1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetten T.H. 1992. Physical Description of Transport Processes Inside an Open Top Chamber in Relation to Field Conditions. PhD Disseration, Agricultrual University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen I., Ro-Poulsen H., Søchting U. and Mortensen L. 1991. Gasformige luftforureningers effekter på danske plantesamfund. Miljø og restprodukter. EM-Journal nr. 1323/86-20. Energiministeriets forskningsudvalg for produktion og fordeling af el og varme.

  • Krupa S.V. and Manning W.J. 1988. Atmospheric ozone: formation and effects on vegetation. Environmental Pollution 50: 101-137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kärenlampi L. and Skärby L. (eds) 1996. Critical levels for ozone in Europe: Testing and finalizing the concepts, UN-ECE workshop report, UN-ECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution workshop in Kuopio, 15-7 April, 1996. University of Kuopio, Department of Ecology and Environmental Science.

  • Körner Ch. 1995. Leaf diffusive conductances in the major vegetation types of the globe. In: Schulze E.-D. and Caldwell M.M. (eds), Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis. Springer, pp. 464-490.

  • Körner Ch., Scheel J.A. and Bauer H. 1979. Maximum leaf diffuse conductance in vascular plants. Photosynthetica 13: 45-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H., Stuart Chapin F. and Pons T.L. 1998. Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer Verlag.

  • Laurila T. and Lättilä H. 1994. Surface ozone exposures measured in Finland. Atmospheric Environment 28: 103-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee E.H. 1999. Early detection, mechanisms of tolerance, and amelioration of ozone stress in crop plants. In: Agrawal S.B. and Agrawal M. (eds), Environmental Pollution and Plant Responses. Lewis publisher, pp. 203-222.

  • Lid J. 1985. Norsk, Svensk, Finsk Flora., Oslo.

  • Lyons T.M., Barnes J.D. and Davison A.W. 1997. Relationships between ozone resistance and climate in European populations of Plantago major. New Phytologist 136: 503-510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons T.M. and Barnes J.D. 1998. Influence of plant age on ozone resistance in Plantago major. New Phytologist 138: 83-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning W.J. and Krupa S.V. 1992. Experimental methodology for studying the effects of ozone on crops and trees. In: Lefohn A.S. (ed.), Surface Level Ozone Exposures and Their Effects on Vegetation. Lewis publishers, USA, pp. 93-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manninen S., Miettinen N. and Huttunen S. 2002. Growth and foliar responses of northern European Scots pines and birches to ozone. In: Background paper -Forests. UNECE Workshop Establishing Ozone Critical Levels II. Göteborg, Sweden, 19-2 November., pp. 147-154.

  • Manninen S., Sorjamaa R., Vanhatalo M. and Huttunen S. 1999. Mountain birch shows high sensitivity to ozone. In: Fuhrer J. and Achermann B. (eds), Critical Levels for Ozone - Level II. Environmental Documenation No. 115. Swiss Agency for Environment, Forest and Landscape, Bern, Switzerland, pp. 157-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manninen S., Siivonen N., Timonen U. and Huttunen S. 2003. Differences in ozone response between two Finnish wild strawberry populations. Environmental and Experimental Botany 49: 29-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin J.T. and Juniper B.E. 1970. The Cuticles of Plants. Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.

  • Matyssek R., Gunthardt-Goerg M.S., Maurer S. and Keller T. 1995. Nighttime exposure to ozone reduces whole-plant production in Betula pendula. Tree Physiology 15: 159-165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen L.M. 1993. Effects of ozone on growth of several subalpine plant species. The Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7: 129-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen L.M. 1994. Further studies on the effects of ozone concentration on growth of subalpine plant species. The Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8: 91-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen L.M. 1999. Foliar injuries caused by ozone in Betula pubescens Ehrh. and Phleum pratense L. as influenced by climatic conditions before and during O3 exposure. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 49: 44-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen L.M. and Nilsen J. 1992. Effects of ozone and temperature on growth of several wild plant species. The Norwegian Journal or Agricultural Sciences 6: 195-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebel B. and Fuhrer J. 1994. Inter-and intraspesific differences in ozone sensitivity in semi-natural plant communities. Angewandte Botanik 68: 116-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum S. and Fuhrer J. 2000. Difference in ozone uptake in grassland species between open-top chambers and ambient air. Environmental Pollution 109: 463-471.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard P.H. 1994. Virkning av ozon på blåbaer (Vaccinium myrtillus), etasjehusmose (Hylocomium splendens), furumose (Pleurozium schreberi) og krussigd (Dicranum polysetum). Rapport fra skogsforsk 9.

  • Pearson S., Davison A.W., Reiling K., Ashenden T. and Ollerenshaw J.H. 1996. The effects ofdifferent ozone exposures on three contrasting populations of Plantago major. New Phytologist 132: 493-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleijel H. and Danielsson H. 1997. Growth of 27 herbs and grasses in relation to ozone exposure and plant strategy. New Phytologist 135: 361-367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H. and Remkes C. 1990. Leaf area ratio and net assimilation raye of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Oecologia 83: 553-559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich P.B. 1987. Quantifying plant response to ozone: a unifying theory. Tree Physiology 3: 63-91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reich P.B. and Amundson R.G. 1985. Ambient levels of ozone reduce net photosynthesis in tree and crop species. Science 230: 566-570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiling K. and Davison A.W. 1992a. The response of native, herbaceous species to ozone: growth and fluorescence screening. New Phytologist 120: 29-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiling K. and Davison A.W. 1992b. Effects of a short ozone exposure given at different stages in the development of Plantago major L. New Phytologist 121: 643-647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiling K. and Davison A.W. 1992c. Spatial variation in ozone resistance of British populations of Plantago major L. New Phytologist 122: 699-708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runeckles V.C. 1992. Uptake of ozone by vegetation. In: Lefohn A.S. (ed.), Surface Level Ozone Exposures and Their Effects on Vegetation. Lewis publisher, pp. 157-188.

  • Runeckles V.C. and Chevone B.I. 1992. Crop responses to ozone. In: Lefohn A.S. (ed.), Surface Level Ozone Exposures and Their Effects on Vegetation. Lewis publisher, pp. 189-270.

  • Sellden G., Sutinen S. and Skärby L. 1997. Controlled ozone exposures and field observations in Fennoscandia. In: Sandermann H., Wellburn A.R. and Heath R.L. (eds), Forest Decline and Ozone, A Comparison of Controlled Chamber and Field Experiments. Ecological studies 127. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 249-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skärby L., Grennfelt P., Karlsson P.E., Karlsson G.P., Pleijel H., Sellden G. et al. 1994. Critical levels for tropospheric ozone - concepts and criteria tested for nordic conditions. TemaNord 1994: 592.

  • Tilman D., Reich P.B., Knops J., Wdin D., Mielke T. and Lehman C. 2001. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294: 843-845.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torsethaugen G., Pell E.J. and Assmann S.M. 1999. Ozone inhibits guard cell K+ channels implicated in stomatal opening. National Academy of Sciences (USA) 96: 13577-13582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treshow M. and Stewart D. 1973. Ozone sensitivity of plants in natural communities. Biological conservation 5: 209-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN/ECE 1999. Critical levels for ozone - level II, Workshop. Background documents. Preliminary background papers prepared for a workshop under the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE). Gerzensee, Switzerland 11-15 April 1999.

  • Volz A. and Kley K. 1988. An evaluation of the Montsouris series of ozone measurements made in the nineteenth century. Nature 332: 240-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield C.P., Davison A.W. and Ashenden T.W. 1998. The effects of nutrient limitation on the response of Plantago major to ozone. New Phytologist 140: 219-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildi B. and Lütz C. 1996. Antioxidant composition of selected high alpine plant species from different altitudes. Plant, Cell and Environment 19: 138-146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Oulu, FIN-90014, Finland

    Ulla Timonen & Satu Huttunen

  2. Department of Ecology and Systematics, University of Helsinki, FIN-00014, Finland

    Sirkku Manninen

Authors
  1. Ulla Timonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Satu Huttunen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sirkku Manninen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satu Huttunen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Timonen, U., Huttunen, S. & Manninen, S. Ozone sensitivity of wild field layer plant species of northern Europe. A review. Plant Ecology 172, 27–39 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000026029.95954.04

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000026029.95954.04

Search

Navigation