Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contextual effects on ethical sensitivity and penalty judgments

  • Published:
Teaching Business Ethics

Abstract

The aim of the current study is to explore thepotential existence of contextual effects onethical sensitivity and penalty judgments. Inso doing, Turkish female and male businessstudents' ethical judgments for accounting andgeneral business contexts are investigated,along with their penalty judgments in these twosettings. The results of this study reveal nosignificant gender-related differences inethical judgments on accounting issues, butsignificant gender differences are observed ingeneral business scenarios. This findingsupports the proposition that observeddifferences of ethical judgments between thegenders may be contextual. The resultsindicate that there is higher ethical awarenessfor both genders in general business contexts,with females showing stronger ethicalsensitivity than males for general businessvignettes. In general, males are found toprefer harsher penalties than females foraccounting settings and for all penaltychoices. Analyses of penalty judgments betweenthe groups of individuals who are moreethically sensitive and who are less ethicallysensitive reveals that there exist significantdifferences between these groups in all penaltychoices, with ethically-more-sensitive groupparticipants preferring stronger penalties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, J. S., A. Tashchian and T. H. Lee: 2001, 'Codes of Ethics as Signals for Ethical Behavior', Journal of Business Ethics 29(3), 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameen, E. C., D. M. Guffey and J. J. McMillan: 1996, 'Gender Differences in Determining the Ethical Sensitivity of Future Accounting Professionals', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 591–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, P.: 1991, 'Personal Characteristics on College Students' Evaluations of Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. C.: 1999, 'Theoretical Approaches to Research on Accounting Ethics', in L. A. Ponemon (ed.), Research on Accounting Ethics, Vol. 5, JAI Press Inc., CT, pp. 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. H. and M. J. Karson: 1989, 'Managers, Values, and Executive Decisions: An Exploration of the Role of Gender, Career Stage, Organizational Level, Function and the Importance of Ethics, Relationships, and Results in Managerial Decision Making', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 747–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, A. and D. Preston: 2000, 'Can Ethical Behavior Really Exist in Business', Journal of Business Ethics 23(2), 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltramini, R. F, R. A. Peterson and G. Kozmetsky: 1984, 'Concerns of College Students Regarding Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 3, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, M., L. O'Connell and J. M. Shepard: 1989, 'Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behavior, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J. R.: 1995, Cases in Ethics and the Conduct of Business, Prentice Hall, Englewood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, S. and Y. J. Ugras: 1998, 'Business Students and Ethics: A Meta-Analysis', Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1117–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. B., and R. L. Clark: 1999, 'Values, Gender and Skill Misrepresentation: A Laboratory Experiment', in L. A. Ponemon (ed.), Research on Accounting Ethics, Vol. 5, JAI Press Inc., CT, pp. 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Changes in Accounting Education Committee: 1986-1987, 1989, 'Report of the Changes in Accounting Education Committee 1986-1987', in J. J. Schultz, Jr. (ed.), Reorienting Accounting Education: Reports on the Environment, Professoriate, and Curriculum of Accounting, American Accounting Association, Sarasota, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, C. J. and K. J. Frey: 2000, 'Some Evidence on the Ethical Disposition of Accounting Students: Context and Gender Implications', Teaching Business Ethics 4, 379–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., L. W. Pant and D. J. Sharp: 1998, 'The Effect of Gender and Academic Discipline Diversity on the Ethical Evaluations, Ethical Intentions, and Ethical Orientation of Potential Public Accounting Recruits', Accounting Horizons 12(3), 250–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, B. C. and D. L. Smith: 1996, 'Perceptions of Business Ethics: Students vs. Business People', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 889–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Denis: 2000, 'The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1 500 Articles Published in Journal of Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 26, 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottell, P. G. and T. M. Perlin: 1990, Accounting Ethics: A Practical Guide For Professionals, Quorum Books, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, S., L. Fok, S. Hartman and D. Payne, 1991: 'Gender and Values:What is the Impact of Decision-Making?', Sex Roles 25(3/4), 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. R. and R. E. Welton: 1991, 'Professional Ethics: Business Students' Perceptions', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R.: 1987, 'Moral Reasoning in Work-Related Conflicts', in W. C. Frederick (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 9, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, R.: 1989, 'An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 855–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, S. P.: 1997, 'Managers' Perception of Proper Ethical Conduct: The Effect of Sex, Age, and Level of Education', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIE (State Statistics Institute-Turkey), www.die.gov.tr. Dienhart, J.: 1995, 'Rationality, Ethical Codes and an Egalitarian Justification for Ethical Expertise', Business Ethics Quarterly 5, 419–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, G. H. and S. J. Platz: 1986, 'Sex Differences in Leadership: How Real are They?', Academy of Management Review 11(1), 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, P. C. and B. N. Schwartz: 1999, 'Values as the Foundation for Moral Judgments: Theory and Evidence in an Accounting Context', in L. A. Ponemon (ed.), Research on Accounting Ethics, Vol. 5, JAI Press Inc., CT, pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J. and M. Levy: 1985, 'Ethics in Retailing: Perceptions of Retail Salespeople', Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 13(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, T. V. and D. E. Giacomino: 2001, 'An Examination of Personal Values: Differences between Accounting Students and Managers and Differences between Genders', Teaching Business Ethics 5, 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderle, G.: 1997, 'AWorldwide Survey Business Ethics in the 1990s', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1475–1483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C. and W. D. Richardson: 1994, 'Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature', Journal of Business Ethics 13, 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith S. and H. B. Stephenson: 1993, 'Decision Rules Used by Male and Female Business Students in Making Ethical Value Judgments: Another Look', Journal of Business Ethics 12, 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. and J. Attanuci: 1988, 'Two Moral Orientations: Gender Differences aAnd Similarities', Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 34, 223–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. R. and M. M. Mowen: 1992, Management Accounting, 2nd ed., South-Western Publication Co., Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R.: 1989, 'Ethical Values and Decision Processes of Male and Female Business Students', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R and C. D. Sutton: 1995, 'Unraveling the Ethical Decision-Making Process: Clues From an Empirical Study Comparing Fortune 1000 Executives and MBA Students', Journal of Business Ethics 14, 805–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert, P., E. M. Meslin, E. V. Dunn, N. Byrne and S. R. Reid: 1990, 'Evaluating Ethical Sensitivity in Medical Students: Using Vignettes as an Instrument', Journal of Medical Ethics 16, 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims, Jr.: 1978, 'Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment', Journal of Applied Psychology 63 (August), 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims, Jr.: 1979, 'Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment', Journal of Applied Psychology 64 (June), 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. K. and K. M. Hiltebeitel: 1995, 'Organizational Influence in a Model of Decision Process of Accountants', Journal of Business Ethics 14, 417–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and F. H. Gautschi, II: 1988, 'Will the Ethics of Business Change? A Survey of Future Executives', Journal of Business Ethics 7, 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karcher, J.: 1996, 'Auditors' Ability to Discern the Presence of Ethical Problems', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 1033–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasaba, R. and S. Bozdogan: 2000, 'Turkey at a Crossroad', Journal of International Affairs 54(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, J., R. Stevens and A. Bechke: 1987, 'Differences in Ethical Perceptions Between Male and Female Managers: Myth or Reality?', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kongar, Emre: 1986, 'Turkey's Cultural Transformation', in G. Renda and C. M. Kortepeter (eds.), The Transformation of Turkish Culture, The Kingston Press Inc., Princeton, NJ, pp. 19–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrath, L. F.: 1996, Auditing Concepts and Applications: A Risk Analysis Approach, 3rd ed., West Publishing Co., Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozan, M. K. and C. Ergin: 1999, 'Third Party Role in Conflict Management in Turkish Organizations', Human Organizations 58(4), 405–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J. M.: 2000, 'The Ability of Internal Auditors to Identify Ethical Dilemmas', Journal of Business Ethics 23(4), 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likierman, A.: 1989, 'Ethical Dilemmas for Accountants: A United Kingdom Perspective', Journal of Business Ethics 8, 617–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, C. and K. A. Berger: 1996, 'Undergraduate Student Attitudes About Hypothetical Marketing Dilemmas', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 525–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., J. Dukerich and J. Dutton: 1991, 'Context, Values and Moral Dilemmas: Comparing the Choices of Business and Law School Students', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 951–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNichols, C. W. and T. W. Zimmerer: 1985, 'Situational Ethics: An Empirical Study of Differentiators of Student Attitudes', Journal of Business Ethics 4, 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menguc, B.: 1998, 'The Earnings Gap Between Male and Female Sales Managers', Industrial Marketing Management 27, 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1997, 'Issues For Business Ethics in the Nineties and Beyond', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miesing, P. and J. F. Preble: 1985, 'A Comparison of Five Business Philosophies', Journal of Business Ethics 4, 465–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S.: 1992, Cases in Accounting Ethics and Professionalism, McGraw Hill, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okleshen, M. and R. Hoyt: 1996, 'A Cross Cultural Comparison of Ethical Perspectives and Decision Approaches of Business Students: United States of America versus New Zealand', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozgen, Z.: 1997, 'Turkish Women Won't Go Back!', Woman and Earth Almanac 5(1), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R., R. Beltramini and G. Kozmetsky: 1991, 'Concerns of College Students Regarding Business Ethics: A Replication', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 733–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. A.: 1995, 'The Objectivity of Accountants' Litigation Support Judgments', The Accounting Review 70(3), 467–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorsolton, K. S., G. Amin and A. Tootoonchi: 1991, 'Business Ethics: Views of Future Leaders', SAM Advanced Management Journal 56 (winter), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radtke, R. R.: 2000, 'The Effects of Gender and Setting on Accountants' Ethically Sensitive Decisions', Journal of Business Ethics 24(4), 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory, Praeger, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegger, D. and E. W. King: 1992, 'A Study of the Effect of Age and Gender upon Student Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M. and M. L. Ambrose: 1997, 'Asymmetric Perceptions of Ethical Frameworks of Men and Women in Business and Nonbusiness Settings', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 719–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaub, M. K., D. W. Finn and P. Munter: 1993, 'The Effects of Auditors' Ethical Orientation on Commitment and Ethical Sensitivity', Behavioral Research in Accounting 5, 145–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. and V. Rogers: 2000, 'Ethics-Related Responses to Specific Situation Vignettes: Evidence of Gender-Based Differences and Occupational Socialization', Journal of Business Ethics 28(1), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L. and E. F. Oakley, III: 1997, 'Gender Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurgin, E. W.: 2000, 'What's So Special about a Special Ethics for Business?', Journal of Business Ethics 24, 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanga, K. G. and R. A. Turpen: 1991, 'Ethical Judgments on Selected Accounting Issues: An Empirical Study', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 739–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, L.: 1998, 'The Role of Virtue in Auditors' Ethical Decision Making: An Integration of Cognitive-Developmental and Virtue-Ethics Perspectives', in L. A. Ponemon (ed.), Research on Accounting Ethics, Vol. 4, JAI Press Inc., CT, pp. 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.: 1992, 'Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education, and Management', Journal of Business Ethics 11, 445–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. and K. A. Nelson: 1995, Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How To Do It Right, Wiley & Sons, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsalikis, J. and M. Ortiz-Buonafina: 1990, 'Ethical Beliefs' Differences of Males and Females', Journal of Business Ethics 9, 509–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1990, 'Managers' Moral Reasoning: Assessing Their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas', Human Relations 43(7), 687–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, W. A., C. W. Moore, J. A. McKinney and J. G. Longenecker: 1999, 'The Effect of Gender and Career Stage on Ethical Judgment', Journal of Business Ethics 20, 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. B., C. P. Cullinan and D.M. Bline: 1998, 'Recognizing Ethical Issues: The Joint Influence of Ethical Sensitivity and Moral Intensity', in L. A. Ponemon (ed.), Research on Accounting Ethics, Vol. 4, JAI Press Inc., CT, pp. 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Management, Bilkent University, 06800 Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey; Tel

    Can Şımga-Mugan

  2. Faculty of Bus. Admin., Bilkent University, 06533 Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey; Tel

    Dilek Önkal-Atay

Authors
  1. Can Şımga-Mugan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dilek Önkal-Atay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Can Şımga-Mugan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Şımga-Mugan, C., Önkal-Atay, D. Contextual effects on ethical sensitivity and penalty judgments. Teaching Business Ethics 7, 341–363 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TEBE.0000005709.10098.65

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TEBE.0000005709.10098.65

Search

Navigation