Abstract
The observation that incompatibility with conscience initiates deployment of defense goes back to Freud's conceptualization of the “incompatible idea” put forward in Studies on Hysteria. In this view, consciousness itself, insofar as it gives rise to painful affect resulting from conflict with the conscience, is the cornerstone for dynamic thinking, first as regards repression of traumatic memory and later for dynamic thinking generally. Subsequent discoveries about the conscience tended to give rise to pars pro toto thinking in which the new discovery replaced rather than added to the basic notion of conscience. Such pars pro toto imbalance exists in full force in psychoanalytic thinking today: Modern conflict theory privileges the postoedipal retaliative aspect of the conscience, as Kleinian thinking does for the preoedipal projective aspects of retaliation. Neither conceptualizes shame adequately. Kohut appreciated the role of shame, but discarded the notion of incompatibility with the ego-ideal. The incompatible idea model still provides an all-inclusive model for conceptualizing the conscience in the context of intrapsychic conflict.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Brenner, C. (1982). The mind in conflict. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
Brenner, C. (1994). The mind as conflict and compromise formation. J. Clin. Psychoanal., 3, 473–485.
Brenner, C. (2002). Conflict, compromise formation, and structural theory. Psychoanal. Q., 71, 397–417.
Breuer J., and Freud, S. (1893-1895). Studies on hysteria. Standard edition 2. London: Hogarth.
Ellenberger, H. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious. New York: Basic Books.
Frankiel, R. (2000, December). Envy and the danger of difference. Paper presented at the midwinter meeting of the American Psychoanalytic Association Panel on Envy, “To have and have not: clinical treatment of envy,” New York.
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. Standard edition 4 and 5. London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on sexuality. Standard edition 7. London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1914). On narcissism: an introduction. Standard edition 14. London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1916). Some character types met with in psychoanalytic work. Standard edition 14. London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. Standard edition 18. London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. Standard edition 19. London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1924). The dissolution of the Oedipus complex. Standard edition 19. London: Hogarth, pp. 172–179.
Freud, S. (1925). Some psychical consequences of the anatomic distinction between the sexes. Standard edition 19. London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms, and anxiety. Standard edition 20. London: Hogarth.
Hartmann, H., and Lowenstein, R. (1962). Notes on the superego. Psychoanal. Study Child, 17, 42–81.
Hutson, P. (1996). The envy complex: Its recognition and analysis. In M. Goldberger (Ed.), Danger and defense (pp. 221–240). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
Jacobson, J. (1994). Signal affect and our psychoanalytic confusion of tongues. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc., 42, 15.
Kernberg, O. (1976). A psychoanalytic classification of character pathology. In Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis (pp. 139–160). New York: Aronson.
Kilborne, B. (2002). Disappearing persons: Shame and appearance. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Klein, M. (1933). The early development of conscience in the child. In S. Lorand (Ed.), Psychoanalysis today (pp. 149–162). New York: Covici-Friede.
Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
Kohut, H. (1972). Thoughts on narcissism and narcissistic rage. Psychoanal. Study Child, 27, 360–400.
Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.
Lansky, M. (1992). Fathers who fail. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
Lansky, M. (1995). Posttraumatic nightmares: Psychodynamic explorations. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
Lansky, M. (1997). Envy as process. In M. Lansky and A. P. Morrison (Eds.), The widening scope of shame (pp. 327–338). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
Lansky, M. (Unpublished). Trigger and screen. Unpublished manuscript.
Lansky, M. (in press). Conscience and the project of a psychoanalytic science of human nature: A clarification of the usefulness of the superego concept. Psychoanal. Inquiry.
Morrison, A. (1987). Shame: The underside of narcissism. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
Morrison A., Lansky, M. (1999, July). Shame and envy. Paper presented at the International Psychoanalytic Congress, Santiago, Chile.
Piers, G., and Singer, M. (1953). Shame and guilt. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Rangell, L. (1954). The psychology of poise-with special elaboration on the psychic significance of the snout or perioral region. Int. J. Psychoanal., 35, 313–333.
Rapaport, D. (1957). A theoretical analysis of the superego concept. In M. Gill, (Ed.), Collected Papers of David Rapaport (pp. 530–568). New York: Basic Books.
Retzinger, S. (1991). Violent emotions: Shame and rage in marital quarrels. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rothstein, A., and Tyson, P. (1985). Perspectives on the superego. (Panel Report.) J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc., 33, 217–231.
Scheff, T. (1990). Microsociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Scheff, T. (1993). Bloody revenge: Emotions, nationalism, and war. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Wurmser, L. (1981). The mask of shame. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wurmser, L. (2000). The power of the inner judge. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lansky, M.R. The “Incompatible Idea” Revisited: The Oft-Invisible Ego-Ideal and Shame Dynamics. Am J Psychoanal 63, 365–376 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TAJP.0000004741.67949.3f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TAJP.0000004741.67949.3f