Skip to main content

Oppressed by Shame: From Auschwitz to a Politics of Revolt

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Violence and Meaning
  • 274 Accesses

Abstract

As part of its rejection of the mind-body split, phenomenology rejects the idea that thought and affect are severed from each other. As lived bodies we are affective thinkers, emotionally attuned to and engaged with the world and others. Pursuing this phenomenological attention to affect, this chapter identifies shame as the affect through which the self confronts its vulnerable intersubjectivity. It examines the ways the vulnerability expressed in shame is woven into the structures of our cultural, social, political and moral lives. It distinguishes the ways that shame may become a force that critiques prevailing meanings and norms, from the ways it can be used to enforce structures of oppression. Auschwitz is not only the most extreme example of the oppressive violence of shame, it was, according to Giorgio Agamben, the experiment in violence that in creating a new type of human being, the Musselman, put the very meaning of the human into question. The testimonies of the Auschwitz survivors Primo Levy and Jean Améry link the fate of the Musselman to the violence that, in destroying their capacity for shame, condemned them to an unbearable isolation. Between the Musselman and Levi and Améry shame may be seen as a pharmakon that can be used to poison a person’s humanity or affirm it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    J. Lang (2010) disputes the argument that Auschwitz succeeded in dehumanizing its inmates. Where Douglas saw the impossibility of dehumanization from the perspective of the slaves’ insistence on their humanity, Lang looks at the dynamics of dehumanization from the perspective of the oppressors. Though he does not address the matter of the Musselman, he claims that preserving the humanity of the prisoners was essential to the Nazi’s sense of power.

  2. 2.

    See Ruth Leys’ From Guilt to Shame: Auschwitz and After for a detailed account of survivor shame.

  3. 3.

    Martin Niemoller’s poem “First They Came for the Communists” poignantly makes this point.

Bibliography

  • Agamben, G. (2016). The Use of Bodies (A. Kostko, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Améry, J. (1980). At the Mind’s Limit: Contemplations by a Survivor on Auschwitz and Its Realities (S. Rosenfeld & S. P. Rosenfeld, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergoffen, D. (2012). Contesting the Politics of Genocidal Rape: Affirming the Dignity of the Vulnerable Body. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendi, I. Y. (2016). Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America. New York: Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J. (2010). Questioning Dehumanization: Intersubjective Dimension of Violence in the Nazi Concentration and Death Camps. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 24(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, P. (1960). If This Is a Man: Remembering Auschwitz. New York: Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1990). Reflections on the Philosophy of Hitlerism, trans. Sean Hand. Critical Inquiry, 17(1, Autumn), 62–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (2003). On Escape (B. Bergo, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, R. (2007). From Guilt to Shame: Auschwitz and After. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukgaber, M. (2018). Philosophical Anthropology and the Interpersonal Theory of the Affect of Shame. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 49, 83–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1984). Being and Nothingness: A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1991). Nausea the Wall and Other Stories (L. Alexander, Trans.). New York: MJF Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra Bergoffen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bergoffen, D. (2019). Oppressed by Shame: From Auschwitz to a Politics of Revolt. In: Lauwaert, L., Smith, L., Sternad, C. (eds) Violence and Meaning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27173-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics