Abstract
As part of an ongoing research project we examined information-processing biases in forensic and nonforensic participants (n = 10 sex offenders, n = 10 violent offenders, n = 10 nonviolent offenders, and n = 13 undergraduates). A computerised version of the Stroop task demonstrated that offenders convicted of both sexual and violent offences were significantly slower than undergraduates to color-name words relating to sexual offending (with sex offenders demonstrating the greatest interference bias). Furthermore, processing bias was also evident for aggression words in violent offenders and violent sexual offenders but not in nonviolent sexual offenders. Specifically, paedophiles convicted of indecent assault presented different response profiles compared to heterosexual rapists. These findings suggest that tests that assess information processing bias for salient material may also prove useful as an assessment tool within forensic populations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barratt, E. S. (1959). Anxiety and impulsiveness related to psychomotor efficiency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 9, 191-198.
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, H., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459.
Cohen, D. J., Eckhardt, C. I., & Schagat, K. D. (1998). Attention allocation and habituation to anger-related stimuli during a visual search task. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 399-409.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.
Eckhardt, C. I., & Cohen, D. J. (1997). Attention to anger-relevant and irrelevant stimuli following naturalistic insult. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(4), 619-629.
Everaerd, W. (1995). Information processing approach and the sexual response in human studies. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), The pharmacology of sexual function and dysfunction: Proceedings of the Esteve Foundation Symposium VI (pp. 175-184). Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica.
Geer, J. H., Lapour, K. J., & Jackson, S. R. (1993). The information processing approach to human sexuality. In N. Birbaumer & A. öhman (Eds.), The structure of emotion: Psychophysiological, cognitive and clinical aspects (pp. 139-155). Toronto, Canada: Hogrefe-Huber.
Geer, J. H., & Melton, J. S. (1997). Sexual-content induced delay with double-entendre words. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 295-316.
Gudjonsson, G. H., & Sigurdsson, J. F. (2000). Differences and similarities between violent offenders and sexual offenders. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(3), 363-372.
Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M., & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic cognitive processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Towards an information-processing model of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8-23.
Marshall, W. L., Anderson, D., & Fernandez, Y. M. (1999). Cognitive behavioural treatment of sexual offenders. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). An integrated theory of sexual offending. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theory and treatment of the offender (pp. 257-275). New York: Plenum.
Marshall, W. L., & Serran, G. A. (2000). Current issues in the treatment and assessment of sexual offenders. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 7, 85-96.
Riemann, B. C., & McNally, R. J. (1995). Cognitive processing of personally relevant information. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 325-340.
Smith, P., & Waterman, M. (2003). Cognitive bias for aggression words in forensic and non-forensic samples. Cognition and Emotion, 17(5), 681-701.
Spielburger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., & Elzinga, B. (2002). Conscious processing of sexual information: Interference caused by sexual primes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31(2), 159-164.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
Todorov, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2002). Automatic sources of aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 53-68.
Van den Hout, M., & Barlow, D. (2000). Attention, arousal and expectancies in anxiety and sexual disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 241-256.
Van Honk, J., Tuiten, A., de Haan, E., Van den Hout, M., & Stam, H. (2001). Attentional biases for angry faces: relationships to trait anger and anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 15(3), 279-297.
Van Honk, J., Tuiten, A., Van den Hout, M., Putman, P., de Haan, E., & Stam, H. (2001). Selective attention to unmasked and masked threatening words: Relationships to trait anger and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 711-720.
Williams, J. M. G., Matthews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3-24.
Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and the emotional disorders (2nd ed). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, P., Waterman, M. Processing Bias for Sexual Material: The Emotional Stroop and Sexual Offenders. Sex Abuse 16, 163–171 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SEBU.0000023064.54397.d6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SEBU.0000023064.54397.d6