Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Hit and Run Research” with “Hit and Miss” Results in Early Childhood Science Education

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constructivism has provided us with a useful pedagogy and a powerful methodological framework for over twenty years. We now know a great deal about children's thinking. Can this research paradigm take us any further? Are we locked into a particular perspective about data gathering and categorising children's thinking? Have we tended to fit early childhood data into the 'accepted science education paradigm'? As early childhood researchers, we have found the wealth of research in science education research unable to provide solutions to some fundamental challenges we face when working with young children. This paper seeks to examine the established body of literature in science education research with a view to seeking out a more inclusive research approach to support early childhood science education. Examples of early childhood data within a range of contexts are presented to illustrate some of the challenges. Some of the issues that are raised may well be helpful to the field as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K., & Beasley, W. (1994). Students' learning in science lessons: Towards understanding the learning process. Research in Science Education, 24, 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (1989). Children's understanding of familiar astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 502–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Caffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: NAEYC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozhovich, L. I. (1977). The concept of cultural historical development of the mind and its prospects. Soviet Psychology, 16(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzzelli, C. A. (1996). The moral implications of teacher-child discourse in early childhood classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 515–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catherwood, D. (1994). Changing views on cognition in early childhood: Putting some sacred cows out to pasture. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 19(4), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W. (1996). Constructivism and non-western science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. T., & Fensham, P. J. (Eds.). (2000). Science and the citizen: For educators and the public. Melbourne Studies in Education Series. Melbourne, Australia: Arena Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. (1999a). Learning opportunities for young children with special needs. Early Education, 21(Spring/September), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. (1999b). Book review – Assessing children's experiences in early childhood final report to the Ministry of Education. Parts One and Two by Margaret Carr. Early Education, 19(Autumn), 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. (2000a). The early years. Conceptual issues and future challenges. New Zealand Research in Early Childhood Education, 3, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J. (2000b). Early intervention: An inclusive approach. In D. Fraser, R. Moltzen, & K. Ryba (Eds.). Learning with special needs in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 211–236). Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives. London, UK: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V., & Zinchenko, V. P. (1993). In H. Daniels, Charting the agenda. Educational activity after Vygotsky (pp. 93–106). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockett, S., & Fleer, M. (1999). Play and pedagogy. Bending the rules. Sydney, Australia: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, M. (1978). Engaging children's minds. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doverborg, E., & Pramling, I. (1993). To understand children's thinking: Methods for interviewing children. Göteborg, Sweden: University of Göteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2000). Research and practice: Is there a dialogue? In H. Penn (Ed.), Early childhood services: Theory, policy and practice (pp. 184–199). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetherston, T. (1999). Students' constructs about energy and constructivist learning. Research in Science Education, 29(4), 515–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (1991). Towards a theory of scaffolded early childhood science education. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 16(3), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (1992). From Piaget to Vygotsky: Moving into a new era of early childhood education. In B. Lambert (Ed.), Changing faces: The early childhood profession in Australia (pp. 134–149). Canberra, Australia: Australian Early Childhood Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (1995). Does cognition lead development or does development lead cognition? In M. Fleer (Ed.), DAP centrism: Challenging developmentally appropriate practice (pp. 10–22). Canberra, Australia: Australian Early Childhood Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (1996). Fusing the boundaries between home and child care to support children's scientific learning. Research in Science Education, 16(2), 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (1997). A cross-cultural study of rural Australian Aboriginal children's understanding of night and day. Research in Science Education, 27(1), 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (1999). Alternative views. Alternative to what? International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M., & Hardy, T. (1993). How can we find out what 3 and 4 year olds think?: New approaches to eliciting very young children's understandings in science. Research In Science Education, 23, 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M., & Hardy, T. (2001). Science for young children: Developing a personal approach to teaching. Sydney, Australia: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M., & Williams-Kennedy, D. (2002). Building bridges: Researching literacy development for young Indigenous children. Watson, Canberra, Australia: Australian Early Childhood Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, D. L. (1994). Handbook on research on science teaching and learning: A project of the national science teachers' association. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göncü, A. (Ed.). (1999). Children's engagement in the world. Sociocultural perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (1998). Teaching for understanding in pre-secondary science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, Part 1 (pp. 183–198). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helldén, G. (1999). Personal context and continuity of human thought; recurrent themes in a longitudinal study of pupils' understanding of scientific phenomena. In M. Komorek et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international conference of the European science education research association. Research in science education past, present, and future (Vol. 2, pp. 411–413). ESERA.

  • Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, A. C. (1996). Development of science concepts within Vygotskian framework, Science Education, 80(1), 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inagaki, K. (1992). Piagetian and post-Piagetian conceptions of development and their implications for science education in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W., & Swinerton, B. J. (1998). Junior school science education in England and Wales since 1900. From steps to stages. London: Woburn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. L., & Lynch, P. P. (1987). Children's conceptions of the earth, sun and moon. International Journal of Science Education,9(1), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B. (2001, April). Research and reality. Paper presented at the World Forum on Early Childhood Education and Development 2001, Athens, Greece.

  • Lambert, B., & Clyde, M. (2000). Re-thinking early childhood theory and practice. Melbourne, Australia: Social Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeds National Curriculum Science Support Project. (1992). Resources for supporting pupils' learning at key stage 3. Part 3 Materials and Properties. Leeds, UK: University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2001).Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont'ev, A. N. (1975). Deyatel'nost', soznanielichnost. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Politicheskoi Literaturi. Published in English as Activity, consciousness, personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1971). Towards the problem of the historical nature of psychological processes. International Journal of Psychology, 6(4), 259–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. H. (1996). Implications of differentiating and understanding constructivist approaches. Educational Psychologist, 3(3/4), 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (1993). Constructivism and science education: Some epistemological problems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2(1), 359–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination. Dordrecht, The Nertherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R. (1989). Constructive criticisms. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 587–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in schools. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a socioculturalmodel of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 791–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. F. (1996). Beyond constructivism. Science Education, 80(1), 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1979). Investigating student understanding of basic physics concepts using an Interview-About-Instances technique. Research in Science Education, 9, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1 & 2), 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1993). First-grade dialogues for knowledge acquisition and use. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning. Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 42–57). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, W. J. (1984). Interviewing children: Problems and promise. Journal of Negro Education, 53(1), 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1973). The child's conception of the world. St. Albans, UK: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahayu, S., & Tytler, R. (1999). Progression in primary school children's conceptions of burning: Toward an understanding of the concept of substance. Research in Science Education, 29(3), 295–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J. (2000a, January). 'It isn't raining on Wednesdays!': Young children's explanations of natural phenomena. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Conference of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, Canberra, Australia.

  • Robbins, J. (2000b, July, November). What's Mr. Whiskers got to do with the sun? The importance of finding out what children understand. In Department of Education, Employment and Training (Eds). High expectations: Outstanding achievements. Conference proceedings of the Early Years of Schooling P-4 Conference. A16.

  • Robbins, J. (2001, January). 'My mummy can tell me other things and I'll be able to tell you': Interviewing children to find out what they understand. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, Canberra, Australia.

  • Robbins, J. (2003). Moving through understanding rather than to understanding: A sociocultural perspective on young children's conceptions of the rain. Australian Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 10(1), 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In W. Damon (Chief Ed.), D. Kuhn, & R. S. Siegler (Volume Eds.), Cognition, perceptions and language. 5th Ed., Handbook of child psychology (pp. 679–744). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1997). From everyday science to science education: How science and technology studies inspired curriculum design and classroom research. Science and Education, 6, 373–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1998). Situated cognition and assessment of competence in science. Evaluation and Programming Planning, 21, 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, G., & Cosgrove, M. (1992). Challenging student teachers' conceptions of science and technology education. Research in Science Education, 22, 384–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B. (1998). Reading the furniture: The semiotic interpretation of science learning environments. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, Part 1 (pp. 609–622). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, M. (1997). Knowing children: Experiments in conversation and cognition, 2nd Ed. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamp, K. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching primary science constructively. Sydney, Australia: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. B. (1992). Early childhood educare: Seeking a theoretical framework in Vygotsky's work. International Journal of Early Years Learning, 1(1), 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. B. (1996). The early childhood curriculum from a sociocultural perspective. Early Child Development and Care, 115, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 23, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thijs, G., & van den Berg, E. (1994). Cultural factors in the origin and remediation of alternative conceptions in physics. Science and Education, 4, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P. (1999). Student restraints to reform: Conceptual change issues in enhancing students' learning processes. Research in Science Education, 29(1), 89–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2000). Deconstructing learning in science – Young children's responses to a classroom sequence on evaporation. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 339–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, M., & Roth, W.-M. (1998).Do interviews really assess students' knowledge? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V., Del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (Ed.). (1998). Cultural worlds of early childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinchenko, V. P. (2002, June). How Shpet's thinking contributes to Vygotskian elaborations. Paper presented at the Fifth Congress of the International Society for Cultural Research and Activity Theory, June 18–22, 2002, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, UK

    Marilyn Fleer & Jill Robbins

Authors
  1. Marilyn Fleer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jill Robbins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleer, M., Robbins, J. “Hit and Run Research” with “Hit and Miss” Results in Early Childhood Science Education. Research in Science Education 33, 405–431 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000005249.45909.93

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000005249.45909.93

Search

Navigation