Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Antimicrobial Activity Against Biofilm Bacteria

  • Published:
Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Standardization of methodology and interpretation has proved essential to scientific progress in studies of the activity of antimicrobial agents against planktonic bacteria. Current studies of antimicrobial activity against biofilm bacteria lack standardization of methodology. The principles applied to standardization of methods for planktonic bacteria can serve as a template in developing standards for studying biofilm bacteria. Such standards are essential to allow meaningful comparison between published studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison DG, Maria-Litran T & Gilbert P (2000) Antimicrobial resistance of biofilms. In: Evans LV (Ed) Biofilms: Recent Advances in Their Study and Control. (pp 149–166) Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar H & Costerton JW (1990) Enhanced activity of combination of tobramycin and piperacillin for eradication of sessile biofilm cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34(9): 1666–1671

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar H, Dasgupta M, Lam K & Costerton JW (1989) Tobramycin resistance of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm grown under iron limitation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 24(5): 647–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MR & Barker J (1999) Unexplored reservoirs of pathogenic bacteria: Protozoa and biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 7(1): 46–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MR & Williams P (1985) The influence of environment on envelope properties affecting survival of bacteria in infections. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 39: 527–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump JA, Barrett TJ Nelson JT & Angulo FJ (2003) Reevaluating fluoroquinolone breakpoints for Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi and for non-Typhi salmonellae. Clin. Infectious Dis. 37: 75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin J, Cormican M, Fleming G, Keelehan J & Colleran E (2003) Linezolid compared with eperezolid, vancomycin and gentamicin in an in vitro model of “antimicrobial lock ” Therapy for Staphylococcus epidermidis central venous catheter-related biofilm infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47(10): 3145–3148

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagostino L, Goodman AE & Marshall KC (1991) Physiological responses induced in bacteria adhering to surfaces. Biofouling 4: 113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Das JR, Bhakoo M, Jones MV & Gilbert P (1998) Changes in the biocide susceptibility of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli cells associated with rapid attachment to plastic surfaces. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84(5): 852–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood DC & Tempest DW (1972) Effects of environment on bacterial wall content and composition. Adv. Microbiol. Physiol. 7: 83–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara S, Miyake Y, Usui T & Suginaka H (1998) Effect of adherence on antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, and Proteus mirabilis. Hiroshima J. Med. Sci. 47(1): 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Gander S, Hayward K & Finch R (2002) An investigation of the antimicrobial effects of linezolid on bacterial biofilms utilizing an in vitro pharmacokinetic model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 49(2): 301–308

    Google Scholar 

  • George AM & Levy SB (1983) Amplifiable resistance to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and other antibiotics in Escherichia coli: Involvement of a non-plasmid-determined efflux of tetracycline. J. Bacteriol. 155(2): 531–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengge-Aronis R (1996) Regulation of gene expression during entry into stationary phase. In: Lin EC (Ed) Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology. (pp. 1497–1512) ASM Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma D, Cook DN, Alberti M, Pon NG, Nikaido H & Hearst JE (1993) Molecular cloning and characterization of acrA and acrE genes of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 175(19): 6299–6313

    Google Scholar 

  • Maira-Litran T, Allison DG & Gilbert P (2000) Expression of the multiple antibiotic resistance operon (mar) during growth of Escherichia coli as a biofilm. J. Appl. Microb. 88(2): 243–247

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod GI & Spector MP (1996) Starvation and stationary-phase-induced resistance to the antimicrobial peptide polymyxin B in Salmonella typhimurium is RpoS (σ S) independent and occurs through both phoP-dependent and-independent pathways. J. Bacteriol. 178(13): 3683–3688

    Google Scholar 

  • Monzon M, Oteiza C, Leiva J, Lamata M & Amorena B (2002) Biofilm testing of Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates: Low performance of vancomycin in relation to other antibiotics. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 44(4): 319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCLS (1999) National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents; Approved Guideline M26A, NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne Pennsylvania 19087–1898 USA

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCLS (2000) National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved Standard-Fifth Edition M7-A5, NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne Pennsylvania 19087–1898 USA

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCLS (2003) National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests; Approved Standard-Eight Edition M2-A8, NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne Pennsylvania 19087–1898 USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering SA, Bayston R & Scammell BE (2003) Electromagnetic augmentation of antibiotic efficacy in infection of orthopaedic implants. J. Bone. Joint. Surg. Br. 85(4): 588593

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom JM, De Grauw KJ, Gerritsen HC, Bradshaw DJ, Marsh PD, Watson GK, Birmingham JJ & Allison C (1999) Depth penetration and detection of pH gradients in biofilms by two-photon excitation microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65(8): 3502–3511

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods GL & Washington JA (1996) In vitro testing of antimicrobial agents. In: Henry JB (Ed) Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods 19th edn. (pp 1170–1182) W.B. Saunders, Philadephia

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang TC & Bishop PL (1996) Evaluation of substrate and pH effects in a nitrifying biofilm. Water Environ. Res. 68: 1107–1115

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curtin, J., Cormican, M. Measuring Antimicrobial Activity Against Biofilm Bacteria. Re/Views in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 2, 285–291 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040457.50864.d6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040457.50864.d6

Navigation