Skip to main content
Log in

Development Involvement and Property Share Performance: International Evidence

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper concerns the dilemma whether regulators should preclude tax-exempt property investment companies from engaging in property development activities. We analyze the economic effects of combinations of property investment and property development by looking at the performance of an international set of property investment companies with varying degrees of involvement in property development. We study the five most important listed property markets in the world: the United States, Hong Kong, Australia, the United Kingdom and France. We examine the extent to which property investment companies participate in development projects by dividing the book value of their development projects by total assets. These development ratios yield remarkable differences both within and across national samples, with national averages varying between 2.23 percent for the United States and 21.34 percent for our Hong Kong sample. Analysis of property share performance yields results that consistently indicate that the cluster of property companies most involved in development projects is associated with both the highest total return and the highest systematic risk. We also find a weak positive link between development involvement and the Jensen alpha of property shares. The statistical significance of this link varies by country, with strong results for Hong Kong and Australia and less compelling results for the United States, the United Kingdom and France. Besides analyzing the stock performance of the companies in our samples we also focus on their operational profitability. Again, we consistently find both the highest and most volatile performance for companies actively participating in property development projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brounen, D., P. M. A. Eichholtz, and P. Kanters. (2000). “The Effects of Property Development Activities on the Performance of REITs,” Real Estate Finance, 4, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capozza, D. R., and P. J. Seguin. (1999). “Focus, Transparency and Value: The REIT Evidence,” Real Estate Economics 27, 587–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. C., P. H. Hendershott, and A. B. Sanders. (1990). “Risk and Return on Real Estate: Evidence from Listed Equity Property Companies,” Real Estate Economics 18, 431–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, D. J., D. K. Denis, and A. Sarin. (1997). “Agency Problems, Equity Ownership, and Corporate Diversification,” Journal of Finance 52, 135–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichholtz, P. M. A., and R. Huisman. (2000). “The Cross Section of Global Property Share Returns.” In J. Brown and C. Liu (eds.), A Global Perspective on Real Estate Cycles. Kluwer Academic Press.

  • Eichholtz, P. M. A., H. Op 't Veld, and M. Schweitzer. (2000). “REIT Performance: Does Managerial Specialization Pay?” In P. Harker and S. Zenios (eds.), Performance of Financial Institutions. Cambridge University Press.

  • Grenadier, S. R. (1995). “The Persistence of Real Estate Cycles,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 10, 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1969). “Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets, and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios,” Journal of Business 42, 167–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, W. (1971). “A Pure Financial Rationale for the Conglomerate Merger,” Journal of Finance 26, 521–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, D. C., and A. Naranjo. (2002). “Commercial Real Estate Return Performance: A Cross-Country Analysis,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 24, 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, J. (1965). “The Valuation of Risky Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets,” Review of Economics and Statistics 47, 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litt, J., and J. P. Mei. (1999). “A Risk Adjustment Model for REIT Evaluation,” Real Estate Finance 15, 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1952). “Portfolio Selection,” Journal of Finance 7, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, C. A. (1994). “Corporate Diversification,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. (1976). “The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing,” Journal of Economic Theory 19, 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964). “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Condition of Risk,” Journal of Finance 19, 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F. (1966). “Mutual Fund Performance,” Journal of Business 39, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titman, S., and A. Warga. (1986). “Risk and the Performance of Real Estate Investment Trusts: A Multiple Index Approach,” AREUEA Journal 14, 414–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, J. F. (1970). “The Nature of Significance of Conglomerate Firms,” St. John's Law Review 44, 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, W. (1987). “The Cyclical Behavior of the National Office Market,” AREUEA Journal 15, 281–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • ULI Market Profiles. (1990-2000). Pacific Rim, Unites States and Europe. Urban Land Institute.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brounen, D., Eichholtz, P. Development Involvement and Property Share Performance: International Evidence. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 29, 79–97 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REAL.0000027202.57984.21

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REAL.0000027202.57984.21

Navigation