Skip to main content
Log in

Microbial biomass, respiration and diversity in ultramafic soils of West Dome, New Zealand

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultramafic soils are colonised by plant communities adapted to naturally elevated heavy metal content but it is not known whether soil microbial communities are similarly adapted to heavy metals. We measured microbial properties of six ultramafic soils that ranged in heavy metal content to test whether microbial diversity would decrease and respiratory quotient (microbial respiration:biomass) increase due to the stress imposed by increasing metal content. Soil samples were collected from beneath Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides tall forest, tall Leptospermum scoparium shrubland, open Leptospermum scoparium shrubland, an open Leptospermum scoparium shrubland with the rare ultramafic endemic Celmisia spedenii, a mixed divaricate shrubland, and a red tussock (Chionochloa rubra) grassland on the Dun Mountain Ophiolite belt, New Zealand. Samples were analysed for catabolic evenness using the catabolic response profile technique, microbial biomass, microbial respiration, and soil properties (pH, total carbon, total nitrogen, magnesium and total or extractable chromium and nickel). The sites differed in base saturation, pH and concentrations of metals, particularly magnesium, chromium and nickel, properties that are a major determinant of the plant communities that develop. Microbial biomass and respiration, catabolic evenness (range of 19.1 to 22.7) and the respiratory quotient were not correlated to any of the measured soil chemical properties. Factor analysis of the respiratory responses showed that the microbial communities under each vegetation type were distinct. The second factor extracted was correlated to total carbon (r 2=0.62, P<0.01), basal respiration (r 2=0.55, P<0.01) and microbial biomass (r 2=0.65, P<0.01). Increasing metals concentrations had no direct impact on microbial diversity, biomass, respiration or community energetics. However, we suggest that metal concentrations may have exerted an indirect effect on the structure of the microbial communities through control of the vegetation community and litter inputs of carbon to the soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggangan N S, Dell B and Malajczuk N 1998 Effects of chromium and nickel on growth of the ecomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus and the formation of ectomycorrhizas on Eucalyptus urophyllaS.T. Blake. Geoderma 84, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amir H and Pineau R 1998 Influence of plants and cropping on microbiological characteristics of some new Caledonian ultramafic soils. Aust. J. Soil Res. 36, 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett R D, Jones A C, Jones D L, Kemmitt S J, Cook R and Hobbs P J 2001 Soil microbial communities patterns related to the history and intensity of grazing in sub-montane ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1653–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore L C, Searle P L and Daly B K 1987 Methods for chemical analysis of soils. New Zealand Soil Bureau Scientific Report No 80, Lower Hutt.

  • Bossio D A, Scow K, Gunapala N, and Graham K 1998 Determinants of soil microbial communities: effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles. Microbial Ecol. 36, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degens B P and Harris J A 1997 Development of a physiological approach to measuring the metabolic diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 29, 1309–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degens B P, Schipper L A, Sparling G P and Vojvodic-Vukovic M 2000 Decreases in organic C reserves in soils can reduce the catabolic diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degens B P, Schipper L A, Sparling G P and Duncan L C 2001 Is the microbial community in a soil with reduced catabolic diversity less resistant to stress or disturbance? Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1143–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández S, Seoane S and Merino A 1999 Plant heavy metal concentrations and soil biological properties in agricultural serpentine soils. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 30, 1867–1884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller K E, Witter E and McGrath S P 1998 Toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and microbial processes in agricultural soils: A review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30, 1389–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair J F, Anderson R E, Tatham R L and Black W C 1995 Multivariate data analysis fourth edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandeler E, Kampicheler C and Horak O 1996 Influence of heavy metals on the functional diversity of soil microbial communities.Biol. Fertil. Soils 23, 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay W L and Norvell W A 1978 Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupwayi N Z, Rice W A and Claydon G W 1998 Soil microbial diversity and community structure under wheat as influenced by tillage and rotation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30, 1733–1741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran A E 1988 Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh P D and Lee W G 1986 Soil-vegetation relationships on the Dun Mountain ophiolite belt at West Dome, Southland, New Zealand. J. Royal Soc. NZ 4, 363–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M C, Paschke M W, McLendon T and Price D 1998. Decreases in soil microbial function and functional diversity in response to depleted uranium. J. Environ. Qual. 27, 1306–1311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro E, Jaffre T, Gauthier D, Gourbiere F, Rinaudo G, Simonet P and Normand P 1999 Distribution of Gymnostomaspp. microsymbiotic Frankiastrains in New Caledonia is related to soil type and to host-plant species. Mol. Ecol. 8, 1781–1788.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohtonen R, Fritze H, Pennanen T, Jumpponen A and Trappe J 1999 Ecosystem properties and microbial community changes in primary succession on a glacier forefront. Oecologia 119, 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennanen T 2001 Microbial communities in boreal coniferous forest humus exposed to heavy metals and changes in soil pH-A summary of the use of phospholipid fatty acids, Biolog® and 3H-thymidine incorporation methods in field studies. Geoderma 100, 91–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennanen T, Frostegård A, Fritze H and Bååth E 1996 Phospholipid fatty acid composition and heavy metal tolerance of soil microbial communities along two heavy metal-polluted gradients in coniferous forests. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 420–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber H H 1992 Simultaneous estimates of the diversity and the degradative capability of heavy-metal-affected soil bacterial communities. Biol. Fert. Soils 13, 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts B A and Proctor J 1992 The ecology of areas with serpentinized rocks-A world view. Kluwer Academic, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper L A, Degens B P, Sparling G P and Duncan L 2001 Changes in microbial heterotrophic diversity along five plant successional sequences. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 2093–2103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel H G, Cossen J-P and Baker A J M 1991 Nickelhyperaccumulating plants provide a niche for nickel-resistant bacteria. Botanical Acta 104, 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparling G P, Feltham C W, Reynolds J, West A W and Singleton P 1990 Estimation of soil microbial C by a fumigation-extraction method: Use on soils of high organic matter content, and a reassessment of the Kec-factor. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT Inc 1992 Systat for Windows: Statistics Version 5. Systat Inc., Evanston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle D A 2002 Communities and ecosystems: Linking the above ground and belowground components. Princeton University press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells N 1968 Element composition of soils and plants. InSoils of New Zealand Part 2. Ed. J Luke. pp. 115–122.N.Z. Soil Bureau, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schipper, L., Lee, W. Microbial biomass, respiration and diversity in ultramafic soils of West Dome, New Zealand. Plant and Soil 262, 151–158 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000037027.56794.08

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000037027.56794.08

Navigation