Skip to main content
Log in

For-adverbials, Frequentative Aspect, and Pluractionality

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I develop a novel interval-based approach to some well-known semantic puzzles related to aspect shift, in particular, to the interaction of for-adverbials with accomplishment and achievement verbs that take indefinite, bare plural, and mass noun complements. My approach is based on the insight that implicit frequentative aspect plays a central role in this interaction, a fact that was largely ignored in previous analyses. Specifically, I interpret frequentative aspect as an abstract verb-level pluractional operator that brings about aspect shift and that is responsible for the distribution of subevent times and subevent participants over the event time of an atelic sentence. What Zucchi and White (2001) call "the aspectual effect of frequency adverbs" thus becomes the general rule for all frequentatively understood for-adverbial sentences. Linguistic support for silent verb-level frequentativity in English is drawn from overt frequentative aspect marking in West Greenlandic verbs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach, E.: 1986, ‘The Algebra of Events’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-el, L.: 2001, ‘Plurality in Squamish Salish: A Look at Reduplication’, in J. Kim and A. Wehrle (eds.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Semantics of Under-represented Languages of the Americas, pp. 1–7. GSLA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. and B. Partee: 1978, Towards the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M.: 1987, ‘On the Semantics of the Greenlandic Antipassive and Related Constructions’, International Journal of American Linguistics 53, 194–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, M.: 1988, Canonical and Noncanonical Argument Expressions, PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

  • Bittner, M.: 1995, ‘Quantification in Eskimo: A Challenge for Compositional Semantics’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 59–80. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. N.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.: 1999, ‘Generics, Frequency Adverbs, and Probability’, Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 221–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C.: 2001, ‘Aspects of Plurality in ±Hoan’, Language 77, 456–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusic, D.: 1981, Verbal Plurality and Aspect, PhD dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Dahl, Ø.: 1985, Tense and Aspect Systems. Blackwel1, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D.: 1979, Word Meaning in Montague Grammar. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortescue, M.: 1984, West Greenlandic. Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golovko, E. V.: 1997, ‘Iterativity in Aleut’, in V. S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of Iterative Constructions, pp. 69–91. Lincom Europa, Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruzdeva, E.: 1997, ‘Plurality of Situations in Nivkh’, in V. S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of Iterative Constructions, pp. 164–188. Lincom Europa, Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: 1989, ‘Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution, and Quantification in Event Semantics’, in R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem and P. van Emde-Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions, pp. 75–115. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: 1992, ‘Thematic Roles as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution’, in I. A. Sag and A. Szabolsci (eds.), pp. 29–53. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, P.: 1995, Plurality, Conjunction, and Events. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, P.: 1998, ‘Generalized Distributivity Operators’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice Theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, pp. 303–323. De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: 1987, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Plurals’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, pp. 151–180. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittwoch, A.: 1991, ‘In Defence of Vendler's Achievements’, Journal of Linguistics 6, 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, F.: 1991, ‘Measure Adverbials’, Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 629–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedjalkov, V. P., I. A. Muravjova, and V. G. Raxtilin: 1997, ‘Plurality of Situations in Chukchee’, in V. S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of Iterative Constructions, pp. 310–330. Lincom Europa, Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C.: 1987, Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stechow, A. von: 1996, ‘The Different Readings of Wieder ‘Again’: A Structural Account’, Journal of Semantics 13, 87–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G.: 1981, ‘The Interpretation of Frequency Adjectives’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 629–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G.: 1985, The Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, H. de: 1991, Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach, PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

  • Van Geenhoven, V.: 1998, Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Geenhoven, V.: 2000, ‘Pro Properties, Contra Generalized Kinds’, in B. Jackson and T. Matthews (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 10, pp. 221–238. CLC Publications, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Geenhoven, V.: 2003, ‘The Semantic Diversity of Characterizing Sentences’, in P. Dekker and R. van Rooy (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 211–216. ILLC, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Geenhoven, V.: to appear, ‘Atelicity, Pluractionality, and Adverbial Quantification’, in H. Verkuyl, A. van Hout and H. de Swart (eds.), Perspectives on Aspect. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

  • Vendler, Z.: 1967, Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H.: 1972, On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlach, F.: 1993, ‘Temporal Adverbials, Tenses and the Perfect’, Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 231–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xrakovskij, V. S. (ed.): 1997, Typology of Iterative Constructions. Lincom Europa, Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, M.: 2000, ‘Pluractional Quantifiers: The Occasional-Construction in English and German’, in B. Jackson and T. Matthews (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 10, pp. 290–306. CLC Publications, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucchi, A. and M. White: 2001, ‘Twigs, Sequences, and the Temporal Constitution of Predicates’, Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 223–270.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Geenhoven, V. For-adverbials, Frequentative Aspect, and Pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics 12, 135–190 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALS.0000031389.36427.af

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALS.0000031389.36427.af

Keywords

Navigation