Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Cognitive Complexity of the Referent and Self-Regulation in Children's Messages

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nature of the message used by children, 4 1/2 and 6 1/2 year-old, was studied in a spatial description task. Speaker and listener were separated from one another by an opaque screen, and had to exchange information. Speaker were asked to describe a board showing eight objects placed in a room, and listeners were instructed to draw a similar picture on the basis of this description. The analysis of the message focused on the description of the object and the expression of spatial location. The results indicated the cognitive difficulty involved in having to distinguish referents according to the attribute and the use of grouping strategies. Although children's overall performance improved with age, the older group presented more messages of low informative quality related to objects that did not have a specific spatial frame of reference. These last results are discussed in terms of private speech that emerge when subjects' linguistic ability is insufficient to organise a complex cognitive situation. It appears that the cognitive features of the message play an important role both in the denotation of the referent and its spatial location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boada, H. (1999). The cognitive complexity of referent in children messages, Poster at Vth European Conference on Psychological Assessment. Patras. Greece. August 25 to 29.

  2. Boada, H., & Forns, M. (1997). Observational guidelines of communicative exchange: An ecological approach to referential communication. Anuario de Psicología, 75, 7-36.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boada, H., & Forns, M. (1999). “Comunicación referencial ecológica: Categorías comunicativas y datos empíricos”. En T. Anguera (Ed.), Observación de la conducta en contextos naturals (pp. 51-57). Barcelona: PPU.

  4. Bowerman, M. 1989. Learning a semantic system: What role do cognitive predispositions play? In M.L. Rice, & R. L. Schiefelbuch (Eds.), The Teachability of Languages(pp. 133-169).Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Camaioni, L., Ercolani, A. P., & Lloyd, P. (1998). The development of referential communication: Learning to speak and learning to process verbal information are not the same thing. Current Psychology of Cognition, 17(1), 3-30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carlson-Raadvansky, L. A., & Logan, G. D. (1997). The influence of reference frame selection on spatial template construction. Journal of Memory and language, 37, 411-437.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coventry. (1998). Spatial prepositions, Functional relations and lexical specification. In P. Olivier, & K. P. Gapp (Ed.), Representation and Processing of Spatial Expressions (pp. 247-263).Mahwah, New Jersey: LEA.

  8. Craton, L. G., Elicker, J., Plumert, J. M., & Pick, H. L. Jr. (1990). Children's use of frames of reference in communication of spatial location. Child development, 61, 1528-1543.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dickson, P. W. (1981). Introduction: Toward an interdisciplinary conception of children's communication abilities. In P. W. Dickson (Ed.), Children's Oral Communication Skills(pp. 1-10).New Academic Press.

  10. Donalson, M. (1978). Children's Minds. New York: Norton

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duncan, R. M., & Cheyne, J. A. (2002). Private speech in young adults Task difficulty, self-regulation, and psychological predication. Cognitive Development, 16, 889-906.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Forns, M., & Boada, H. (1997). Estudi longitudinal de la reestructuració del missatge en nens bilingües i monolingües dins d'un programa escolar d'immersió lingüística. Anuario de Psicolog ía, 75, 77-93.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Forns, M., Boada, H., & Martínez, M. (1998). The ability of monolingual and bilingual pre-school children to restructure messages. In J. Arnau, & M. Artigal (Eds.), Immersion Programmes: A European Perspective. Barcelona: University of Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1986). Private speech and self-regulation: A commentary of Frauenglass and Diez. Developmental Psychology, 22(5), 706-708.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Glucksberg, S., & Krauss, R. M. (1967). What do people say after they have learned how to talk? Studies of the development of referential communication. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 13, 309-316.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goudena, P. P. (1992). The problem of abbreviation and internalization of private speech. In R. M. Diaz, & L. E. Berk (Eds.), Private Speech. From Social Interaction to Self-regulation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krauss, R. M., & Glucksberg, S. (1969). The development of communication competence as a function of age. Child development, 40, 255-266.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989).Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lidster, W., & Bremmer, G. (1999). Interpretation and construction of co-ordinate dimensions by 4-to 5-year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 189-201.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lloyd, P., Boada, H., & Forns, M. (1992). New directions in referential communication research. British Journal of Development Psychology, 10, 385-403.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McCarthy, D. (1983). Escalas de McCarthy de aptitudes y Psicomotricidad para niños. T.E.A.: Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1948).La répresentation de l'espace chez l'enfant.P.U.F: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Piaget, J.Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1948).La géometrie spontanée de l'enfant.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Plumert, J. M., Ewert, K., & Spear, S. J. (1995). The early development of children's communication about nested spatial relations. Child Development, 66, 959-969.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Plumert, J. M., Pick, H. L., Marks, R. A., Kintsch, A. S., & Wegesin, D. (1994). Locating objects and communicating about locations: Organizational differences in children's searching and direction-giving. Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 443-453.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (original work published in 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vygotsky, L. S. 1987. Thinking and speech. In R. Rieber, & A. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of General Psychology (pp. 39-285). New York: Plenun Press (original work published in 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yule, G.(1997). Referential Communication Tasks. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Spain

    Humbert Boada & Maria Forns

Authors
  1. Humbert Boada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Forns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Humbert Boada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boada, H., Forns, M. The Cognitive Complexity of the Referent and Self-Regulation in Children's Messages. J Psycholinguist Res 33, 237–261 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPR.0000027964.51244.d8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPR.0000027964.51244.d8

Search

Navigation