Abstract
The evidence shows that human primates become (relatively) rational actors . Using a distributed perspective, we identify aspects of human agency that raise important questions for sociocognitive science . In humans, we argue, agency does not centre on individual agents . Cognitive, social and linguistic outcomes depend on skills in moving in and out of aggregates that bind people, artifacts , language and institutions. While recognising the value of symbol processing models, these presuppose the embodied events of human symbol grounding . At a micro level, humans coordinate with others and the world to self-construct by cognising, talking and orienting to social affordances . We trace the necessary skills to sense-saturated coordination or interactivity . As a result of perceiving and acting on the environment , human individuals use the artificial to extend their natural powers. By using verbal patterns , artifacts and institutions , we become imperfect rational actors whose lives span the micro and the macro worlds.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Adults sing, converse, read books, discover new media, and are fooled by advertisements: wordings appear in dreams and silent thoughts. While not languaging, this is also what Love (2004) calls first-order language. In all of these activities formal patterns can be said to constrain expressive dynamics.
- 3.
Here a symbol can be defined as a cultural constraint that serves in taking the measure or others and/or in controlling one’s behaviour: many symbols are prosodic, gestural or enact what Goffman (1959) calls the interaction order.
- 4.
There is no clear evidence of when this occurs: however, there is abundant evidence that it is based on the skill of making and tracking phonetic gestures (Fowler and Rosenblum 1991; Fowler 2010). Further, since it is necessary to pretending it is likely that children begin to have the necessary experience in the second half of the second year.
- 5.
Wegner and Sparrow (2007) use experimental work to trace the social and bodily complexity of co-action—and its deep links with our sense of agency.
- 6.
One of the most remarkable facts about robots is that, already, they use human consciousness: this is exemplified, for example, when they learn to discriminate what we—but not they—see as colours; accordingly, it can be argued that robots are of importance as linguistic informants (Cowley 2008).
- 7.
This depends on the observer’s point of view: in many respects, Kanzi remains distinctly a bonobo.
References
Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition. Artificial Intelligence, 149, 91–130.
Bateson, M. C. (1971). The interpersonal context of infant vocalization. Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics, 100, 170–176.
Bickhard, M. (2007). Language as an interaction system. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 171–187.
Boudon, R. (1981). The logic of social action: An introduction to sociological analysis. London: Routledge.
Bråten, S. (2007). Altercentric infants and adults: On the origins and manifestations of participant perception of others’ acts and utterances. In S. Bråten (Ed.), On being moved: From mirror neurons to empathy (pp. 111–135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York: WW Norton Press.
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap.
Cowley, S. J. (2007a). How human infants deal with symbol grounding. Interaction Studies, 8, 81–104.
Cowley, S. J. (2007b). The cradle of language: Making sense of bodily connections. In D. Moyal-Sharrock (Ed.), Perspicuous presentations: Essays on Wittgenstein’s philosophy of psychology (pp. 278–298). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
Cowley, S. J. (2007c). Cognitive dynamics and distributed language. Language Sciences, 29, 575–583.
Cowley, S. J. (2008). Robots: The new linguistic informants? Connection Science, 20, 359–369.
Cowley, S. J. (2009). Language flow: Opening the subject. Cognitive Semiotics, 4, 64–92.
Cowley, S. J. (2011a). Distributed language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cowley, S. J. (2011b). Taking a language stance. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 185–209.
Cowley, S. J. (in press). Naturalizing language: Human appraisal and technology. AI & Society.
Cowley, S. J., Moodley, S., & Fiori-Cowley, A. (2004). Grounding signs of culture: Primary intersubjectivity in social semiosis. Mind, Culture and Activity, 11, 109–132.
Cowley, S. J., & MacDorman, K. F. (2006). What baboons, babies and tetris players tell us about interaction: A biosocial view of norm-based social learning. Connection Science, 18, 363–378.
Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cronin, B. (2004). Bowling alone together: Academic writing as distributed cognition. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 557–560.
Davies, K. (1949). Human society. New York: Macmillan.
Davidson, D. (1997). Seeing through language. Royal Institute of Philosophy, Supplement, 42, 15–28.
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 27–51.
DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mother’s voices. Science, 208, 1174–1176.
DeCasper, A. J., & Spence, M. (1986). Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns’ perception of speech sounds. Infant, Behavior and Development, 9, 133–150.
Di Paolo, E. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 429–452.
Durkheim, E. (1895[1998]). Rules of sociological method. Basingston: Macmillan.
Fowler, C. A., & Rosenblum, L. D. (1991). The perception of phonetic gestures. In I. G. Mattingly & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception (pp. 33–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fowler, C. A. (2010). Embodied, embedded language use. Ecological Psychology, 22, 286–303.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
Harnard, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D. Nonlinear phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346.
Harris, R. (1981). The language myth. Oxford: Duckworth.
Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodges, B. (2007). Good prospects: Ecological and social perspectives on conforming, creating and caring in conversation. Language Sciences, 29, 584–604.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Järvilehto, T. (1998). The theory of the organism-environment system: I. Description of the theory. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 33, 321–334.
Järvilehto, T., Nurkkala, V. M., & Koskela, K. (2009). The role of anticipation in reading. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17, 509–526.
Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.
Kravchenko, A. (2007). Essential properties of language: Why language is not a digital code. Language Sciences, 29, 621–650.
Linell, P. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. London: Routledge.
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte NC: Information Age Publishing.
Locke, J. (1690/1975). An essay concerning human understanding. In P. H. Niddich (Eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26, 525–544.
MacDorman, K. (2007). Life after the symbol system metaphor. Interaction Studies, 18, 143–158.
Maturana, H. R. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In G. A. Miller & E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of eric lenneberg (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
Melser, D. (2004). The act of thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2009). Symbols as constraints: The structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17, 653–676.
Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, D. (2007). H. sapiens as ecologically special: What does language contribute? Language Sciences, 16, 710–731.
Pattee, H. H. (1969). How does a molecule become a message? Developmental Biology Supplement, 3, 1–16.
Pattee, H. H. (1997). The physics of symbols and the evolution of semiotic controls”. In Proceedings from the Workshop on Control Mechanisms for Complex Systems: Issues of Measurement and Semiotic Analysis. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley.
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.
Port, R. (2010). Rich memory and distributed phonology. Language Sciences, 32, 43–55.
Raguso, R., & Willis, M. (2002). Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naïve hawkmoths Manduca Sexta. Animal Behavior, 64, 685–695.
Savage-Rumbaugh, S. E., Shanker, S. G., & Taylor, T. J. (1998). Apes, language and the human mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sigtryggsdóttir, T. (2007). Guiding attention leads to changes in child’s manifest practical understanding. Unpublished dissertation, University of Hertfordshire.
Spiekermann, K. (2013). Judgement aggregation and distributed thinking. In S.J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition Beyond the Brain (pp. 31–51) (First edition). London: Springer.
Steffensen, S. V. (2011). Beyond mind: An extended ecology of languaging. In S. J. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 185–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stern, D. N. (1971). A micro-analysis of mother-infant interaction: Behaviors regulating social contact between a mother and her three-and-a-half-month-old twins. Journal of American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 10, 501–517.
Stuart, S. A. J. (2012). Enkinaesthesia: The essential sensuous background for co-agency. In Z. Radman (Ed.), The background: Knowing without thinking (pp. 167–186). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive Science. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed Language view. Ecological Psychology, 23, 210–245.
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind and life: Biology, phenomenology and the sciences of mind. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tønsberg, G. H., & Hauge, T. S. (1996). The musical nature of prelinguistic interaction. The temporal structure and organization in co-created interaction with congenital deaf-blinds. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 5, 63–75.
Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and co-operation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (Ed.), Before speech (pp. 321–347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trevarthen, C., & Hubley, P. (1978). Secondary intersubjectivity: Confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year. In A. Lock (Ed.), Action, gesture, and symbol (pp. 183–229). New York: Academic Press.
Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 3–48.
Wenger, D., & Sparrow, B. (2007). The puzzle of coaction. In D. Ross, D. Spurrett, H. Kinkaid, & L. G. Stephens (Eds.), Distributed cognition and the will (pp. 17–41). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Willems, R., & Hagoort, P. (2007). Neural evidence and the interplay between language, gesture and action: A review. Brain and Language, 101, 278–289.
Wittgenstein, L. W. (1958). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed.). Blackwell: Oxford.
Acknowledgements
Martin Neumann’s contribution was undertaken within the Project ‘Emergence in the Loop’ (EmiL: IST-033841) funded by the Future and Emerging Technologies programme of the European Commission, in the framework of the initiative “Simulating Emergent Properties in Complex Systems”. Stephen Cowley’s draws much on the opportunity to contribute to a programme of scientific workshops on Agency and languaging (2010–2012) that were organized by the University of Jyväskylä (and sponsored by the Finnish Ministry of Culture).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neumann, M., Cowley, S.J. (2017). Human Agency and the Resources of Reason. In: Cowley, S., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (eds) Cognition Beyond the Brain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49114-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49115-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)