Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Species-Specificity of Chemical Signals: Silk Source Affects Discrimination in a Wolf Spider (Araneae: Lycosidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Female spiders deposit chemical cues that elicit male courtship behavior with silk. These cues are often assumed to be species-specific although male spiders may court in response to chemical cues of closely-related species. We used behavioral assays to test the extent of species discrimination of female chemical cues by male Schizocosa ocreata, a wolf spider (Lycosidae). Discrimination, expressed as relative courtship intensity of males, varied significantly with phylogenetic distance. Males did not discriminate between female cues of conspecifics and a sibling species, S. rovneri. Courtship response was intermediate for another species within the ocreata clade and not different from control for spiders outside the clade. These findings support the sibling species status of S. ocreata and S. rovneri, and also suggest the composition of female chemical signals is conserved across closely related wolf spider species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aspey, W. P. (1976). Wolf spider sociobiology: I. Agonistic display and dominance-subordinance relationships in adult male Schizocosa crassipes. Behaviour 62: 102–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyagari, L. R., and Tietjen, W. J. (1987). Preliminary isolation of male-inhibitory pheromone of the spider Schizocosa ocreata (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 13: 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. G. (2002). tiA Spider's World: Senses and Behavior, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.

  • Blanke, R. (1973). Nachweis von pheromonen bei netzspinnen. Die Naturwissenschaften 60: 481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. W., and Vehrencamp, S. L. (1998). tiPrinciples of Animal Communication, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

  • Coddington, J. A., and Levi, H. W. (1991). Systematics and evolution of spiders (Araneae). Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22: 565–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, F. G., and Capocasale, R. M. (1984). Lycocsa carbonelli, sp. nov.: una etoespecie simpatrida, sibilina de Lycosa thorelli (Keyserling) (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol. 11: 423–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, F. G., Viera, C., and Francescoli, G. (2000). Acomparative study of sexual behavior in two synmorphic species of the genus Lycosa (Araneae, Lycosidae) and their hybrid progeny. J. Arachnol. 28: 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, J. (1949). Comparative biology of salticid spiders at Rancho Grande, Venezuela, part IV. an analysis of display. Zoologica 34: 159–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1970). tiGenetics of the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.

  • Dondale, C. D., and Redner, J. H. (1990). tiThe Insects and Arachnids of Canada Part 17: The Wolf Spiders, Nurseryweb Spiders, and Lynx Spiders of Canada and Alaska Araneae: Lycosidae, Pisauridae, and Oxyopidae, Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

  • Foelix, R. F. (1996.) Biology of Spiders, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, K. F., and Yeargan, K. V. (1999). Exploitation of intraspecific communication systems: Illicit signalers and receivers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 92: 960–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegdekar, B. M., and Dondale, C. D. (1969). A contact sex pheromone and some response parameters in lycosid spiders. Can. J. Zool. 47: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R. (1987). Comparative study of releaser pheromones associated with silk of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). N. Z. J. Zool. 14: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. R., Clark, R. J., and Harland, D. P. (2002). Behavioural and cognitive influences of kairomones on an araneophagic jumping spider. Behaviour 139: 749–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaston, B. J. (1936). The senses involved in the courtship of some vagabond spiders. Entomol. Am. 16: 97–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, W. J., and Uetz, G. W. (1996). Female choice and pre-existing bias: Visual cues during courtship in two Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim. Behav. 52: 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. L., Stratton, G. E., Miller, P. R., and Hebets, E. (1998). Geographic variation in male courtship behaviour and sexual isolation in wolf spiders of the genus Schizocosa. Anim. Behav. 56: 937–951.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita, T., and Hayashi, H. (1996). Volatile chemical cue elicits mating behavior of cohabiting males of Nephila clavata (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J. Arachnol. 24: 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, C. D. (1982). Sex pheromones in two orbweaving spiders, (Araneae, Araneidae): An experimental field study. J. Arachnol. 10: 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papke, M. D., Riechert, S. E., and Schulz, S. (2001). An airborne female pheromone associated with male attraction and courtship in a desert spider. Anim. Behav. 61: 877–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons, M. H., and Uetz, G. W. (1996). Wolf spiders vary patch residence time in the presence of chemical cues from prey (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol. 24: 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons, M. H., Walker, S. E., and Rypstra, A. L. (2002). Fitness costs and benefits of antipredator behavior mediated by chemotactile cues in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behav. Ecol. 13: 386–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persons, M. H., Walker, S. E., Rypstra, A. L., and Marshall, S. D. (2001). Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim. Behav. 61: 43–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, S. D., Macnab, A. M., and Jackson, R. R. (1987). Communication with chemicals: Pheromones and spiders. In Nentwig, W. (ed.), Ecophysilogy of Spiders, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prouvost, O., Trabalon, M., Papke, M., and Schulz, S. (1999). Contact sex signals on web and cuticle of Tegenaria atrica (Araneae, Agelenidae). Arc. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 40: 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punzo, F., and Kukoyi, O. (1997). The effects of prey chemical cues on patch residence time in the wolf spider Trochosa parthenus (Chamberlin) (Lycosidae) and the lynx spider Oxyopes salticus Hentz (Oxyopidae). Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc. 10: 323–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, C. J. J., Stolting, H. C. J., and Vlijm, L. (1971). Silk production in adult females of the wolf spider Pardosa amentata (Lycosidae, Araneae). J. Zool., Lond. 165: 285–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert, S. E., and Singer, F. D. (1995). Investigation of potential male mate choice in a monogamous spider. Anim. Behav. 49: 715–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. H. (1982). Courtship and mating in spiders. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 27: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K., and Smith, R. L. (1979). Aspects of the courtship behavior of the black widow spider, Latrodectus hesperus (Araneae: Theridiidae), with evidence for the existence of a contact sex pheromone. J. Arachnol. 7: 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovner, J. S. (1968). An analysis of display in the lycosid spider Lycosa rabida Walckenaer. Anim. Behav. 16: 358–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, S., and Toft, S. (1993). Identification of a sex pheromone from a spider. Science 260: 1635–1637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searcy, L. E., Rypstra, A. L., and Persons, M. H. (1999). Airborne chemical communication in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina. J. Chem. Ecol. 25: 2527–2533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, J. P. (1995). Multiple hypothesis testing. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 46: 561–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, G. E., and Uetz, G. W. (1981). Acoustic communication and reproductive isolation in two species of wolf spiders. Science 214: 575–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, G. E., and Uetz, G. W. (1986). The inheritance of courtship behavior and its role as a reproductive isolating mechanism in two species of Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Evolution 40: 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, G. E., Hebets, E. A., Miller, P. R., and Miller, G. L. (1996). Pattern and duration of copulation in wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol. 24: 186–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, M. K., Tumlinson, J. H., and Heath, R. R. (1987). Chemical mimicry: Bolas spiders emit components of moth prey species sex pheromones. Science 236: 964–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, R. B., and Hirscheimer, A. J. (1986). Multiple web-borne pheromones in a spider Frontinella pyramitela (Araneae: Linyphiidae). Anim. Behav. 34: 748–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, R. B., and Renkes, G. (1982). Linyphiid spider courtship: Releaser and attractant functions of a contact sex pheromone. Anim. Behav. 30: 714–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, R. B., Shane, C. M., and Hirscheimer, A. J. (1987). Communication by cuticular pheromones in a linyphiid spider. J. Arachnol. 15: 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, R. B., Shane, C. M., and Hirscheimer, A. J. (1989). Spider vs, spider: Frontinella pyramitela detects Argyrodes trigonum via cuticular chemicals. J. Arachnol. 17: 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietjen, W. J. (1977). Dragline-following by male lycosid spiders. Psyche 84: 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietjen, W. J., and Rovner, J. S. (1980). Trail-following behavior in two species of wolf spiders: Sensory and etho-ecological concomitants. Anim. Behav. 28: 735–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietjen, W. J., and Rovner, J. S. (1982). Chemical communication in lycosids and other spiders. In Witt, P. N., and Rovner, J. S. (eds.), Spider Communication Mechanisms and Ecological Significance, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 249–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trabalon, M., Bagneres, A. G., and Roland, C. (1997). Contact sex signals in two sympatric spider species, Tegenaria domestica and Tegenaria pagana. J. Chem. Ecol. 23: 747–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz, G. W. (2000). Signals and multi-modal signaling in spider communication. In Espmark, Y., Amundsen, T., and Rosenqvist, G. (eds.), Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in Animal Communication, Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, pp. 387–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz, G. W., and Denterlein, G. (1979). Courtship behavior, habitat, and reproductive isolation in Schizocosa rovneri Uetz and Dondale (Araneae: Lycosidae). J. Arachnol. 7: 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz, G. W., and Roberts, J. A. (2002). Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: Insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain Behav. Evol. 59: 222–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weygoldt, P. (1977). Communication in crustaceans and arachnids. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), How Animals Communicate, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 303–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, D. L., and Chen, B. (1999). Impact of intraguild predators on survival of a forest-floor wolf spider. Oecologia 121: 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, T. D. (2003). tiPheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221-0006

    J. Andrew Roberts & George W. Uetz

Authors
  1. J. Andrew Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. George W. Uetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, J.A., Uetz, G.W. Species-Specificity of Chemical Signals: Silk Source Affects Discrimination in a Wolf Spider (Araneae: Lycosidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 17, 477–491 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000042536.06225.53

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000042536.06225.53

Search

Navigation