Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of an ecological and a standardized vocational assessment on Office of Vocational Rehabilitation (OVR) counselors' perceptions of individuals with developmental disabilities. One hundred and forty-one OVR counselors with experience in making funding decisions were randomly assigned to read either an ecological or a standardized vocational assessment report on an individual with developmental disabilities. Each group (ecological or standardized) then responded to 3 items on a questionnaire regarding job coach funding approval, time required for training, and employment outcome for the individual with disabilities. No statistically significant differences were found between groups with respect to job coach funding decisions. In contrast, significant differences between the 2 groups indicated that OVR counselors in the ecological assessment group perceived the individual with disabilities to need less training time, and to be more likely to remain on the job after job coaching was terminated than those in the standardized assessment group. Implications in terms of OVR funding decisions and directions for research are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Allinder, R. M., and Siegel, E. (1999). “Who is Brad?” Preservice teacher's perceptions of summarizing assessment information about a student with moderate disabilities. Educ. Train. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. 34(2): 157–169.
Anthony, W. A., and Jansen, M. A. (1984). Predicting the vocational capacity of the chronically mentally ill. Am. Psychol. 39(5): 537–544.
Barcus, J., Wehman, P., Moon, M., Brooke, V., Gondola, P., and Everson, J. (1988). Design and implementation of a short term in service training program for supported employment service providers. Rehabil. Educ. 2: 17–33.
Berven, N. L. (1984). Assessment practices in rehabilitation counseling. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 15(3): 9–14.
Bitter, J. A. (1967). Using employer job sites in evaluation of the mentally retarded for employability. Ment. Retard. 5(3): 21–23.
Bordieri, J. E., and Thomas, D. (1986). Facility based services purchased by state vocational rehabilitation agencies. Vocat. Eval. Work Adjust. Bull. 19: 134–138.
Botterbusch, K. F. (1987). Vocational Assessment and Evaluation Systems: A Comparison, University of Wisconsin — Stout, Stout Vocational Rehabilitation Institute, Material Development Center, Menomonie.
Browder, D. M. (1991). Assessment of Individuals With Severe Disabilities, 2nd edn., Brookes, Baltimore.
Browder, D. M. (2001). Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and severe disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Catson, H. L., and Watson, A. L. (1990). Vocational assessment and rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 34(1): 61–66.
Clark, G. M. (1996). Transition planning assessment for secondary-level students with learning disabilities. J. Learn. Disabil. 29(1): 79–92.
Cole, K. N., Swisher, V., Thompson, M. D., and Fewell, R. R. (1985). Enhancing sensitivity of assessment instruments for children: Graded multi-dimensional scoring. J. Assoc. Pers. Severe Handicap. 10: 209–213.
Downing, J. E., and Perino, D. (1992). Functional versus standardized assessment procedures: Implications for educational programming. Ment. Retard. 30(5): 289–295.
Everson, J. M. (1996). Using person-centered planning concepts to enhance school to adult life transition planning. J. Vocat. Rehabil. 6: 7–13.
Falvey M. A., Forest, M., Pearpoint, J., and Rosenberg, R. L. (1994). Building connections. In Thousand, J. S., Villa, R. A., and Nevin, A. I. (eds.), Creativity and Collaborative Learning: A Practical Guide to Empowering Students and Teachers, Brookes, Baltimore, pp. 347–368.
Fry, R., and Ruddy, L. (1987). Innovations in vocational evaluation and work adjustment. Vocat. Eval. Work Adjust. Bull. 20: 75–77.
Giangreco, M. F., Edelman, S. W., Luiselli, T. E., and MacFarland, S. Z. C. (1996). Support service decision making for students with multiple service needs: Evaluative data. J. Individ. Severe Handicap. 21(3): 135–144.
Harris, R. J. (1975). A Primer of Multivariate Statistics, Academic Press, New York.
Janikowski, T. P., Berven, N. L., and Bordieri, J. E. (1991). Validity of the microcomputer evaluation and assessment aptitude scores. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 35(1): 38–51.
Janikowski, T. P., Berven, N. L., Meixelsperger, M. K., and Roedl, K. E. (1989). A computer-based case simulation to assess skill in predicting client behavior. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 33(3): 127–139.
Lehr, D. H. (1989). Educational programming for young children with the most severe disabilities. In: Brown, Fredda; Ed; Lehr, Donna, H.; Persons with profound disabilities: Issues and practices.; 213–237; Baltimore, MD, England: Paul H. Brookes Publishing, 1989, xv, 343.
Linehan, S. H., and Brady, M. P. (1995). Functional versus developmental assessments: Influences on instructional planning decisions. J. Spec. Educ. 29(3): 295–309.
Linehan, S. H., Brady, M. P., and Hwang, C. (1991). Ecological versus developmental assessment: Influences on instructional expectations. J. Assoc. Pers. Severe Handicap. 16(3): 146–153.
Lofquist, L. H., and Dawis, R. V. (1991). Essentials of Person Environment Correspondence Counseling, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
McCue, M. (1984). Assessment and rehabilitation of disabled adults. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 3: 281–290.
Millington, M. J., Szymankski, E. M., and Johnston-Rodriguez, S. (1995). A contextual-stage model for employment selection. J. Job Place. 11(1): 31–36.
Moon, M. S., Inge, K. J., Wehman, P., Brooke, V., and Barcus, J. M. (1990). Helping Persons With Severe Mental Retardation Get and Keep Employment: Supported Employment Issues and Strategies, Brookes, Baltimore.
Murphy, S., and Hagner, D. (1988). Evaluating assessment settings: Ecological influences on vocational evaluation. J. Rehabil. 54(1): 53–59.
Prout, H. T., and Sheldon, K. L. (1984). Classifying mental retardation in vocational rehabilitation: A study of diagnostic practices and their adherence to accepted guidelines. Rehabil. Couns. Bull. 7: 125–128.
Rainforth, B., and York, J. (1987). Integrating related services in community instruction. J. Assoc. Pers. Severe Handicap. 12: 190–198.
Sigafoos, J., Cole, D. A., & McQuarter, R. J. (1987). Current practices in the assessment of students with severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12(4): 264–273.
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as Amended, 29 U. S. C. 795g.
U.S. Department of Labor (1970). Manual for the USES General Aptitude Test Battery: Section III Development, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
U.S. Department of Labor (1979). Guide for Occupational Exploration, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Valpar International Corporation (1984). Manual for MESA 84. Microcomputer Evaluation Screening and Assessment, Valpar International Corporation, Tuscon, AZ.
Wallace, G., and Larsen, S. C. (1978). Educational Assessment of Learning Problems: Testing for Teaching, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
West, M., Revell, W. G., and Wehman, P. (1992). Achievements and challenges. I: A five year report on consumer and system outcomes from the supported employment initiative. J. Assoc. Pers. Severe Handicap. 17: 227–235.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grasso, E., Jitendra, A.K., Browder, D.M. et al. Effects of Ecological and Standardized Vocational Assessments on Office of Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors' Perceptions Regarding Individuals with Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 16, 17–31 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JODD.0000010037.17733.52
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JODD.0000010037.17733.52