Skip to main content
Log in

Time-dependent strength and fatigue resistance of dental direct restorative materials

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elastic modulus (EM), initial fracture strength (FS) and flexural fatigue limit (FFL) of dental restorative materials were measured in a simulated oral environment to correlate mechanical response under the influence of water with the chemical nature of the test materials under investigation. One resin composite (RC; Tetric® Ceram, Ivoclar-Vivadent Corp., Liechtenstein), an ion-leaching resin composite (ILRC; Ariston® pHc, Ivoclar-Vivadent Corp., Liechtenstein) a compomer (CO; Dyract® AP, Dentsply Corp., USA) and a glass-ionomer cement (GIC; Ketac® Molar, 3MEspe Corp., Germany) were tested. Static EM, FS and dynamic FFL experiments were performed. The FFL was determined under cyclic loading for 105 cycles in terms of a staircase approach. The materials were stored for 1, 8, 30, 90 and 180 days in 37 °C distilled water, respectively. The RC degraded over time due to water adsorption followed by failure within the resin matrix. The ILRC suffered from a pronounced decrease in FS as well as in FFL due to a constant ion-leaching and macroscopic crack growth. CO failed over time due to resin-filler interface cracking. The GIC exhibited improved mechanical performance over time due to a post-hardening mechanism. The results reveal the necessity for substantial preclinical evaluation of direct restorative materials. The material parameters under investigation are capable of predicting clinical performance over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Hickel, W. Dasch, R. Janda, M. J. Tyas and K. J. Anusavice, Int. Dent. J. 48 (1998) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Braem, P. Lambrechts and G. Vanherle, J. Dent. 22 (1994) 97.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Kohler, C. G. Rasmusson and P. Odman, ibid. 28 (2000) 111.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. J. T. Burke, N. H. F. Wilson, S. W. Cheung and I. A. Mjor, ibid. 29 (2001) 317.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Hickel, J. Manhart and F. Garcia-Godoy, Am. J. Dent. 13 (2000) 41.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. J. M. Soderholm and M. J. Roberts, J. Dent. Res. 69 (1990) 1812.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. L. Ferracane, H. X. Berge and J. R. Condon, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 42 (1998) 465.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. E. Ritter and W. Grayeski, Polym. Eng. Sci. 36 (1996) 2382.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. F. Mccabe, Y. Wang and M. Braem, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 50 (2000) 375.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. L. Drummond, J. Oral Rehabil. 16 (1989) 509.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. J. Cock and D. C. Watts, J. Dent. Res. 64 (1985) 147.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Vaidyanathan and T. K. Vaidyanathan, J. Dent. 29 (2001) 545.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. J. Dixon and A. M. Mood, J. Am. Stat. Ass. 43 (1948) 109.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. A. Draughn, J. Dent. Res. 58 (1979) 1093.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Manhart, K. H. Kunzelmann, H. Y. Chen and R. Hickel, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. (Appl. Biomater.) 53 (2000) 353.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. A. Cattani-Lorente, V. Dupuis, F. Moya, J. Payan and J. M. Meyer, Dent. Mater. 15 (1999) 21.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Gladys, M. Braem, B. Van Meerbeek, P. Lambrechts and G. Vanherle, Biomaterials 19 (1998) 541.

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. D. Frechette, “Advances in Ceramics”, vol. 28 (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. U. Lohbauer, T. Van Der Horst, R. Frankenberger, N. Kramer and A. Petschelt, Dent. Mater. 19 (2003) 435.

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. C. B. Small, T. F. Watson, A. V. Chadwick and S. K. Sidhu, Biomaterials 19 (1998) 545.

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Eliades, A. Kakaboura and G. Palaghias, Dent. Mater. 14 (1998) 57.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Braun, R. Frankenberger and N. Kramer, Clin. Oral Invest. 5 (2001) 139.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. J. Feilzer, A. J. De Gee and C. L. Davidson, J. Dent. Res. 66 (1987) 1636.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Lohbauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lohbauer, U., Frankenberger, R., Krämer, N. et al. Time-dependent strength and fatigue resistance of dental direct restorative materials. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 14, 1047–1053 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000004001.73640.4c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000004001.73640.4c

Keywords

Navigation