Skip to main content
Log in

Causality and Museum Subsidies

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although museums are major recipients of public money, very little is known regarding what factors cause changes in the level of funding given to particular institutions. It is nevertheless regularly asserted by those affected that governments will reduce the level of subsidy going to those museums that raise revenues for themselves, especially if these revenues were raised through charging for admission. This paper explores the causal influences underlying changes in the level of government grants to museums. Statistically analysing data drawn from a panel of UK museums funded by central government, evidence is found that increases in non-grant income do indeed result in a statistically significant reduction in future government subsidies. It is however unclear whether these reductions are sufficient to offset entirely the financial benefits from charging or the pursuit of private benefactors. Despite the government's avowed intention to widen access to museums, changes in visitor numbers do not appear to cause changes in government grants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. (1998) “Is Charging Economic?” Journal of Cultural Economics 22: 179-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1993) “An Experimental Test of the Public-Goods Crowding-Out Hypothesis”. American Economic Review 83: 1317-1327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations”. Review of Economic Studies 58: 277-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, S. and Falconer, P. (1998) “Charging for Admission to Museums and Galleries: A Framework for Analysing the Impact on Access”. Journal of Cultural Economics 22: 167-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. (2000) “Is There a Dark Side to Government Support for the Nonprofits?” Public Administration Review 60: 211-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creigh-Tyte, S. and Selwood, S. (1998) “Museums in the U.K.: Some Evidence on Scale and Activities”. Journal of Cultural Economics 22: 151-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (1999) Annual Report 1999. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2001) Annual Report 2001. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for National Heritage (1997) Annual Report 1997. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (1996) The British Museum: A Fundamental Review of the Museum's Operation. The British Museum, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. (1994) “Cultural Economics and Museum Behaviour”. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 41: 325-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C. (1969) “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross Spectral Methods”. Econometrica 37: 424-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., and Rosen, H. (1989) “The Revenues-Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from Local Government Data”. International Economic Review 30: 415-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P. and Luksetich, W. (1999) “The Relationship among Funding Sources for Art and History Museums”. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 10: 21-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (1988) “A Museum Cost Function”. Journal of Cultural Economics 12: 41-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. and Thomas, B. (1998) “The Economics of Museums: A Research Perspective”. Journal of Cultural Economics 22: 75-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson, R. and Owen, A. (1999) “Estimating Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide for Macroeconomists”. Economics Letters 65: 9-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiviet, J. (1995) “On Bias Inconsistency, and the Efficiency of Various Estimators in Dynamic Panel Data Models”. Journal of Econometrics 68: 53-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luksetich, W. and Partridge, M. (1997) “Demand Functions for Museum Services”. Applied Economics 29: 1553-1559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, D. and Foster, T. (2003) “Valuing Congestion Costs in the British Museum”. Oxford Economic Papers 55: 173-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F. (1995) “Determining the Size of Museum Subsidies”. Journal of Cultural Economics 18: 255-270.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, J. (1998) “National Museums: To Charge or Not to Charge”. Journal of Cultural Economics 19: 33-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A. and Godfrey, C. (1974) “The Economics of Museums and Galleries”. The Lloyds Bank Review 111: 17-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, D. and Haugh, L. (1977) “Causality in Temporal Systems: Characterisations and a Survey”. Journal of Econometrics 5: 265-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. (1971) “Unsettled Questions in the Political Economy of the Arts”. The Three Banks Review 91: 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwood, S. (ed.) (2001) The U.K. Cultural Sector. The Policy Studies Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maddison, D. Causality and Museum Subsidies. Journal of Cultural Economics 28, 89–108 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCEC.0000019515.96628.f5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCEC.0000019515.96628.f5

Navigation