Skip to main content
Log in

Finding a Better Person-Environment Fit in the Academic Deanship

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individuals seek a balance between the demands of their institutions and the dimensions that make up their personalities and determine their needs (Getzels & Guba, 1957). Academic deans are no exception. Indeed, the fit (or lack of it) between the work environment and the unique characteristics of individuals asked to function within a given setting helps determine whether they experience levels of stress that move them forward in their work or suffer debilitating stress that leads to excessive physical and mental strain. This article examines the fit between academic deans and their work environments in the U.S. and Australia as it relates to multiple role stress factors affecting deans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergin, M., & Solman R. (1988). Perceptions of role related stress in senior educational executives and its relationship to their health. The Journal of Educational Administration, 26, 159–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T., Horowitz, S. M., Edington, D. M., & Klos, D. M. (1986). University faculty and administrator responses to job strains. Research in Higher Education, 25, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blix, A., & Lee, J. (1991). Occupational stress among university administrators. Research in Higher Education, 32, 289–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowditch, J. L., & Buono, A. F. (1997). A primer on organizational behavior (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretz R. D. Jr., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, K. C. (1995). The stress management handbook: A practical guide to reducing stress in every aspect of your life. Shawnee Mission, KS: National Press Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, R. D., Cobb, S., French, J. R. P., Van Harrison, R., & Pinneau, S. R. (1980). Job demands and worker health: Main effects and occupational differences. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, R. D. (1983). Person-environment fit: Past, present and future. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Stress research (pp. 35–78). New York: Wiley, 35–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, P., & Bennett, M. (1980). College administrators and executive stress: A growing problem. Community College Review, 8(3), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C., & Marshall, J. (1978). Understanding executive stress. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawis, R. V. (1994). The theory of work adjustment as convergent theory. In M. L. Savickas & P. W. Lent (Eds.), Convergence in career development theories: Implications for science and practice (pp. 33–43). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawis, R. V, England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1964). A theory of work adjustment. (Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 15). Minneapolis: Industrial Resource Center, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984) A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V, & Bedeian, A. G. (1995). Personality similarity and work-related outcomes among African-American nursing personnel: A test of the supplemental model of person-environment congruence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46, 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6, 283–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J., & Caplan, R. (1972). Organizational stress and individual strain. In A. Marrow (Ed.), The failure of success (pp. 30–66). New York: Amacom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Guba, E. G. (1957). Social behavior and the administrative process. School Review, 65, 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmelch, W. H., & Chan, W. (1994). Thriving on stress for success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L., & Hermanson, M. (1996). The 1996 national survey of academic deans in higher education. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, The Center for Academic Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L., & Sarros, J. C. (forthcoming in 1999). The academic dean: An imperiled species searching for balance. Research in Higher Education, 40(6).

  • Hesselbein, F., Goldsmith, M., & Beckhard, R. (1996). The Drucker Foundation: The leader of the future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L. (1966). A psychological classification scheme for vocations and major fields. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 13, 278–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. (1982). Occupational stress. In L. Goldberger & S. Briznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress (pp. 419–444). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivancevich, J. M., & Matteson, M. (1987). Organizational behavior and management. Piano, TX: Business Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. L. (1981). Work & health. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R., & Byosiere, P. (1992). Stress in organizations. In M. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 3 (pp. 571–650). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. Wolfe, D. Quinn, R. Snoek, J., & Rosenthal, R. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsten, M. F. (1994). Management and gender: Issues and attitudes. Westport CN: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S, (1970). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T., Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (1987). Work design as an approach to person-environment fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 278–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1979 November). Positive denial: The case for not facing reality. Psychology Today, 44–60.

  • Lewis, C. T., Garcia, J. E., & Jobs, S. M. (1990). Managerial skills in organization. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, C. D., Moxley, R. S., & Van Velsor, E. (1998). The Center for Creative Leadership: Handbook of leadership development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Y., & Boris, S. B. (1978). Paradigm development and leadership style of university department chairpersons. Research in Higher Education, 9, 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 382–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., Faerman, S. R., Thompson, M. P., & McGrath, M. R. (1990). Becoming a master manager: A competency framework. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbach, W. E., & Sashkin, M. (1995). Leadership Inventory. Gettysburg, PA: Gettysburg College, Eisenhower Leadership Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarros, J. C., Gmelch, W. H., & Tanewski, G. A. (1996) Role stress and satisfaction of academic department heads. Frankston, Victoria, Australia: Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck, J., Cotton, J., & Jennings, K. (1989). Antecedents and consequences of role stress: a covariance structure analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tack, M. W, & Patitu, C. L.(1992). Faculty job satisfaction: Women and minorities in peril. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., & O'Reilly, L. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton, M. L., & Sarros, J. C. (Winter 1999). Stress in academic leadership: A comparison of U.S. department chairs and Australian heads. Review of Higher Education, 2, 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L. & Gmelch, W. H. (April 1998). The interconnections between job satisfaction and work-related stress in academic deans. Paper presentation at AERA Conference (San Diego, CA.).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W. & Wolverton, M.L. Finding a Better Person-Environment Fit in the Academic Deanship. Innovative Higher Education 24, 203–226 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047411.49250.c6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047411.49250.c6

Keywords

Navigation