Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing Biological Orders of river sites and biological structures of watercourses using ecological traits of aquatic insects

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method is proposed to assess Biological Orders (BO) of river sites and to compare biological structures of watercourses using two general ecological traits (typological preferendum and typological amplitude) of 187 species of aquatic insects (Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera) specified in a previous database (Verneaux et al., 2003).

A community is defined as an arrangement of species which have various abundances, typological preferenda (tp) and typological amplitudes (ta). In the field, any species assemblage was considered possible, and a river site community was analyzed using two descriptors: its relative species richness and its Biological Order, calculated using the abundance and the ecological traits (tp, ta) of the recorded species. The BO of a river site, with a range from 0 to 10, constitutes a mean community point which plots the site on a theoretical upstream-downstream gradient defined by a species continuum (Verneaux et al., 2003).

The grounds and the BO assessment are presented, followed by the method applied to a site of the upper course of the Loue River (French Jura). Community changes which occurred between 1975 and 2000 are specified. The Loue pattern was then plotted with other watercourses in a typological graph where biological structures of rivers are compared using a biological templet. This method, showing differences to the templet, allows to estimate biological changes referable to different levels of disturbance.

Biological Orders and the significance of the biological templet are then discussed. The proposed typological analysis, giving both the Biological Order of a river site and its distance from the biological templet, constitutes a useful tool for running waters diagnosis and biological integrity assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angelier, E., 2000. Ecologie des eaux courantes. Tec & Doc éd., Paris, 199 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogh, J., 1958. Lebensgemeinschaften der Landtiere. Academie Verlag, Berlin, 560 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bournaud, M., P. Richoux & P. Usseglio-Polatera, 1992. An approach to the synthesis of qualitative ecological information issued from aquatic Coleoptera communities. Regulated Rivers 7: 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bournaud, M., H. Tachet, A. Berly & B. Cellot, 1998. Importance des caractéristiques du microhabitat sur la microdistribution du macrobenthos d’une portion du Haut-Rhône (France). Annales de Limnologie 34: 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayrou, J., A. Compin, N. Giani & R. Céréghino, 2000. Associations spécifiques chez les macroinvertébrés benthiques et leur utilisation pour la typologie des cours d’eau. Cas du réseau hydrographique Adour-Garonne (France). Annales de Limnologie 36: 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessel, D., J. D. Lebreton & N. Yoccoz, 1987. Propriétés de l’analyse canonique des correspondances. Une utilisation en hydrobiologie. Revue de Statistique Appliquée 35: 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Décamps, H., 1968. Vicariances écologiques chez les Trichoptères des Pyrénées. Annales de Limnologie 4: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fittkau, E. & F. Reiss, 1983. Versuch einer Rekonstruktion der Fauna europaïscher Ströme und ihrer Auen. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 97: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendron, J. M. & H. Laville, 1997. Les Chironomidés (Diptera) de l’Aude, rivière méditerranéenne des Pyrénées orientales: étude biocénotique et typologique. Annales de Limnologie 33: 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, 555 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illies, J., & L. Botosaneanu, 1963. Problèmes et méthodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considérées surtout du point de vue faunistique. Mitteilungen der internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 12: 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothé, P., 1962. Der ‘Artenfehlbetrag’, ein einfaches Gutkriterium und seine Anwendung bei biologischen Vorfluteruntersuchungen. Deutsche Gewässerkundliche Mitteilungen 6: 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macan, T. T., 1963. Freshwater Ecology. Longmans, London, 358 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, P. S., 1966. Studies on Loch Lomond. II-The Fauna of the River Endrick. Backie & Son, Glasgow, 194 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, D., M. T. Furse, J. F. Wright & P. D. Armitage, 1987. The prediction of the macro-invertebrate fauna of unpolluted running-water sites in Great Britain using environmental data. Freshwater Biology 17: 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouthon, J., 1999. Longitudinal organization of the Mollusc species in a theoretical French river. Hydrobiologia 390: 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, R. H. & M. C. Thoms, 1999. What is river health? Freshwater Biology 41: 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynoldson, T. B., R. H. Norris, V. H. Resh, D. E. Day & D. Rosenberg, 1997. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 833–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipahiler, F., 2000. New Rhyacophila (Trichoptera Rhyacophilidae) species from France and Spain. Aquatic Insects 22: 138–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B., 1975. Zur Longitudinalzonierung eines zentralafrikanischen Fliessgewässersystems unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Köcherfliegen (Trichoptera, Insecta). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 76: 153–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, C. F. J. & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 1995. Canonical correspondance analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquatic Sciences 57: 255–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thioulouse J., D. Chessel, S. Doledec & J. M. Olivier, 1997. ADE4: AMultivariate Analysis and Graphical Display Software. Statistics and Computing 7: 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulfstrand, S., 1968. Benthic animal communities in Lapland streams. Oikos Suppl. 10: 1–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, S. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdonschot, P. F.M., 1995. Typology of macrofaunal assemblages: a tool for the management of running waters in Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 297: 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux, J., 1973. Cours d’eau de Franche-Comté (massif du Jura). Recherches écologiques sur le réseau hydrographique du Doubs-essai de biotypologie. Annales de l’Université de Franche Comté, Biologie Animale 3: 1–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux, J., 1976a. Biotypologie de l’écosystème ‘eau courante’. La structure biotypologique. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris 283: 1663–1666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux, J. 1976b. Biotypologie de l’écosystème ‘eau courante’. Les groupements socio-écologiques. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris 283: 1791–1793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux, J., 1984. Méthodes biologiques et problèmes de la détermination des qualités des eaux courantes. Bulletin d’ Ecologie 15: 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux, J. & G. Leynaud, 1974. Note sommaire sur la définition d’objectifs et de critères de la qualité des eaux courantes. Travaux de la Division Qualité des Eaux, Pêche et Pisciculture du C.T.G.R.E.F., Paris, 14 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux, J. & M. Rezzouk, 1974. Les structures d’un grand cours d’eau à Salmonidés: la Loue (Massif du Jura). Essai typologique et problèmes des relations entre espèces et milieu. Annales de Limnologie 10: 131–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux, J., A. Schmitt, V. Verneaux & C. Prouteau, 2003. Benthic insects and fish of the Doubs River system: typological traits and the development of a species continuum in a theoretical extrapolated watercourse. Hydrobiologia 490: 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinçon, G. & C. Ravizza, 2001, Leuctridae (Plecoptera) of the Pyrénées. Annales de Limnologie 37: 293–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittier, T. R., R.M. Hughes & D. P. Larsen, 1988, Correspondance between Ecoregions and spatial pattern in stream ecosystems in Oregon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45: 1264–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F., D. Moss, P. D Armitage & M. T. Furse, 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macroinvertebrates species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwater Biology 14: 221–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright J. F., J. H. Blackburn, R. J. M. Gunn, M. T. Furse, P. D. Armitage, J. M. Winder & K. L. Symes, 1996. Macroinvertebrate frequency data for the RIVPACS III sites in Great Britain and their use in conservation evaluation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 6: 141–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verneaux, J., Verneaux, V., Schmitt, A. et al. Assessing Biological Orders of river sites and biological structures of watercourses using ecological traits of aquatic insects. Hydrobiologia 519, 39–47 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000026483.41753.d3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000026483.41753.d3

Navigation