Skip to main content
Log in

Applying a Mixed-Integer Program to Model Re-Screening Women who Test Positive for C. trachomatis Infection

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We proposed a mixed-integer program to model the management of C. trachomatis infections in women visiting publicly funded family planning clinics. We intended to maximize the number of infected women cured of C. trachomatis infections. The model incorporated screening, re-screening, and treatment options for three age groups with respective age-specific C. trachomatis infection and re-infection rates, two possible test assays, and two possible treatments. Our results showed the total budget had a great impact on the optimal strategy incorporating screening coverage, test selection, and treatment. At any budget level, the strategy that used a relatively small per-patient budget increase to re-screen all women who tested positive 6 months earlier always resulted in curing more infected women and more cost-saving than the strategy that was optimal under the condition of not including a re-screening option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2001 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, MMWR 51 (No. RR-6) (2002) 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.L. Groseclose, A.A. Zaidi, S.J. DeLisle, W.C. Levine and M.E. St Louis, Estimated incidence and prevalence of genital chlamydia trachomatis infections in the United States, 1996, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 26 (1999) 339–344.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.J. Mertz, R.A. Voigt, K. Hutchins and W.C. Levine, Jail STD Prevalence Monitoring Group, Findings from STD screening of adolescents and adults entering corrections facilities, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 29 (2002) 834–839.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T.A. Farley, D.A. Cohen and W. Elkins, Asymptomatic sexually transmitted diseases: The case for mass screening, American Journal of Preventive Medicine 36 (2003) 502–509.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Guideline for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases, MMWR 47 (RR-1) (1998) 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Rein, W. Kassler, K. Irwin and L. Rablee, Direct medical cost of pelvic inflammatory disease and its sequelae: Decreasing, but still substantial, Obstetrics and Gynecology 95 (2000) 397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  8. American Social Health Association, Update on fiscal year 1994: Funding for the STD program of the CDC and NIH, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 21 (1994) 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Screening tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections-2002, MMWR 52 (No. RR-15) (2002) 9–10, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. US Preventive Services Task Force, Screening for chlamydial infection: Recommendations and rationale, American Journal of Preventive Medicine 20 (2001) 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Gonorrhea and chlamydial infections, Technical bulletin no. 190 (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, 1994).

  12. American Academy of Pediatrics, Red Book: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases (American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. American Medical Association, AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and Rationale (American Medical Association, Chicago, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.M. Marrazzo, C.L. Celum, S.D. Hillis, D. Fine, S. Delisle and H.H. Handsfield, Performance and cost-effectiveness of selective screening criteria for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 24 (1997) 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Tao, T. Gift, C. Walsh, K. Irwin and W. Kassler, Optimal resource allocation for curing chlamydia trachomatis infection among asymptomatic women of clinics operating on a fixed budget, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 29 (2002) 703–709.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Nathanson, M. Sammel and M. Berlin, Repeat chlamydia infections in region III family planning clinics-implications for screening programs, Presented at the 2002 National STD Prevention Conference, San Diego, March 4-7. Abstract #B5F.

  17. F. Xu, J.A. Schillinger, L.E. Markowitz, M.R. Sternberg, M.R. Aubin and M.E. St Louis, Repeat Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: Analysis through a surveillance case registry in Washington state, 1993-1998, American Journal of Epidemiology 152 (2000) 1164–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Hillier and G. Lieberman, Introduction to Operations Research (McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S.H. Jacobson, E.C. Sewell, R. Deuson and B.G. Weniger, An integer programming model for vaccine procurement and delivery for childhood immunization: A pilot study, Health Care Management Science 2 (1999) 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Richter, M.L. Brandeau and D.K. Owens, An analysis of optimal resource allocation for prevention of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in injection drug users and non-users, Medical Decision Making 19 (1999) 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Taylor and S. Huxley, A break from tradition for the San Francisco police: Patrol officer scheduling using an optimization-based decision support system, Interfaces 19 (1989) 4–24.

    Google Scholar 

  22. L.W. Dicker, D.J. Mosure, W.C. Levine, C.M. Black and S.M. Berman, Impact of switching laboratory tests on reported trends in Chlamydia trachomatis infections, American Journal Epidemiology 151 (2000) 430–435.

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Whittington, C. Kent, P. Kissinger et al., Determinants of persistent and recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 28 (2001) 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M.R. Howell, T.C. Quinn, W. Brathwaite and C.A. Gaydos, Screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis in family planning clinics: The cost effectiveness of DNA amplification assays, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 25 (1998) 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Steece, National Pricing of Chlamydia Reagents (Association of State and Territorial Public Health Laboratory Directors, Washington, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Dean, D. Ferrero and M. McCarthy, Comparison of performance and cost-effectiveness of direct fluorescent-antibody, ligase chain reaction, and PCR assays for verification of chlamydial enzyme immunoassay results for populations with a low to moderate prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection, Journal of Clinical Microbiology 36 (1998) 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A.C. Haddix, S.D. Hillis and W.J. Kassler, The cost effectiveness of azithromycin for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 22 (1995) 274–280.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S.D. Hillis, F.B. Coles, B. Litchfield et al., Doxycycline and azithromycin for prevention of chlamydial persistence or recurrence one month following treatment in women: A use-effectiveness study in public health settings, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 25 (1997) 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Cerin, L. Grillner and E. Persson, Chlamydia test monitoring during therapy, International Journal of STD & AIDS 2 (1991) S176–S179.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D.H. Martin, T.F. Mroczkowski, Z.A. Dalu et al., A controlled trial of a single dose of azithromycin for the treatment of chlamydial urethritis and cervicitis, New England Journal of Medicine 327 (1992) 921–925.

    Google Scholar 

  31. H.H. Handsfield and W.E. Stamm, Treating chlamydia infection: Compliance versus cost, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 25 (1997) 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Anonymous, Drug Topics Red Book (Medical Economics Company, Inc., Montvale, 1998).

  33. M.B. Shafer, R.H. Pantell and J. Schachter, Is the routine pelvic examination needed with the advent of urine-based screening for sexually transmitted diseases? Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 153 (1999) 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Recommendations for the prevention and management of Chlamydia trachomatis infections, MMWR 42 (RR-12) (1993) 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J.T. Humphreys, J.F. Henneberry, R.S. Rickard and J.L. Beebe, Costbenefit analysis of selective screening criteria for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending Colorado family planning clinics, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 19 (1992) 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  36. D.J. Mosure, S. Berman, D. Fine, S. Delisle, W. Cates and J.R. Boring, Genital chlamydia infections in sexually active female adolescents: Do we really need to screen everyone? J. Adolesc Health 20 (1997) 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  37. C.A. Gaydos, M.R. Howell, B. Pare, K.L. Clark, D.A. Ellis, R.M. Hendrix et al., Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female military recruits, New England Journal of Medicine 339 (1998) 739–744.

    Google Scholar 

  38. H.S. Weinstock, G.A. Bolan, R. Kohn, C. Balladares, A. Back and G. Oliva, Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: A need for universal screening in high prevalence population? American Journal Epidemiology 135 (1992) 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  39. C. Eubanks, W.E. Lafferty, A. Kimball, R. MacCormack and W.J. Kassler, Privatization of STD services in Tacoma,Washington: A quality review, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 26 (1999) 537–542.

    Google Scholar 

  40. S.S. Bull, C. Rietmeijer, J.D. Fortenberry et al., Practice patterns for the elicitation of sexual history, education and counseling among providers of STD services: Results from the Gonorrhea Community Action Project (GCAP), Sexually Transmitted Diseases 26 (1999) 584–589.

    Google Scholar 

  41. G. Tao, K.L. Irwin and W.J. Kassler, Missed opportunities to assess sexually transmitted diseases among US adults during routine medical check-ups: Results of the 1994 US National Health Interview Survey, American Journal of Preventive Medicine 18 (2000) 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J.R. Schwebke, R. Sadler, J.M. Sutton and E.W. Hook III, Positive screening tests for gonorrhea and chlamydial infection fail to lead consistently to treatment of patients attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 24 (1997) 181–184.

    Google Scholar 

  43. L. Westrom and D. Eschenbach, Pelvic inflammatory disease, in: Sexually Transmitted Diseases, eds. K.K. Holmes, P.F. Sparling, P.-A. Mardh et al. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  44. S.D. Hillis, B.S. Owens, P.A. Marchbanks, L.E. Amsterdam and W.R. Mac Kenzie, Recurrent chlamydial infections increase the risks of hospitalization for ectopic pregnancy and pelvic inflammatory disease, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 176 (1997) 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoyu Tao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tao, G., Abban, B.K., Gift, T.L. et al. Applying a Mixed-Integer Program to Model Re-Screening Women who Test Positive for C. trachomatis Infection. Health Care Management Science 7, 135–144 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HCMS.0000020653.31862.23

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HCMS.0000020653.31862.23

Navigation