Skip to main content
Log in

Coevolution across landscapes: a spatially explicit model of parasitoid-host coevolution

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geographic mosaic theory of coevolution suggests that population spatial structure may have a strong impact on coevolutionary dynamics. Therefore, coevolution must be studied across geographic scales, not just in single populations. To examine the impact of movement rate on coevolutionary dynamics, we developed a spatially explicit model of host–parasitoid coevolution. We described space as a coupled-map lattice and assumed that resistance (defined as the ability of a host to encapsulate a parasitoid egg) and virulence (defined as the successful parasitization of a host) traits were graded and costly. The model explicitly detailed population and evolutionary dynamics. When holding all parameters constant and varying only the movement rate of the host and parasitoid, profoundly different dynamics were observed. We found that fluctuations in the mean levels of resistance and virulence in the global population were greatest when the movement rate of the host and parasitoid was high. In addition, we found that the variation in resistance and virulence levels among neighboring patches was greatest when the movement rates of the host and parasitoid was low. However, as the distance among patches increased, so did the variation in resistance and virulence levels regardless of movement rate. These generalizations did not hold when spatial patterns in the distribution of resistance and virulence traits, such as spirals, were observed. Finally, we found that the evolution of resistance and virulence caused the abundance of hosts to increase and the abundance of parasitoids to decrease. As a result, the spatial distribution of hosts and parasitoids was influenced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Comins, H.N., Hassell, M.P. and May, R.M. (1992) The spatial dynamics of host–parasitoid systems. J Animal Ecol. 61, 735–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, M.R.T. (1999) Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellowes, M.D.E., Kraaijeveld, A.R. and Godfray, H.C.J. (1998) Trade-off associated with selection for increased ability to resist parasitoid attack in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B 265, 1553–1558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandon, S. (2002) Local adaptation and the geometry of host-parasite coevolution. Ecol. Lett. 5, 246–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandon, S., Copowiez, Y., Dubois, Y., Michalakis, Y. and Olivieri, I. 1996. Local adaptation and gene-for-gene coevolution in a metapopulation model. Proc. Royal Acad. Sci. B 263, 1003–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H.C.J. (1994) Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton University Press, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomulkiewicz, R., Thompson, J.N., Host, R.D., Nuismer, S.L. and Hochberg, M.E. (2000) Hot spots, cold spots and the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. Am. Nat. 156, 156–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P., Comins, H.N. and May, R.M. (1991) Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics. Nature 353, 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henter, H.J. (1995) The potential for coevolution in a host–parasitoid system. II. Genetic variation within a population of wasps in the ability to parasitize an aphid host. Evolution 49, 439–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henter, H.J. and Via, S. (1995) The potential for coevolution in a host–parasitoid system. I. Genetic variation within an aphid population in susceptibility to a parasite wasp. Evolution 49, 427–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, M.E. (1997) Hide or fight? The competitive evolution of concealment and encapsulation in parasitoid–host associations. Oikos 80, 342–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffbauer, R.A. (2001) Pea aphid–parasitoid interactions: have parasitoids adapted to differential resistance? Ecology 82, 717–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffbauer, R.A. (2002) Evidence for nonadaptive evolution in parasitoid virulence following a biological control introduction. Eco. Appl. 12, 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffbauer, R.A. and Via, S. (1999) Evolution of an aphid–parasitoid interaction: variation in resistance to parasitism among aphid population specialized on different plants. Evolution 53, 1135–1145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijeveld, A.R. and Godfray, H.C.J. (1997) Trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 389, 278–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijeveld, A.R. and Godfray, H.C.J. (1999) Geographic patterns in evolution of resistance and virulence in Drosophila and its parasitoids. Am. Nat. 153, S61–S74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijeveld, A.R. and Godfray, H.C.J. (2001) Is there local adaptation in Drosophila-parasitoid interactions? Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijeveld, A.R., Hutcheson, K.A., Limentani, E.C. and Godfray H.C.J. (2001) Costs of counterdefenses to host resistance in a parasitoid of Drosophila. Evolution 55, 1815–1821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijeveld, A.R. and Van Alphen, J.J.M. (1995) Geographical variation in encapsulation ability of Drosophila melanogaster larvae and evidence for parasitoid-specific components. Evol. Ecol. 9, 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapchin, L. (2002) Host–parasitoid association and diffuse coevolution: when to be a generalist? Am. Nat. 160, 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lively, C.M. (1999) Migration, virulence and the geographic mosaic of adaptation by parasites. Am. Nat. 153, S34–S47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuismer, S.L., Thompson, J.N. and Gomulkiewicz, R. (2000) Coevolutionary clines across selection mosaics. Evolution 54, 1102–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, A. and Godfray, H.C.J. (1999) A model for the coevolution of resistance and virulence in coupled host–parasitoid interactions. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B 266, 455–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speith, P.T. (1979) Environmental heterogeneity: a problem of contradictory selection pressures, gene flow and local polymorphism. Am. Nat. 113, 247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, M.R. and Pech L.L. (1995) Immunological basis for compatibility in parasitoid host relationships. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 40, 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiën, N.S.H., Boyles, D., Kraaijeveld, A.R. and Godfray, H.C.J. (2001) Competitive ability of parasitized Drosophila larvae. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 747–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.N. (1999) Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. Am. Nat. 153, 1–S14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrall, P.H. and Burdon, J.J. (2002) Evolution of gene-for-gene systems in metapopulations: the effect of spatial scale of hosts and pathogen dispersal. Plant Pathol. 51, 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark S. Sisterson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sisterson, M.S., Averill, A.L. Coevolution across landscapes: a spatially explicit model of parasitoid-host coevolution. Evolutionary Ecology 18, 29–49 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EVEC.0000017692.23250.d1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EVEC.0000017692.23250.d1

Navigation