Abstract
Because data for conservation planning are always limited, surrogates are often substituted for intractable measurements such as species richness or population viability. We examined the ability of habitat quality to act as a surrogate for population performance for both Red-shouldered Hawks (Buteo lineatus) and Northern Goshawks (Accipiter gentilis). We compared simple measures of habitat quality to estimates of population growth rates obtained from a spatially explicit model of population dynamics. We found that habitat quality was a relatively poor predictor of simulated population growth rates for several reasons. First, a relatively small proportion of the potential habitat for each species served as population sources in our simulations—15% for Red-shouldered Hawks and 2% for Goshawks. Second, when habitat quality correctly predicted demographic sources on the landscape, it consistently underestimated the contribution of these areas to the population. In areas where habitat quality correctly anticipated the presence of demographic sinks, we found no useful quantitative relationship between the two measures. Our simulation model captured the influence of habitat quality on the hawk populations, but it also incorporated interactions between dispersing individuals and landscape patterns. Thus, the discrepancies we observed likely reflected the influence of forest fragmentation and the spatial arrangement of forest patches on the populations. We conclude that simple measures of habitat quality will often be poor surrogates for population persistence, but that spatially explicit population models can help inform the development of better indices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bradley, M.P. and Smith, E.R.: 2004, 'Using Science to Assess Environmental Vulnerabilities', Environ. Monit. Assess. 94, 1-7.
Cabeza, M. and Moilanen, A.: 2001, 'Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity', Trends Ecol. Evol.. 16, 242-248.
Carroll, C., Phillips, M.K., Schumaker, N.H. and Smith, D.W.: 2003, 'Impacts of landscape change on wolf restoration success: planning a reintroduction program based on static and dynamic spatial models', Conserv. Biol. 17, 536-548.
Caswell, H.: 1989, Matrix population models, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA USA.
Cooper, C.B., Walters, J.R. and Priddy, J.: 2002, 'Landscape patterns and dispersal success: simulated population dynamics in the Brown Treecreeper', Ecol. Appl. 12, 1576-1587.
Crocoll, S.T.: 1994, 'Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus)', in A. Poole and F. Gill (eds.), The birds of North America, The Academy of Natural Sciences, Washington, DC, USA; The American Ornithologists Union, PA, USA, Vol No. 107.
Dunning, J.B., Stewart, D.J., Danielson, B.J., Noon, B.R., Root, T.L., Lamberson, R.H. and Stevens, E.E.: 1995, 'Spatially explicit population models: Current forms and future uses', Ecol. App. 5, 3-11.
Dykstra, C.R., Hays, J.L., Daniel, F.B. and Simon, M.M.: 2000, 'Nest site selection and productivity of suburban Red-shouldered Hawks in southern Ohio', Condor. 102, 401-408.
Dykstra, C.R., Hays, J.L., Daniel, F.B. and Simon, M.M.: 2001, 'Home range and habitat use of suburban Red-shouldered Hawks in southwestern Ohio', Wilson Bull. 113, 308-316.
Fahrig, L. and Merriam, G.: 1985, 'Habitat patch connectivity and population survival', Ecology. 66, 1762-1768.
Gotelli, N.J.: 1995, A primer of ecology, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
Hansen, A.J. and Urban, D.L.: 1992, 'Avian response to landscape pattern: the role of species' life histories', Landscape Ecol. 7, 163-180.
Hansson, L., Fahrig, L. and Merriam, G.: 1995, Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
Jacobs, J.P. and Jacobs, E.A. 2002, 'Conservation Assessment for Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus), National Forests of the North Central States', U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, Eastern Region, Milwaukee, WI, USA, p. 100.
Kennedy, P.L., Ward, J.M., Rinker, G.A. and Gessaman, J.A.: 1994, 'Post-fledging areas in northern goshawk home ranges', Studies in Avian Biology. 16, 75-82.
Kennedy, P.L.: 2003, 'Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis atricapillus)', U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Lefkovitch, L.P.: 1965, 'The study of population growth in organisms by stages', Biometrics. 2,1-18.
Leslie, P.H.: 1945, 'On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics', Biometrika. 35, 183-112.
Lichstein, J.W., Simons, T.R. and Franzreb, K.E.: 2002, 'Landscape effects on breeding songbird abundance in managed forests', Ecol. Appl. 12, 836-857.
MacArthur, R.H. and Wilson, E.O.: 1967, The theory of island biogeography, Princeton University Press, New York, NY, USA.
Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. and Pressey, R.L.: 1988, 'Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity', Biol. Conserv. 43, 63-76.
Margules, C.R. and Pressey, R.L.: 2000, 'Systematic conservation planning', Nature. 405, 243-53.
Norton, D.A. and Lord, J.M.: 1990, 'Scale and the spatial concept of fragmentation', Conserv. Biol. 4, 197-202.
Opdam, P.F.M., van Apeldoorn, R., Schotman, A. and Kalkhoven, J.: 1993, 'Population responses to landscape fragmentation', in C.C. Vos and P.F.M. Opdam (eds.), Landscape ecology of a stressed environment, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
Pulliam, H.R.: 1988, 'Sources, sinks and population regulation', Am. Nat. 132, 652-661.
Pulliam, H.R. and Danielson, B.J.: 1991, 'Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics', Am. Nat. 137, s50-s66.
Reynolds, R.T., Joy, S.M. and Leslie, D.G.: 1994, 'Nest productivity, fidelity, and spacing of northern goshawks in northern Arizona', Studies in Avian Biology. 16, 106-113.
Sauer, J.R., Hines, J.E. and Fallon, J.: 2003, 'The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966-2002', Version 2003.1 U.S. Geological Service, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, USA.
Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J. and Margules, C.R.: 1991, 'Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review', Conserv. Biol. 5, 18-32.
Schumaker, N.H.: 1993, 'Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity', Ecology. 77, 1210-1225.
Schumaker, N.H. 1998, 'A user's guide to the PATCH model', U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Schumaker, N.H., Ernst, T., White, D. and Haggerty, P.: in press, 'Projecting wildlife responses to alternative future landscapes in Oregon's Willamette Basin', Ecol. Appl. in press.
Squires, J.R. and Reynolds, R.T.: 1997, 'Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis)', in A. Poole and F. Gill (eds.), Birds of North America, The Academy of Natural Sciences, Washington, DC, USA; The American Ornithologists' Union, PA, USA, Vol No. 298.
Vogelmann, J.E., Howard, S.M., Yang, L., Larson, C.R., Wylie, B.K. and Van Driel, N.: 2001, 'Completion of the 1990s National Land Cover Data Set for the conterminous United States from Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources', Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sen. 67, 650-662.
Vos, C.C., Verbroom, J., Opdam, P.F.M. and Ter Braak, C.J.F.: 2001, 'Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices', Am. Nat. 157, 24-41.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lawler, J.J., Schumaker, N.H. Evaluating Habitat as a Surrogate for Population Viability Using a Spatially Explicit Population Model. Environ Monit Assess 94, 85–100 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000016881.12925.b1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000016881.12925.b1